Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

amendment list, 13 May 2026

Establishing the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE)

Document CJ55-AM-788873 · (COM(2026)0135 – 2026/0078(COD))

Committee on Security and Defence Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

Full text

Jump to an amendment (309)
Text 1,964 paragraphs

Amendment 1

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(3) Innovation is critical to achieve and support Europe’s defence readiness, particularly in today’s era of intensifying threats, systemic competition, and geopolitical rivalries. The proliferation of threats has sparked an international arms race and a global technological competition, with emerging and disruptive technologies in fields such as AI, quantum, robotics, cyber and space, playing a decisive role in maintaining strategic advantage and ensuring credible deterrence. Achieving this requires rapid testing, validation and integration of these technologies into defence capabilities, as well as continuous engagement with the technology and innovation ecosystem.(3) Innovation is critical to achieve and support Europe’s defence readiness, particularly in today’s era of intensifying threats, systemic competition, and geopolitical rivalries. The proliferation of threats has sparked an international arms race and a global technological competition, with emerging and disruptive technologies in fields such as AI, quantum, robotics, cyber and space, playing a decisive role in maintaining strategic advantage and ensuring credible deterrence. Cybersecurity and cyber resilience should be integrated throughout the lifecycle of all supported technologies and products, including development, supply chain management, deployment and maintenance phases. Achieving this requires rapid testing, validation and integration of these technologies into defence capabilities, as well as continuous engagement with the technology and innovation ecosystem.

Or. en

Amendment 2

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) The war in Ukraine shows how rapidly defence technologies are evolving. Innovation cycles are becoming faster, which means defence products must adapt rapidly. These changes are also reshaping battlefield dynamics. SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, often with an important civilian background, play a key role in supporting Ukraine’s defence and armed forces. These new defence actors bring faster innovation, greater flexibility, cost-efficient solutions, and new operational ideas and processes. As a result, they are becoming a major driving force in transforming the EDTIB. The joint White Paper European Defence – Readiness 2030 highlights the importance of a strong technological innovation ecosystem. This is essential to ensure that Europe’s defence industry can keep pace with the rapidly changing nature of modern warfare.(4) The war in Ukraine shows how rapidly defence technologies are evolving. Innovation cycles are becoming faster, which means defence products must adapt rapidly and continuously. These changes are also reshaping battlefield dynamics. SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, often with a civilian background, play a key role in supporting Ukraine’s defence and armed forces. These new defence actors bring faster innovation, greater flexibility, cost-efficient solutions, and new operational ideas and processes. As a result, they are becoming a major driving force in transforming the EDTIB. The joint White Paper European Defence – Readiness 2030 highlights the importance of a strong technological innovation ecosystem. This is essential to ensure that Europe’s defence industry and the armed forces of the EU Member States and associated third countries can keep pace with the rapidly changing nature of modern warfare.

Or. en

Read the rest (1,952 paragraphs)

Amendment 3

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) The war in Ukraine shows how rapidly defence technologies are evolving. Innovation cycles are becoming faster, which means defence products must adapt rapidly. These changes are also reshaping battlefield dynamics. SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, often with an important civilian background, play a key role in supporting Ukraine’s defence and armed forces. These new defence actors bring faster innovation, greater flexibility, cost-efficient solutions, and new operational ideas and processes. As a result, they are becoming a major driving force in transforming the EDTIB. The joint White Paper European Defence – Readiness 2030 highlights the importance of a strong technological innovation ecosystem. This is essential to ensure that Europe’s defence industry can keep pace with the rapidly changing nature of modern warfare.(4) The war in Ukraine shows how rapidly defence technologies are evolving. Innovation cycles are becoming faster, which means defence products must adapt rapidly. Russia's war of aggression has underscored the operational relevance of low-cost and software-based solutions that can be iterated quickly and fielded at pace. SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, often with an important civilian background, have played a key role in supporting Ukraine's defence and armed forces, demonstrating that the defence sector needs new actors capable of delivering faster innovation, greater flexibility, cost-efficient solutions, and new operational ideas and processes. In the context of Ukraine's defence readiness, their contribution has been crucial, confirming that the ability to identify, adapt and field emerging technologies rapidly has become a core operational requirement for modern armed forces.

Or. en

Amendment 4

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4 a) The wars in Ukraine and Iran have also highlighted acute capability gaps and serious bottlenecks affecting Member States’ armed forces and defence industrial bases, as well as external dependencies on critical components, technologies and weapons systems essential to the conduct of warfare and, therefore, to deterrence in the face of the return of high-intensity conflict in Europe. Responding to the rapid evolution of defence technologies should therefore go hand in hand with efforts to address Member States’ capability gaps and strategic dependencies, without disregarding the actual capability needs of their armed forces. Such an approach is consistent with the commitment made after the June 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague to build an autonomous and credible European pillar within NATO.

Or. en

Amendment 5

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4 a) The lessons learnt from the war in Ukraine have direct implications for the transformation of the EDTIB. New defence players — particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups — should become a major driving force in reshaping how innovative defence technologies and products are developed and delivered across Europe, enabling faster innovation cycles, greater agility and more cost-efficient solutions. The joint White Paper on European Defence – Readiness 2030 highlights the importance of a strong technological innovation ecosystem as essential to ensure that Europe's defence industry can keep pace with the rapidly changing nature of modern warfare, accelerate innovation, shorten time-to-market and guarantee the rapid uptake of disruptive technologies.

Or. en

Amendment 6

Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4 a) The war in Ukraine has demonstrated the decisive role of unmanned and autonomous systems in modern warfare, including aerial, ground and maritime systems, as well as counter-unmanned solutions. Such technologies enable rapid innovation cycles, scalable and cost-efficient capability development and reduced risks for military personnel. The Programme should therefore give particular consideration to emerging and disruptive unmanned and autonomous defence solutions, including related software, sensors, communications systems and counter-UAS technologies, where they contribute to strengthening the defence readiness and operational effectiveness of Member States’ armed forces.

Or. en

Amendment 7

Željana Zovko

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5) To provide comprehensive support for the collaborative research and development (R&D) of defence products and technologies, the Union has established the European Defence Fund (EDF). With a budget of EUR 7.3 billion under the 2021-2027 MFF, the EDF aims to promote the competitiveness, efficiency and innovation capacity of the EDTIB, as well as reducing fragmentation within the EDTIB. As one of the largest defence R&D programmes in Europe, the EDF supports the collaborative development of the most complex defence systems that no Member State could afford to develop alone. It also supports the development of new European defence supply chains. As part of the EDF, the EU Defence Innovation Scheme (EUDIS) was established in 2022, to provide targeted support to non-traditional defence actors, particularly SMEs and start-ups, and to lower barriers to market entry. The EUDIS involves several initiatives, such as targeted R&D calls, business acceleration and matchmaking services, hackathons, and equity financing, accounting for around 20% of the EDF budget committed each year. These actions have significantly contributed to expanding the EDTIB and fostering defence innovation capacity across the Union. In addition, the EDF BraveTech EU initiative provides further support for defence innovators, offering them gradual access to funding alongside technology testing and iterative development cycles. It focuses on developing solutions based on defence needs identified by Ukraine, giving Ukrainian industry a direct opportunity to collaborate with EU defence innovators.(5) To provide comprehensive support for the collaborative research and development (R&D) of defence products and technologies, the Union has established the European Defence Fund (EDF). With a budget of EUR 7.3 billion under the 2021-2027 MFF, the EDF aims to promote the competitiveness, efficiency and innovation capacity of the EDTIB, as well as reducing fragmentation within the EDTIB. As one of the largest defence R&D programmes in Europe, the EDF supports the collaborative development of the most complex defence systems that no Member State could afford to develop alone. It also supports the development of new European defence supply chains. As part of the EDF, the EU Defence Innovation Scheme (EUDIS) was established in 2022, to provide targeted support to non-traditional defence actors, particularly SMEs and start-ups, and to lower barriers to market entry. The EUDIS involves several initiatives, such as targeted R&D calls, business acceleration and matchmaking services, hackathons, and equity financing, accounting for around 20% of the EDF budget committed each year. These actions have significantly contributed to expanding the EDTIB and fostering defence innovation capacity across the Union. In addition, the EDF BraveTech EU initiative provides further support for defence innovators, offering them gradual access to funding alongside technology testing and iterative development cycles. It focuses on developing solutions based on defence needs identified by Ukraine, giving Ukrainian industry a direct opportunity to collaborate with EU defence innovators. In this context, the Programme should also contribute to strengthening the operational resilience of the Union and the Member States by accelerating the development and deployment of adaptable, scalable and rapidly deployable defence technologies capable of responding to evolving and unpredictable operational threats. Operational resilience requires not only the development of advanced capabilities, but also the ability to rapidly test, deploy and adapt them within a dynamic security environment.

Or. en

Justification

The rapidly evolving security environment and lessons learned from Ukraine demonstrate that defence innovation must not only focus on developing new technologies, but also on ensuring their rapid testing, deployment and adaptation to operational realities. The existing recital already addresses iterative development cycles and innovation support under the EDF and EUDIS frameworks. This amendment strengthens that logic by explicitly anchoring the operational resilience dimension within the Programme’s rationale and by emphasising the importance of rapidly deployable and adaptable defence capabilities.

Amendment 8

Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5) To provide comprehensive support for the collaborative research and development (R&D) of defence products and technologies, the Union has established the European Defence Fund (EDF). With a budget of EUR 7.3 billion under the 2021-2027 MFF, the EDF aims to promote the competitiveness, efficiency and innovation capacity of the EDTIB, as well as reducing fragmentation within the EDTIB. As one of the largest defence R&D programmes in Europe, the EDF supports the collaborative development of the most complex defence systems that no Member State could afford to develop alone. It also supports the development of new European defence supply chains. As part of the EDF, the EU Defence Innovation Scheme (EUDIS) was established in 2022, to provide targeted support to non-traditional defence actors, particularly SMEs and start-ups, and to lower barriers to market entry. The EUDIS involves several initiatives, such as targeted R&D calls, business acceleration and matchmaking services, hackathons, and equity financing, accounting for around 20% of the EDF budget committed each year. These actions have significantly contributed to expanding the EDTIB and fostering defence innovation capacity across the Union. In addition, the EDF BraveTech EU initiative provides further support for defence innovators, offering them gradual access to funding alongside technology testing and iterative development cycles. It focuses on developing solutions based on defence needs identified by Ukraine, giving Ukrainian industry a direct opportunity to collaborate with EU defence innovators.(5) To provide comprehensive support for the collaborative research and development (R&D) of defence products and technologies, the Union has established the European Defence Fund (EDF). With a budget of EUR 7.3 billion under the 2021-2027 MFF, the EDF aims to promote the competitiveness, efficiency and innovation capacity of the EDTIB, as well as reducing fragmentation within the EDTIB. As one of the largest defence R&D programmes in Europe, the EDF supports the collaborative development of the most complex defence systems that most Member States could not afford to develop alone. It also supports the development of new European defence supply chains. As part of the EDF, the EU Defence Innovation Scheme (EUDIS) was established in 2022, to provide targeted support to non-traditional defence actors, particularly SMEs and start-ups, and to lower barriers to market entry. The EUDIS involves several initiatives, such as targeted R&D calls, business acceleration and matchmaking services, hackathons, and equity financing, accounting for around 20% of the EDF budget committed each year. These actions have significantly contributed to expanding the EDTIB and fostering defence innovation capacity across the Union. In addition, the EDF BraveTech EU initiative provides further support for defence innovators, offering them gradual access to funding alongside technology testing and iterative development cycles. It focuses on developing solutions based on defence needs identified by Ukraine, giving Ukrainian industry a direct opportunity to collaborate with EU defence innovators.

Or. fr

Amendment 9

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5 a) The Programme should be designed and implemented in a manner that ensures complementarity with relevant NATO activities in the field of defence innovation, including the Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA), the NATO Innovation Fund and the Rapid Adoption Action Plan, while avoiding unnecessary duplication. Member States’ commitments under the North Atlantic Treaty, including Article 3 thereof, remain unaffected.

Or. en

Amendment 10

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6) Regulations (EU) 2021/6952 and (EU) 2024/7953 enable the European Innovation Council (EIC) Accelerator to support dual-use technologies and stimulate investment in defence technologies under the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP). In addition, this Regulation allows for EIC direct support to defence technologies in the form of direct equity financing.(6) Regulations (EU) 2021/6952 and (EU) 2024/7953 enable the European Innovation Council (EIC) Accelerator to support dual-use technologies and stimulate investment in defence technologies under the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP). In addition, this Regulation allows for EIC direct support to defence technologies in the form of direct equity financing. The AGILE Programme should be implemented in a manner consistent with the principles and objectives of Regulation (EU) 2021/695 establishing Horizon Europe, including the requirements on research integrity and ethical standards applicable to dual-use technologies. The Commission should establish synergy pathways enabling seamless transition of AGILE-funded entities and results into Horizon Europe downstream instruments, including the EIC Accelerator and the EUDIS Business Accelerator, so as to prevent duplication and maximise the lifecycle value of Union-funded innovation.
2 Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, pp. 1–68, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/695/oj).2 Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, pp. 1–68, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/695/oj).
3 Regulation (EU) 2024/795 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 February 2024 establishing the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP), and amending Directive 2003/87/EC and Regulations (EU) 2021/1058, (EU) 2021/1056, (EU) 2021/1057, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) 2021/1060, (EU) 2021/523, (EU) 2021/695, (EU) 2021/697 and (EU) 2021/241 (OJ L, 2024/795, 29.2.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/795/oj).3 Regulation (EU) 2024/795 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 February 2024 establishing the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP), and amending Directive 2003/87/EC and Regulations (EU) 2021/1058, (EU) 2021/1056, (EU) 2021/1057, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) 2021/1060, (EU) 2021/523, (EU) 2021/695, (EU) 2021/697 and (EU) 2021/241 (OJ L, 2024/795, 29.2.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/795/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 11

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs of Members States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions.(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The Programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation and further development of civil and dual-use technologies for defence applications, in order to address the most urgent capability development needs of Member States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low-cost and rapidly deployable defence solutions. The Programme should also promote civil-military synergies and broad participation of innovative entities from all Member States, in particular from those with less developed defence innovation ecosystems or lower participation in existing Union defence programmes. It should contribute to strengthening the inclusiveness, competitiveness and technological resilience of the EDTIB, while taking into account the Union’s evolving security environment and the need to strengthen defence readiness and resilience across all regions of the Union.

Or. en

Justification

This amendment aims to strengthen the inclusiveness and geographical balance of the European defence innovation ecosystem. Significant disparities persist across Member States with regard to defence innovation capacity, access to research and development support, and participation in existing Union defence programmes. In particular, SMEs and innovative entities in Member States with less developed defence innovation ecosystems may face structural barriers in accessing funding opportunities and integrating into European defence value chains. Promoting broader participation across the Union would contribute to reducing fragmentation within the EDTIB, strengthening technological resilience and enhancing the Union’s overall defence readiness. A more inclusive approach would also support the emergence of new defence actors and help ensure that innovation potential from all regions of the Union can contribute to addressing evolving security challenges.

Amendment 12

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs of Members States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions.(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs of Members States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions. The programme should contribute to strengthening the technological and industrial base of the Union in the field on defence innovation, including by encouraging cooperation across Union industrial value chains, facilitating access for undertakings established in different Member States, and strengthening the diffusion of innovation across the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 13

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs of Members States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions.(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The Programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, as well as critical products, technologies and components for defence, including through the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs and existing capability gaps of Member States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions, reinforcing security of supply and reducing strategic dependencies.

Or. en

Amendment 14

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs of Members States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions.(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs of Members States, taking into consideration the capability priorities identified in the context of defence readiness agenda, as well as associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions.

Or. en

Amendment 15

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs of Members States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions.(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, and their uptake by Members States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions, to address their most urgent capability development needs, in particular for those facing high exposure to conventional military threats.

Or. en

Amendment 16

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions. The programme should focus on supporting the development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs of Members States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions.(8) In addition to those substantial efforts, a new programme should be established (the AGILE Programme, ‘the Programme’) to provide rapid, agile and targeted support to SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups in the EU insofar as they meet the requirements of the SME definition, to develop innovative defence solutions The programme should focus on supporting the design and development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence up to a high technology readiness level, including the adaptation of civil technologies for defence applications, to address the most urgent capability development needs of Members States and associated third countries, with a particular focus on low cost defence solutions.

Or. ro

Amendment 17

Giorgio Gori

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8 a) In order to reinforce the Union’s defence technological and industrial base as a whole, the Programme should encourage the participation and the collaboration within and among undertakings established in a broad range of Member States, including those with emerging defence innovation ecosystems, while avoiding excessive concentration of support in a limited number of Member States or industrial actors.

Or. en

Amendment 18

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8 a) The security of the Union is closely linked to the stability and resilience of its external borders, including in the Northern dimension. Enhanced cooperation among Member States in these regions, as well as with like-minded partner countries, is essential to address shared security challenges and to strengthen the Union’s technological and industrial base.

Or. en

Amendment 19

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8 b) The evolving security environment at the Union’s external borders, particularly in the Northern and Eastern regions, requires rapid deployment of innovative capabilities and shortened development cycles.

Or. en

Amendment 20

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8 c) In order to strengthen the Union’s resilience and innovation capacity, particular attention should be given to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in geographically remote, sparsely populated, and external border regions, including in the Northern dimension, where security, logistics, and environmental conditions require specialised solutions.

Or. en

Amendment 21

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8 d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8 d) Cooperation with neighbouring countries sharing similar climatic and security conditions, in particular in the Arctic and Baltic regions, can significantly enhance the effectiveness of defence innovation efforts and contribute to regional stability.

Or. en

Amendment 22

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies (particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups) to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements.(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. The Programme should also allow, where appropriate, the participation of small-scale consortia and cooperation with research and technology organisations, technical universities, incubators and other innovation support entities, in order to facilitate the emergence of new defence actors and strengthen the Union’s defence innovation ecosystem. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies (particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups) to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements and security and defence strategies of Member States, while ensuring, where relevant, interoperability and compatibility with applicable NATO standards and guidelines, including relevant Standardization Agreements (STANAGs).

Or. en

Justification

The amendment aims to increase the flexibility and inclusiveness of the AGILE Programme by allowing, where appropriate, the participation of small-scale consortia and cooperation with research and technology organisations and other innovation support entities. It notes the important role of research and technology organisations, technical universities, incubators and similar entities in supporting defence innovation. Access to testing, validation and demonstration capacities is essential for innovative solutions to mature into credible and operationally relevant defence capabilities. Strengthening cooperation between innovative companies and such entities would contribute to reinforcing the Union’s defence innovation ecosystem and facilitating the emergence of new defence actors across the Union.

Amendment 23

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies (particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups) to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements.(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups in the EU, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies (particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups) to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements, but it should not be possible to sell the resulting products outside the EU by means of this procedure with financial support from the Union.

Or. ro

Amendment 24

Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies (particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups) to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements.(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. The Programme should also contribute to strengthening interoperability and industrial cooperation between the Union and NATO Allies. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies (particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups) to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 25

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies (particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups) to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements.(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies (particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups) to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements, and carried out by consortia of SMEs and intended users or customers.

Or. en

Amendment 26

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies (particularly SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups) to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements.(9) In order to ensure the efficient implementation of the EU budget, the AGILE Programme will be fully complementary to existing EU instruments supporting defence innovation. EUDIS supports non-traditional defence actors within the broader EDF framework, including R&D grants for consortia and other support actions targeting single entities (Business Accelerator, Matchmaking). HEDI, managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA), fosters cooperation among Member States on defence innovation. The EIC is a key EU innovation programme to identify, develop and scale up breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovation. Following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2653, the EIC STEP Scale Up Scheme will provide direct equity financing to help defence and dual use companies to scale up their innovations. AGILE fills a distinct gap, as it will offer streamlined, direct support to individual SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, for the development of innovative solutions and its uptake by Member States and industry, with very short award timelines and a clear link to the capability needs of Member States. It should therefore enable the Union to pilot new approaches to supporting defence innovation, while complementing existing EU instruments across various maturity levels, consortium sizes, timeframes and technological domains. The rapid evolution of defence threats requires a shift towards a more flexible approach to enable innovative companies to respond quickly to identified capability challenges. The Programme should therefore prioritise challenge-based innovation activities with rapid iteration cycles, directly linked to Member States' priority operational requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 27

Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9 a) In view of the rapidly evolving nature of defence innovation and the strategic importance of emerging and disruptive technologies for the Union’s long-term defence readiness, it is essential to ensure continuity and predictability of support beyond the initial implementation period of the Programme. The Commission should therefore assess the effectiveness of the Programme not only in terms of the individual projects supported, but also with regard to its contribution to strengthening the European defence innovation ecosystem, attracting innovative companies and investment to the Union, accelerating the operational uptake of new technologies and enhancing cooperation between defence actors and the wider deep-tech ecosystem. That assessment should also evaluate whether the implementation mechanisms introduced under the Programme, including accelerated award procedures and flexible forms of Union support, should be expanded, adapted or integrated into future Union defence funding instruments. The results of the evaluation should inform future decisions on the continuation, scaling-up or long-term integration of support for disruptive defence innovation at Union level.

Or. en

Amendment 28

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(10) In particular, the Programme should seek to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products and technologies with high disruptive potential, expected to be fully exploitable within the next 1 to 3 years. It should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from single legal entities, while allowing for subcontracting of specific tasks or collaboration with other entities during implementation.(10) In particular, the Programme should seek to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products and technologies with high disruptive potential, expected to be fully exploitable within the next 1 to 3 years. It should also support the continuous adaptation, upgrading and iterative improvement of existing innovative defence products and technologies in response to rapidly evolving operational requirements and technological developments. It should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from single legal entities and, where appropriate, small-scale consortia, while allowing for the participation of research and technology organisations, technical universities, incubators and other innovation support entities in supported actions, including through cooperation, subcontracting or other forms of collaboration during implementation.

Or. en

Justification

The amendment aims to increase the flexibility and inclusiveness of the AGILE Programme by allowing, where appropriate, the participation of small-scale consortia and cooperation with research and technology organisations and other innovation support entities. It notes the important role of research and technology organisations, technical universities, incubators and similar entities in supporting defence innovation. Access to testing, validation and demonstration capacities is essential for innovative solutions to mature into credible and operationally relevant defence capabilities. Strengthening cooperation between innovative companies and such entities would contribute to reinforcing the Union’s defence innovation ecosystem and facilitating the emergence of new defence actors across the Union.

Amendment 29

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(10) In particular, the Programme should seek to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products and technologies with high disruptive potential, expected to be fully exploitable within the next 1 to 3 years. It should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from single legal entities, while allowing for subcontracting of specific tasks or collaboration with other entities during implementation.(10) In particular, the Programme should seek to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products and technologies with high disruptive potential, expected to be fully exploitable within the next 1 to 3 years. Such disruptive potential should not be understood as being limited to entirely new technologies or technological solutions, but should also include the novel integration, adaptation or more effective, faster or more cost-efficient use of existing technologies, products, processes or operational concepts. The Programme should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from single legal entities, while allowing for subcontracting of specific tasks or collaboration with other entities during implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 30

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(10) In particular, the Programme should seek to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products and technologies with high disruptive potential, expected to be fully exploitable within the next 1 to 3 years. It should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from single legal entities, while allowing for subcontracting of specific tasks or collaboration with other entities during implementation.(10) In particular, the Programme should seek to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products, components and technologies with high disruptive potential or capable of addressing critical capability gaps and dependencies, expected to be fully exploitable within the next 1 to 3 years. It should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from single legal entities, while allowing for subcontracting of specific tasks or collaboration with other entities during implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 31

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(10) In particular, the Programme should seek to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products and technologies with high disruptive potential, expected to be fully exploitable within the next 1 to 3 years. It should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from single legal entities, while allowing for subcontracting of specific tasks or collaboration with other entities during implementation.(10) In particular, the Programme should seek the support granted to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products and technologies with high disruptive potential, expected to be fully exploitable within the next 1 to 3 years. It should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from single legal entities in the European Union, while allowing for subcontracting of specific tasks or collaboration with other entities in the EU during implementation.

Or. ro

Amendment 32

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(10) In particular, the Programme should seek to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products and technologies with high disruptive potential, expected to be fully exploitable within the next 1 to 3 years. It should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from single legal entities, while allowing for subcontracting of specific tasks or collaboration with other entities during implementation.(10) In particular, the Programme should seek to significantly accelerate the innovation cycles of defence products and technologies with high disruptive potential, intended to be developed, tested, qualified and procured within the next 1 to 3 years. It should offer innovators the greatest possible flexibility to propose novel solutions, including from consortia involving a single SME, while allowing for subcontracting of specific tasks or collaboration with other entities during implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 33

Julie Rechagneux, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Mélanie Disdier

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(10 a) The Programme should support innovation addressing identified defence capability gaps of Member States' armed forces. Such support may cover hardware capability gaps, including command and control, autonomous systems, precision-strike capabilities, air and missile defence, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and space-based capabilities. It may also cover software capability gaps, including military cloud, secure data-processing, artificial intelligence, and interoperable operational software. Particular attention should be paid to reducing critical dependencies on non-associated third countries, including as regards advanced components and critical raw materials. The Programme may also support innovation in the field of operational energy and military medical resilience.

Or. en

Amendment 34

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries taking into account the evolving security environment of the Union and, in particular, the increased defence readiness and resilience needs of Member States exposed to the most acute security threats at the Union’s external borders. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.

Or. en

Amendment 35

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors.

Or. en

Amendment 36

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.(11) Indeed, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should also align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should contribute to enable the uptake of innovative solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors. Such uptake should become the norm through strong incentives for Member States to provide early guarantees to procure successful AGILE projects that fulfill their capability needs. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.

Or. en

Amendment 37

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors, including through industrial partnerships, technology transfer and integration of such solutions into existing industrial systems and supply chains. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.

Or. en

Amendment 38

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. The Programme should therefore support the transition from innovation to deployment through procurement-linked investment mechanisms, including co-financing of initial acquisition, industrial scale-up and deployment by Member States. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly from startups and SMEs. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing, procurement, and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.

Or. en

Amendment 39

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships.(11) However, the persistent structural challenge for European defence SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, is the gap between successful innovation and operational deployment by the armed forces of Member States and associated third countries. To address that gap, the Programme should align with the genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States and associated third countries. By doing so, it should support the uptake of innovation solutions by their armed forces and defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors. The Programme should establish a fast-track process to enable the Union to support the testing and deployment of innovative support mechanisms that address the most urgent defence readiness requirements, including in support of European Readiness Flagships and European Defence Projects of Common Interest.

Or. en

Amendment 40

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(11 a) Some New Defence actors struggle with the lack of local alternatives from the EDTIB for critical components of defence products, in particular in the context of Unmanned Autonomous Systems production. The Programme should also support SMEs willing to localize production.

Or. en

Amendment 41

Željana Zovko

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations, including through defence innovation sandbox environments operating under simplified administrative procedures and in operationally realistic conditions. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process, including through structured mechanisms enabling rapid operational feedback between armed forces, testing environments, defence innovators and industrial actors, so as to ensure that innovative solutions are continuously adapted to evolving operational realities and lessons learned from modern conflicts, thereby shortening the cycle between operational need identification and the fielding of effective solutions. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.

Or. en

Justification

Russia's war against Ukraine has demonstrated that defence innovation cycles increasingly depend on rapid operational feedback and iterative adaptation between end users and developers. The original text refers to real-time feedback but does not establish structured mechanisms to institutionalise this feedback loop or provide dedicated environments for rapid experimentation. This amendment strengthens the existing recital by explicitly requiring structured feedback linkages between armed forces, innovators and industry, and by introducing defence innovation sandbox environments as a tool to accelerate testing and validation, particularly for SMEs and non-traditional defence actors that face barriers in accessing existing testing infrastructure.

Amendment 42

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. Furthermore, the cooperation with and facilitation by system integrators and original equipment manufacturers in the testing and demonstration processes can facilitate the uptake of Programme outcomes. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.

Or. en

Amendment 43

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.(12) To this end, the Programme should dedicate at least 75% of its budget to support activities carried out by consortia of SMEs, contracting authorities or contracting entities, and involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations, particularly in wartime conditions, for example in Ukraine. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities and the selection of successful applicants. This should ensure subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.

Or. en

Amendment 44

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States, and where relevant NATO, Ukraine, relevant industrial actors, such as prime contractors, first-tier subcontractors, and innovation support entities, is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.

Or. en

Amendment 45

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities, with constantly monitoring of the progress of project activities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.

Or. ro

Amendment 46

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations, drawing upon, notably, the ongoing work of the European Defence Agency. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.

Or. en

Amendment 47

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme can support the uptake of new technologies and products by aggregating demand, and using innovative procurement mechanisms, such as innovation partnerships. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.(12) To this end, the Programme should support activities involving field testing, experimentation and demonstrations. These activities should allow entities to validate innovative solutions in realistic operational conditions, generating real-time feedback that can be used to refine and improve the solutions through an iterative process. The active involvement of Member States is crucial at every stage of this process, from setting up testing requirements to assessing demonstrated capabilities. This will help create credible demand signals and facilitate subsequent procurement decisions. Additionally, the Programme should support the transition from testing and demonstration to national or multinational procurement through co-financing mechanisms linked to acquisition commitments, initial production batches and industrial scale-up. Shared platforms and services can also be developed to address the common operational needs of multiple end users.

Or. en

Amendment 48

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12 a) Where emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence have successfully undergone testing, experimentation or demonstration, beneficiaries should be supported in identifying credible pathways towards market uptake, scale-up financing and integration into more complex defence systems. To that end, the Programme should facilitate matchmaking and investment-readiness activities involving innovative SMEs, including start-ups and scale-ups, Member States’ armed forces, relevant European defence industrial actors, including prime contractors, system integrators and first-tier subcontractors, and private investors, while preserving fair competition, equal treatment and the protection of intellectual property.

Or. en

Amendment 49

Željana Zovko

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12 a) Furthermore, the Programme should support innovative defence solutions contributing to the protection, surveillance and resilience of strategic European infrastructure, including maritime infrastructure, subsea communication links, energy infrastructure and critical supply corridors, given the increasing frequency of hybrid threats and deliberate acts of sabotage targeting such assets.

Or. en

Justification

Strategic infrastructure, including subsea cables, maritime infrastructure, energy networks and critical supply corridors, has become a growing security concern for the Union and its Member States. This amendment ensures that AGILE also supports innovative defence solutions addressing the protection and resilience of such assets, while remaining fully consistent with the Programme’s objectives related to defence readiness, rapid deployment and operational innovation.

Amendment 50

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 13

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(13) Space-based capabilities have become indispensable enablers of modern defence and security operations, providing critical functions including intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, secure communications, positioning, navigation and timing, and early warning. Moreover, the increasing reliance of armed forces on space-based assets, combined with the growing vulnerability of space infrastructure to threats, make the resilience and responsiveness of the European space sector a strategic priority. Space is identified in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 as a key strategic enabler within the priority capability areas established by the EU and its Member States, and the Defence Readiness Roadmap proposes a European Space Shield as a potential flagship initiative. The dual-use nature of space technologies and services means that innovation in the space sector has direct and immediate implications for defence capabilities, and that defence-driven demand can accelerate the development and commercialisation of European space technologies. The Programme should therefore support the development of innovative space-based and space-enabled defence capabilities, by including new entrants and non-traditional actors, to enhance the Union's strategic autonomy in space and strengthen the EDTIB. This includes contributing to the development of a future Earth Observation Governmental Service (EOGS) with autonomous, resilient and defence-grade earth observation capabilities. The Programme should also support activities in the space domain to accelerate the uptake of space-based defence capabilities by Member States, and, by the EU, in line with the Space Programme, the Secure Connectivity Programme or as regards the activities of the EU Satellite Centre (SatCen), while ensuring consistency with the relevant Union space-related initiatives.(13) Space-based capabilities have become indispensable enablers of modern defence and security operations, providing critical functions including intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, secure communications, positioning, navigation and timing, and early warning. Moreover, the increasing reliance of armed forces on space-based assets, combined with the growing vulnerability of space infrastructure to threats, make the resilience and responsiveness of the European space sector a strategic priority. Space is identified in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 as a key strategic enabler within the priority capability areas established by the EU and its Member States, and the Defence Readiness Roadmap proposes a European Space Shield as a potential flagship initiative. The dual-use nature of space technologies and services means that innovation in the space sector has direct and immediate implications for defence capabilities, and that defence-driven demand can accelerate the development and commercialisation of European space technologies. The Programme should therefore support the development of innovative space-based and space-enabled defence capabilities, by including new entrants and non-traditional actors, to enhance the Union's strategic autonomy in space and strengthen the EDTIB. This includes contributing to the development of a future Earth Observation Governmental Service (EOGS) with autonomous, resilient and defence-grade earth observation capabilities. The Programme should also support activities in the space domain to accelerate the uptake of space-based defence capabilities by Member States, and, by the EU, in line with the Space Programme, the Secure Connectivity Programme or as regards the activities of the EU Satellite Centre (SatCen), while ensuring consistency with the relevant Union space-related initiatives, including governmental Earth observation, secure space-based communications and related capabilities relevant for monitoring and situational awareness along the Union's external border. Any reallocations from the EU Space Programme and the Secure Connectivity Programme to the Programme should not undermine the operational capacity of those programmes.

Or. en

Amendment 51

Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 13

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(13) Space-based capabilities have become indispensable enablers of modern defence and security operations, providing critical functions including intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, secure communications, positioning, navigation and timing, and early warning. Moreover, the increasing reliance of armed forces on space-based assets, combined with the growing vulnerability of space infrastructure to threats, make the resilience and responsiveness of the European space sector a strategic priority. Space is identified in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 as a key strategic enabler within the priority capability areas established by the EU and its Member States, and the Defence Readiness Roadmap proposes a European Space Shield as a potential flagship initiative. The dual-use nature of space technologies and services means that innovation in the space sector has direct and immediate implications for defence capabilities, and that defence-driven demand can accelerate the development and commercialisation of European space technologies. The Programme should therefore support the development of innovative space-based and space-enabled defence capabilities, by including new entrants and non-traditional actors, to enhance the Union's strategic autonomy in space and strengthen the EDTIB. This includes contributing to the development of a future Earth Observation Governmental Service (EOGS) with autonomous, resilient and defence-grade earth observation capabilities. The Programme should also support activities in the space domain to accelerate the uptake of space-based defence capabilities by Member States, and, by the EU, in line with the Space Programme, the Secure Connectivity Programme or as regards the activities of the EU Satellite Centre (SatCen), while ensuring consistency with the relevant Union space-related initiatives.(13) Space-based capabilities have become indispensable enablers of modern defence and security operations, providing critical functions including intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, secure communications, positioning, navigation and timing, and early warning. Moreover, the increasing reliance of armed forces on space-based assets, combined with the growing vulnerability of space infrastructure to threats, make the resilience and responsiveness of the European space sector a strategic priority. Space is identified in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 as a key strategic enabler within the priority capability areas established by the EU and its Member States, and the Defence Readiness Roadmap proposes a European Space Shield as a potential flagship initiative. The dual-use nature of space technologies and services means that innovation in the space sector has direct and immediate implications for defence capabilities, and that defence-driven demand can accelerate the development and commercialisation of European space technologies. The Programme should therefore support the development of innovative space-based and space-enabled defence capabilities, by including new entrants and non-traditional actors, to enhance the Union's strategic autonomy in space and strengthen the EDTIB. This includes contributing to the development of a future Earth Observation Governmental Service (EOGS) with autonomous, resilient and defence-grade earth observation capabilities. The Programme should also support activities in the space domain to accelerate the uptake of space-based defence capabilities by Member States, and, by the EU, in line with the Space Programme, the Secure Connectivity Programme or as regards the activities of the EU Satellite Centre (SatCen), while ensuring consistency with the relevant Union space-related initiatives. In any case, it should be ensured that funding for space purposes is sufficiently ring-fenced in order to secure the competitiveness of the European space sector and to guarantee that no funding is reallocated to the detriment of the space sector.

Or. en

Amendment 52

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(13 a) Real-world testing environments in extreme climatic and geographical conditions, including Arctic and sub-Arctic regions, are essential for validating defence technologies intended for use in harsh operational environments and along the Union’s external borders.

Or. en

Amendment 53

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14) To ensure uniform conditions for implementing this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission for the adoption of work programmes. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/20116 . To ensure the swift adoption of these work programmes and, ultimately, the implementation of the Programme for the benefit of the European defence SME ecosystem, the Commission should be able to use the advisory procedure set out in Article 4 of the aforementioned Regulation.(14) To ensure uniform conditions for implementing this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission for the adoption of work programmes. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/20116 .
6 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers6 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers

Or. en

Amendment 54

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14) To ensure uniform conditions for implementing this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission for the adoption of work programmes. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/20116 . To ensure the swift adoption of these work programmes and, ultimately, the implementation of the Programme for the benefit of the European defence SME ecosystem, the Commission should be able to use the advisory procedure set out in Article 4 of the aforementioned Regulation.(14) To ensure uniform conditions for implementing this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission for the adoption of work programmes. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/20116 . To ensure that the actions supported by the Programme meet the capability needs of Member States’ armed forces and that funded start-ups are effectively connected to their potential end customers, the Commission should use the examination procedure set out in Article 5 of the aforementioned Regulation, thereby ensuring the formal involvement of Member States in the work programme and the direct consideration of their capability needs.
6 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers6 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers

Or. en

Amendment 55

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14) To ensure uniform conditions for implementing this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission for the adoption of work programmes. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/20116 . To ensure the swift adoption of these work programmes and, ultimately, the implementation of the Programme for the benefit of the European defence SME ecosystem, the Commission should be able to use the advisory procedure set out in Article 4 of the aforementioned Regulation.(14) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the adoption of work programmes. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/20116 . To ensure the swift adoption of these work programmes and, ultimately, the implementation of the Programme for the benefit of the European defence SME ecosystem, the Commission should be able to use the advisory procedure set out in Article 4 of the aforementioned Regulation.
6 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers6 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers

Or. en

Amendment 56

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14 a) To avoid unnecessary duplication and administrative burden on Member States, especially in light of the increasing number of Union instruments and committees in which they are required to participate, the Programme should rely on the existing EDF committee for the adoption of the work programme. Using the EDF committee, instead of establishing a separate additional committee dedicated to AGILE, would ensure continuity of expertise, avoid duplication, reduce administrative and procedural burden, ensure consistency between the Programme and the EDF, and allow for its swift implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 57

Hélder Sousa Silva

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats.(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified on the basis of the EU Capability Priorities derived from the Capability Development Plan and, as appropriate, complemented by the gaps and opportunities identified through the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD), the priority capability areas set out in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030, and the operational requirements stemming from the European Readiness Flagships, so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. The European Defence Agency, as the body responsible for the Capability Development Plan and as host of the Hub for EU Defence Innovation (HEDI), and the European External Action Service, including the EU Military Staff, should be closely associated with the identification of challenges. The work programme may, on a strictly advisory basis, draw on input from established defence industry actors, provided that such input does not influence the design of calls in a manner detrimental to fair competition or to the participation of new defence players, in particular SMEs and innovative start-ups and scaleups. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats.

Or. en

Amendment 58

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats.(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries, SMEs, start-ups, scale-ups, specialised suppliers, relevant industry associations, testing and certification bodies, and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole, while taking into account the need to mobilise defence industrial capabilities across the Union, including in smaller and medium-sized Member States and in Member States facing elevated security risks. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats.

Or. en

Amendment 59

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats.(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats. The work programme should be based on clearly documented capability needs submitted by Member States and should not be designed in a manner that directly or indirectly favours a predetermined economic operator, technology provider or industrial consortium.

Or. en

Amendment 60

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats.(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme should also draw on input from major industries and the EDA, especially through the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD), the Capability Development Plan (CDP) with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats

Or. en

Amendment 61

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats.(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, and, where relevant, with NATO and Ukraine, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries, EDA and NATO with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole, including through the participation of entities from Member States with less developed defence innovation ecosystems, and to addressing pressing, urgent and lasting threats.

Or. en

Amendment 62

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats.(15) The work programme should establish challenges, defined as calls for proposals addressing specific defence needs identified in coordination with Member States, based on a structured process involving Member States so that supported projects respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs of Member States. For this purpose, the work programme may also draw on input from major industries and the EDA with a view to addressing specific, mission-driven capability needs and assessing the feasibility and effective uptake of supported solutions. In all cases, priority should be given to challenges that attract the broadest possible support from Member States, reflecting genuine common demand and strategic alignment, and contributing to the defence readiness of the EU as a whole. To cover the full range of innovation, the Programme should also include calls that address broader defence innovation objectives. In the selection of projects under such calls and challenges, the Commission should ensure that the Programme contributes to strengthening defence industrial capacity across the Union as a whole and to addressing urgent and lasting threats.

Or. en

Amendment 63

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15 a) To ensure transparency and democratic oversight of the Programme, the Commission should monitor its implementation and evaluate its effectiveness in achieving the objectives set out in this Regulation. The Commission should publish an interim report on the implementation of the Programme, including information on the distribution of support among SMEs, the geographic distribution of supported entities across the Union and associated countries, the thematic distribution of supported activities, and any significant concentrations of funding among recipients or sectors. Additionally to the interim report, the Commission should publish a final report at the end of the implementation of all the actions carried out by the Programme. The reports should be made publicly available and their findings should be presented to the European Parliament.

Or. en

Amendment 64

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) The Programme aims to support the innovation efforts of non-traditional defence players, and primarily SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups. By providing targeted support, the Programme seeks to accelerate the maturation and fine-tuning of their disruptive technologies and products, and bring them closer to the market, ultimately enhancing their competitiveness and growth.deleted

Or. en

Justification

We propose to delete the paragraph as its content is redundant and was mentioned at least twice above.

Amendment 65

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) The Programme aims to support the innovation efforts of non-traditional defence players, and primarily SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups. By providing targeted support, the Programme seeks to accelerate the maturation and fine-tuning of their disruptive technologies and products, and bring them closer to the market, ultimately enhancing their competitiveness and growth.(16) The Programme aims to support the innovation efforts of non-traditional defence players, and primarily SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups. By providing targeted support, the Programme seeks to accelerate the maturation and fine-tuning of their disruptive technologies and products, and bring them closer to the market, ultimately enhancing their competitiveness and growth. It also facilitates the design and implementation of collaborative partnerships between the world of business, research establishments and the public authorities, thus contributing to the development of a European defence innovation ecosystem. By supporting projects with a high potential for technological and strategic impact, the initiative seeks to strengthen the technological autonomy and resilience of the defence industry, and to stimulate knowledge transfer and the rapid market uptake of innovative solutions.

Or. ro

Amendment 66

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) The Programme aims to support the innovation efforts of non-traditional defence players, and primarily SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups. By providing targeted support, the Programme seeks to accelerate the maturation and fine-tuning of their disruptive technologies and products, and bring them closer to the market, ultimately enhancing their competitiveness and growth.(16) The Programme aims to support the innovation efforts of non-traditional defence players, and primarily SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups. By providing targeted support, the Programme seeks to accelerate the maturation and fine-tuning of their disruptive technologies and products, and bring them closer to the market, ultimately enhancing their competitiveness and growth. Entities involved in actions under this Programme should strive to ensure compliance with NATO standards and other relevant standards, thus reducing any excessive differentiation of defence products across the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 67

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) The Programme aims to support the innovation efforts of non-traditional defence players, and primarily SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups. By providing targeted support, the Programme seeks to accelerate the maturation and fine-tuning of their disruptive technologies and products, and bring them closer to the market, ultimately enhancing their competitiveness and growth.(16) The Programme aims to support the innovation efforts of non-traditional defence players, and primarily SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups. By providing targeted support, the Programme seeks to accelerate the maturation and fine- tuning of their disruptive technologies and products, and bring them closer to the market, ultimately enhancing their competitiveness and growth. By supporting non-traditional defence players, the Programme equally aims to facilitate the creation of new European supply chains in the defence domain.

Or. en

Amendment 68

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) The Programme aims to support the innovation efforts of non-traditional defence players, and primarily SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups. By providing targeted support, the Programme seeks to accelerate the maturation and fine-tuning of their disruptive technologies and products, and bring them closer to the market, ultimately enhancing their competitiveness and growth.(16) The Programme aims to support the innovation efforts of non-traditional defence players, and primarily SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups. By providing targeted support, the Programme seeks to accelerate the maturation and fine-tuning of their disruptive technologies and products, and bring them closer to the market, including through mechanisms enabling uptake for successful products, ultimately enhancing their competitiveness and growth.

Or. en

Amendment 69

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16 a) Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has caused tremendous damage in Ukraine, with estimated recovery and reconstruction costs of EUR 506 000 000 000 as of 31 December 2024. Moreover, Ukraine has lost access to international financial markets and experienced a significant drop in public revenue, while public expenditure has increased substantially. Against that background, it can be envisaged that Ukraine will have substantive funding needs in the coming years. For that reason, Ukraine should not be required to contribute financially to the Programme in order to be associated to it.

Or. en

Amendment 70

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 17

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(17) As the AGILE Programme aims to support the innovation capacity of the Union’s defence industry, only legal entities which are established in the EU or in associated third countries and are not subject to control by non-associated third countries or by non-associated third-country entities should be eligible for support. Additionally, to protect the essential security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, the infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources of the recipients and subcontractors involved in an action supported by the Programme should be located on the territory of a Member State or of an associated third country for the entire duration of an action, and the recipients should have their executive management structures in the EU or in an associated third country. To safeguard these essential security and defence interests, those eligibility criteria should also apply to funding provided through procurement.(17) As the AGILE Programme aims to support the innovation capacity of the Union’s defence industry, only legal entities which are established in the EU or in associated third countries and are not subject to control by non-associated third countries or by non-associated third-country entities should be eligible for support. These requirements should be applied in a manner that protects the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, while avoiding unnecessary disruption of access to trusted allied technologies, components and supply chains where no readily available Union or associated-country alternative exists in time, quality or scale and where appropriate safeguards are in place. Additionally, to protect the essential security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, the infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources of the recipients and subcontractors involved in an action supported by the Programme should be located on the territory of a Member State or of an associated third country for the entire duration of an action, and the recipients should have their executive management structures in the EU or in an associated third country. To safeguard these essential security and defence interests, those eligibility criteria should also apply to funding provided through procurement.

Or. en

Amendment 71

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 17

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(17) As the AGILE Programme aims to support the innovation capacity of the Union’s defence industry, only legal entities which are established in the EU or in associated third countries and are not subject to control by non-associated third countries or by non-associated third-country entities should be eligible for support. Additionally, to protect the essential security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, the infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources of the recipients and subcontractors involved in an action supported by the Programme should be located on the territory of a Member State or of an associated third country for the entire duration of an action, and the recipients should have their executive management structures in the EU or in an associated third country. To safeguard these essential security and defence interests, those eligibility criteria should also apply to funding provided through procurement.(17) As the AGILE Programme aims to support the innovation capacity of the Union’s defence industry, only legal entities which are established in the EU or in associated third countries and are not subject to control by non-associated third countries or by non-associated third-country entities should be eligible for support. Additionally, to protect the essential security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, the infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources of the recipients and subcontractors involved in an action supported by the Programme should be located on the territory of a Member State or of an associated third country for the entire duration of an action, and the recipients should have their executive management structures in the EU or in an associated third country, and only consist of representatives from the EU with the experience needed to be involved in such actions. To safeguard these essential security and defence interests, those eligibility criteria should also apply to funding provided through procurement.

Or. ro

Amendment 72

Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 17

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(17) As the AGILE Programme aims to support the innovation capacity of the Union’s defence industry, only legal entities which are established in the EU or in associated third countries and are not subject to control by non-associated third countries or by non-associated third-country entities should be eligible for support. Additionally, to protect the essential security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, the infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources of the recipients and subcontractors involved in an action supported by the Programme should be located on the territory of a Member State or of an associated third country for the entire duration of an action, and the recipients should have their executive management structures in the EU or in an associated third country. To safeguard these essential security and defence interests, those eligibility criteria should also apply to funding provided through procurement.(17) As the AGILE Programme aims to support the innovation capacity of the Union’s defence industry, only legal entities which are established in the EU or, where duly justified, in associated third countries and are not subject to control by non-associated third countries or by non-associated third-country entities should be eligible for support. Additionally, to protect the essential security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, the infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources of the recipients and subcontractors involved in an action supported by the Programme should be located on the territory of a Member State or of an associated third country for the entire duration of an action, and the recipients should have their executive management structures in the EU or in an associated third country. To safeguard these essential security and defence interests, those eligibility criteria should also apply to funding provided through procurement.

Or. fr

Amendment 73

Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) The interim evaluation of the European Defence Fund (EDF) has shown that the administrative burden and time required to provide guarantees when an EU-established recipient is controlled by a non-associated third country or entity are incompatible with the speed and flexibility necessary for effective programme implementation. To address this challenge and facilitate the swift implementation of the Programme, derogations from the principle that recipients must not be controlled by entities established outside the EU or associated countries should not be permitted. Practice from previous defence industry programmes also indicates that the provision of guarantees results in additional procedural complexity and longer evaluation periods, while removing this exception is unlikely to significantly affect the number of eligible entities.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 74

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) The interim evaluation of the European Defence Fund (EDF) has shown that the administrative burden and time required to provide guarantees when an EU-established recipient is controlled by a non-associated third country or entity are incompatible with the speed and flexibility necessary for effective programme implementation. To address this challenge and facilitate the swift implementation of the Programme, derogations from the principle that recipients must not be controlled by entities established outside the EU or associated countries should not be permitted. Practice from previous defence industry programmes also indicates that the provision of guarantees results in additional procedural complexity and longer evaluation periods, while removing this exception is unlikely to significantly affect the number of eligible entities.(18) The interim evaluation of the European Defence Fund (EDF) has shown that the administrative burden and time required to provide guarantees when an EU-established recipient is controlled by a non-associated third country or entity may be incompatible with the speed and flexibility necessary for effective programme implementation. To address this challenge, derogations from the principle that recipients must not be controlled by entities established outside the EU or associated third countries should be permitted only on an exceptional and duly justified basis, where such participation contributes substantially to the objectives of the Programme, does not contravene the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, and is subject to appropriate guarantees. Such guarantees should be proportionate and may take into account equivalent eligibility conditions previously verified and confirmed under other Union defence industrial programmes.

Or. en

Justification

This amendment introduces a more proportionate and operationally realistic approach to participation rules under the AGILE Programme. While ensuring rapid implementation and minimising administrative burden remain important objectives, a blanket exclusion of entities controlled by non-associated third-country entities may unintentionally limit the participation of innovative companies operating within trusted transatlantic and allied defence ecosystems. In strategic and dual-use sectors, innovative SMEs and startups often rely on internationally integrated investment and technology ecosystems. Allowing limited and duly justified derogations, subject to appropriate safeguards, would preserve the Union’s security and defence interests while ensuring that the Programme remains accessible to innovative and operationally relevant actors contributing to the Union’s defence readiness and technological resilience.

Amendment 75

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18 a) For the purposes of the derogation concerning control by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third-country entity, the assessment of whether participation is consistent with the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States may take into account, inter alia, whether the relevant third country is a NATO ally or has an established security and defence partnership with the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 76

Željana Zovko

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19) To ensure Member States’ armed forces can benefit from cutting-edge technologies and innovation, the Programme should be able to provide incentives to attract SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, established outside the EU or associated third countries but have the potential to contribute significantly to the achievement of the Programme’s objectives. To this end, the work programme should be able to identify certain award procedures under which such SMEs may participate in the AGILE programme even if they do not yet meet the eligibility requirementsrelating to their establishment or the establishment of their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country (inducement intervention). Under this approach, recipients would be granted a temporary and conditional waiver of such eligibility requirements, which they would have to comply with within the timeline specified in the legal commitment to receive Union support. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be made once the eligibility requirements have been fulfilled by the end of the waiver period.(19) To ensure Member States' armed forces can benefit from cutting-edge technologies and innovation, the Programme should be able to provide incentives to attract SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, established outside the EU or associated third countries but have the potential to contribute significantly to the achievement of the Programme's objectives. Special attention should be given to ensuring balanced participation opportunities for SMEs, start-ups and defence innovators across the Union, including from geographically peripheral regions and Member States with less developed defence innovation ecosystems, so as to avoid excessive concentration of defence innovation capacities within a limited number of innovation hubs and to contribute to a more resilient and geographically balanced European defence technological and industrial base. To this end, the work programme should be able to identify certain award procedures under which such SMEs may participate in the AGILE programme even if they do not yet meet the eligibility requirements relating to their establishment or the establishment of their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country (inducement intervention). Under this approach, recipients would be granted a temporary and conditional waiver of such eligibility requirements, which they would have to comply with within the timeline specified in the legal commitment to receive Union support. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be made once the eligibility requirements have been fulfilled by the end of the waiver period.

Or. en

Justification

Recital 19 currently focuses primarily on attracting innovative companies and technological expertise through the inducement intervention mechanism. While this objective is important, the Programme should also contribute to ensuring balanced participation opportunities for defence innovators across the Union and avoid excessive concentration of defence innovation capacities within a limited number of innovation hubs. Strengthening participation from geographically peripheral regions and Member States with less developed defence innovation ecosystems would contribute to a more resilient, geographically balanced and strategically autonomous European defence technological and industrial base.

Amendment 77

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19) To ensure Member States’ armed forces can benefit from cutting-edge technologies and innovation, the Programme should be able to provide incentives to attract SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, established outside the EU or associated third countries but have the potential to contribute significantly to the achievement of the Programme’s objectives. To this end, the work programme should be able to identify certain award procedures under which such SMEs may participate in the AGILE programme even if they do not yet meet the eligibility requirementsrelating to their establishment or the establishment of their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country (inducement intervention). Under this approach, recipients would be granted a temporary and conditional waiver of such eligibility requirements, which they would have to comply with within the timeline specified in the legal commitment to receive Union support. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be made once the eligibility requirements have been fulfilled by the end of the waiver period.(19) To ensure Member States’ armed forces can benefit from cutting-edge technologies and innovation, the Programme should be able to provide incentives to attract SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, established outside the EU or associated third countries but have the potential to contribute significantly to the achievement of the Programme’s objectives. To this end, the work programme should be able to identify certain award procedures under which such SMEs may participate in the AGILE programme even if they do not yet meet the eligibility requirementsrelating to their establishment or the establishment of their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country (inducement intervention). Under this approach, recipients would be granted a temporary and conditional waiver of such eligibility requirements, which they would have to comply with within the timeline specified in the legal commitment to receive Union support. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be made once the eligibility requirements have been fulfilled by the end of the waiver period. Entities controlled by the EU or associated third countries, relocating from hostile third countries such as Russia, should not be eligible for funding as their participation could undermine the security and defence interests of the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 78

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19) To ensure Member States’ armed forces can benefit from cutting-edge technologies and innovation, the Programme should be able to provide incentives to attract SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, established outside the EU or associated third countries but have the potential to contribute significantly to the achievement of the Programme’s objectives. To this end, the work programme should be able to identify certain award procedures under which such SMEs may participate in the AGILE programme even if they do not yet meet the eligibility requirementsrelating to their establishment or the establishment of their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country (inducement intervention). Under this approach, recipients would be granted a temporary and conditional waiver of such eligibility requirements, which they would have to comply with within the timeline specified in the legal commitment to receive Union support. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be made once the eligibility requirements have been fulfilled by the end of the waiver period.(19) To ensure Member States’ armed forces can benefit from cutting-edge technologies and innovation, the Programme should be able to provide incentives to attract SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, established outside the EU or associated third countries but have the potential to contribute significantly to the achievement of the Programme’s objectives. To this end, the work programme should be able to identify certain award procedures, with well-established criteria and for a clearly defined time period, under which such SMEs may participate in the AGILE programme even if they do not yet meet the eligibility requirements relating to their establishment or the establishment of their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country (inducement intervention). Under this approach, recipients would be granted a temporary and conditional waiver of such eligibility requirements, which they would have to comply with within the timeline specified in the legal commitment to receive Union support and to establish a monitoring procedure throughout the duration of the project. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be made once the eligibility requirements have been fulfilled by the end of the waiver period - failing which the funding received from the EU should be repaid.

Or. ro

Amendment 79

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19) To ensure Member States’ armed forces can benefit from cutting-edge technologies and innovation, the Programme should be able to provide incentives to attract SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, established outside the EU or associated third countries but have the potential to contribute significantly to the achievement of the Programme’s objectives. To this end, the work programme should be able to identify certain award procedures under which such SMEs may participate in the AGILE programme even if they do not yet meet the eligibility requirementsrelating to their establishment or the establishment of their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country (inducement intervention). Under this approach, recipients would be granted a temporary and conditional waiver of such eligibility requirements, which they would have to comply with within the timeline specified in the legal commitment to receive Union support. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be made once the eligibility requirements have been fulfilled by the end of the waiver period.(19) To ensure Member States’ armed forces can benefit from cutting-edge technologies and innovation, the Programme should be able to provide incentives to attract SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, established outside the EU or associated third countries but have the potential to contribute significantly to the achievement of the Programme’s objectives. To this end, the work programme should be able to identify certain award procedures under which such SMEs may participate in the AGILE programme even if they do not yet meet the eligibility requirements relating to their establishment or the establishment of their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country (inducement intervention). Under this approach, recipients would be granted a temporary and conditional waiver of such eligibility requirements, which they would have to comply with within the timeline specified in the legal commitment to receive Union support. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be made once the eligibility requirements have been fulfilled by the end of the waiver period.

Or. en

Amendment 80

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19 a) In line with the programme’s objective to foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, and in order to prioritise the allocation of AGILE funds to start-ups and SMEs that already comply with the eligibility criteria set out in the regulation, the Union financial contribution in the context of inducement intervention should not exceed 10 % of the financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 81

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 20

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country.(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country. However, in order to safeguard the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, and to ensure consistency with Union foreign policy objectives, recipients seeking to benefit from inducement interventions that are established in, or subject to control by entities or individuals from, third countries whose policies or actions are incompatible with the principles and objectives of the Union's common foreign and security policy, including respect for good neighbourly relations, should not be eligible.

Or. en

Amendment 82

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 20

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country.(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country. To avoid undermining the security of supply of the Union’s defence industrial ecosystem, recipients of inducement interventions should fully comply with the eligibility criteria, including as regards their subcontractors, not only for the entire duration of the action but also for five years after receipt of the final payment. The Programme should also provide for a funding cap to prevent inducement interventions from disproportionately diverting resources away from its primary objective of supporting SMEs established in the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 83

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 20

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country.(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country. However, in order to safeguard the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, and to ensure consistency with Union foreign policy objectives, recipients seeking to benefit from inducement interventions that are established in, or subject to control by entities or individuals from third countries whose policies or actions are incompatible with the principles and objectives of the Union's common foreign and security policy, including respect for good neighbourly relations, shall not be eligible.

Or. en

Amendment 84

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 20

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country.(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate, in a limited manner, from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country, within a clearly established and documented timeframe - failing which the funding received from the EU should be repaid.

Or. ro

Amendment 85

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 20

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country.(20) To enable the inducement intervention to achieve its intended purpose, it should be possible to derogate from the eligibility requirement that recipients be established and have their executive management structure in the EU or an associated third country to receive Union support, provided such support specifically aims to facilitate compliance with those eligibility requirements, including by covering the industrial costs associated with the relocation of the company or the establishment of its executive management structure within the EU or an associated third country.

Or. en

Amendment 86

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann, Inese Vaidere

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) Given the need for the actions supported under the AGILE Programme to be implemented within a short timeframe, while minimising the administrative burden on applicants, financing not linked to cost, or simplified cost options, including single lump sums, should be used where the Union support is provided in the form of a grant. Union support should only be provided in the form of reimbursement of actual eligible costs where the objectives of a specific action cannot be achieved in any other way.(21) Given the need for the actions supported under the AGILE Programme to be implemented within a short timeframe, while minimising the administrative burden on applicants, financing not linked to cost, or simplified cost options should be used where the Union support is provided in the form of a grant. Given the need to ensure swift, accessible and results-oriented support for SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scale-ups, grants under the Programme should take the form of lump sums as a preferred way of financing in order to reduce administrative burden, increase predictability for recipients and allow them to focus on the achievement of agreed outputs. Union support should only be provided in the form of reimbursement of actual eligible costs where the objectives of a specific action cannot be achieved in any other way.

Or. en

Amendment 87

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) Given the need for the actions supported under the AGILE Programme to be implemented within a short timeframe, while minimising the administrative burden on applicants, financing not linked to cost, or simplified cost options, including single lump sums, should be used where the Union support is provided in the form of a grant. Union support should only be provided in the form of reimbursement of actual eligible costs where the objectives of a specific action cannot be achieved in any other way.(21) Given the need for the actions supported under the AGILE Programme to be implemented within a short timeframe, while minimising the administrative burden on applicants, financing not linked to cost, or simplified cost options, should be used where the Union support is provided in the form of a grant. Given the need to ensure swift, accessible and results-oriented support for SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scale-ups, grants under the Programme shall take the form of lump sums as a preferred way of financing in order to reduce administrative burden, increase predictability for recipients and allow them to focus on the achievement of agreed outputs. Union support should only be provided in the form of reimbursement of actual eligible costs where the objectives of a specific action cannot be achieved in any other way.

Or. en

Amendment 88

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 22

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(22) The functioning of the defence industry sector does not follow the conventional rules and business models that govern more traditional markets. Demand comes almost exclusively from national governments, which also control all acquisition of defence-related products and technologies, including exports. Therefore, the defence industry, in particular small and non-traditional defence innovators, does not engage in substantial self-funded innovation projects, and Member States and associated third countries often fully fund all related costs. Furthermore, these actors face persistent barriers in accessing finance, including co-financing, in particular private finance for investments, due to the risks market actors associate with such investments. Therefore, leveraging public investment for the Union defence sector is vital, given the compelling need to boost investment in defence innovation. As these measures would not otherwise be undertaken, it appears justified that Union financial support can cover up to 100 % of the eligible costs for actions eligible under the AGILE Programme.(22) The functioning of the defence industry sector does not follow the conventional rules and business models that govern more traditional markets. Demand comes almost exclusively from national governments, which also control all acquisition of defence-related products and technologies, including exports. Therefore, the defence industry, in particular small and non-traditional defence innovators, does not engage in substantial self-funded innovation projects, and Member States and associated third countries often fully fund all related costs. Therefore, leveraging public investment for the Union defence sector is vital, given the compelling need to boost investment in defence innovation. As these measures would not otherwise be undertaken, it appears justified that Union financial support can cover up to 100 % of the eligible costs for actions eligible under the AGILE Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 89

Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 23

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(23) To further simplify and accelerate the submission and evaluation process, the Union support should be provided through a dedicated evaluation procedure, involving certain checks after the award decision has been made. Applicants should be invited to submit proposals together with a short summary. This summary should be evaluated before the proposals are evaluated in full against the relevant award criteria set out in the work programme. This approach is intended to reduce the administrative burden on applicants and provide financial certainty as quickly as possible, while accepting a reasonable level of financial or legal risk to the Union, proportionate to the objectives pursued. The financial interest of the Union should be duly protected, and no financing should be provided until the full evaluation has been completed.(23) To further simplify and accelerate the submission and evaluation process, the Union support should be provided through a dedicated evaluation procedure, involving certain checks after the award decision has been made. Applicants should be invited to submit proposals together with a detailed summary. This summary should be evaluated before the proposals are evaluated in full against the relevant award criteria set out in the work programme. This approach is intended to reduce the administrative burden on applicants and provide financial certainty as quickly as possible, while accepting a reasonable level of financial or legal risk to the Union, proportionate to the objectives pursued. The financial interest of the Union should be duly protected, and no financing should be provided until the full evaluation has been completed.

Or. fr

Amendment 90

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 23 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(23 a) Given the high-risk and high-potential nature of emerging and disruptive defence innovation, the success of the Programme should be assessed at portfolio level. The failure of individual actions to achieve all their expected results should not, in itself, be considered as a failure of the Programme, provided that the portfolio of supported actions generates valuable technological, operational, industrial or investment outcomes, including through testing, validation, integration, market uptake, follow-on investment, lessons learned or the identification of technologies not suitable for further development. The evaluation of the Programme should therefore take into account both successful outcomes and evidence-based learning resulting from unsuccessful or discontinued actions.

Or. en

Amendment 91

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 24

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(24) For the same purpose, it should be possible to derogate from certain obligations under Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 concerning the content of grant applications, the selection criteria, and the evaluation procedure. This would allow the award decision to be adopted and the grant agreement to be signed on the basis of a preliminary assessment of eligibility and selection criteria, relying in particular on applicants’ declarations on honour, including with regard to control requirements. The Commission should adopt award decisions without delay and complete the final evaluation of the relevant criteria within four months of the application deadline. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be provided once the final evaluation has been completed.(24) For the same purpose, it should be possible to derogate from certain obligations under Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 concerning the content of grant applications, the selection criteria, and the evaluation procedure. This would allow the award decision to be adopted and the grant agreement to be signed on the basis of a preliminary assessment of eligibility and selection criteria, relying in particular on applicants’ declarations on honour, including with regard to control requirements. The Commission should adopt award decisions without delay and complete the final evaluation of the relevant criteria within four months of the application deadline, and report regularly to Parliament on the implementation of the Programme and its course. The financial interests of the Union should be duly protected, and payments should only be provided once the final evaluation has been completed.

Or. ro

Amendment 92

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 25

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(25) As an alternative to this accelerated evaluation procedure, and in order for the Union to support innovation solution without initial artificial narrowing or limitation linked to the specific form taken by the Union support, the AGILE Programme should allow for a more flexible and accessible approach to identifying, selecting and supporting innovative projects and ideas, including through instrument-neutral award procedures. Under such an approach, ideas should be assessed and selected based on their merit in contribution to the objectives of the AGILE Programme. The most appropriate and effective budget implementation instrument under the Programme, whether a grant, procurement or another form of support, should be determined only after selection, based on the specific characteristics, requirements and merits of the individual project.(25) As an alternative to this accelerated evaluation procedure, and in order for the Union to support innovation solution without initial artificial narrowing or limitation linked to the specific form taken by the Union support, the AGILE Programme should allow for a more flexible and accessible approach to identifying, selecting and supporting innovative projects and ideas, including through instrument-neutral award procedures. Under such an approach, ideas should be assessed and selected based on their merit in contribution to the objectives of the AGILE Programme. The most appropriate and effective budget implementation instrument under the Programme, whether a grant, procurement or another form of support, should be determined only after selection, based on the specific characteristics, requirements and merits of the individual project. Whenever possible, grants under the Programme should take the form of lump sums.

Or. en

Amendment 93

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 26

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(26) To remain attractive to a broader range of potential applicants and to address an existing gap in the defence innovation cycle, it is necessary and proportionate to allow for costs incurred before the grant application is submitted to be eligible for funding, as provided for in Article 196(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. The AGILE Programme focuses on late-stage development activities that bridge the critical gap between commercialisation and procurement, bringing emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence closer to market readiness and operational deployment. Innovative companies, in particular SMEs, often initiate and self-fund development work before formal funding opportunities become available. This will enable the Programme to support critical innovation actions that started up to three months before the closing of the call for proposals to receive EU support and accelerate their completion, ensuring the timely delivery of results addressing the most urgent challenges faced by the armed forces of Members States and associated third countries.(26) To remain attractive to a broader range of potential applicants and to address an existing gap in the defence innovation cycle, it is necessary and proportionate to allow for costs incurred before the grant application is submitted to be eligible for funding, as provided for in Article 196(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. The AGILE Programme focuses on late-stage development activities that bridge the critical gap between commercialisation and procurement, bringing emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence closer to market readiness and operational deployment that contribute to the industrial resilience and technological sovereignty of the Member States and of associated countries, including along the relevant supply-chains. Innovative companies, in particular SMEs, often initiate and self-fund development work before formal funding opportunities become available. This will enable the Programme to support critical innovation actions that started up to three months before the closing of the call for proposals to receive EU support and accelerate their completion, ensuring the timely delivery of results addressing the most urgent challenges faced by the armed forces of Members States and associated third countries.

Or. en

Amendment 94

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 27 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(27 a) Due to the urgent need to support Ukraine with the most innovative and disruptive products from the EDTIB, any product supported by this Programme should be considered eligible for procurement by Ukraine through Regulation (EU) 2026/467 [Ukraine Support Loan].

Or. en

Amendment 95

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 30

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(30) Given the urgent need to support crucial investments in defence capabilities and particularly in defence innovation in the context of pressing geopolitical challenges it is appropriate to provide for an exception to the eight-week period referred to in Article 4 of Protocol No 1 on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union, annexed to the TEU, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community. On the same basis, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 96

Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 30

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(30) Given the urgent need to support crucial investments in defence capabilities and particularly in defence innovation in the context of pressing geopolitical challenges it is appropriate to provide for an exception to the eight-week period referred to in Article 4 of Protocol No 1 on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union, annexed to the TEU, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community. On the same basis, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.(30) Given the urgent need to support crucial investments in defence capabilities and particularly in defence innovation, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Or. fr

Amendment 97

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 30

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(30) Given the urgent need to support crucial investments in defence capabilities and particularly in defence innovation in the context of pressing geopolitical challenges it is appropriate to provide for an exception to the eight-week period referred to in Article 4 of Protocol No 1 on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union, annexed to the TEU, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community. On the same basis, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.(30) Given the urgent need to support investments in defence capabilities and defence innovation in the context of pressing geopolitical challenges, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. However, the urgency of the measure should not limit democratic scrutiny by national parliaments. The Commission should therefore transmit the work programme, any substantial amendment thereto, and an annual implementation report to national parliaments at the same time as transmission to the European Parliament and the Council.

Or. en

Amendment 98

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 30 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(30 a) In the current geopolitical context, it is essential to ensure complementarity and coherence between Union actions and those of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which remains the cornerstone of collective defence for its members. The Programme should be implemented in a manner consistent with NATO’s strategic objectives, in particular by contributing to enhanced interoperability, operational readiness and the fulfilment of capability targets agreed by Member States within NATO frameworks. Synergies should be ensured with relevant NATO initiatives supporting defence innovation and capability development, including the Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA) and the NATO Innovation Fund, in order to avoid duplication, maximise efficiency of public spending and accelerate the development and uptake of emerging and disruptive technologies, while fully respecting the Union’s decision-making autonomy.

Or. en

Amendment 99

Marta Wcisło

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 30 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(30 a) The Union’s Eastern border regions bordering Russia and Belarus, are exposed to permanent security, hybrid and economic pressures resulting from Russia’s war against Ukraine, militarisation of the Union’s external borders and hostile actions conducted against the European Union. These regions therefore require targeted support, simplified procedures and dedicated financial allocations.

Or. en

Amendment 100

Marta Wcisło

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 30 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(30 b) Security and resilience initiatives on the Union’s Eastern flank, including the Eastern Flank Watch, the Eastern Shield and the Baltic Defence Line should be given high importance given ongoing Russian war.

Or. en

Amendment 101

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann, Inese Vaidere

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 31 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(31 a) Given the pilot nature of the Programme and its implementation within the current Multiannual Financial Framework, the Commission should assess whether the Programme, if successful, should be continued, adapted and reinforced under the 2028–2034 Multiannual Financial Framework. That assessment should examine, in particular, the Programme’s impact on the rapid uptake of innovative defence solutions, the participation of SMEs, startups and scaleups, cooperation with prime contractors and system integrators, and the adequacy of the financial envelope.

Or. en

Amendment 102

Marc Botenga, João Oliveira, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article -1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article-1
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.

Or. en

Amendment 103

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
This Regulation establishes the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE Programme) for the period from 1 January 2027 to 31 December 2027, and lays down its objectives and budget, the forms of funding under the Programme and the rules for providing such funding.This Regulation establishes the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE Programme) for the period from 1 January 2027 to 31 December 2027, and lays down its objectives and budget, the forms of funding under the Programme and the rules for providing such funding, as well as the arrangements for monitoring the implementation of the Programme.

Or. ro

Amendment 104

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2 a) ‘recipient’ means a legal entity with which a funding or financing agreement has been signed or to which a funding or financing decision has been notified;

Or. en

Amendment 105

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(3) ‘defence product’ means goods, services and works that fall within the scope of Article 2 of Directive 2009/81/EC;(3) ‘defence product’ means any defence-related product as referred to in the Annex to Directive 2009/43/EC, as well as works, supplies, services, software and technologies directly related to those products for any and all elements of their life cycle within the meaning of Article 2, point (c), of Directive 2009/81/EC;

Or. en

Justification

The amendment aligns the definition with the terminology already used in other EU defence instruments, notably EDIP, and reflects the nature of emerging and disruptive technologies targeted by the AGILE Programme.The current wording does not sufficiently cover software- and technology-driven defence innovation, including AI, cyber, autonomous and dual-use solutions, which are central to the Programme and often developed by SMEs and start-ups.

Amendment 106

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(3 a) ‘executive management structure’ means a body of a legal entity, appointed in accordance with national law, and, where applicable, reporting to the chief executive officer, which is empowered to establish the legal entity’s strategy, objectives and overall direction, and which oversees and monitors management decision-making;

Or. en

Amendment 107

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, whether through a new technology or technological solution or through the novel integration, adaptation or more effective, faster or more cost-efficient use of existing technologies, products, processes or operational concepts, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;

Or. en

Amendment 108

Christophe Gomart

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product, technology, component, subsystem, sensor, smart material or any other enabling or critical defence technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, or that makes a meaningful contribution to defence systems by responding to the capability needs identified by the Member States, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;

Or. fr

Amendment 109

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action, and that is compatible with international law as well as the highest ethical standards;

Or. en

Amendment 110

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by substantially improving, complementing or replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to reach a high level of operational or technological maturity during or shortly after the action;

Or. en

Justification

The amendment reflects the specific nature of emerging and disruptive technologies where development cycles evolve at very high speed and, over a period of 3 years, technological assumptions, operational needs or battlefield requirements identified at the beginning of an action may substantially evolve or become outdated, requiring projects to adapt accordingly throughout their implementation. The amendment therefore ensures that the Programme remains sufficiently flexible to support breakthrough innovation and rapidly evolving defence capabilities, while maintaining a focus on technologies reaching a high level of operational or technological maturity.

Amendment 111

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means an enhanced or completely new technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete

Or. en

Amendment 112

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is committed to be procured at the end of the action;

Or. en

Amendment 113

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence' means a defence product or technology that: (a) radically transforms the concept or conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing or rendering less effective or obsolete existing defence technologies; and (b) is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;

Or. en

Amendment 114

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence’ means a defence product or technology that brings about a radical change, including a paradigm shift in the concept and conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing existing defence technologies or rendering them obsolete, and that is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;(4) 'emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence' means a defence product or technology that: (a) radically transforms the concept or conduct of defence affairs, including by replacing or rendering less effective or obsolete existing defence technologies; and (b) is expected to be fully exploitable at the end of the action;

Or. en

Amendment 115

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4 a) ‘critical product, technology or component for defence’ means a defence product, technology or component that is essential to meeting the capability needs, or addressing the capability gaps, of Member States’ armed forces, and contributes to strengthening security of supply or reducing strategic dependencies;

Or. en

Justification

This proposal would broaden the scope of the instrument to ensure that innovations proposed by SMEs which address critical capability gaps and close the technological gap faced by Member States’ armed forces, but do not bring about a paradigm shift per se, are covered by its funding.

Amendment 116

Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4 a) 'integration partnership' means a contractual collaboration established after 26 March 2026 between an SME, innovative start-up or scale-up, and a system integrator, aimed at testing, facilitating the integration of, and scaling up emerging or disruptive defence products or technologies within existing systems.

Or. en

Amendment 117

Christophe Gomart

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5) ‘small and medium-sized enterprises’ or ‘SMEs’ means small and medium-sized enterprises as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC.(5) ‘small and medium-sized enterprises’ or 'SMEs' means small and medium-sized enterprises as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, as well as small mid-caps as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to the Commission Recommendation of 21 May 2025 on the definition of small mid-cap enterprises;

Or. fr

Amendment 118

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5 a) ‘classified information’ means information or material, in any form, the unauthorised disclosure of which could cause varying degrees of prejudice to the interests of the Union, or of one or more of the Member States, and which bears an EU classification marking or a corresponding classification marking, as established in the Agreement between the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, regarding the protection of classified information exchanged in the interests of the European Union;

Or. en

Amendment 119

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6 a) ‘results’ means any tangible or intangible effect of a given action, such as data, knowhow or information, whatever its form or nature and whether or not it can be protected, as well as any rights attached to it, including IPRs;

Or. en

Amendment 120

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7 a) ‘sensitive information’ means information and data, including classified information, that is to be protected from unauthorised access or disclosure because of obligations laid down in Union or national law or in order to safeguard the privacy or security of a natural or legal person;

Or. en

Amendment 121

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7 b) ‘non-associated third-country entity’ means a legal entity that is established in a non-associated third country or, where it is established in the Union or in an associated country, that has its executive management structures in a non-associated third country;

Or. en

Amendment 122

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme also aims to create new European supply chains by facilitating matchmaking between innovators that are often non-traditional defence players and prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors with the ultimate goal to close the capability gap identified by the end-users. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.

Or. en

Amendment 123

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most pressing, recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, especially in Member States exposed to heightened security threats, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness and strengthening defence industrial and innovation capacities in regions with less developed defence innovation ecosystems, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.

Or. en

Justification

The proposed amendment aims to ensure that the objectives of the AGILE Programme adequately reflect the Union’s evolving security environment and the urgent need to strengthen defence readiness across all regions of the Union, in particular in Member States exposed to heightened security threats following Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. It is consistent with the strategic priorities identified in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 and the Defence Readiness Roadmap 2030, including the strengthening of the Union’s resilience, defence industrial capacity and technological preparedness. The amendment also addresses persistent disparities in participation and industrial capacity across the Union’s defence innovation ecosystem. In several existing Union defence programmes, entities from Member States with less developed defence innovation ecosystems have faced structural difficulties in accessing funding opportunities and participating as leading beneficiaries. Strengthening defence industrial and innovation capacities across all regions of the Union would contribute to a more balanced, resilient and competitive EDTIB, while reducing strategic dependencies and reinforcing the Union’s overall defence readiness.

Amendment 124

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries across the full technology stack, including hardware components, software libraries, data infrastructure, and supply chain inputs.

Or. en

Amendment 125

Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, including through enhanced interoperability and cooperation with NATO Allies, while reducing strategic dependencies on strategic competitors and non-aligned third countries.

Or. en

Amendment 126

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery and uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence to address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency of operational capabilities of armed forces of Member States and associated countries. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.

Or. en

Amendment 127

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging, disruptive and critical products, technologies and components for defence, and to addressing the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as well as their capability gaps and strategic dependencies, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.

Or. en

Amendment 128

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, and, where relevant contributing to reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.

Or. en

Amendment 129

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups in the European Union, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.

Or. ro

Amendment 130

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting increasing the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence that address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.

Or. en

Amendment 131

Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of European SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.

Or. fr

Amendment 132

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to supporting the rapid delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, with a focus on cost-efficiency. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the rapid innovation capacity of SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, with a view to increasing the rapid and cost-efficient delivery of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence that address the most recent and fast evolving challenges faced by Member States’ armed forces, in particular those stemming from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The Programme shall thereby foster the competitiveness of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) and contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence readiness, while reducing strategic dependencies on non-associated third countries.

Or. en

Amendment 133

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Programme has the following specific objectives:2. In particular, the Programme shall aim to:

Or. en

Amendment 134

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States, especially those exposed to heightened security and defence challenges, and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole, while contributing to a more balanced development of defence innovation capacities across the Union, including in Member States with less developed defence innovation ecosystems.

Or. en

Justification

The proposed amendment aims to ensure that the objectives of the AGILE Programme adequately reflect the Union’s evolving security environment and the urgent need to strengthen defence readiness across all regions of the Union, in particular in Member States exposed to heightened security threats following Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. It is consistent with the strategic priorities identified in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 and the Defence Readiness Roadmap 2030, including the strengthening of the Union’s resilience, defence industrial capacity and technological preparedness. The amendment also addresses persistent disparities in participation and industrial capacity across the Union’s defence innovation ecosystem. In several existing Union defence programmes, entities from Member States with less developed defence innovation ecosystems have faced structural difficulties in accessing funding opportunities and participating as leading beneficiaries. Strengthening defence industrial and innovation capacities across all regions of the Union would contribute to a more balanced, resilient and competitive EDTIB, while reducing strategic dependencies and reinforcing the Union’s overall defence readiness.

Amendment 135

Željana Zovko

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States, including the capacity for rapid operational deployment and iterative adaptation to evolving battlefield and threat conditions, and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union's industry as a whole.

Or. en

Justification

The specific objectives of the Programme as currently drafted focus on accelerating innovation cycles but do not explicitly address the capacity for rapid operational deployment — a critical step between innovation and effective operational use. Modern security environments, as demonstrated by the war in Ukraine, require technologies that are not only developed rapidly but are also designed and validated for swift deployment and continuous adaptation from the outset. This targeted amendment ensures that rapid operational deployment and iterative adaptation to evolving operational conditions are explicitly recognised as dimensions of the Programme's specific objectives, and the operational lessons of recent conflicts.

Amendment 136

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States, tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole, and avoiding excessive concentration of funding in a limited number of Member States or industrial ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 137

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann, Inese Vaidere

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States identified in accordance with Article 16 and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.

Or. en

Amendment 138

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.

Or. en

Amendment 139

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging, disruptive and critical products, technologies and components for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.

Or. en

Amendment 140

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups and scaleups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.

Or. en

Amendment 141

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed across the Union by SMEs, including start-ups, taking into account the urgent needs of Member States and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.(a) to significantly accelerate innovation cycles of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including start-ups, addressing the urgent needs of Member States and associated countries and tapping into the innovation potential of the Union’s industry as a whole.

Or. en

Amendment 142

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) to support the scaling up of start-ups and scaleups developing emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence across the Union and their integration with the supply chains of the EDTIB, thereby enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the EU.

Or. en

Amendment 143

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) to create new European supply chains in the defence sector.

Or. en

Amendment 144

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) to support the uptake by Member States' armed forces, and European defence industrial prime contractors of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, and their scaling up across Europe, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces and enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the EU.(b) to support the uptake by Member States' armed forces of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces.

Or. en

Amendment 145

Hélder Sousa Silva

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) to support the uptake by Member States' armed forces, and European defence industrial prime contractors of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, and their scaling up across Europe, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces and enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the EU.(b) to support the uptake by Member States' armed forces, and European defence industrial prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, including through structured commercial cooperation and supply chain integration, and their scaling up across Europe, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces and enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the EU.

Or. en

Amendment 146

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) to support the uptake by Member States' armed forces, and European defence industrial prime contractors of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, and their scaling up across Europe, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces and enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the EU.(b) to support the uptake by Member States' armed forces, and European defence industrial prime contractors of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, and their scaling up across Europe, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces, supporting a more balanced development of defence innovation capacities across the Union and enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the EU.

Or. en

Amendment 147

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) to support the uptake by Member States' armed forces, and European defence industrial prime contractors of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, and their scaling up across Europe, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces and enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the EU.(b) to significantly increase the uptake by armed forces of the Member States and associated countries, and European defence industrial prime contractors of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, and their scaling up across the Union, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces and enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 148

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) to support the uptake by Member States' armed forces, and European defence industrial prime contractors of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, and their scaling up across Europe, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces and enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the EU.(b) support Member States in rapid procurement, operational deployment and industrial scale-up of emerging and disruptive products and technologies, especially those developed by SMEs, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, and their scaling up across Europe, thereby reinforcing the technological edge of Member States’ armed forces and enhancing the resilience and security of supply for such defence products and technologies across the EU.

Or. en

Amendment 149

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. A significant share of the Programme’s budget shall be directed to SMEs and start-ups operating in Northern, Eastern, and external border regions of the Union, including those contributing to dual-use technologies relevant for defence and security in challenging operational environments.

Or. en

Justification

SMEs and start-ups play a critical role in delivering agile and disruptive innovation in the defence sector. However, entities operating in Northern, Eastern, and external border regions often face structural disadvantages related to geography, market access, and investment flows. Targeted support under the Programme ensures a more balanced participation across the Union while unlocking high-value dual-use innovation in areas particularly relevant for security and resilience.

Amendment 150

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. At least 75% of this financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 shall be dedicated to call for proposals combining actions referred to in points (a), (b) and (d) referred to in Article 10 (1).

Or. en

Amendment 151

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the amounts of additional resources referred to in Article 5 may also be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Programme such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, including the design, set up, testing and certification, operation and maintenance of corporate information technology systems and platforms, as well as information and communication activities, including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, and all other technical and administrative assistance or staff-related expenses incurred by the Commission in managing the Programme.4. The financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the amounts of additional resources referred to in Article 5 may also be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Programme such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, including the design, set up, testing and certification, operation and maintenance of corporate information technology systems and platforms, as well as information and communication activities, including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, and all other technical and administrative assistance or staff-related expenses incurred by the Commission in managing the Programme. Such activities should include measures aimed at ensuring broad awareness of the Programme and facilitating participation across the Union, in particular among SMEs, startups and non-traditional defence actors with limited prior participation in Union programmes.

Or. en

Amendment 152

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the amounts of additional resources referred to in Article 5 may also be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Programme such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, including the design, set up, testing and certification, operation and maintenance of corporate information technology systems and platforms, as well as information and communication activities, including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, and all other technical and administrative assistance or staff-related expenses incurred by the Commission in managing the Programme.4. The financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the amounts of additional resources referred to in Article 5 may also be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Programme such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, including the design, set up, testing and certification, operation and maintenance of corporate information technology systems and platforms, as well as information and communication activities, including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, and all other technical and administrative assistance or staff-related expenses incurred by the Commission in managing the Programme. Expenditure under this paragraph shall not exceed 5 % of the financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1, and expenditure on communication activities shall not exceed 1 % of that financial envelope.

Or. en

Amendment 153

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article4a
Arctic and Northern Dimension Innovation Window
1. A dedicated funding window shall be established under the AGILE Programme to support defence-relevant innovation in Arctic and Northern regions of the Union.
2. This window shall prioritise projects that:
(a) develop dual-use technologies applicable in extreme cold climate conditions.
(b) strengthen resilience of critical infrastructure in sparsely populated and remote areas.
(c) enhance situational awareness, mobility, and logistics in Arctic environments.
(d) support collaboration with research institutions and industry clusters in Northern Member States.
3. Special consideration shall be given to SMEs and research organisations operating in Northern and Eastern border regions of the Union.

Or. en

Justification

The Arctic and Northern regions of the Union have gained increased strategic importance considering the evolving security environment, including Russia’s continued military build-up and destabilising actions in the wider region. These developments underline the need for enhanced preparedness, resilience, and technological capability along the Union’s Northern and Eastern external borders. The specific operational conditions of these regions—such as extreme cold, long distances, and limited infrastructure—require tailored and innovative solutions that are not sufficiently addressed through general funding instruments. Establishing a dedicated innovation window under the Programme will support the development of dual-use technologies and capabilities suited to these environments, particularly in areas such as situational awareness, mobility, and critical infrastructure protection. Furthermore, the amendment strengthens the participation of SMEs and research organisations in Northern and border regions, contributing to a more balanced, resilient, and strategically autonomous European defence technological and industrial base, while reinforcing cooperation among Member States facing similar security challenges.

Amendment 154

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 5deleted
Additional resources
1. Member States, EU institutions, bodies and agencies, third countries, international organisations, international financial institutions, or other third parties, may make additional financial or non-financial contributions available to the Programme, or any of its specific activities or objectives referred to in Article 3. Additional financial contributions shall constitute external assigned revenue within the meaning of Article 21(2), points (a), (d), or (e) or Article 21(5) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.
2. Resources allocated to Member States under shared management may, at the request of the Member State concerned, be transferred to the Programme subject to the conditions set out in the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060. The Commission shall implement those resources directly in accordance with Article 62(1), first subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 or indirectly in accordance with point (c) of that subparagraph. Those resources shall be used for the benefit of the Member State concerned. Where the Commission has not entered into a legal commitment under direct or indirect management for additional amounts thus made available to the Instrument, the corresponding uncommitted amounts may, at the request of the Member State concerned, be transferred back to the source programmes, in accordance with the conditions set out in Regulation (EU) 2021/1060.

Or. en

Amendment 155

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Before awarding support under the Programme, the Commission or the relevant implementing body shall verify that the action is not already adequately supported by another Union programme or instrument. The award decision shall include a statement explaining why support under this Regulation is necessary and does not duplicate funding available under the European Defence Fund, the EU Defence Innovation Scheme, the European Innovation Council, the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform or any other relevant Union instrument.

Or. en

Amendment 156

Marc Botenga, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) Ukraine, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 157

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) other third countries which are NATO allies or have an established security and defence partnership with the Union, on an exceptional and duly justified basis and subject to appropriate safeguards, where such participation is consistent with the security and defence interests of the Member States and the EU and contributes to the objectives of the Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 158

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Third countries standing accused or found guilty of grave violations of international law, particularly violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, war crimes and crimes against humanity, in front of national or international courts and institutions, as well as entities established in those countries and directly or indirectly connected to, benefiting from or contributing to these violations, shall be excluded from receiving funds under the Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 159

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. In accordance with point (a) of Article 196(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, financial contributions may, where relevant and necessary for the implementation of an action, cover actions started and costs incurred prior to the date of the submission of the proposal for those actions, provided that those actions did not start more than three months before the closing of the call for proposals and have not been completed before the signature of the grant agreement.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 160

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. In accordance with point (a) of Article 196(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, financial contributions may, where relevant and necessary for the implementation of an action, cover actions started and costs incurred prior to the date of the submission of the proposal for those actions, provided that those actions did not start more than three months before the closing of the call for proposals and have not been completed before the signature of the grant agreement.3. In accordance with point (a) of Article 196(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, financial contributions may, in exceptional and duly justified cases, cover costs incurred prior to the date of submission of the proposal, provided that:
(a) those costs were incurred after publication of the relevant call for proposals;
(b) the action had not been completed before the signature of the grant agreement;
(c) the applicant demonstrates that the costs were necessary for the implementation of the action; and
(d) the retroactive eligibility of such costs does not distort competition or favour applicants with prior knowledge of the content of the call.

Or. en

Amendment 161

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann, Inese Vaidere

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Where Union funding is provided in the form of a grant, funding shall be provided as financing not linked to costs or simplified cost options, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Funding may be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement only where the objectives of an action cannot be achieved otherwise.4. Where Union funding is provided in the form of a grant, funding shall be provided as financing not linked to costs or simplified cost options, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Whenever possible, grants under the Programme shall take the form of lump sums. Funding may be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement only where the objectives of an action cannot be achieved otherwise.

Or. en

Amendment 162

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Where Union funding is provided in the form of a grant, funding shall be provided as financing not linked to costs or simplified cost options, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Funding may be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement only where the objectives of an action cannot be achieved otherwise.4. Where Union funding is provided in the form of a grant, funding shall be provided as financing not linked to costs or simplified cost options, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Whenever possible, grants under the Programme shall take the form of lump sums. Funding may be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement only where the objectives of an action cannot be achieved otherwise

Or. en

Amendment 163

Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. In accordance with Article 153(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the evaluation committee may be composed partially or fully of independent external experts.5. In accordance with Article 153(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the evaluation committee may be composed partially or fully of independent external experts. Members designated by the European Parliament’s Committee on Security and Defence (SEDE) and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) may participate in the evaluation committee, subject to compliance with applicable confidentiality and security requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 164

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. In accordance with Article 153(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the evaluation committee may be composed partially or fully of independent external experts.5. In accordance with Article 153(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the evaluation committee may be assisted by external experts holding valid personal security clearance, if required by the work programme. By way of derogation from Article 242 of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the list of independent experts shall not be made public.

Or. en

Amendment 165

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. In accordance with Article 153(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the evaluation committee may be composed partially or fully of independent external experts.5. In accordance with Article 153(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the evaluation committee shall be composed partially or fully of independent external experts for actions referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 10 (1), and any combination of such actions.

Or. en

Amendment 166

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. The Commission shall, no later than three months after the conclusion of the AGILE pilot period, submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a structured lessons-learned report assessing:
(a) the effectiveness of simplified award procedures relative to existing EDF benchmarks;
(b) the types of SMEs, including enabling SMEs, successfully reached and their geographical distribution;
(c) the degree to which funded actions reduced identifiable strategic dependencies;
(d) any cybersecurity incidents or vulnerabilities identified during implementation;
(e) the uptake of AGILE-funded solutions by Member States' armed forces.
The report shall include concrete recommendations on whether, and in what form, the AGILE model should be incorporated into the European Competitiveness Fund and the next European Defence Fund cycle. Entities that have successfully completed an AGILE action shall be granted facilitated access to downstream EU funding instruments, including EIC Scale-Up and EDF collaboration grants, through streamlined eligibility recognition procedures.

Or. en

Amendment 167

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. Award procedures and resulting legal commitments shall allow for termination where the objectives of the action are unlikely to be achieved or within the set timelines, or the action has lost its relevance for operational use.

Or. en

Amendment 168

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) entities established in an associated third country;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 169

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) international organisations;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 170

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) SEAPs.

Or. en

Amendment 171

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. For actions supported under the Programme as listed in Article 10, with the exception of actions referred to in point (d) of Article 10 (1), recipients of Union funding shall be SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, and shall comply with the eligibility requirements set out in this Article.3. For actions supported under the Programme as listed in Article 10, with the exception of actions referred to in point (d) of Article 10(1), recipients of Union funding shall be SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, and shall comply with the eligibility requirements set out in this Article. However, for actions referred to in points (b) and (d) of Article 10(1), legal entities other than SMEs, including prime contractors, system integrators and first-tier subcontractors, may also be eligible to receive Union funding where their participation is necessary for the testing, validation, qualification, certification, integration, demonstration, scale-up or market uptake of emerging and disruptive products or technologies for defence developed by SMEs, provided that the action demonstrably benefits SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, and supports their access to defence supply chains and markets.

Or. en

Amendment 172

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. For actions supported under the Programme as listed in Article 10, with the exception of actions referred to in point (d) of Article 10 (1), recipients of Union funding shall be SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, and shall comply with the eligibility requirements set out in this Article.3. For actions supported under the Programme as listed in Article 10, with the exception of actions referred to in point (d) of Article 10(1), recipients of Union funding shall be SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, and shall comply with the eligibility requirements set out in this Article. The work programme may, where duly justified by the nature of the action, allow the participation of additional eligible entities that are necessary to test, validate, certify, integrate, industrialise, scale or deploy the supported solution, including small mid-caps, specialised suppliers, testing and certification bodies, research and technology organisations and manufacturing partners.

Or. en

Amendment 173

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. For actions supported under the Programme as listed in Article 10, with the exception of actions referred to in point (d) of Article 10 (1), recipients of Union funding shall be SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, and shall comply with the eligibility requirements set out in this Article.3. For actions supported under the Programme as listed in Article 10, with the exception of actions referred to in point (d) of Article 10 (1), recipients of Union funding shall be SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, and shall comply with the eligibility requirements set out in this Article. Where an action involves prime contractors, first-tier subcontractors or other undertakings that are not SMEs, the work programme and the legal commitment shall ensure that SMEs remain the principal beneficiaries of Union support and retain appropriate ownership or access rights in relation to the results they generate.

Or. en

Amendment 174

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. For actions supported under the Programme as listed in Article 10, with the exception of actions referred to in point (d) of Article 10 (1), recipients of Union funding shall be SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, and shall comply with the eligibility requirements set out in this Article.3. For actions supported under the Programme as listed in Article 10, with the exception of actions referred to in point (d) of Article 10 (1), recipients of Union funding shall primarily be SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, acting either individually or, where appropriate and justified, in small-scale consortia, and shall comply with the eligibility requirements set out in this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 175

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Research and technology organisations, technical universities, incubators and other innovation support entities may also participate in actions supported under the Programme and receive Union funding, in particular where they cooperate with SMEs, startups and scaleups in the development, testing, validation, demonstration or refinement of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including by providing access to testing, validation and demonstration facilities and capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 176

Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Prime contractors that have entered into an integration partnership with an SME, innovative start-up, or scale-up shall be considered eligible under this Regulation, provided that they have satisfied the eligibility conditions — in particular those relating to guarantees provided by the Member State or associated country in which they are established.

Or. en

Amendment 177

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Except for actions referred to in point (c) of Article 10 (1), recipients shall be established in the EU or in an associated third country, have their executive management structures in the EU or an associated third country.4. Except for actions referred to in point (c) of Article 10 (1), recipients and subcontractors shall be established in the EU or in an associated third country, have their executive management structures in the EU or an associated third country.

Or. en

Amendment 178

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Except for actions referred to in point (c) of Article 10 (1), recipients shall be established in the EU or in an associated third country, have their executive management structures in the EU or an associated third country.4. Except for actions referred to in point (c) of Article 10 (1), recipients shall be established in the EU or in an associated third country, have their executive management structures in the EU.

Or. en

Amendment 179

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. For actions supported under the Programme as listed in Article 10, points (a) and (b), and any combination of actions involving such type of actions, the Union support shall only be granted to actions carried out by a consortium of at least two legal entities, including an SME and either a contracting authority from a Member State or an Associated country or an international organisation, or a contracting entity consisting in a European defence industrial prime contractor.

Or. en

Amendment 180

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Recipients shall not be subject to control by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third-country entity.5. Recipients and subcontractors shall not be subject to control by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third-country entity.

Or. en

Amendment 181

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. By way of derogation from paragraphs 4 and 5, a legal entity established in the EU or in an associated third country, or having its executive management structures therein, and controlled by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third-country entity may, on an exceptional and duly justified basis, be eligible to receive Union funding where its participation:
a) contributes substantially to the achievement of the objectives of the Programme;
b) does not contravene the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States; and
c) is supported by guarantees approved by the Member State or the associated third country in which the legal entity is established, in accordance with its national procedures.

Or. en

Amendment 182

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. For the purposes of paragraph 5, applicants shall disclose their direct and indirect beneficial ownership, voting rights, shareholder agreements, veto rights, special rights, financing arrangements and other arrangements capable of conferring decisive influence. The Commission or the relevant implementing body shall verify such information before signature of any legal commitment and shall reject applicants where the information provided is incomplete, misleading or insufficient to exclude control by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third-country entity.

Or. en

Amendment 183

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 b. The guarantees referred to in paragraph 5a shall substantiate, in particular, that:
a) control over the legal entity is not exercised in a manner that restrains or restricts its ability to carry out the action and to deliver results, or that imposes restrictions concerning its infrastructure, facilities, assets, resources, intellectual property or know-how needed for the purposes of the action;
b) access by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third-country entity to sensitive information relating to the action is prevented;
c) appropriate measures are in place to ensure security of supply and continuity of performance of the action; and
d) the action and its results comply with Articles 15 and 19.

Or. en

Amendment 184

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources of the recipients of Union funding which are used for the purposes of the funded action shall be located on the territory of a Member State or of an associated third country for the entire duration of the action.6. The infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources of recipients of Union funding and of their subcontractors, which are used for the purposes of the funded action, shall be located on the territory of a Member State or of an associated third country for the entire duration of the action.

Or. en

Amendment 185

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Where recipients of Union funding involved in an action have no readily available alternatives or relevant infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources in the Union or in an associated third country, they may use their infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources which are located or held outside the territory of the Member States or of the associated third countries, provided that this use does not contravene the security and defence interests of the EU and its Member States, including respect for the principle of good neighbourly relations, and is consistent with the objectives set out in Article 3. The costs related to activities using such infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources shall not be eligible for support from the Programme.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 186

Christophe Gomart

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Where recipients of Union funding involved in an action have no readily available alternatives or relevant infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources in the Union or in an associated third country, they may use their infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources which are located or held outside the territory of the Member States or of the associated third countries, provided that this use does not contravene the security and defence interests of the EU and its Member States, including respect for the principle of good neighbourly relations, and is consistent with the objectives set out in Article 3. The costs related to activities using such infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources shall not be eligible for support from the Programme.7. Where recipients of Union funding involved in an action have no readily available alternatives or relevant infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources in the Union or in an associated third country, they may use their infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources which are located or held outside the territory of the Member States or of the associated third countries, provided that this use does not contravene the security and defence interests of the EU and its Member States, including respect for the principle of good neighbourly relations, and is consistent with the objectives set out in Article 3. The costs related to activities using such infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources shall not be eligible for support from the Programme. Where the actions supported under the Programme are likely to lead to subsequent industrialisation or production, the products and technologies developed shall remain under the aegis of a design authority established in the EU or an associated third country and shall seek to limit dependency on components from non-associated third countries.

Or. fr

Amendment 187

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Where recipients of Union funding involved in an action have no readily available alternatives or relevant infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources in the Union or in an associated third country, they may use their infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources which are located or held outside the territory of the Member States or of the associated third countries, provided that this use does not contravene the security and defence interests of the EU and its Member States, including respect for the principle of good neighbourly relations, and is consistent with the objectives set out in Article 3. The costs related to activities using such infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources shall not be eligible for support from the Programme.7. Where recipients of Union funding or their subcontractors involved in an action have no readily available alternatives or relevant infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources in the Union or in an associated third country, they may use their infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources which are located or held outside the territory of the Member States or of the associated third countries, provided that this use does not contravene the security and defence interests of the EU and its Member States, including respect for the principle of good neighbourly relations, and is consistent with the objectives set out in Article 3. The costs related to activities using such infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources shall not be eligible for support from the Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 188

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Legal entities may be deemed to fulfil the eligibility conditions referred to in this paragraph where they have fulfilled equivalent conditions under Regulations (EU) 2018/109214 , (EU) 2021/69715 , (EU) 2023/152516 , or (EU) 2023/241817 of the European Parliament and of the Council or under Regulation (EU) 2025/110618 and provided that no subsequent changes call into question the fulfilment of those conditions.8. Legal entities may be deemed to fulfil the eligibility conditions referred to in this paragraph where they have fulfilled equivalent conditions under Regulations (EU) 2018/109214 , (EU) 2021/69715 , (EU) 2023/152516 , or (EU) 2023/241817 of the European Parliament and of the Council or under Regulation (EU) 2025/110618provided that the continued fulfilment of the relevant eligibility criteria is verified and confirmed by the Commission, and that no subsequent changes call into question the fulfilment of those conditions.
14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union's defence industry (OJ L 200, 7.8.2018, p. 30, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1092/oj).14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union's defence industry (OJ L 200, 7.8.2018, p. 30, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1092/oj).
15 Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 149, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/697/oj).15 Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 149, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/697/oj).
16 Regulation (EU) 2023/1525 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 2023 on supporting ammunition production (ASAP) (OJ L 185, 24.7.2023, p. 7, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1525/oj).16 Regulation (EU) 2023/1525 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 2023 on supporting ammunition production (ASAP) (OJ L 185, 24.7.2023, p. 7, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1525/oj).
17 Regulation (EU) 2023/2418 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on establishing an instrument for the reinforcement of the European defence industry through common procurement (EDIRPA) (OJ L, 2023/2418, 26.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2418/oj).17 Regulation (EU) 2023/2418 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on establishing an instrument for the reinforcement of the European defence industry through common procurement (EDIRPA) (OJ L, 2023/2418, 26.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2418/oj).
18 Council Regulation (EU) 2025/1106 of 27 May 2025 establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) through the Reinforcement of the European Defence Industry Instrument, OJ L, 2025/1106, 28.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/1106/oj18 Council Regulation (EU) 2025/1106 of 27 May 2025 establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) through the Reinforcement of the European Defence Industry Instrument, OJ L, 2025/1106, 28.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/1106/oj

Or. en

Justification

While previous assessments under other Union defence programmes may be taken into account for the purposes of simplification and reducing administrative burden, the security-sensitive nature of the Programme requires the continued fulfilment of the relevant eligibility conditions to be verified and confirmed by the Commission, including in light of any subsequent changes that may affect compliance with those conditions. This approach also facilitates the verification that entities benefiting from the derogation mechanism applicable to recipients controlled by non-associated third countries or entities continue to fulfil the relevant eligibility conditions, while ensuring appropriate safeguards for the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States.

Amendment 189

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Legal entities may be deemed to fulfil the eligibility conditions referred to in this paragraph where they have fulfilled equivalent conditions under Regulations (EU) 2018/109214 , (EU) 2021/69715 , (EU) 2023/152516 , or (EU) 2023/241817 of the European Parliament and of the Council or under Regulation (EU) 2025/110618 and provided that no subsequent changes call into question the fulfilment of those conditions.8. Legal entities may be deemed to fulfil the eligibility conditions referred to in this paragraph where they have fulfilled equivalent conditions under Regulations (EU) 2018/109214 , (EU) 2021/69715 , (EU) 2023/152516 , (EU) 2023/241817 , or (EU) 2025/2643 of the European Parliament and of the Council or under Regulation (EU) 2025/110618 and provided that no subsequent changes call into question the fulfilment of those conditions.
14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union's defence industry (OJ L 200, 7.8.2018, p. 30, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1092/oj).14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union's defence industry (OJ L 200, 7.8.2018, p. 30, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1092/oj).
15 Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 149, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/697/oj).15 Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 149, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/697/oj).
16 Regulation (EU) 2023/1525 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 2023 on supporting ammunition production (ASAP) (OJ L 185, 24.7.2023, p. 7, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1525/oj).16 Regulation (EU) 2023/1525 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 2023 on supporting ammunition production (ASAP) (OJ L 185, 24.7.2023, p. 7, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1525/oj).
17 Regulation (EU) 2023/2418 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on establishing an instrument for the reinforcement of the European defence industry through common procurement (EDIRPA) (OJ L, 2023/2418, 26.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2418/oj).17 Regulation (EU) 2023/2418 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on establishing an instrument for the reinforcement of the European defence industry through common procurement (EDIRPA) (OJ L, 2023/2418, 26.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2418/oj).
18 Council Regulation (EU) 2025/1106 of 27 May 2025 establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) through the Reinforcement of the European Defence Industry Instrument, OJ L, 2025/1106, 28.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/1106/oj18 Council Regulation (EU) 2025/1106 of 27 May 2025 establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) through the Reinforcement of the European Defence Industry Instrument, OJ L, 2025/1106, 28.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/1106/oj

Or. en

Amendment 190

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Legal entities may be deemed to fulfil the eligibility conditions referred to in this paragraph where they have fulfilled equivalent conditions under Regulations (EU) 2018/109214 , (EU) 2021/69715 , (EU) 2023/152516 , or (EU) 2023/241817 of the European Parliament and of the Council or under Regulation (EU) 2025/110618 and provided that no subsequent changes call into question the fulfilment of those conditions.8. Legal entities may be deemed to fulfil the eligibility conditions referred to in this paragraph where they have fulfilled equivalent conditions under Regulations (EU) 2018/109214 , (EU) 2021/69715 , (EU) 2023/152516 , (EU) 2023/241817 or (EU) 2025/2643 of the European Parliament and of the Council or under Regulation (EU) 2025/110618 and provided that no subsequent changes call into question the fulfilment of those conditions.
14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union's defence industry (OJ L 200, 7.8.2018, p. 30, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1092/oj).14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union's defence industry (OJ L 200, 7.8.2018, p. 30, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1092/oj).
15 Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 149, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/697/oj).15 Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 149, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/697/oj).
16 Regulation (EU) 2023/1525 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 2023 on supporting ammunition production (ASAP) (OJ L 185, 24.7.2023, p. 7, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1525/oj).16 Regulation (EU) 2023/1525 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 2023 on supporting ammunition production (ASAP) (OJ L 185, 24.7.2023, p. 7, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1525/oj).
17 Regulation (EU) 2023/2418 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on establishing an instrument for the reinforcement of the European defence industry through common procurement (EDIRPA) (OJ L, 2023/2418, 26.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2418/oj).17 Regulation (EU) 2023/2418 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on establishing an instrument for the reinforcement of the European defence industry through common procurement (EDIRPA) (OJ L, 2023/2418, 26.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2418/oj).
18 Council Regulation (EU) 2025/1106 of 27 May 2025 establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) through the Reinforcement of the European Defence Industry Instrument, OJ L, 2025/1106, 28.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/1106/oj18 Council Regulation (EU) 2025/1106 of 27 May 2025 establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) through the Reinforcement of the European Defence Industry Instrument, OJ L, 2025/1106, 28.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/1106/oj

Or. en

Amendment 191

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 9 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) actions or parts thereof, that are already fully financed from other public or private sources, except contributions from the Union in the context of synergy actions referred to in Article 6;(a) actions or parts thereof, that are already fully financed from other public or private sources;

Or. en

Amendment 192

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 9 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) actions for the development of products and technologies the use, development or production of which is prohibited by applicable international law.(b) actions for the development of products and technologies the use, development or production of which is prohibited by applicable international law binding on the relevant Member State or entity.

Or. en

Justification

Member States are not uniformly bound by the same international obligations in the field of defence. For example, in response to the deteriorating security environment and increased military threats posed by Russia, several Member States bordering Russia and Belarus, including Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Finland, have withdrawn from, or initiated withdrawal from, the Ottawa Convention.

Amendment 193

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 9 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) actions related to lethal autonomous systems that operate outside a responsible chain of human command and control or that cannot be used in compliance with international humanitarian law;

Or. en

Amendment 194

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 9 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) actions involving companies or other entities operating in illegally occupied territories or otherwise involved in violations of human rights or international law;

Or. en

Amendment 195

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 9 – point b b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b b) projects aimed at developing, directly or indirectly, AI weapons and lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS).

Or. en

Amendment 196

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article9a
Actions supported under the Programme shall integrate appropriate cybersecurity and cyber resilience safeguards, including secure-by-design approaches, supply chain security measures, vulnerability management procedures and resilience testing, where relevant to the supported technology or product. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, specify minimum cybersecurity standards tailored to the technology categories funded under the Programme, in coordination with ENISA and the European Defence Agency. Beneficiaries shall notify the Commission and the relevant national cybersecurity authority without undue delay of any significant cybersecurity incident affecting an AGILE-funded action.

Or. en

Amendment 197

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) support for the fast development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including where it is based on integration and adaptation of civilian technologies with dual use potential for defence purposes;(a) support for the fast development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through the integration, adaptation or enhancement of civilian and dual-use technologies for defence purposes, such as software-based, AI-enabled and autonomous technologies,

Or. en

Amendment 198

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) support for the fast development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including where it is based on integration and adaptation of civilian technologies with dual use potential for defence purposes;(a) support for the fast development, based on a competitive development environment, of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including where it is based on integration and adaptation of civilian technologies with dual use potential for defence purposes;

Or. en

Amendment 199

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) support for the fast development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including where it is based on integration and adaptation of civilian technologies with dual use potential for defence purposes;(a) support for the fast development of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, where it is based on integration and adaptation of civilian technologies with dual use potential for defence purposes;

Or. en

Amendment 200

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) support for the fast development of critical products, technologies or components for defence, where such actions contribute to strengthening security of supply, mastering critical defence technologies, or addressing capability gaps of Member States’ armed forces;

Or. en

Amendment 201

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) support for the fast development of components necessary for the production of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence in the context of localization of supply chains in the Union and associated countries;

Or. en

Amendment 202

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 203

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand;(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations, support to aggregation of demand, and cooperation between SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, and European defence industrial prime contractors, system integrators and first-tier subcontractors, with a view to facilitating integration into defence supply chains and operational deployment;

Or. en

Amendment 204

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand;(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations, including through cooperation with research and technology organisations, technical universities and other testing and innovation support entities providing access to testing, validation and demonstration facilities and capabilities, and including through support to aggregation of demand;

Or. en

Amendment 205

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand;(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand, as well as through facilitating access to relevant industrial infrastructures and integration into industrial value chains;

Or. en

Amendment 206

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand;(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through support for joint procurement commitments, framework acquisition arrangements, and co-financing mechanisms linked to national or multinational procurement programmes;

Or. en

Amendment 207

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand;(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, through dedicated and iterative field testing particularly in wartime conditions, for example in Ukraine, and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand;

Or. en

Amendment 208

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) support for the market uptake of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand;(b) support for the market uptake of emerging, disruptive and critical products, technologies and components for defence, including through dedicated and iterative field testing and demonstrations and including through support to aggregation of demand;

Or. en

Amendment 209

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) support for the establishment of an entity or of its executive management structure in the EU or in an associated third country for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 210

Christophe Gomart

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) support for the establishment of an entity or of its executive management structure in the EU or in an associated third country for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b);(c) support for the establishment of an entity or of its executive management structure in the EU or in an associated third country for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), provided that this establishment helps place a strategically important industry on a firm, lasting footing in the Union or an associated third country, including through significant research, development, production or innovation activities. Entities benefiting from support under the first point shall demonstrate their commitment to becoming an established part of the European defence technological and industrial base and shall not be eligible for support where the main aim of their establishment is to access EU funding;

Or. fr

Amendment 211

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) support for the establishment of an entity or of its executive management structure in the EU or in an associated third country for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b);(c) support, only where strictly necessary for the implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), for the establishment of an entity or of its executive management structure in the Union or in an associated third country, provided that such support does not cover general corporate relocation costs, marketing costs, acquisition costs, legal restructuring unrelated to the funded action, or costs that would have been incurred irrespective of Union support;

Or. en

Amendment 212

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) support for the establishment of an entity or of its executive management structure in the EU or in an associated third country for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b);(c) support for the establishment of an entity or of its executive management structure in the EU or in an associated third country for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b) to cover exclusively costs related to research, development, testing, certification, qualification and related ancillary costs;

Or. en

Amendment 213

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities.(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities, including post-testing matchmaking, investment-readiness support and integration support between beneficiaries and Member States’ armed forces, relevant European defence industrial actors, including prime contractors, system integrators and first-tier subcontractors, and private investors, with a view to facilitating market uptake, access to scale-up financing and integration into complex defence systems.

Or. en

Amendment 214

Christophe Gomart

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities.(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities, including with the involvement of other legal entities such as large industrial groups, research and technology organisations (RTOs) and public entities, particularly by means of subcontracting, technology transfer, technical assistance, access to industrial capabilities and industrialisation support;

Or. fr

Amendment 215

Željana Zovko

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities.(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, including through defence innovation sandbox environments enabling rapid testing, experimentation and validation of emerging technologies and operational concepts under controlled yet operationally realistic conditions and with simplified administrative procedures, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities.

Or. en

Justification

Article 10(1)(d) lists supporting actions eligible under the Programme but does not currently include dedicated testing and experimentation environments tailored to the needs of non-traditional defence actors. Defence innovation sandbox environments, operating under simplified procedures and in operationally realistic conditions, would directly address barriers faced by SMEs and start-ups in accessing existing testing infrastructure.

Amendment 216

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities.(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities, including enabling digital and data infrastructures, AI orchestration layers, platform engineering capabilities, and sovereign hardware and semiconductor components necessary for AI inference and deployment.

Or. en

Amendment 217

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities.(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities, as well as support for the participation of research and technology organisations, technical universities, incubators, start-up support initiatives and other innovation support structures.

Or. en

Amendment 218

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) supporting action necessary for the effective implementation of actions under points (a) and (b), including but not limited to qualification, certification, access to infrastructure, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities.(d) including but not limited to qualification, certification, validation, conformity assessment, mutual recognition of testing, qualification and certification results across Member States, access to infrastructure and testing sites, access to innovative manufacturing capacities and processes, skills development, procurement of studies and ecosystem building and strengthening activities.

Or. en

Amendment 219

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) support the development and use of testing and validation environments located in extreme climate regions, including Arctic and sub-Arctic areas, in order to accelerate the deployment of innovative defence solutions and enhance interoperability among Member States.

Or. en

Justification

Defence technologies must be validated in realistic operational environments to ensure reliability and effectiveness. Arctic and sub-Arctic regions provide unique testing conditions that cannot be replicated elsewhere in the Union. Supporting such test environments enhances the quality, interoperability, and deployment readiness of EU-funded innovations while strengthening the Union’s technological edge in extreme conditions.

Amendment 220

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d b) support, in accordance with applicable rules, collaborative activities involving entities from Member States and partner countries in the Arctic and Baltic regions, with a view to strengthening interoperability, supply chain resilience, and joint capability development.

Or. en

Justification

Cooperation with neighbouring countries in the Arctic and Baltic regions enables the Union to benefit from shared expertise, compatible operational environments, and existing industrial linkages. Such collaboration strengthens interoperability, enhances supply chain resilience, and contributes to regional stability, while remaining fully aligned with the Programme’s governance and eligibility framework.

Amendment 221

Željana Zovko

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Programme may provide support for actions covering the swift upgrade of existing products and technologies provided that the use of pre-existing information, intellectual property, or other rights necessary to carry out the action are not subject to a restriction by a non-associated third country or a non-associated third-country entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediary legal entities, which would prevent the effective implementation of the action.2. The Programme may provide support for actions covering the swift upgrade, adaptation and operational enhancement of existing products and technologies, including through software-based modifications and the integration of emerging civilian technologies for defence purposes, provided that the use of pre-existing information, intellectual property, or other rights necessary to carry out the action are not subject to a restriction by a non-associated third country or a non-associated third-country entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediary legal entities, which would prevent the effective implementation of the action.

Or. en

Justification

Modern conflicts, particularly Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, have demonstrated the importance of rapidly adapting and operationally enhancing existing systems, including through software updates and the integration of civilian technologies for defence purposes. This amendment clarifies that the Programme may support such activities as part of its objective of delivering rapid and operationally relevant defence innovation, while maintaining existing safeguards regarding intellectual property and third-country restrictions.

Amendment 222

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Programme may provide support for actions covering the swift upgrade of existing products and technologies provided that the use of pre-existing information, intellectual property, or other rights necessary to carry out the action are not subject to a restriction by a non-associated third country or a non-associated third-country entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediary legal entities, which would prevent the effective implementation of the action.2. The Programme may provide support for actions covering the swift upgrade, adaptation, iterative improvement and modernisation of existing products and technologies, including where this requires the use of pre-existing information, intellectual property, components or other rights, provided that any restrictions attached thereto by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third-country entity, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediary legal entities, do not materially prevent the effective implementation of the action, do not undermine the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, and do not render the results inconsistent with Article 15.

Or. en

Amendment 223

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Recipients of the Programme shall benefit, where possible and appropriate, from fast-track access to EU testing and experimentation facilities and to the EUDIS Business Accelerator.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 224

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Recipients of the Programme shall benefit, where possible and appropriate, from fast-track access to EU testing and experimentation facilities and to the EUDIS Business Accelerator.3. Recipients of the Programme shall benefit, where possible and appropriate, from fast-track access to EU testing and experimentation facilities and to the EUDIS Business Accelerator, and shall be included by the Commission in the Military Sales Catalogue established under Regulation (EU) 2025/2643 [EDIP].

Or. en

Amendment 225

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Recipients of the Programme shall benefit, where possible and appropriate, from fast-track access to EU testing and experimentation facilities and to the EUDIS Business Accelerator.3. Recipients of the Programme shall benefit, where possible and appropriate, from fast-track access to EU testing and experimentation facilities and to the EUDIS Business Accelerator, and shall be included by the Commission in the Military Sales Catalogue established under Regulation (EU) 2025/2643 [EDIP].

Or. en

Amendment 226

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Recipients of the Programme shall benefit, where possible and appropriate, from fast-track access to EU testing and experimentation facilities and to the EUDIS Business Accelerator.3. Recipients of the Programme shall benefit, where possible and appropriate, from fast-track access to EU and associated countries testing and experimentation facilities and to the EUDIS Business Accelerator.

Or. en

Amendment 227

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Recipients of Union funding that are SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups, may use Union funding to purchase services or subcontract specific tasks from other legal entities, including prime contractors, system integrators and first-tier subcontractors, where such services or tasks are necessary for testing, validation, qualification, certification, system integration, demonstration, scale-up or market uptake of the emerging and disruptive products or technologies for defence concerned. Such purchases or subcontracting shall not undermine the objective of the Programme to primarily support SMEs, including innovative startups and scaleups.

Or. en

Amendment 228

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. The results of the programme should be taken into account in the mapping of supply chains linked to emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence in the context of Article 56 of Regulation (EU) 2025/2643 [EDIP].

Or. en

Amendment 229

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. The Commission shall prioritize the mapping of supply chains linked to emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence in the context of Article 56 of Regulation (EU) 2025/2643 [EDIP].

Or. en

Amendment 230

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) disruptiveness potential;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 231

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) disruptiveness potential;(a) disruptiveness potential, including the potential to bring about a radical change through a new technology or technological solution or through the novel integration, adaptation or more effective, faster or more cost-efficient use of existing technologies, products, processes or operational concepts;

Or. en

Amendment 232

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) contribution to strengthening security of supply, mastering critical defence technologies and addressing capability gaps of Member States’ armed forces;

Or. en

Amendment 233

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the quality of the proposal and ability to implement the action;(b) the quality of the proposal and ability to rapidly implement the action;

Or. en

Amendment 234

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) the impact in the defence domain, considering the needs of Member States and associated third countries, including with regard to cost-efficiency, speed of delivery, and readiness for operational use.(c) the impact in the defence domain, considering the needs of Member States and associated third countries, including with regard to cost-efficiency, speed of delivery, and readiness for operational use, as well as the extent to which the action may contribute to strengthening the Union’s defence innovation base, including through cross-border cooperation, diffusion or uptake of results across different Member States where relevant, and to the development and deployment of innovative defence solutions within the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 235

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) the impact in the defence domain, considering the needs of Member States and associated third countries, including with regard to cost-efficiency, speed of delivery, and readiness for operational use.(c) the impact in the defence domain, considering the needs of Member States and associated third countries, including with regard to cost-efficiency, speed of delivery, readiness for operational use and interoperability with NATO, as well as the potential for dual-use applications, civil-military synergies, scalability and contribution to the competitiveness and technological resilience of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base;

Or. en

Amendment 236

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) the impact in the defence domain, considering the needs of Member States and associated third countries, including with regard to cost-efficiency, speed of delivery, and readiness for operational use.(c) the impact in the defence domain, considering the needs of Member States and associated third countries, especially those with high exposure to the risk of materialisation of conventional military threats, including with regard to cost-efficiency;

Or. en

Amendment 237

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) the impact in the defence domain, considering the needs of Member States and associated third countries, including with regard to cost-efficiency, speed of delivery, and readiness for operational use.(c) the impact in the defence domain, considering the needs of Member States, including with regard to cost-efficiency, speed of delivery, and readiness for operational use.

Or. en

Amendment 238

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) speed of delivery, and readiness for operational use demonstrated through commitments for testing or end use of the product in operations;

Or. en

Amendment 239

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) the potential for market uptake and integration within industrial value chains.

Or. en

Amendment 240

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) potential to fill capability gap or expressed need of military personnel in the Union;

Or. en

Amendment 241

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c b) the contribution to the industrial resilience and technological sovereignty of the Union and the associated countries, including along the supply chains of emerging and disruptive product or technology for defence.

Or. en

Amendment 242

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c b) potential for scalability;

Or. en

Amendment 243

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c c) Member State participation and acquisition interest;

Or. en

Amendment 244

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c d) credible procurement pathways.

Or. en

Amendment 245

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. The Programme shall encourage and, where appropriate, prioritise collaborative projects involving entities from Member States located in Northern and Eastern external border regions, and shall promote synergies with partner countries sharing similar operational environments, in full compliance with the Programme’s eligibility rules.

Or. en

Justification

Security challenges at the Union’s external borders are shared among several Member States, particularly in the Northern and Eastern regions. Strengthening cross-border cooperation and fostering joint innovation projects improves efficiency, reduces duplication, and enhances interoperability. This amendment also supports the resilience of the Union by reinforcing its technological and industrial base in strategically important regions.

Amendment 246

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. In addition to the principles listed in paragraph 1, the work programmes referred to in Article 16 may also take into account the increase in security of supply for supply chains of emerging and disruptive products and technologies for defence.

Or. en

Amendment 247

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The award criteria and their application shall ensure equal treatment, transparency and effective competition. Calls for proposals, functional requirements and evaluation criteria shall not be drafted in a manner that has the object or effect of favouring a predetermined undertaking, product, service, technology, intellectual property portfolio or industrial group. The Commission shall document, for each call, how the requirements are linked to capability needs identified by Member States and how competition has been preserved.

Or. en

Amendment 248

Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The work programme may further specify the application of the award criteria laid down in paragraph 1, including in relation to the contribution of actions to the Union’s defence innovation base, cross-border cooperation, and the diffusion or uptake of results across Member States, as well as their potential for scale-up, industrialisation and market introduction within the Union, without modifying the substance of those criteria.

Or. en

Amendment 249

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. For award procedures pursuant to Article 12 (4), award criteria for the second-stage shall include the level of commitment of public and private contracting authorities and entities established in the Union or an associated country towards the validation and uptake of the emerging and disruptive products and technologies.

Or. en

Amendment 250

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. In order to ensure that actions listed in Article 10 can be effectively implemented without undue delay, the work programme may identify award procedures, under direct or indirect management, that benefit from an accelerated and simplified award procedure.1. In order to ensure that actions listed in Article 10 can be effectively implemented without undue delay, the work programme may identify award procedures, under direct or indirect management, that benefit from an accelerated and simplified award procedure. Award procedures may also be organised around operational capability challenges identified by Member States or associated third countries. Where appropriate, capability challenges may be based on relevant information from operational end-users, including from representatives of Member States’ armed forces.

Or. en

Amendment 251

Christophe Gomart

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) Limitation of the requirements for the award decision and signature of legal commitments to a preliminary evaluation of award and exclusion criteria; the award decision may be taken based solely on a self-declaration of applicants and tenderers on selection and eligibility criteria, especially regarding control, without request for corresponding supporting documents during the preliminary evaluation. The Commission shall finalise the final evaluation without undue delay.(a) Limitation of the requirements for the award decision and signature of legal commitments to a preliminary evaluation of award and exclusion criteria; the award decision may be taken based solely on a self-declaration of applicants and tenderers on selection and eligibility criteria, especially regarding control, without request for corresponding supporting documents during the preliminary evaluation. The Commission shall finalise the final evaluation without undue delay. However, checks relating to security, ownership of the entities, the protection of the Union’s key security and defence interests, and the absence of critical dependency risks may not be deemed complete until EU funds have actually been allocated.

Or. fr

Amendment 252

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) Limitation of the requirements for the award decision and signature of legal commitments to a preliminary evaluation of award and exclusion criteria; the award decision may be taken based solely on a self-declaration of applicants and tenderers on selection and eligibility criteria, especially regarding control, without request for corresponding supporting documents during the preliminary evaluation. The Commission shall finalise the final evaluation without undue delay.(a) Limitation of the requirements for the preliminary award decision to a preliminary evaluation of award and exclusion criteria may be permitted. However, no legal commitment shall be signed before the Commission or the relevant implementing body has verified the eligibility criteria, selection criteria, beneficial ownership, control structure and absence of control by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third-country entity. Self-declarations may be used only for the preliminary ranking of proposals and shall not be sufficient for the signature of a legal commitment.

Or. en

Amendment 253

Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Proposals and offers shall be evaluated and ranked based on common award criteria, set out in the Work Programme, such as their comparative contribution to the objectives. The evaluation committee shall determine the most appropriate instrument of budget implementation under direct or indirect management, as well as propose the maximum amount and form of the Union contribution.Proposals and offers shall be evaluated and ranked based on common award criteria, set out in the Work Programme, such as their comparative contribution to the objectives. The evaluation committee shall determine the most appropriate instrument of budget implementation under direct or indirect management, as well as propose the maximum amount and form of the Union contribution. Members designated by the European Parliament’s Committee on Security and Defence (SEDE) and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) may participate in the work of the evaluation committee, in accordance with applicable security and confidentiality rules.

Or. en

Amendment 254

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) during the second stage, within the available budget, successfully evaluated projects or offers shall be invited to adjust and complete their proposal or offer in accordance with the conclusions of the evaluation committee.(b) during the second stage, within the available budget, successfully evaluated projects or offers shall be invited to adjust and complete their proposal or offer in accordance with the conclusions of the evaluation committee. Selected projects should where appropriate be channelled towards follow-on procurement, framework agreements, joint acquisition mechanisms or industrial scale-up support.

Or. en

Amendment 255

Merja Kyllönen, Jussi Saramo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Fast-track procedures shall be established under the Programme for projects addressing urgent capability gaps related to surveillance, mobility, infrastructure resilience, and situational awareness in external border regions of the Union.

Or. en

Justification

The security challenges at the Union’s external borders are evolving rapidly, requiring faster development and deployment of technological solutions. Introducing fast-track procedures within the Programme allows the Union to respond more effectively to urgent capability gaps, particularly in surveillance, mobility, and infrastructure resilience, thereby reinforcing overall security and preparedness.

Amendment 256

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The Commission shall award the funding by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.

Or. en

Amendment 257

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The Commission shall award the funding by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 17(3).

Or. en

Amendment 258

Marc Botenga, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 13deleted
Inducement intervention
1. By way of derogation from Article 9 of this Regulation, the work programme may specify that an award procedure takes the form of an inducement intervention to allow for a temporary and conditional waiver of compliance with the eligibility requirementsrelating to the place of establishment or the executive management.
2. Compliance with the eligibility criteria that have been temporarily waived in accordance with paragraph 1 of this article shall be achieved and evaluated within a timeframe specified in the legal commitment. The Union support shall be provided once all the requirements have been met.
3. If the eligibility criteria that have been temporarily waived in accordance with paragraph 1 of this article are not complied within the specific timeframe specified in the legal commitment, the action shall be considered ineligible and any Union funding shall be fully recovered.
4. For the purpose of this article, no pre-financing shall be paid.

Or. en

Amendment 259

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By way of derogation from Article 9 of this Regulation, the work programme may specify that an award procedure takes the form of an inducement intervention to allow for a temporary and conditional waiver of compliance with the eligibility requirementsrelating to the place of establishment or the executive management.1. By way of derogation from Article 9 of this Regulation, the work programme may specify that an award procedure takes the form of an inducement intervention only where the Commission demonstrates that no comparable capability is available from an undertaking established in the Union or in an associated third country and that the participation of the undertaking concerned is necessary to address an urgent capability need identified by Member States.

Or. en

Amendment 260

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. Award procedures designated as inducement interventions pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be limited to legal entities that are not established in, and not subject to control, directly or indirectly, by natural or legal persons from, third countries whose policies or actions are determined by the Commission, in consultation with the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, to be incompatible with the interests and objectives of the Union's common foreign and security policy pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union, or that do not respect the values referred to in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union. The work programme shall specify the criteria and procedure for making such determinations, which shall be carried out prior to the designation of any inducement intervention.

Or. en

Amendment 261

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Applicants seeking to benefit from an inducement intervention shall provide, together with their application, a declaration confirming that neither the applicant nor any entity exercising control over the applicant, directly or indirectly, is established in or controlled by persons from a third country referred to in paragraph 1a of this Article. The Commission shall verify the accuracy of such declarations as part of the final evaluation referred to in Article 12(2), point (a). Where a declaration is found to be inaccurate, the legal commitment shall be terminated and any Union funding fully recovered.

Or. en

Amendment 262

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Recipients shall maintain their establishment in the Union or in an associated third country for the duration of the action and for at least five years after the final payment. Where the eligibility criteria set out in Article 9 are no longer fulfilled during that period, the support provided from the Programme shall be reimbursed.

Or. en

Amendment 263

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 3 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 b. No more than 10 % of the total amount of Union funding awarded under the Programme shall be allocated to recipients which, at the time of application, are not established in the Union or in an associated third country, including support provided for the actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (c).

Or. en

Amendment 264

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The total Union funding committed under award procedures designated as inducement interventions pursuant to paragraph 1 shall not exceed 20% of the total financial envelope referred to in Article 4(1). The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the use of inducement interventions as part of its monitoring obligations under Article 5 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 265

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann, Inese Vaidere

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The total Union funding provided under award procedures designated as inducement interventions pursuant to paragraph 1 shall not exceed 20% of the total financial envelope referred to in Article 4(1).

Or. en

Amendment 266

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The Union financial contribution to eligible actions by virtue of this article shall not exceed 10 % of the financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 267

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 14deleted
Funding rates
Without prejudice to Article 193 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the Programme may finance up to 100 % of the eligible costs.

Or. en

Amendment 268

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Without prejudice to Article 193 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the Programme may finance up to 100 % of the eligible costs.Without prejudice to Article 193 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the Programme may finance up to 70 % of the eligible costs.

Or. en

Amendment 269

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
By way of exception, the Programme may finance up to 100 % of the eligible costs where the Commission demonstrates in the award decision that:
(a) the action addresses an urgent capability need identified by at least three Member States;
(b) the action would not be carried out without full Union support;
(c) the expected results will be available for uptake by Member States under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory conditions; and
(d) the beneficiary will not receive double compensation through subsequent public procurement for the same development costs.

Or. en

Amendment 270

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph -1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
-1. Funds used under the Programme shall result in proportionate public ownership, including of intellectual property rights and know-how.

Or. en

Amendment 271

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Where a legal commitment concluded under an inducement intervention is terminated pursuant to Article 13(3) on grounds that the recipient has failed to fulfil the eligibility criteria within the specified timeframe, all foreground information generated in the course of the action up to the date of termination shall be transferred to and become the property of the Union. The Commission shall manage such foreground information in a manner consistent with the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, and shall make it available to Member States upon request.

Or. en

Amendment 272

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Where, within five years after the final payment of the action, a recipient becomes subject to control by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third-country entity, relocates substantial activities related to the funded action outside the Union or associated third countries, or grants rights that undermine the availability of the results for Member States, the Commission shall recover all or part of the Union support, unless it determines that such change does not contravene the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States.

Or. en

Amendment 273

Christophe Gomart

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where Union support is provided in the form of the public procurement of a study, results shall be owned by the EU and all Member States or associated third countries shall have the right, free of charge, to a non-exclusive licence for the use of the study upon written request.5. Where Union support is provided in the form of the public procurement of a study, results shall remain the property of the contractor or beneficiary concerned, while the EU and all Member States or associated third countries shall have the right, free of charge, to a non-exclusive licence for the solely non-commercial and non-competitive use of the study upon written request.

Or. fr

Amendment 274

Christophe Gomart

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Where Union support is provided in the form of a grant, EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies as well as granting authorities shall enjoy upon request royalty-free access rights to results, without impacting the ownership of results, including IPRs on background information, for the only purpose of developing, implementing and monitoring existing Union policies or programmes in the fields of its competence and the right to grant.6. Where Union support is provided in the form of a grant, EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies as well as granting authorities shall enjoy upon request royalty-free access rights to results, without impacting the ownership of results, including IPRs on background information, for the only purpose of developing, implementing and monitoring existing Union policies or programmes in the fields of its competence and the right to grant. The results of actions supported by the Programme shall remain the property of the recipients behind them. Access rights granted under this paragraph shall be without prejudice to the protection of earlier information, business secrets, intellectual property rights and recipients' legitimate commercial interests.

Or. fr

Amendment 275

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 6 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6 a. Where a recipient has received Union support for the development, testing or demonstration of a product or technology under this Regulation, any subsequent procurement by Member States, Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies shall take into account the Union contribution already received, in order to avoid double compensation for the same development costs.

Or. en

Amendment 276

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The work programme shall set out in detail the categories of actions to be supported by the Programme. Those categories shall be in line with the objectives referred to in Article 3.2. The work programme shall set out in detail the categories of actions to be supported by the Programme. Those categories shall be in line with the objectives referred to in Article 3 and may include actions implemented by single entities or, where appropriate, small-scale consortia, as well as actions involving research and technology organisations, technical universities, incubators and other innovation support entities;

Or. en

Amendment 277

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos, Angelika Niebler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. When preparing the work programme and defining the challenges referred to therein, the Commission shall take into account, where relevant, the capability priorities identified in the context of the Common Security and Defence Policy, including the Capability Development Plan and the findings and collaborative opportunities identified through the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence, as well as the views and expertise provided by the European Defence Agency. The Commission shall also take into account, where relevant, lessons learned, project pipelines and results from relevant Union defence innovation initiatives, including EUDIS, in order to ensure complementarity, avoid duplication and facilitate follow-on support for promising technologies. The work programme shall prioritise challenges that respond to urgent and prioritised capability needs shared by several Member States, while preserving the ability of the Programme to support bottom-up emerging and disruptive innovation.

Or. en

Amendment 278

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. In the preparation of the work programme, the Commission shall ensure a structured process involving Member States and drawing on input from the defence industry, particularly prime contractors and first-tier subcontractors, so that the challenges established respond to genuine and prioritised defence needs and address specific mission-driven capability requirements. The Commission shall draw on such input to identify technological bottlenecks and integration requirements, assess feasibility, and ensure the uptake and scaling of supported solutions within European defence industrial value chains.

Or. en

Amendment 279

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann, Inese Vaidere

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The work programme shall identify and prioritise challenges on the basis of a structured capability-needs mapping carried out by the Commission in close cooperation with Member States. That mapping shall take into account, where appropriate, priority capability gaps identified at Union level, the relevant outputs of the Capability Development Plan, the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence and other relevant tools of the European Defence Agency, the needs arising from European Readiness Flagships, and NATO capability planning outputs where relevant for Member States and consistent with Union priorities.

Or. en

Amendment 280

Jan Farský, Angelika Niebler, Aura Salla, Wouter Beke, Marion Walsmann, Inese Vaidere

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 b. The work programme shall set out how the inputs referred to in paragraph 2a have been taken into account in the definition of challenges, award criteria and functional requirements. It shall also indicate, where relevant, how each challenge contributes to addressing urgent and prioritised defence needs of Member States and to facilitating subsequent testing, procurement or market uptake.

Or. en

Amendment 281

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Eszter Lakos

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 b. The work programme shall identify, where appropriate, government facilities or facilities operated by system integrators and original equipment manufacturers that expressed their readiness to support the actions referred in Paragraph 2 of this Article. Such support should constitute non-financial contributions available to the Programme as referred to in Article 5 (1).

Or. en

Amendment 282

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. With the exception of the award procedure defined in Article 12(5), the work programme shall contain functional requirements where appropriate and shall specify the form of Union funding under Article 8, while not preventing competition among the calls for proposals.3. With the exception of the award procedure defined in Article 12(4), the work programme shall contain functional requirements where appropriate and shall specify the form of Union funding under Article 8, while not preventing competition among the calls for proposals.

Or. en

Amendment 283

Hélder Sousa Silva

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Before adopting the work programme, the Commission shall:
(a) formally consult the European Defence Agency and the European External Action Service, including the EU Military Staff, on the list of challenges and on the design of the calls;
(b) hold a structured exchange with the relevant Council preparatory bodies dealing with defence;
(c) transmit the draft work programme and consult the European Parliament and the Council simultaneously. The consultations referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) may run in parallel and shall not exceed a period of four weeks.

Or. en

Amendment 284

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. For each call for proposals or award procedure, the work programme shall include, in a non-classified annex where necessary, a justification setting out:
(a) the Member State capability needs addressed;
(b) the reasons why existing Union programmes or national instruments are insufficient;
(c) the expected added value of Union funding;
(d) the measures taken to avoid favouring predetermined beneficiaries;
(e) the expected route to testing, demonstration, uptake or procurement.

Or. en

Amendment 285

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall adopt the work programme by means of an implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 17(3).4. The Commission shall adopt the work programme by means of an implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 17(3).

Or. en

Amendment 286

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall adopt the work programme by means of an implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 17(3).4. The Commission shall adopt the work programme by means of an implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 17(3).

Or. en

Amendment 287

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall adopt the work programme by means of an implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 17(3).4. The Commission shall adopt the work programme by means of an implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 17(3).

Or. en

Amendment 288

Krzysztof Hetman, Borys Budka, Adam Jarubas, Mirosława Nykiel, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall adopt the work programme by means of an implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 17(3).4. The Commission shall adopt the work programme by means of an implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with examination procedure referred to in Article 17(3).

Or. en

Amendment 289

Hélder Sousa Silva, Eszter Lakos

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The Commission may amend the work programme in the course of its implementation in order to respond to urgent and rapidly evolving operational requirements of Member States' armed forces, including those stemming from lessons learned in field testing supported under the Programme and from the experience of Ukrainian armed forces. Any such amendment shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraphs 4 and 5. Where the amendment is of limited scope and is aimed at reflecting operational developments identified by Member States, the Commission may apply a shortened consultation period of two weeks under paragraph 4.

Or. en

Amendment 290

Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The Commission shall regularly inform the European Parliament, and in particular the Committee on Security and Defence (SEDE) and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE), about the implementation of the Programme, including the preparation of work programmes, the definition of challenges, the outcome of award procedures and the overall allocation of Union funding, subject to applicable confidentiality and security requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 291

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The work programme shall ensure that no more than 20 % of the total amount of Union funding awarded under the Programme is allocated to recipients established in the associated third countries referred to in Article 7(1).

Or. en

Justification

A ceiling on funding for recipients established in associated third countries would ensure that AGILE primarily benefits Union-based SMEs while preserving cooperation with Ukraine and other associated partners. This would be consistent with the approach taken in EDIP.

Amendment 292

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.1. The Commission shall be assisted by the committee established by Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2021/697. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.

Or. en

Justification

Merging the AGILE committee with the existing EDF committee would ensure continuity of experience, avoid duplication, and allow the Programme to become operational as quickly as possible. It would also reduce the administrative burden on Member States, which would otherwise be required to participate in an additional committee.

Amendment 293

Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure, Anthony Smith, Özlem Demirel

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. Independent experts in international law, international humanitarian law and in ethics shall provide their views and expertise to the committee. Their opinions shall guide decision-making.

Or. en

Amendment 294

Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The European Defence Agency (EDA) shall be invited to provide its views and expertise to the committee as an observer. The European External Action Service shall also be invited to assist in the work of the committee.2. The European Defence Agency (EDA) shall be invited to provide its views and expertise to the committee as an observer. The European External Action Service shall also be invited to assist in the work of the committee. Representatives designated by the European Parliament’s Committee on Security and Defence (SEDE) and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) shall also be invited to participate in the work of the committee, subject to applicable confidentiality and security requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 295

Hélder Sousa Silva

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The European Defence Agency (EDA) shall be invited to provide its views and expertise to the committee as an observer. The European External Action Service shall also be invited to assist in the work of the committee.2. The European Defence Agency (EDA) shall be invited as a permanent advisor to provide its views and expertise to the committee. The European External Action Service, including the EU Military Staff, shall also be invited to assist in the work of the committee. A representative of the competent committees of the European Parliament shall be invited to attend the meetings of the committee as an observer.

Or. en

Amendment 296

Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The European Defence Agency (EDA) shall be invited to provide its views and expertise to the committee as an observer. The European External Action Service shall also be invited to assist in the work of the committee.2. The European Defence Agency (EDA) shall be invited to provide its views and expertise to the committee as an observer. The European External Action Service shall also be invited to assist in the committee.

Or. en

Amendment 297

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The Commission may, on its own initiative or upon request from one or more Member States, invite, where relevant, representatives of NATO and Ukraine to attend meetings of the committee in an advisory capacity, taking into account their operational experience and expertise relevant to defence innovation and interoperability.

Or. en

Amendment 298

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The Commission may, on its own initiative or upon request from one or more Member States, invite, where relevant, representatives of associated countries to attend meetings of the committee. Representatives of associated countries shall not be present during deliberations or participate in voting of the committee.

Or. en

Amendment 299

Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux, Christophe Bay, Aleksandar Nikolic

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. Where the committee delivers no opinion, the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.

Or. en

Justification

The use of the advisory procedure for a defence funding instrument is unprecedented. Existing defence instruments use the examination procedure under Article 5, as it allows for deeper involvement of Member States in the adoption of the work programme. This is essential to ensure that start-ups develop products that respond to Member States’ capability needs and can find end customers among their armed forces.

Amendment 300

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.

Or. en

Amendment 301

Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.

Or. en

Justification

The amendment replaces the advisory procedure with the examination procedure for the adoption of the work programme. Given the strategic and defence-related nature of the AGILE Programme, Member States should exercise an appropriate level of oversight over the definition of priorities and implementation of the Programme. The examination procedure constitutes the standard governance model for comparable Union instrument. Aligning AGILE with those instruments ensures consistency within the Union’s defence industrial framework and avoids establishing a less rigorous governance model for a pilot instrument that may subsequently be expanded under future financial frameworks, in particular in a strategically sensitive area where Member States should retain an appropriate level of influence over implementation priorities and work programmes.

Amendment 302

Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.

Or. en

Amendment 303

Christophe Gomart

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3a. The examination procedure under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply to the adoption of the work programme as well as to final award decisions for actions supported under the Programme. Member States shall be fully involved in the selection and ranking of projects to ensure their consistency with the operational and capability needs they identified.

Or. fr

Amendment 304

Judita Laššáková

Proposal for a regulation

Article 18 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The procurement contract of a Member State concerning any defence product resulting from an action supported under the Programme shall be considered as a contract awarded in the framework of a cooperative programme based on research and development as referred to in Article 13 (c) of Directive 2009/81/EC [following the adoption of Omnibus directive 2025/0177 (COD)].A procurement contract of a Member State concerning a defence product resulting from an action supported under the Programme may be considered as a contract awarded in the framework of a cooperative programme based on research and development as referred to in Article 13, point (c), of Directive 2009/81/EC only where the contracting authority demonstrates that:
(a) the conditions laid down in that Directive are fulfilled;
(b) the use of the exclusion does not have the object or effect of directly awarding a follow-on contract to a predetermined economic operator without objective justification;
(c) the Union contribution already received for the development of the product has been taken into account; and
(d) the procurement remains consistent with the principles of transparency, equal treatment and protection of the financial interests of the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 305

Ivars Ijabs, Tonino Picula

Proposal for a regulation

Article 18 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 18a
Fast-tracking of procurement for Ukraine
1. By way of derogation from the eligibility conditions and product schedules laid down in Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EU) 2026/467, defence products resulting from actions supported under the AGILE programme shall be eligible for financing under the Ukraine Support Loan established by Regulation (EU) 2026/467.
2. For the purposes of this Article, a defence product shall be considered to result from the AGILE programme where it has been developed or produced, in whole or in part, within the framework of an action that has received financial support under the AGILE programme and has been certified as such by the Commission.
3. The derogation provided for in paragraph 1 shall apply only to the extent necessary to enable the support or financing referred to therein and shall not affect the application of any other conditions or obligations under Regulation (EU) 2026/467.

Or. en

Amendment 306

Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The Commission and Member States shall ensure, where appropriate, coordination with NATO security standards and procedures in the implementation of actions involving entities established in NATO member states.

Or. en

Amendment 307

Hélder Sousa Silva

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Financial resources allocated to the Programme may contribute to the organisation of dissemination activities, match-making events and awareness-raising activities, including to open supply chains to foster the cross-border participation of SMEs.3. Financial resources allocated to the Programme may contribute to the organisation of dissemination activities, match-making events and awareness-raising activities, including to open supply chains to foster the cross-border participation of SMEs. In particular, the Commission shall establish a dedicated matchmaking framework between recipients of the Programme and European defence prime contractors, with a particular focus on entities that receive Union support under other defence funds.

Or. en

Amendment 308

Reinier Van Lanschot, Sergey Lagodinsky

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 21a
Monitoring, evaluation and review
1. The Commission shall monitor the implementation of the Programme and assess its effectiveness in achieving the objectives set out in this Regulation.
2. By (one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation) the Commission shall publish an interim report on the implementation of the Programme. This report shall include the distribution of support among SMEs, the geographic distribution of supported entities across the Union and associated countries, the thematic distribution of supported activities, and any significant concentration of funding among recipients or sectors, and shall be publicly available. A final report shall be published at the end of the implementation of all the actions carried out by the Programme.
3. The Commission shall present the findings of the reports referred to in paragraph 2 to the European Parliament.

Or. en

Amendment 309

Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Or. en