Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

opinion parliamentary committee, 24 September 2025

On general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections

Document AGRI-AD-774421 · (2025/0210(BUD))

Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development · Rapporteur: Dario Nardella

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

AI:In short

The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development's opinion on the 2026 EU budget calls for increased CAP funding, rejects merging CAP with cohesion funds, and demands more support for farmers, rural development, and crisis management.

Position. The committee proposes amendments to the 2026 budget to increase CAP funding, reject merging with cohesion funds, and enhance support for farmers, rural development, and crisis management.

Key points

  1. Welcomes the proposed allocations but stresses they should be increased to address rural challenges; insists agriculture revenues stay within Heading 3.
  2. Rejects merging CAP with cohesion funds and replacing EAGF/EAFRD with a single fund; calls for a separate, strengthened CAP budget with automatic inflation adjustment.
  3. Recalls CAP objectives from Article 39 TFEU and stresses they must guide spending and trade policy; emphasizes agriculture's strategic importance for food security and sustainability.
  4. Notes concern over the reduced EAGF margin and calls for a flexible and adequate EAGF to respond to crises.
  5. Calls for sufficient flexibility and strategic capacity in the 2026 budget to address geopolitical, climate, and trade risks, including support for Ukraine's alignment and impact assessment.
  6. Demands trade agreements respect reciprocity and safeguard clauses; calls for impact assessments and compensation for trade impacts.
  7. Urges improving the agricultural reserve's accessibility and activation, with additional funding and swift support for farmers hit by animal diseases.
  8. Calls for full use of flexibility instruments and investment in preparedness, prevention, and early-warning systems.
  9. Urges prioritising generational renewal with start-up support, access to land and finance, training, and credit guarantee schemes.
  10. Calls for differentiated measures to address regional disparities and support dignified retirement for farmers.
  11. Calls for reinstatement of promotion programmes and increased sectoral allocations for vulnerable sectors, school schemes, and rural development.
  12. Emphasises investment in water management, soil resilience, digitalisation, research, and innovation, including for POSEI and animal disease compensation.

Who is affected

  • EU farmers, especially young farmers and those in sensitive sectors like wine and dairy, affected by trade pressures and crises.
  • Rural communities and regions, including outermost regions under POSEI, affected by depopulation and infrastructure needs.
  • Agri-food producers and exporters affected by cuts to promotion programmes and trade competition.
  • Children and schools benefiting from EU school schemes for fruit, vegetables, and milk.

Figures and deadlines

  • EUR 56,97 billion in commitment appropriations and EUR 53,13 billion in payment appropriations under Heading 3.
  • EUR 54,79 billion for Cluster 8, an increase of 0,8 % compared to 2025.
  • EAGF margin reduced to EUR 76 million.
  • Agricultural reserve reinstated at EUR 450 million.
  • EUR 13,3 billion allocated to EAFRD.
  • Increase of EUR 34 662 944 in the budget line for 'Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment'.

Legal basis. Article 39 TFEU and Article 349 TFEU

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Opinion 33 paragraphs

The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following into its motion for a resolution:

General budgetary considerations for the Common Agricultural Policy

1.Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to allocate EUR 56,97 billion in commitment appropriations and EUR 53,13 billion in payment appropriations under Heading 3 “Natural Resources and Environment”, and notes that EUR 54,79 billion of those commitment appropriations is dedicated to Cluster 8 “Agriculture and Maritime Policy”, an increase of 0,8 % compared to 2025; stresses that the current allocation should be increased to better reflect the growing challenges in rural areas, including depopulation, digital divide, and climate change adaptation; deplores the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) budget cuts in the MFF revision, which particularly affect market and promotion measures in the 2026 budget; insists that revenues or repayments from agriculture remain within the agriculture component of Heading 3 “Natural Resources and Environment”;

2. Deplores the proposal of merging CAP with cohesion funds and calls for a separate, dedicated and strengthened CAP budget in the future MFF 2028-2034; stresses the need to restore adequate funding for CAP technical assistance; rejects the proposal to replace EAGF and EAFRD with a single National and Regional Partnership Fund, stressing that CAP must remain an EU policy with two pillars, and not nationalised policy lacking a level-playing field, especially in the current context of low agricultural prices, rising input costs, trade pressures and climate change impacts; deplores the progressive erosion of CAP support due to the lack of effective inflation adjustment mechanisms; underlines that the 2 % MFF deflator does not offset real inflation, which has reduced the value of direct payments and farmers’ incomes while costs and administrative burden remain significant and societal expectations have increased; calls, therefore, for higher CAP funding and automatic adjustment mechanisms to safeguard profitability;

Objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy

3.Recalls that Article 39 TFEU sets out the objectives of CAP, which include support to fair living standards for farmers, market stability, increased productivity by promoting technical progress and by ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, safeguarding the food supply, taking into account the particular nature of agricultural activity, and maintaining fair prices for consumers; stresses that those objectives must continue to guide the EU’s priorities as regards agricultural spending and trade policy and cannot be subordinated to changing external policy pressures or to other EU policies and objectives; emphasises agriculture’s strategic importance in delivering on key EU priorities such as food security, sustainable and competitive growth, social inclusion , vibrant rural communities, climate resilience, biodiversity and animal welfare; acknowledges the limited budgetary impact of the recent CAP simplification measures and efforts to reduce farmers’ administrative burden such as the proposed flexibility and the simplified provisions for small and medium-sized farms; furthermore reiterates the crucial role of agricultural and rural development policies, in particular the CAP, in achieving a high level of food security and strategic autonomy for the EU, taking into account food needs, ensuring fair income for farmers and sustainability of EU agricultural production as well as promoting sustainable food systems; stresses that agriculture can contribute to the EU environmental objectives where farmers are incentivised and fairly remunerated, with reduced regulatory and administrative burden; underlines that through the CAP, farmers have already made significant efforts to integrate those objectives; warns however that, without adequate resources, the CAP cannot remain a key driver of the economic, environmental and social sustainability of the EU agriculture;

European Agricultural Guarantee Fund

4.Notes with considerable concern the significant reduction of the margin under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) sub-ceiling to just EUR 76 million, which reduces the EU’s flexibility to respond to unforeseen shocks such as geopolitical instability, trade disputes, price shocks, climate-related events, epizootic diseases, or market volatility; stresses, in this regard, that the EAGF must be flexible and adequate in order to tackle the crises in the EU through the crisis reserve; highlights the importance of risk prevention in order to reduce the risks posed by future climate, health and market shocks;

Geopolitical context and strategic resilience

5.Draws attention to the ongoing impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine on EU agricultural markets, including rising input costs, supply chain disruptions, and regional instability, as well as additional pressures from multiple crises such as high fertiliser and energy prices and other geopolitical tensions; stresses that the framework agreement with the United States on transatlantic tariffs will increase pressure on EU farmers notably in sensitive sectors such as wine and dairy and underscores the need for a strong and coordinated EU response; stresses the importance of protecting domestic production and farmers’ contractual stability against speculation, price shocks, and market disruptions; notes the resilience of the agri-food sector, particularly in Member States that have absorbed the most severe shocks while urging the Commission to ensure that the 2026 budget provides sufficient flexibility and strategic capacity to tackle evolving geopolitical, climate and trade-related risks, including through reinforced crisis reserve mechanisms, adequate compensation measures against unfair trade, and external promotion of EU products; urges allocation of adequate resources to help farmers cope with inflation, fuel costs, global market changes, and adverse weather events; stresses the need for a fair distribution of CAP support between and within Member States; underlines that previous enlargements have influenced the shape and size of the EU budget and led to lasting reforms of the CAP; stresses the importance of strategic preparation for future EU enlargement to ensure stability of the agricultural sector and fair prices for consumers, including an impact assessment on the integration of Ukraine’s agricultural sector into the CAP; stresses the importance of supporting Ukraine in aligning its standards with EU standards, strengthen governance and modernise rural infrastructure while taking into account, throughout this process, the interests of EU farmers; highlights in this regard the severe impact of temporary trade liberalisation with Ukraine on some domestic markets, resulting in significant losses for local producers; underlines the potential of creating strategic regional food reserves and warehouses to ensure supply continuity, stimulate rural processing infrastructure, and strengthen food security, ensuring access to affordable food in emergency situations;

Trade and the fight against unfair competition

6.Stresses that the CAP budget must be aligned with international trade commitments and EU global food security responsibilities; calls for all trade agreements to respect the principle of reciprocity, ensuring that imports comply with equivalent environmental, social, or food safety and animal health and welfare standards in order to prevent unfair competition and safeguard EU production standards; calls for the strict application of safeguard clauses and the introduction of traceability mechanisms to protect the internal market and farmers' incomes; urges the Commission to conduct a comprehensive impact assessment of the EU trade agreements on EU agricultural markets and rural economies and ensure that the 2026 budget provides sufficient flexibility and financial capacity to mitigate and compensate the impacts of new trade agreements on the agricultural sector; calls furthermore for a targeted policy review to protect the EU agri-food sector from unfair competition;

Read the rest (21 paragraphs)

Crisis preparedness and risk management

7.Takes note that the 2026 agricultural reserve has been reinstated at EUR 450 million and is fully financed with new appropriations with no recourse to financial discipline while 2025 agricultural reserve has been partly financed through the carry-over of the 2024 funds; welcomes this reinstatement as it reflects the growing need for risk management; acknowledges that the amount, fixed at current prices since 2021 under Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 of the European Parliament and of the Council, is insufficient to address today’s challenges; urges the Commission to improve the agricultural reserve’s accessibility and activation mechanisms by establishing, through the 2025 Omnibus packages, new tools for managing natural, market and health risks, ensuring that funds follow objective and transparent allocation criteria and reach farmers swiftly and fairly with priority to the most affected, to restore their livelihoods and economic activity; stresses that any new mechanisms must be accompanied by adequate additional funding to guarantee effectiveness; highlights that the agricultural reserve should be used transparently, purposefully and proactively and reiterates the need to assess options for mobilising additional funds outside the CAP; notes that the agricultural reserve cannot fully offset the consequences of climate-driven extreme weather events, therefore encourages Member States to support insurance, adaptation, prevention and preparedness for farmers, foresters, agricultural workers and rural communities; calls for a specific mechanism to swiftly support farmers hit by animal disease outbreaks, ensuring business continuity, income stability and rural resilience;

8.Notes that despite the increase of the agricultural reserve, the overall financial space under EAGF remains narrow, and reiterates the need to fully utilise all flexibility instruments under the MFF, including unused margins and special instruments, both in response to agri-food shocks and in order to refill the crisis reserve; stresses the need to invest in preparedness, prevention and adaptation measures and early-warning systems; urges the Commission to ensure the agricultural reserve has adequate resources for market stabilisation and rapid crisis response and ensure the swifter activation and allocation of support, including the development of stockpiling strategies to safeguard food security in agricultural or geopolitical emergencies;

Generational renewal and social resilience

9.Reaffirms the urgency of supporting generational renewal in agriculture; regrets the lack of a visible increase in the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) allocations dedicated to young farmers and new entrants into farming; urges the Commission and Member States to prioritise, strengthen and facilitate start-up support and access to affordable land and finance under the CAP Strategic Plans, particularly for young farmers and new entrants into farming; underlines the need for adequate resources to provide training for new entrants into farming as well as to establish dedicated credit guarantee schemes; recognises that young farmers face difficulties accessing finance and knowledge, and urges therefore the Commission and Member States to better address those challenges to secure fair income and long-term perspectives; draws attention to the ageing of rural population, persistent gender gaps, and high rates of young people neither in employment nor in education or training and emphasises support for initiatives under the Rural Pact and strong financial and political backing for farm modernisation, access to land, and vocational training;

10. Highlights persistent disparities between more and less developed regions in accessing support and stresses that generational renewal depends on integrated strategies to enhance the attractiveness of rural life and work; calls therefore on the Commission to propose differentiated measures reflecting outward-migration, demographic ageing, and land abandonment; calls on the Commission to support Member States in identifying mechanisms for dignified farmers retirement;

Sectoral programmes and competitiveness

11.Expresses serious concern over the complete removal of funding for promotion programmes under direct management, which previously supported EU agri-food exports and consumer awareness; regrets the significant cuts made to those programmes as a result of the mid-term review of the MFF; calls for the full reinstatement and adequate funding of those programmes, in order to strengthen the competitiveness, trade opportunities and reputation of EU production and exports; considers the reduction of support for promotion activities counterproductive in a context where producers face increased competition, and calls for a dedicated budget to be allocated for the promotion of products from disadvantaged and mountainous areas, with a focus on quality and traceability; urges the Commission to actively promote EU farmers and the agricultural sector both locally and through a dynamic, comprehensive EU export policy covering all agricultural products;

12.Welcomes the significant increase in sectoral allocations for fruit and vegetables and stresses the importance of protecting them from unfair competition as well as maintaining support for these and other vulnerable sectors (e.g. apiculture, wine, olive and sunflower oil)which contribute to food security, sustainable growth, rural development and employment, and reflect the quality, tradition and excellence of the EU;

13.Reiterates the value of the EU school schemes for fruit, vegetables and milk in promoting healthy diets and positive attitudes toward farming, while indirectly contributing to the improvement of children's health, well-being, overall development and academic performance, helping to reduce social inequalities and early school leaving; calls for stable, transparent, and increased funding to ensure continuity, broader reach and awareness of those schemes across all Member States and regions, as well as a better quality of the products distributed; encourages sourcing from local and community producers, prioritising, where possible, seasonal and minimally packaged products and short supply chains in order to foster rural development; underlines in that regard farmers’ key role in delivering quality food, ensuring strategic autonomy and safeguarding food security;

Rural development and innovation

14.Supports the proposed allocation of EUR 13,3 billion to the EAFRD and stresses the importance of maintaining support for rural communities, smart villages, the development of rural infrastructure, such as energy grids, as well as innovation, thereby fostering employment, sustainable growth, local development in rural areas, while providing start-up and investment support to farmers and businesses; calls for prioritising projects that safeguard agricultural jobs, create quality employment, safeguard labour rights and help tackle rural poverty and social exclusion;

Sustainable water and soil management

15.Emphasises the need to invest in sustainable water management, including the protection of wetlands as natural water-storage buffers alongside the capture, retention and efficient management of water resources and the development of strategic water storage basins, including for rainwater; calls for increased financial support to modernise and develop irrigation, precision farming and hydraulic infrastructure, making it more efficient, resilient and sustainable, through proven water-saving technologies; stresses that these investments must ensure fair access to water resources for all farmers, irrespective of farm size, safeguarding property rights; stresses the importance of investing in soil resilience, particularly in light of increasing climate variability and the rising risks of drought, fires, floods and soil degradation and erosion within CAP Strategic Plans; recalls that adequate quantities of quality water are essential for both crop irrigation and livestock farming and that investment in modern irrigation is vital for ensuring food security and shielding farmers from impacts of extreme weather events related to climate change; notes that access to EU funds for water storage facilities remains difficult and that current investments are insufficient; calls therefore for the mobilisation of additional financial instruments for this purpose;

Digitalisation and precision farming

16. Encourages further integration of digitalisation and precision farming into rural development objectives; highlights that this requires adequate funding to guarantee broadband access in all rural areas and urges the Commission to streamline and make more user-friendly the access to EU digital funding for all, but especially small and medium-sized farms; stresses that digitalisation is a tool for achieving more efficient, sustainable, traceable, socially responsible and high-performing agriculture, thereby making rural employment and areas more attractive and enabling new businesses to develop; underlines that digitalisation is also a crucial tool for the enhancement of inland areas and for combating depopulation; highlights the need to address the digital divide among farmers by providing targeted training, education, and support, particularly for small-scale farms and older farmers; recalls the importance of ensuring that research results reach farm level and are translated into farm advisory services that are accessible, affordable, practical, and tailored to farmer’s needs; draws attention to the role of stronger Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS), as well as the Farm Sustainability Data Network (FSDN), in encouraging innovation projects and promoting their uptake;

17. Calls for increased and adequate funding for research, development and innovation in the agri-food sector, including safe and sustainable alternatives to pesticides, such as biological control solutions, and emphasises the need for targeted investment in precision agriculture, adaptation to climate change, biotechnologies, including new genomic techniques, artificial intelligence and robotics, so as to optimise productivity while reducing inputs, costs and emissions; welcomes the proposed increase of EUR 34 662 944 in the budget line for “Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment” compared to 2025, and calls for this funding to be prioritised towards farm-level innovation and practical solutions; underlines that financial support should also cover circular economy projects such as the use of digestate and RENURE fertilisers, renewable energy production, and incentives for the efficient use of biomass, agricultural waste and co-products to enhance farm energy autonomy and resilience; highlights the potential of emerging technologies and production models such as agriphotovoltaics, and controlled-environment agriculture, which enables innovative and resource-efficient food production systems; stresses that those models can deliver multiple benefits, including clean energy, improved soil and crop performance, diversification of farmers’ incomes, resilience against climate impacts, and greater competitiveness and reduced reliance on imports; calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide appropriate funding, tailored policy tools and access to the European Investment Bank Group financing to support their further development and uptake;

POSEI

18. Highlights the strategic importance of the POSEI programme in ensuring the continuity of agricultural activity in the outermost regions, preserving food sovereignty and enhancing their economic, social and territorial cohesion, in line with Article 349 TFEU; deplores that the POSEI financial envelope has remained unchanged for over a decade and that the Commission has not applied the 2 % deflator set by the European Council conclusions of 17-21 July 2020; calls, therefore, on the Commission to present a substantial update of the programme, ensuring both the application of the deflator and an adequate increase in financial allocations both under the current MFF and the MFF 2028–2034, taking into account inflation, structurally higher production and transport costs, territorial fragmentation, growing exposure to extreme weather events, market volatility, and the logistical challenges of supply chains in the outermost regions; underlines the need to establish a specific mechanism to mitigate additional transport costs and to reward the environmental services provided by farmers in the outermost regions, in line with the EU’s climate and environmental objectives;

Combating animal diseases

19. Welcomes the paper presented by several Member States at the Agriculture and Fisheries Council in May 2025, noting the growing spread of different animal diseases such as avian influenza, bluetongue, peste des petits ruminants, foot and mouth disease and African swine fever; calls on the Commission to intensify preventive measures, present an EU vaccination strategy backed by dedicated funding; calls for strengthened EU-level coordination on veterinary vaccine purchase and supply through a preparedness mechanism, and for fostering vaccine development within the EU; urges the Commission to increase allocations for compensation following animal and plant diseases, as the current veterinary and phytosanitary funding for 2025–2027 proved inadequate; underlines the need for adequate funding to step up prevention and control of emerging and re-emerging animal diseases, and support research of sustainable solutions, including genetic selection for disease resistance, while reducing reliance on costly treatments; calls therefore for the establishment of a dedicated EU compensation mechanism to provide swift, fair and adequate financial support to farmers affected by epidemics or outbreaks of animal diseases, ensuring business continuity and strengthening the resilience of rural communities.

Annex: declaration of input 1 paragraph

The rapporteur for opinion declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not include in his opinion input from interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies, to be listed in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

Information on adoption by the committee asked for opinion 1 paragraph
Date adopted24.9.2025
Result of final vote+: –: 0:32 3 13
Members present for the final voteArno Bausemer, Stefano Bonaccini, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Daniel Buda, Asger Christensen, Barry Cowen, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Ivan David, Valérie Deloge, Salvatore De Meo, Csaba Dömötör, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Herbert Dorfmann, Sebastian Everding, Luke Ming Flanagan, Maria Grapini, Cristina Guarda, Martin Häusling, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart, Elsi Katainen, Stefan Köhler, Tomáš Kubín, Camilla Laureti, Norbert Lins, Cristina Maestre, Dario Nardella, Maria Noichl, Gilles Pennelle, André Rodrigues, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Arash Saeidi, Eric Sargiacomo, Christine Singer, Raffaele Stancanelli, Anna Strolenberg, Pekka Toveri, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Veronika Vrecionová, Thomas Waitz, Maria Walsh
Substitutes present for the final voteAlexander Bernhuber, Benoit Cassart, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Claudiu-Richard Târziu, Anna Zalewska
Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final voteGabriela Firea, Aurelijus Veryga

Procedure pages

How the committees handled the text, and how their members voted on it.

Final vote by roll call by the committee asked for opinion 3 paragraphs

32 · For

ECR
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Claudiu-Richard Târziu, Aurelijus Veryga, Veronika Vrecionová, Anna Zalewska
No group
Katarína Roth Neveďalová
EPP
Daniel Buda, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Herbert Dorfmann, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart, Stefan Köhler, Norbert Lins, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Pekka Toveri, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Maria Walsh
Renew
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Barry Cowen, Elsi Katainen, Christine Singer
S&D
Stefano Bonaccini, Gabriela Firea, Maria Grapini, Camilla Laureti, Cristina Maestre, Dario Nardella, André Rodrigues, Eric Sargiacomo

3 · Against

The Left
Sebastian Everding, Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi

13 · Abstained

ESN
Arno Bausemer, Ivan David
Patriots
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli
S&D
Maria Noichl
Greens
Cristina Guarda, Martin Häusling, Anna Strolenberg, Thomas Waitz