Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

opinion parliamentary committee draft, 17 March 2026

On the proposal for a Council Decision amending Decision (EU) 2021/1764 on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other for the period 2028 to 2034

Document BUDG-PA-785490 · (COM(2025)0599 – C100248/2025 – 2025/0264(CNS))

Committee on Budgets · Rapporteur: Bogdan Rzońca

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

AI:In short

The Committee on Budgets gives its budgetary assessment of the proposed Council Decision amending Decision (EU) 2021/1764 on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) and Greenland for 2028 to 2034. It considers the programme envelope should be increased from EUR 999 000 000 and welcomes the proposed EUR 530 million for Greenland. It asks for sufficient human resources from the outset and throughout the next multiannual financial framework (MFF), and for indicative sub-envelopes and specific OCT thematic and geographical budget lines. It stresses that loans and budgetary guarantees to OCTs must be transparently presented, monitored and provisioned from the OCT programme, and that complementarity with other programmes must not harm traceability of expenditure. It says external assigned revenue must be clearly circumscribed, transparent and subject to parliamentary scrutiny, with any amendments coordinated with the Committee on Budgets.

Position. The Committee on Budgets considers the programme envelope should be increased from EUR 999 000 000, welcomes EUR 530 million for Greenland, and asks for sufficient human resources, indicative sub-envelopes, specific OCT budget lines, transparent treatment of loans and guarantees, and scrutiny of external assigned revenue.

Key points

  1. The proposal sets up a framework for the association of the EU's Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) including Greenland.
  2. It aims to foster cooperation with OCTs and Greenland in strategic sectors such as critical raw materials, renewable energy and sustainable tourism.
  3. The programme simplifies the existing funding architecture but stays separate from Global Europe because of its distinct legal nature.
  4. The Committee considers the programme envelope should be increased from EUR 999 000 000 to enable the Union to step up support for OCTs.
  5. It welcomes the Commission's proposal to allocate EUR 530 million to Greenland given its growing geostrategic importance in the Arctic region.
  6. It says sufficient human resources must be available from the outset and throughout the next MFF for effective implementation of the OCT programme.
  7. It deplores the lack of a limited breakdown of the OCT programme budget and recommends considering indicative sub-envelopes for the OCTs.
  8. It deplores the lack of a detailed indicative budgetary nomenclature and insists on specific OCT thematic and geographical budget lines for oversight and transparency.
  9. It says loans and budgetary guarantees to OCTs through Global Europe must be clearly identified, transparently presented and monitored, respecting the budgetary authority, with provisioning from the OCT programme.
  10. It says complementarity between the OCT programme, Global Europe and the European Competitiveness Fund must not harm traceability of expenditure, and contributions from other programmes must be identifiable at all stages.
  11. It says external assigned revenue under the OCT programme must be clearly circumscribed, transparent and subject to parliamentary scrutiny, and any amendments coordinated with the Committee on Budgets.

Who is affected

  • Overseas Countries and Territories: the programme supports their association with the EU and cooperation in strategic sectors.
  • Greenland: the proposal allocates EUR 530 million to it because of its geostrategic importance in the Arctic.
  • The Commission: it would implement the programme and decide spending priorities, which the Committee wants constrained.
  • The budgetary authority: it would gain oversight through specific budget lines and scrutiny of external assigned revenue.

Figures and deadlines

  • EUR 999 000 000 — the current programme envelope the Committee considers should be increased.
  • EUR 530 million — the funding the Commission proposes to allocate to Greenland.
  • 2028 to 2034 — the period covered by the proposed Council Decision.

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 25 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Budgetary assessment 15 paragraphs

for the Committee on Development on the proposal for a Council Decision amending Decision (EU) 2021/1764 on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other for the period 2028 to 2034

(COM(2025)0599 – C100248/2025 – 2025/0264(CNS))

The Committee on Budgets has carried out a budgetary assessment of the proposal under Rule 58 of the Rules of Procedure and has reached the following conclusions:

The Committee on Budgets,

A.whereas the proposal establishes a framework for the association of the European Union’s Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) including Greenland;

B.whereas the proposal is aimed at fostering cooperation with OCTs and Greenland, including in strategic sectors such as critical raw materials, renewable energy and sustainable tourism;

C.whereas the programme simplifies the existing funding architecture but remains separate from Global Europe due to its distinct legal nature;

1.Considers that the programme envelope should be increased from EUR 999 000 000 to [number from MFF Interim Report in current and 2025 prices] to enable the Union to step up its support for OCTs and to harness the full potential of a mutually beneficial partnership;

2.Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to allocate EUR 530 million in funding to Greenland given its growing geostrategic importance in the Arctic region;

3.Considers that sufficient human resources must be available from the outset and throughout the entire programming period of the next MFF to ensure an effective implementation of the OCT programme;

4.Deplores the lack of a limited breakdown of the budget of the OCT programme; notes that this would give the Commission great latitude to shift and decide on spending priorities during implementation; recommends giving consideration to fixing indicative sub-envelopes for the OCTs;

5.Deplores the lack of a sufficiently detailed indicative budgetary nomenclature; considers that this will hamper oversight and the budgetary authority’s ability to steer accurately policy priorities in the annual budgetary procedure; expresses concerns that the overly aggregated budgetary architecture would facilitate transfers not subject to the decision of the budgetary authority; insists on the need to introduce specific OCT thematic and geographical budget lines to enhance oversight by the budgetary authority and transparency in the allocation of funds;

6.Takes note that the proposal foresees the possibility to provide loans and budgetary guarantees to OCTs through the Global Europe programme; stresses that the budgetary implications of such borrowing and lending operations must be clearly identified, transparently presented and carefully monitored throughout the MFF period; insists that all decisions related to such operations must fully respect the powers of the co-legislators and the prerogatives of the budgetary authority; underlines that the appropriate provisioning for loans and budgetary guarantees must be constituted from the OCT programme;

7.Takes note of the proposed complementarity between the OCT programme and other programmes such as the Global Europe Programme and the European Competitiveness Fund; stresses that enhanced complementarity between instruments must not come at the expense of traceability of expenditure or the prerogatives of the budgetary authority; underlines that the contribution from other programmes must be explicitly identifiable at all stages of the budgetary cycle;

8.Stresses that the use of external assigned revenue under the OCT programme must be clearly circumscribed, fully transparent and subject to effective parliamentary scrutiny; takes note, in that regard, of the provisions relating to additional financial contributions by Member States, third countries and other donors; underlines that, should the lead committee consider amending provisions relating to external assigned revenue, this should be done in coordination with the Committee on Budgets and the other committees in order to ensure a consistent approach.

Amendments 13 paragraphs

As part of its budgetary assessment, the Committee on Budgets also submits the following amendments to the proposal:

Amendment 1

Proposal for a Council decision

Recital 10 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(10a) The provisions of this Decision as well as its governance arrangements must be conducive to proper decision-making by the budgetary authority and to appropriate parliamentary oversight. In particular, any specification of the programme’s internal architecture should be duly reflected in the budget nomenclature through the introduction of corresponding budget lines.

Or. en

Amendment 2

Proposal for a Council decision

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5

Decision (EU) 2021/1764

Article 75 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The indicative financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period 2028-2034 is set at EUR 999 000 000 in current prices.1. The indicative financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period 2028-2034 is set at EUR [number from the interim report, in current and 2025 prices].

Or. en