Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

resolution motion, 10 February 2026

On four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine

Motion B-10-2026-0149 · (2026/2599(RSP))

on behalf of the PfE Group · Rapporteur: Matthieu Valet

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

AI:In short

This resolution condemns Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and calls for a diplomatic settlement, coordinated with the United States, to end the conflict and ensure long-term security. It commends the US peace initiative, stresses that there is no military solution favoring Ukraine, and emphasizes that defence decisions must remain with Member States and not escalate tensions. It raises concerns about the scale of EU aid, corruption in Ukraine's energy sector, and the impact of the war and sanctions on European citizens.

Key points

  1. Condemns Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine launched on 24 February 2022 and reiterates solidarity with Ukraine's people and commitment to its independence and sovereignty.
  2. Underlines that a diplomatic settlement is necessary to end Russia's aggression and calls for close coordination with the United States and parties concerned to support negotiations for a peace settlement ensuring long-term security.
  3. Commends the peace initiative launched by US President Donald Trump and underlines that peace via diplomatic means is in the interest of both Ukrainians and EU citizens.
  4. Repeats that there is no military solution to the conflict that would favour Ukraine.
  5. Emphasises that defence policy decision-making must remain within Member States' remit and that any defence action must deter hostile actions without escalating tensions.
  6. Notes the EU and Member States have provided over EUR 193 billion (including EUR 69 billion in military assistance) and are about to provide a EUR 90 billion loan, while the US has spent over USD 175 billion.
  7. Expresses concern that over-ambitious aid would create a debt spiral and absorb a large part of the EU budget for decades.
  8. Raises concerns about governance and oversight of EU aid following a large-scale anti-corruption operation in Ukraine's energy sector involving over 70 searches and seizure of over USD 4 million.
  9. States that the war, excessive loans, and sanctions have contributed to record-high energy prices and burdens on European businesses and households, and that Ukraine's forced EU accession would harm agriculture and labour markets.

Who is affected

  • Ukraine and its people, who are victims of the war and face displacement and hardship.
  • EU Member States, which must maintain defence decision-making and coordinate with the US on peace negotiations.
  • European taxpayers and businesses, who bear the burden of high energy prices and aid costs.

Figures and deadlines

  • EUR 193 billion (including EUR 69 billion in military assistance) provided by the EU and Member States to Ukraine.
  • EUR 90 billion Ukraine support loan to be provided.
  • USD 175 billion spent by the United States, including USD 106 billion in direct government and military aid.
  • 20 % of the total resources of the seven-year budget would go to Ukraine post-2027.
  • USD 800 billion for civilian needs and USD 700 billion for rearmament are Ukraine's validated reconstruction estimates.
  • Over 70 searches and seizure of more than USD 4 million in cash in the anti-corruption operation.
  • Around USD 100 million in illicit proceeds alleged over time.

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Text 19 paragraphs

B100149/2026

European Parliament resolution on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine

(2026/2599(RSP))

The European Parliament,

–having regard to its previous resolutions on the war in Ukraine,

–having regard to Rule 167(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

A.whereas Russia has been waging an illegal war of aggression against Ukraine since 24 February 2022; whereas despite sustained military operations, significant loss of life and extensive material expenditure, the frontlines have moved only slightly over the past four years, resulting in a prolonged war of attrition;

B.whereas this war has caused immense human suffering, including hundreds of thousands of deaths, the destruction of infrastructure and the displacement of millions of civilians, while many individuals are also subject to forced conscription by authorities;

C.whereas civilians are the first victims of this war; whereas this war has led to the deaths of innocent people and to the displacement of millions of people;

D.whereas the Russian Federation has carried out repeated attacks against Ukraine’s energy infrastructure, including power plants, transmission networks and heating facilities, resulting in widespread electricity outages, disruptions to heating and water supply, and intense hardship for the civilian population;

E.whereas the EU and its Member States have provided over EUR 193 billion (including EUR 69 billion in military assistance) to Ukraine, and are about to provide the EUR 90 billion Ukraine support loan; whereas the United States has spent over USD 175 billion to support Ukraine, including USD 106 billion in direct government and military aid; whereas based on the Commission’s plans for the post-2027 multiannual financial framework, Ukraine would receive 20 % of the total resources of the seven-year budget, and the Commission has already validated Ukraine’s estimates for reconstruction, which amount to USD 800 billion for civilian needs and USD 700 billion for rearmament; whereas the Commission plans to provide a significant part of this effort; whereas such over-ambitious aid would create a long-lasting debt spiral for future generations and would absorb a large part of the EU budget for decades to come;

F.whereas on 10 November 2025, Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) carried out a large-scale operation in Ukraine’s strategic energy sector, involving over 70 searches and the seizure of more than USD 4 million in cash; whereas investigators alleged that the scheme involved around USD 100 million in illicit proceeds over time and the investigation remains ongoing; whereas these revelations raise serious concerns regarding governance, transparency and the oversight of EU aid to Ukraine;

Read the rest (7 paragraphs)

G.whereas the war in Ukraine, excessive loans and financial instruments, and the misguided sanctions policy have contributed to record-high energy prices, significant burdens on European businesses and households, and serious concerns regarding the security of European taxpayers; whereas Ukraine’s forced and accelerated EU accession does not serve the interests of EU citizens, and would create serious concerns for the agriculture sector and the labour market;

H.whereas the Trump administration has engaged in diplomatic efforts to reach a peace settlement in Ukraine; whereas neither side is positioned to achieve a decisive military victory, making peace negotiations the only viable resolution to the conflict;

1.Condemns Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine launched on 24 February 2022; reiterates its solidarity with the people of Ukraine and its commitment to Ukraine’s independence and sovereignty;

2.Underlines that after four years of continuous and devastating war, with significant loss of life and widespread destruction affecting civilian populations, a diplomatic settlement is necessary to end Russia’s aggression; calls for close coordination with the United States and the parties concerned in order to support negotiations and advance a peace settlement that ensures long-term security for civilians and for Europe as a whole;

3.Commends the peace initiative launched by the President of the United States, Donald Trump, since he took office; underlines that peace achieved as soon as possible via diplomatic means is in the interest of the peoples of both Ukraine and the EU; repeats that there is no military solution to the conflict that would favour Ukraine;

4.Notes that in the rapidly changing geopolitical climate, it is crucial to strengthen the Member States’ defence capabilities; emphasises that decision-making in the field of defence policy must remain within the remit of the Member States; reiterates that any action related to defence must not aim to escalate tensions on the continent but to instead deter any hostile actions, while establishing and maintaining peace;

5.Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the EU Member States, the President, Government and Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the United Nations, the Russian authorities and the Government of the United States.