amendment list, 4 September 2026
Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligence
Document AFET-AM-792048 · (2026/2005(INI))
Committee on Foreign Affairs
Full text
Jump to an amendment (302)
- Amendment 103
- Amendment 104
- Amendment 105
- Amendment 106
- Amendment 107
- Amendment 108
- Amendment 109
- Amendment 110
- Amendment 111
- Amendment 112
- Amendment 113
- Amendment 114
- Amendment 115
- Amendment 116
- Amendment 117
- Amendment 118
- Amendment 119
- Amendment 120
- Amendment 121
- Amendment 122
- Amendment 123
- Amendment 124
- Amendment 125
- Amendment 126
- Amendment 127
- Amendment 128
- Amendment 129
- Amendment 130
- Amendment 131
- Amendment 132
- Amendment 133
- Amendment 134
- Amendment 135
- Amendment 136
- Amendment 137
- Amendment 138
- Amendment 139
- Amendment 140
- Amendment 141
- Amendment 142
- Amendment 143
- Amendment 144
- Amendment 145
- Amendment 146
- Amendment 147
- Amendment 148
- Amendment 149
- Amendment 150
- Amendment 151
- Amendment 152
- Amendment 153
- Amendment 154
- Amendment 155
- Amendment 156
- Amendment 157
- Amendment 158
- Amendment 159
- Amendment 160
- Amendment 161
- Amendment 162
- Amendment 163
- Amendment 164
- Amendment 165
- Amendment 166
- Amendment 167
- Amendment 168
- Amendment 169
- Amendment 170
- Amendment 171
- Amendment 172
- Amendment 173
- Amendment 174
- Amendment 175
- Amendment 176
- Amendment 177
- Amendment 178
- Amendment 179
- Amendment 180
- Amendment 181
- Amendment 182
- Amendment 183
- Amendment 184
- Amendment 185
- Amendment 186
- Amendment 187
- Amendment 188
- Amendment 189
- Amendment 190
- Amendment 191
- Amendment 192
- Amendment 193
- Amendment 194
- Amendment 195
- Amendment 196
- Amendment 197
- Amendment 198
- Amendment 199
- Amendment 200
- Amendment 201
- Amendment 202
- Amendment 203
- Amendment 204
- Amendment 205
- Amendment 206
- Amendment 207
- Amendment 208
- Amendment 209
- Amendment 210
- Amendment 211
- Amendment 212
- Amendment 213
- Amendment 214
- Amendment 215
- Amendment 216
- Amendment 217
- Amendment 218
- Amendment 219
- Amendment 220
- Amendment 221
- Amendment 222
- Amendment 223
- Amendment 224
- Amendment 225
- Amendment 226
- Amendment 227
- Amendment 228
- Amendment 229
- Amendment 230
- Amendment 231
- Amendment 232
- Amendment 233
- Amendment 234
- Amendment 235
- Amendment 236
- Amendment 237
- Amendment 238
- Amendment 239
- Amendment 240
- Amendment 241
- Amendment 242
- Amendment 243
- Amendment 244
- Amendment 245
- Amendment 246
- Amendment 247
- Amendment 248
- Amendment 249
- Amendment 250
- Amendment 251
- Amendment 252
- Amendment 253
- Amendment 254
- Amendment 255
- Amendment 256
- Amendment 257
- Amendment 258
- Amendment 259
- Amendment 260
- Amendment 261
- Amendment 262
- Amendment 263
- Amendment 264
- Amendment 265
- Amendment 266
- Amendment 267
- Amendment 268
- Amendment 269
- Amendment 270
- Amendment 271
- Amendment 272
- Amendment 273
- Amendment 274
- Amendment 275
- Amendment 276
- Amendment 277
- Amendment 278
- Amendment 279
- Amendment 280
- Amendment 281
- Amendment 282
- Amendment 283
- Amendment 284
- Amendment 285
- Amendment 286
- Amendment 287
- Amendment 288
- Amendment 289
- Amendment 290
- Amendment 291
- Amendment 292
- Amendment 293
- Amendment 294
- Amendment 295
- Amendment 296
- Amendment 297
- Amendment 298
- Amendment 299
- Amendment 300
- Amendment 301
- Amendment 302
- Amendment 303
- Amendment 304
- Amendment 305
- Amendment 306
- Amendment 307
- Amendment 308
- Amendment 309
- Amendment 310
- Amendment 311
- Amendment 312
- Amendment 313
- Amendment 314
- Amendment 315
- Amendment 316
- Amendment 317
- Amendment 318
- Amendment 319
- Amendment 320
- Amendment 321
- Amendment 322
- Amendment 323
- Amendment 324
- Amendment 325
- Amendment 326
- Amendment 327
- Amendment 328
- Amendment 329
- Amendment 330
- Amendment 331
- Amendment 332
- Amendment 333
- Amendment 334
- Amendment 335
- Amendment 336
- Amendment 337
- Amendment 338
- Amendment 339
- Amendment 340
- Amendment 341
- Amendment 342
- Amendment 343
- Amendment 344
- Amendment 345
- Amendment 346
- Amendment 347
- Amendment 348
- Amendment 349
- Amendment 350
- Amendment 351
- Amendment 352
- Amendment 353
- Amendment 354
- Amendment 355
- Amendment 356
- Amendment 357
- Amendment 358
- Amendment 359
- Amendment 360
- Amendment 361
- Amendment 362
- Amendment 363
- Amendment 364
- Amendment 365
- Amendment 366
- Amendment 367
- Amendment 368
- Amendment 369
- Amendment 370
- Amendment 371
- Amendment 372
- Amendment 373
- Amendment 374
- Amendment 375
- Amendment 376
- Amendment 377
- Amendment 378
- Amendment 379
- Amendment 380
- Amendment 381
- Amendment 382
- Amendment 383
- Amendment 384
- Amendment 385
- Amendment 386
- Amendment 387
- Amendment 388
- Amendment 389
- Amendment 390
- Amendment 391
- Amendment 392
- Amendment 393
- Amendment 394
- Amendment 395
- Amendment 396
- Amendment 397
- Amendment 398
- Amendment 399
- Amendment 400
- Amendment 401
- Amendment 402
- Amendment 403
- Amendment 404
Text 1,844 paragraphs
Amendment 103
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Stresses that human rights, particularly human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, must remain at the centre of AI; stresses that legal human rights obligations apply in all circumstances, and that AI systems need to offer transparency and oversight as a basis for accountability and responsibility, ensuring that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle; | 1. Stresses that meaningful human control and oversight must remain at the centre of AI to guarantee human rights, ethics, security, responsibility and accountability; considers it essential that systems are designed in a way that relevant humans have the right amount of knowledge, expertise and responsibility to maintain meaningful control and that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle; |
Or. en
Amendment 104
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Stresses that human rights, particularly human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, must remain at the centre of AI; stresses that legal human rights obligations apply in all circumstances, and that AI systems need to offer transparency and oversight as a basis for accountability and responsibility, ensuring that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle; | 1. Stresses that human rights, particularly human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, as well as respect for privacy and data protection, must remain at the centre of AI, ensuring that AI technologies are designed, tested, and deployed in ways that prioritize human well-being, autonomy, and dignity, while preventing harm to individuals and communities; stresses that legal human rights obligations apply in all circumstances, and that AI systems need to offer transparency and oversight as a basis for accountability and responsibility, ensuring that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle; |
Or. en
Read the rest (1,832 paragraphs)
Amendment 105
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Stresses that human rights, particularly human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, must remain at the centre of AI; stresses that legal human rights obligations apply in all circumstances, and that AI systems need to offer transparency and oversight as a basis for accountability and responsibility, ensuring that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle; | 1. Stresses that human rights, particularly human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, must remain at the centre of AI; stresses that legal human rights obligations apply in all circumstances, and that AI systems need to offer transparency and oversight as a basis for accountability and responsibility, ensuring that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle; underlines that a predictable, proportionate and innovation-friendly regulatory environment is key to ensuring European competitiveness in AI and to guaranteeing that AI systems placed on the Union market or deployed by Union actors are designed, developed and deployed in compliance with Union human rights standards, rather than the Union becoming dependent on third-country systems built to different, or no, such standards; |
Or. en
Amendment 106
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Stresses that human rights, particularly human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, must remain at the centre of AI; stresses that legal human rights obligations apply in all circumstances, and that AI systems need to offer transparency and oversight as a basis for accountability and responsibility, ensuring that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle; | 1. Stresses that human rights, particularly human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, must remain at the centre of AI; Stresses that legal human rights obligations apply in all circumstances, and that AI systems need to offer transparency and oversight as a basis for accountability and responsibility, ensuring that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle, without this entailing the establishment of new judicial or quasi-judicial mechanisms at Union level which would duplicate the powers of national courts; |
Or. pt
Amendment 107
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Stresses that human rights, particularly human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, must remain at the centre of AI; stresses that legal human rights obligations apply in all circumstances, and that AI systems need to offer transparency and oversight as a basis for accountability and responsibility, ensuring that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle; | 1. Stresses that human rights, particularly human dignity, equality, non-discrimination and freedom of speech, must remain at the centre of AI; stresses that legal human rights obligations apply in all circumstances, and that AI systems need to offer transparency and oversight as a basis for accountability and responsibility, ensuring that remedies are accessible and readily available at every phase of the AI life cycle; |
Or. fi
Amendment 108
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Considers that artificial intelligence is evolving at an unprecedented pace, rapidly transforming economies, security, and daily life; stresses that governments have a fundamental responsibility to establish clear regulatory frameworks to ensure that technological innovation fully respects human rights, human dignity, and privacy; underlines that this task is intrinsically linked to the EU’s foreign policy, as the standards set today will dictate global digital governance; calls, therefore, on the High Representative and the Commission to actively project a human-centric model of AI in EU external action, offering partner countries ethical technological alternatives and preventing the adoption of foreign technologies that undermine fundamental freedoms and create long-term autocratic dependencies; |
Or. en
Amendment 109
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Acknowledges that human rights defenders, particularly women and those from marginalised communities, face heightened AI-enabled threats, including surveillance, profiling, harassment, disinformation; stresses that AI systems can amplify existing threats to their security and ability to carry out their work, contributing to self-censorship, silencing and the shrinking of civic space, and causing serious psychological harm; stresses that EU external AI action should address risks to human rights defenders and civic space, in line with EU and UN guidelines on human rights defenders; |
Or. en
Amendment 110
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Underlines that there is no international organisation with exclusive competence on AI and the international governance of its human rights aspects is considered at multiple levels; stresses that the EU should cooperate internationally as to avoid duplication while preserving the competences of the Member States concerning AI and national security; |
Or. en
Amendment 111
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Stresses that the EU's external action on artificial intelligence should take into account the specific risks faced by human rights defenders and the civic space in which they operate, in line with the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders and the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders; |
Or. en
Amendment 112
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Underlines that states have a duty under international law to refrain from and address any unjustified interference with human rights, and to ensure their effective realisation and protection; emphasises that this duty is particularly important in the context of the governance of AI systems; | 2. Underlines that states have a duty under various international law instruments to refrain from and address any unjustified interference with human rights of their citizens, and to ensure their effective realisation and protection; emphasises that this duty is particularly important in the context of the governance of AI systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 113
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. Expresses concern that massive de-regulation in AI deployment risks weakening oversight in a period of rapid AI expansion and growing documented misuse of AI systems, including lack of legal certainty and predictability; acknowledges, at the same time, that excessive regulatory intervention may undermine innovation, investment and competitiveness; highlights that an appropriate response would be defending a proportionate, risk-based and innovation-friendly approach; |
Or. en
Amendment 114
Dan Barna, Lucia Yar, Petras Auštrevičius
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. Highlights the growing gap between the speed of technological change and the pace of democratic governance with regards to it; |
Or. en
Amendment 115
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; | 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; notes that AI models often process vast amounts of personal data without a valid legal basis, transparency or accountability, and that advanced data aggregation and simulation techniques can facilitate profiling, predictive behaviour, and surveillance, posing significant risks to human dignity, autonomy, freedom, security, private life, and physical and psychological well-being; underlines that trustworthy AI models should abide by the rule of law and comply with strict ethical principles, as well with clear principles for personal data processing, including information to the user, lawfulness, necessity, proportionality, fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, data security, accountability and control over the information; |
Or. en
Amendment 116
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; | 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; notes that large language models often process vast amounts of personal data without consent or transparency, and that advanced data aggregation and simulation techniques can facilitate collective profiling, predictive behaviour, and surveillance, posing significant risks to human dignity, autonomy, private life, as well as physical and psychological well-being; underlines that trustworthy AI models should set clear principles for personal data processing, including information to the user, lawfulness, necessity, proportionality, fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, data security, accountability and control over the information; |
Or. en
Amendment 117
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; | 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data protection is essential for protecting digital human rights; notes with concern that AI companies rely on vast amounts of personal data and in some cases used them without individuals knowledge or informed consent; stresses that the collection and use of data must be transparent, accountable and subjective to effective oversight, ensuring that individuals keep meaningful control over their personal information; |
Or. en
Amendment 118
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; | 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; stresses that a high level of data protection and traceability is compatible with, and should be accompanied by, improved access to high-quality data for AI development in the Union, and that the absence of such access risks increasing European dependence on models trained and governed outside any comparable rights framework; |
Or. en
Amendment 119
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; | 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; highlights the need for a strong protection of data of vulnerable groups, mainly minors that are often, in a breach of currently existing legislation, used by social media and their algorithms, causing severe negative consequences for their privacy and mental as well as physical health, relationships and healthy development; |
Or. en
Amendment 120
Alice Teodorescu Måwe
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; | 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; stresses that measures to address the risks of AI must not hinder the responsible development and use of the technology, taking into account the significant economic, technological and geopolitical risks for the EU of lagging behind in AI development; |
Or. sv
Amendment 121
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy is essential for protecting digital human rights; | 3. Emphasises that data is a crucial component of AI technologies and that safeguarding data privacy in accordance with EU law is essential for protecting digital human rights; |
Or. en
Amendment 122
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; | 4. Acknowledges that AI risks making inequality worse because of concentrated power, biased systems and digital gaps, but considers that AI can also help reducing inequality by enlarging access to knowledge, improving public services and narrowing wage gaps; |
Or. en
Amendment 123
Matthieu Valet
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; | 4. Warns against the ever-increasing delegation of human faculties of analysis, judgment and decision-making to artificial-intelligence systems; stresses that the continual reliance on the recommendations, advice and decisions produced by these automated systems may gradually lead individuals and institutions to defer to an algorithmic authority perceived as more objective, more serious or more reliable than human judgment; takes the view that preserving the ability of individuals, particularly the most vulnerable among us, to exercise their own judgment must be a fundamental principle of any AI-related policy; |
Or. fr
Amendment 124
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; | 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for defenceless groups, including older people, persons with disabilities, homeless people and rural populations with lower digital literacy, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; |
Or. pt
Amendment 125
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; | 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or insufficiently robust or diverse data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; |
Or. en
Amendment 126
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; | 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and amplify discriminatory biases, stereotypes, stigma, prejudice and false assumptions; stresses that the use of AI systems across different cultural, social, and legal contexts can further amplify discrimination, particularly gender and intersectional discrimination; expresses concern that the use of AI by public administrations to manage and implement public policies, such as social services, presents real risks of falling into discriminatory bias over support for vulnerable populations, as there have been documented cases of individuals and communities being treated as suspects by default in a scenario of fraud detection and rights ascertainment, thereby worsening their situation; |
Or. en
Amendment 127
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; | 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; moreover highlights the risk of AI systems being able to generate misleading, distorted or unrealistic results in the name of promoting the objectives of the DEI agenda; |
Or. fi
Amendment 128
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already marginalised groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; | 4. Underlines the risk of AI exacerbating existing social inequalities, particularly for already vulnerable groups, as systems may be built on algorithms and/or data that reproduce, perpetuate and exacerbate discriminatory biases; calls for a common European methodology to assess the impact of AI on these groups; |
Or. en
Amendment 129
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; | 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of individuals, groups and societies through facial recognition, biometric systems, and other technologies. thereby posing a grave threat to democracy, human rights; notes with concern the increasing use of AI-enabled surveillance technologies in some countries, raising serious concerns regarding privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly and other fundamental human rights; underlines that AI-enabled surveillance, profiling and automated analysis of personal data can particularly endanger human rights defenders and civil society actors by facilitating their identification, monitoring and targeting; |
Or. en
Amendment 130
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; | 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; notes with particular concern that authoritarian states develop and export integrated AI-enabled surveillance systems to third countries, and that these are deployed against political opponents, journalists, religious and ethnic minorities and human rights defenders; stresses that the Union's external action must offer partner countries a credible democratic alternative to such systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 131
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; | 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; warns that AI-assisted surveillance can stifle legitimate criticism, close spaces for public discussion, foment self-censorship, and be used to intimidate and harass individuals, including through cyber harassment and violence, and lead to their detainment, depriving them of ability to enjoy their fundamental freedoms; |
Or. en
Amendment 132
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; | 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; warns that AI-assisted surveillance can stifle legitimate criticism, close spaces for public discussion, foment self-censorship, and be used to intimidate and harass individuals, including through cyber harassment and violence, and lead to their detainment, depriving them of ability to enjoy their fundamental freedoms; |
Or. en
Amendment 133
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; | 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; acknowledges, at the same time, that AI-assisted surveillance tools, when subject to prior judicial oversight and parliamentary oversight, remain indispensable for the prevention of terrorism and organised crime; |
Or. pt
Amendment 134
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; | 5. Is deeply concerned that AI has enabled surveillance to become significantly more sophisticated, pervasive and widespread, allowing for the monitoring of entire groups and societies and posing a grave threat to democracy and human rights; |
Or. en
Amendment 135
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5a. Denounces the growing deployment of AI-powered surveillance technologies, including facial recognition, biometric identification, predictive profiling and behavioural analysis systems, which pose serious threats to privacy, freedom of expression, assembly and association, democratic participation and the right to non-discrimination; |
Or. en
Amendment 136
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; | 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance can be used to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders, including where such technologies are deployed by public authorities for law enforcement or security purposes; stresses that the use of such technologies must comply with international human rights law and the principles of legality, necessity and proportionality and be subject to strict safeguards, effective independent oversight and accessible remedies, particularly where they may affect human rights defenders, journalists, civil society organisations or other actors exercising their rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly; |
Or. en
Amendment 137
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; | 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance can suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; stresses that its use by public authorities must comply with human rights law and principles of legality, necessity and proportionality, with strict safeguards, independent oversight and effective remedies; |
Or. en
Amendment 138
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; | 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can, without strong and efficiently enforced legal safeguards, easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; |
Or. en
Amendment 139
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; | 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; stresses that such activities must be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable international law and the principles of legality, necessity and proportionality; regrets that broad exceptions to legal safeguards for AI systems, such as in defence, counter-terrorism and national security, can hinder human rights monitoring; |
Or. en
Amendment 140
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; | 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders, which clearly sets those instances of abuse apart from legitimate surveillance practices governed by the rule of law in accordance with their respective constitutional orders; |
Or. pt
Amendment 141
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; | 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; stresses that clear rules on the use of such systems are needed to guarantee security without compromising individual freedom; |
Or. en
Amendment 142
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; | 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent, target political opposition, and undermine liberal democracy; |
Or. en
Amendment 143
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders; | 6. Warns that AI-assisted surveillance, even when initially used for legitimate purposes such as law enforcement and security, can easily be repurposed to suppress dissent and target human rights defenders, political dissidents and differing political views; |
Or. en
Amendment 144
Engin Eroglu
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Is highly concerned about the deployment of AI-enabled systems by authoritarian actors, including Russia, North Korea, Iran and China, for mass surveillance, suppression of dissent, and targeted persecution on political, ethnic, or religious grounds; warns that the rapid proliferation of these technologies facilitates extraterritorial state-sponsored repression, thereby directly compromising the security and rights of diaspora populations and eventually European citizens inside the European Union; highlights the risk posed by the proliferation of AI and similar frontier technologies from authoritarian regimes to third countries; warns that the export of foreign surveillance standards could consolidate authoritarian governance models abroad, thereby systematically eroding international human rights; |
Or. en
Amendment 145
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Notes that AI-assisted surveillance and automated classification systems are used in certain jurisdictions to identify, monitor and restrict religious communities, including through the automated detection of religious symbols, texts, dress and gatherings; stresses that freedom of thought, conscience and religion is among the rights most directly threatened by pervasive automated monitoring; calls on the EEAS to address the use of AI against religious minorities in its human rights reporting and in relevant human rights dialogues with third countries; |
Or. en
Amendment 146
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Expresses deep concern about the use of AI-assisted surveillance technologies, including spyware-like digital intrusion programmes, to target journalists and political opponents, either by third countries or possibly by Member State authorities; calls on the Member States to thoroughly, independently and transparently investigate all reported cases and to apply in full the safeguards already enshrined in Union law; |
Or. pt
Amendment 147
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Strongly condemns the malign use of AI by authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, including China, to conduct mass surveillance, suppress dissent and persecute individuals on political, ethnic or religious grounds; warns that these technologies increasingly enable transnational repression, extending the reach beyond their borders to target human rights defenders, journalists, political opponents and diaspora communities, including within the EU; |
Or. en
Amendment 148
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Condemns in the strongest possible terms the use of artificial intelligence by rogue states like China and Russia for the mass surveillance of citizens, controlling society and suppressing dissidence; |
Or. fi
Amendment 149
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Strongly condemns the use of AI to perpetuate gender-based violence and undermine gender rights, as seen in the Grok case, which has shown how AI-powered tools can be used to create and spread non-consensual, sexualised content, including deepfakes and other forms of image and video manipulation; | 7. Is deeply concerned that AI-powered tools can be used to create and spread non-consensual, sexualised content, including deepfakes and other forms of image and video manipulation as documented in recent cases that triggered inquiries by the European Commission and national regulators; strongly condemns the use of AI to generate (child) sexual abuse material; |
Or. en
Amendment 150
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Strongly condemns the use of AI to perpetuate gender-based violence and undermine gender rights, as seen in the Grok case, which has shown how AI-powered tools can be used to create and spread non-consensual, sexualised content, including deepfakes and other forms of image and video manipulation; | 7. Strongly condemns the use of AI to perpetuate gender-based violence and undermine gender rights, as seen in the Grok case, which has shown how AI-powered tools can be used to create and spread non-consensual, sexualised content, including deepfakes and other forms of image and video manipulation; notes that such technologies can be used to harass, intimidate, and silence individuals, especially women and girls, and undermine their freedom of expression, participation in public life, and mental well-being; stresses the disproportionate impact this has on women in public life, including politicians, journalists, human rights defenders and activists, who are particularly targeted by these forms of AI-enabled abuse with the aim of intimidating them and discouraging their participation in democratic life; calls for trustworthy AI systems to prioritise the implementation of the highest standards and safeguards to protect women´s rights and equality; |
Or. en
Amendment 151
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Strongly condemns the use of AI to perpetuate gender-based violence and undermine gender rights, as seen in the Grok case, which has shown how AI-powered tools can be used to create and spread non-consensual, sexualised content, including deepfakes and other forms of image and video manipulation; | 7. Highlights that AI systems disproportionately affect women, girls and LGBTIQ+ persons by reinforcing structural discrimination, facilitating technology-enabled gender-based violence and online harassment; Strongly condemns the use of AI to perpetuate gender-based violence and undermine gender rights, as seen in the Grok case, which has shown how AI-powered tools can be used to create and spread non-consensual, sexualised content, including deepfakes and other forms of image and video manipulation; condemns the use of AI to profile or infer individuals' sexual orientation, gender identity or other protected characteristics; |
Or. en
Amendment 152
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Strongly condemns the use of AI to perpetuate gender-based violence and undermine gender rights, as seen in the Grok case, which has shown how AI-powered tools can be used to create and spread non-consensual, sexualised content, including deepfakes and other forms of image and video manipulation; | 7. Strongly condemns the use of AI to perpetuate gender-based violence and undermine gender rights, as seen in the Grok case, which has shown how AI-powered tools can be used to create and spread non-consensual, sexualised content, including deepfakes and other forms of image and video manipulation; stresses that the primary responsibility lies with those who produce and disseminate that content, not only with the providers of the technology or platform, and that any regulatory response should clearly distinguish these separate responsibilities; |
Or. pt
Amendment 153
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7a. Stresses that AI technologies are being developed without specific gender responsive safeguards, amplifying existing gender biases, shaping harmful narratives about girls and women and creating new gender-specific threats, such as deepfakes, which enable image-based abuse and online harassment that disproportionately target girls and young women, particularly those in the public sphere, such as politicians, journalists and activists; |
Or. en
Amendment 154
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; | 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure the full and effective enforcement of existing Union law on the protection of minors online, and to develop more dedicated European legislation for ensuring age-appropriate design, parents controls, robust age verification and effective safeguards against AI-generated harmful content; |
Or. en
Amendment 155
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; | 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents, whose developing cognitive abilities make them particularly vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation through AI-powered tools, including falling victims to AI-generated non-consensual, sexualised content; calls for trustworthy AI systems to put in place the highest standards and safeguards to protect children´s rights as a priority; |
Or. en
Amendment 156
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; | 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; reiterates particularly that social media and their recommender alghorithms pose grave risks to healthy development of children and adolescents; highlights therefore the urgent need to address these risks, i.a. by reconsidering the classification of these recommender systems as high-risk AI; |
Or. en
Amendment 157
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; | 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; considers that it is essential to protect the development of foundational learning skills of young children during the early years of education; welcomes, in this regard, the imposition of a near-ban on the use of generative AI in elementary schools in Norway; |
Or. en
Amendment 158
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; | 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; calls on the Member States to bolster, as a matter of priority and in the exercise of their own powers in the fields of education and the protection of minors, national mechanisms for the protection of children and adolescents from the risks posed by AI; |
Or. pt
Amendment 159
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents; | 8. Is deeply concerned about the potential harm that AI can cause to children and adolescents through exposure to harmful content and the development of unhealthy psychological dependency; |
Or. en
Amendment 160
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8a. Is particularly concerned about the mental health risks associated with AI, especially for vulnerable groups, including risks related to social isolation, emotional dependency and exposure to harmful content; |
Or. en
Amendment 161
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; | 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; stresses that the upheaval to labour markets caused by AI systems is comparable to earlier historic innovations that brought about major change, where machines and automated systems replaced many jobs; highlights the responsibility of national authorities and governments to prepare for the changes that AI systems bring with them, so that the rights of workers, human rights and welfare are attended to when the nature or content of work changes; |
Or. fi
Amendment 162
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; | 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; emphasises that the deployment of AI in the workplace must be driven by an ethical, precautionary and human-centric approach; warns that AI cannot justify or be used to undermine workers´ rights, dignity and well-being, displace workers or augment skill gaps or de-skilling; warns about the potential use of AI systems to subject workers to automated surveillance or to associate their productivity with their worth, undermining the fundamental right to labour; insists that, on the contrary, trustworthy AI systems should contribute to the upskilling of the workforce and build upon their potential to improve global working conditions; |
Or. en
Amendment 163
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; | 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; calls on the EU and the Member States to strengthen governance frameworks and to invest in skills, education and training systems in order to better protect workers' rights and to ensure that AI is used to improve human capabilities, not undermine them; |
Or. en
Amendment 164
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; | 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting, both in positive and negative way; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity, health, safety, well-being as well as their work-life balance or for displacing workers; highlights the need to put in place strategies to fill in the skills gaps and to ensure accessible and available up-skilling and re-skilling, leaving no-one behind; |
Or. en
Amendment 165
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; | 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; stresses, at the same time, that AI also offers significant opportunities for productivity gains and the creation of new, higher-value jobs, and that the Union's ability to protect workers through this transition depends on sustained investment in reskilling and upskilling, as well as on Europe's own capacity to develop and deploy competitive AI systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 166
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; | 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; recognises, at the same time, the potential of AI to create new sectors of activity and skilled jobs, and the need for active reskilling policies that support rather than stifle innovation; |
Or. pt
Amendment 167
Matthieu Valet
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; | 9. Recognises the impact of AI systems on reshaping global work, labour markets and productivity; emphasises that the effects of AI systems will be profound and long-lasting; warns that the deployment of AI systems cannot be used to justify undermining workers’ rights, dignity and well-being, displacing workers or augmenting skill gaps or deskilling; stresses that the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence marks a shift in the relationship between human beings and these automated systems, which are now capable of producing text, images, sound and other content traditionally regarded as the preserve of human creativity; warns, however, against the excessive delegation of these activities, which could lead to a decline in and the loss of creativity and skills amongst content-creators; is particularly concerned at the use, without effective consent or appropriate remuneration, of protected works and content for the purposes of developing and training AI systems; stresses the need to uphold intellectual property rights and to ensure transparency in respect of the works used; |
Or. fr
Amendment 168
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9a. Calls for meaningful human oversight in high-risk applications of AI while rejecting disproportionate restrictions that prevent the responsible use of AI in healthcare, education, public administration, research and industry; |
Or. en
Amendment 169
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes the growing use of artificial intelligence-powered technologies for the surveillance and management of migration routes and the protection of the Union’s external borders; recognises the strategic importance of reliable and secure AI tools in strengthening border management, preventing irregular migration, combating human trafficking and smuggling networks, and identifying emerging security threats; calls on the Union to support Member States and partner countries in developing and deploying secure, effective and interoperable technological solutions for external border protection; |
Or. en
Amendment 170
Alice Teodorescu Måwe
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes the growing use of AI-enabled technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including at the EU’s external borders, and stresses that such technologies can contribute to more effective border management and increased security, while respecting applicable fundamental rights and legal obligations; |
Or. sv
Amendment 171
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies such as drones, biometric tools, and heat and motion-detecting cameras, to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; warns that while these technologies are intended to enhance border governance, they deter individuals from seeking international protection, further undermining the right to asylum and the principle of non-refoulement enshrined in Union law, and resulting in migrants seeking ever more dangerous routes into the EU, thus posing significant risks to their rights and safety; demands transparency in Union funding provided for the deployment of AI-powered technologies in EU border management and of the EU-funded systems in third countries; |
Or. en
Amendment 172
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; Strongly opposes the use of AI systems for automated decision-making, predictive profiling and biometric surveillance in migration, asylum and border management because they undermine the rights to asylum, non-discrimination, due process and effective remedy; calls for strict human rights safeguards, meaningful human oversight and independent monitoring, while prohibiting AI applications that put migrants, refugees and racialised communities at risk; insists that all data generated through AI systems deployed in migration, asylum, border management or other public security functions, particularly where financed with public funds, must remain under public ownership and governance, be processed exclusively in compliance with fundamental rights and data protection standards, and must not be retained, commercialised or repurposed by private providers; |
Or. en
Amendment 173
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; stresses that such technologies, when deployed within the safeguards of the Pact on Migration and Asylum, can strengthen the protection of human rights by enabling faster identification, better safeguarding of vulnerable persons and more effective prevention of trafficking in human beings, while also contributing to a more orderly management of the Union's external borders; |
Or. en
Amendment 174
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU, essential to curbing illegal immigration and human trafficking networks, and underlines that these new tools must be accompanied by suitable procedural safeguards; |
Or. pt
Amendment 175
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; encourages the EU and its Member States to improve the use of AI-tools in predicting migration patterns in order to support early warning systems and resource planning; |
Or. en
Amendment 176
Matthieu Valet
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; applauds this improvement but emphasises that it must be operated and ultimately signed off by humans; |
Or. fr
Amendment 177
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; welcomes the efforts to make the EU’s external borders more effective, including through the use of AI systems; |
Or. fi
Amendment 178
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Notes a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; | 10. Notes with grave concern a growing reliance on AI-powered technologies to monitor borders and migration routes, including along the external borders of the EU; |
Or. en
Amendment 179
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe environmental and social implications of AI systems; | 11. Recognise the potential environmental and social implications of AI systems; recalls, at the same time, that AI applications can contribute significantly to energy efficiency, grid optimisation, climate modelling and the reduction of emissions; calls for a balanced assessment of the net environmental effect of AI deployment rather than of its energy consumption alone; |
Or. en
Amendment 180
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe environmental and social implications of AI systems; | 11. Highlights the need to address environmental and social implications of AI systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 181
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe environmental and social implications of AI systems; | 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe environmental and social implications of AI systems, particularly given its rapid deployment, which include excessive energy and water consumption, as well as a growing demand for rare earth minerals, thus exacerbating resource conflicts; stresses that this trend intensifies human rights violations in the supply chain, particularly with regard to workers' rights, the right to a safe and healthy environment, and the right to access clean water; emphasises that addressing these challenges is essential to ensuring that the digital transition is sustainable and consistent with Europe’s climate and environmental objectives; |
Or. en
Amendment 182
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe environmental and social implications of AI systems; | 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe environmental and social implications of AI systems, particularly given its rapid deployment, which include excessive energy and water consumption, as well as a growing demand for rare earth minerals, thus exacerbating resource conflicts; stresses that this trend intensifies human rights violations in the supply chain, particularly with regard to workers' rights, the right to a safe and healthy environment, and the right to access clean water; |
Or. en
Amendment 183
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe environmental and social implications of AI systems; | 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe environmental and social implications of AI systems and calls strongly for them to be assessed together with the net benefits of AI for energy efficiency; |
Or. pt
Amendment 184
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe environmental and social implications of AI systems; | 11. Is deeply concerned about the severe social implications of AI systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 185
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11a. Is deeply concerned about the environmental footprint of AI, given the extensive carbon, energy, and water costs associated with the training of large models and the environmental costs of AI data centres, including their heavy reliance on water supplies; stresses the need to assess and mitigate the lifecycle environmental impacts of AI systems, including resource use, electronic waste and the extraction of critical raw materials; |
Or. en
Amendment 186
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11a. Is concerned about the use of AI systems to identify, locate and persecute individuals on the basis of their religion or belief, including religious minorities and Christian communities in countries where they face persecution; calls on the EEAS to regularly include this aspect in its annual reports on freedom of religion or belief in the world; |
Or. pt
Amendment 187
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11a. Calls for comprehensive assessments of the environmental and climate impacts of AI, including energy and water consumption, critical raw material extraction and electronic waste, ensuring that the costs of digitalisation are not disproportionately borne by vulnerable communities and countries in the Global South just as is currently the case; |
Or. en
Amendment 188
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11a. Is deeply concerned about the growing influence of censorship embedded within AI tools, undermining the freedom of information and genuine free political discussion, that are necessary for a democracy to flourish; |
Or. en
Amendment 189
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; | 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing use of AI-enabled technologies to facilitate and scale up transnational repression, including through surveillance, biometric identification, digital tracking, profiling, impersonation, disinformation, harassment and other forms of intimidation targeting journalists, political opponents, human rights defenders, dissidents and diaspora communities across borders; stresses that AI can enable authorities and other actors to aggregate and analyse data from multiple sources, identify individuals and their networks, and coordinate cross-border repression, thereby undermining fundamental freedoms and democratic participation; |
Or. en
Amendment 190
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; | 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out and scale-up transnational repression, including through surveillance, biometric identification, profiling, impersonation, disinformation, harassment and other forms of digital intimidation against individuals, including human rights defenders and journalists; stresses that AI can enable actors engaging in transnational repression to collect, aggregate and analyse data from multiple sources, as well as coordinating cross-border repression; acknowledged that human rights defenders, particularly women, LGTB and defenders from marginalised and discriminated communities, are particularly exposed to AI-enabled threats; |
Or. en
Amendment 191
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; | 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing use of AI-enabled technologies to facilitate and scale up transnational repression, including through surveillance, biometric identification, profiling, impersonation, disinformation, harassment and other forms of digital intimidation targeting human rights defenders across borders; stresses that AI can enable authorities and other actors to aggregate and analyse data from multiple sources, identify individuals and their networks, and coordinate cross-border repression; |
Or. en
Amendment 192
Dan Barna, Lucia Yar, Petras Auštrevičius
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; | 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out, intensify and scale up transnational repression; |
Or. en
Amendment 193
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; | 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; calls on the EU and its Member States to strengthen coordination with democratic partners to counter these practices and prevent the transfer of technologies that facilitate such repression; |
Or. en
Amendment 194
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; | 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; calls for the EEAS and the Member States to develop a coordinated response, including through the Union's human rights sanctions regime; |
Or. en
Amendment 195
Engin Eroglu
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; | 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; calls on the EU and its Member States to reinforce multilateral coordination with like-minded partners to transnational repression; |
Or. en
Amendment 196
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; | 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression through disinformation campaigns and other malicious methodologies; |
Or. en
Amendment 197
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression; | 12. Is deeply concerned about the growing risks of AI being used to carry out transnational repression, such as the monitoring, intimidation and harassment of dissidents; |
Or. fi
Amendment 198
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights; | 13. Calls on businesses developing AI systems to ensure that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights; calls for binding human rights due diligence obligations for companies developing, financing, deploying or exporting AI systems, ensuring civil liability and effective access to remedy for victims of AI-related human rights violations; |
Or. en
Amendment 199
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights; | 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses, particularly providers of AI systems as well as those engaged in public-private AI partnerships, in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage is ethical and respects human rights; highlights that businesses should identify, prevent, mitigate and account for actual and potential adverse human rights risks throughout the AI lifecycle, in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which serve as an appropriate framework for addressing human right impacts across the AI value chain; |
Or. en
Amendment 200
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights; | 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI, and the use of data, respect human rights; and calls on industry leaders to prioritise responsible development over unchecked acceleration in such transformative technologies; |
Or. en
Amendment 201
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights; | 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights ; underlines that companies developing, deploying or providing AI systems should identify, prevent, mitigate and account for actual and potential adverse human rights impacts arising throughout the AI life cycle, in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; stresses that such assessments should specifically consider impacts on human rights defenders, civil society and civic space; supports the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights as an appropriate framework for addressing human right impacts across the AI value chain; |
Or. en
Amendment 202
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights; | 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights; stresses that expectations placed on European companies operating in third countries should be matched by comparable expectations of their international competitors, so that responsible conduct does not become a competitive disadvantage; |
Or. en
Amendment 203
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights; | 13. Stresses the crucial role of businesses in ensuring that the development and deployment of AI and data usage respect human rights, pointing out that the competitiveness of European AI businesses and the simplification of the applicable regulatory framework constitute a necessary condition for them to be able to compete and thus promote European standards globally; |
Or. pt
Amendment 204
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 14. Insists that states have a duty to effectively promote and protect human rights against abuses by third parties, including businesses; | 14. Insists that states have a duty to effectively promote and protect the freedom of information of individual citizens and entrepreneurs; emphasises that AI censorship is a significant concern for small businesses and individuals relying on AI technology for accurate and unbiased assistance; |
Or. en
Amendment 205
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 14. Insists that states have a duty to effectively promote and protect human rights against abuses by third parties, including businesses; | 14. Insists that states have a duty to effectively promote and protect human rights against abuses by third parties, including businesses; considers that mandatory human rights due diligence obligations, effective regulations and oversight mechanisms throughout the AI lifecycle could amount to such measures and ensure that AI is developed in an ethical way; |
Or. en
Amendment 206
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 14. Insists that states have a duty to effectively promote and protect human rights against abuses by third parties, including businesses; | 14. Insists that states have a duty to effectively promote and protect human rights against abuses by third parties, including businesses; stresses that this duty includes ensuring effective human rights due diligence and accountability for AI systems that may adversely affect human rights defenders and civic space; |
Or. en
Amendment 207
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 15. Calls for the EU institutions and the Member States to lead the efforts in relevant international forums and among international partners to develop AI-specific guidance on corporate responsibility for human rights; | 15. Calls for the EU institutions and the Member States to lead the efforts in relevant international forums and among international partners to promote the consistent application of existing internationally agreed frameworks on business and human rights to the development and deployment of AI, avoiding the creation of duplicative or divergent instruments that would increase compliance burdens on European companies without raising standards globally; |
Or. en
Amendment 208
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 15. Calls for the EU institutions and the Member States to lead the efforts in relevant international forums and among international partners to develop AI-specific guidance on corporate responsibility for human rights; | 15. Calls for the EU institutions and the Member States to lead the efforts in relevant international forums and among international partners to develop AI-specific guidance on corporate responsibility for human rights, including specific guidance on identifying and addressing risks to human rights defenders, civil society and civic space; |
Or. en
Amendment 209
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 15. Calls for the EU institutions and the Member States to lead the efforts in relevant international forums and among international partners to develop AI-specific guidance on corporate responsibility for human rights; | 15. Calls for the EU institutions and the Member States to lead the efforts in relevant international forums and among international partners to develop AI-specific guidance on corporate responsibility for human rights; including specific guidance on identifying and addressing risks to human rights defenders, civil society and civic space; |
Or. en
Amendment 210
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 15. Calls for the EU institutions and the Member States to lead the efforts in relevant international forums and among international partners to develop AI-specific guidance on corporate responsibility for human rights; | 15. Calls for the EU institutions and the Member States to lead the efforts in relevant international forums and among international partners to develop AI-specific guidance on corporate responsibility for human rights, in coordination with existing OECD initiatives; |
Or. pt
Amendment 211
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in warfare; | 16. Strongly condemns the use of artificial intelligence to facilitate, enable or conceal war crimes, crimes against humanity or other serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law; stresses that AI must always be developed, deployed and governed in accordance with the principles of peace, social justice, equality, solidarity and the full respect of fundamental rights, ensuring that technological innovation serves the public interest rather than reinforcing systems of domination, discrimination, exploitation or repression; |
Or. en
Amendment 212
Alice Teodorescu Måwe
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in warfare; | 16. Notes that artificial intelligence, including the processing and analysis of data and information, has become a central part of modern warfare and defence capabilities; recognises the important role that AI-enabled technologies have played in strengthening Ukraine’s ability to defend itself against Russia’s war of aggression; stresses that the risks posed by the use of AI in warfare must not hinder the development and use of crucial modern defence technologies; |
Or. sv
Amendment 213
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in warfare; | 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in armed conflicts; underlines, at the same time, that human-rights-compliant defence AI can also play an important role in strengthening European defence, including through instruments such as SAFE and EDIP; |
Or. en
Amendment 214
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in warfare; | 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in warfare, including for intelligence-gathering, data analysis, targeting, and target prioritization, as well as the deployment of AI-powered autonomous weapon systems, particularly in conflict zones; underlines that the "human-in-control" principle must be an essential requirement over the use of force, and the design and deployment of such systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 215
Dan Barna, Lucia Yar, Petras Auštrevičius
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in warfare; | 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in warfare and about the absense of a legally-binding international agreement to govern military AI and limit the autonomy of AI-enabled weapons; |
Or. en
Amendment 216
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in warfare; | 16. Expresses concern about the growing evidence of AI systems being used in warfare, particularly about the latest allegations of using fully-autonomous drones against Ukraine; |
Or. en
Amendment 217
Alice Teodorescu Måwe
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16a. Stresses the need for the EU and the Member States to strengthen their ability to prevent, deter and respond to AI-enabled attacks and other hostile uses of artificial intelligence by state and non-state actors, including AI-enabled cyberattacks, information interference and other forms of hybrid threats; calls for enhanced cooperation between the EU, Member States and trusted international partners to develop resilient capabilities against such threats; |
Or. sv
Amendment 218
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16a. Strongly condemns the growing militarisation of artificial intelligence and the development of autonomous weapons systems capable of selecting and engaging targets without meaningful human control; reiterates that decisions over the use of lethal force must always remain under human responsibility and accountability; |
Or. en
Amendment 219
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16b. Expresses grave concern over the use of AI-enabled surveillance and targeting technologies in Gaza and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, stressing that AI must never be used to facilitate war crimes, crimes against humanity or other serious violations of international law; |
Or. en
Amendment 220
Alice Teodorescu Måwe
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 17. Underlines the importance of applying high human right standards to dual-use items and technologies powered by AI; | 17. Underlines the importance of ensuring that dual-use AI technologies are developed, transferred and used in accordance with applicable international law and EU export control rules, while taking into account legitimate security and defence needs and avoiding unnecessary barriers to responsible innovation; |
Or. sv
Amendment 221
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 17. Underlines the importance of applying high human right standards to dual-use items and technologies powered by AI; | 17. Underlines the importance of applying high human right standards to dual-use items and technologies powered by AI; stresses that such standards should be pursued jointly with the Union's international partners, so as not to undermine the competitiveness of the European defence technological and industrial base or the objectives of the EDIP and the EDF to reduce Europe's dependency on non-European dual-use AI systems developed outside any human rights framework; |
Or. en
Amendment 222
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 17. Underlines the importance of applying high human right standards to dual-use items and technologies powered by AI; | 17. Underlines the importance of applying high human right standards to dual-use items and technologies powered by AI, particularly those with civilian or humanitarian purposes, those deployed in conflict zones, and those developed, purchased or deployed by authoritarian and illiberal regimes; warns in this regard that they can be misused by malicious actors and end up undermining human rights; |
Or. en
Amendment 223
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 17. Underlines the importance of applying high human right standards to dual-use items and technologies powered by AI; | 17. Underlines the importance of applying high human right standards to dual-use items and technologies powered by AI, without hindering the ability of Member States to develop and procure those technologies for legitimate national and collective defence purposes, including within the framework of NATO; |
Or. pt
Amendment 224
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Leire Pajín, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 17a. Notes that, in humanitarian contexts, AI-enabled harmful information targeting humanitarian organisations, personnel and affected communities can erode trust in humanitarian action, undermine perceptions of neutrality and impartiality, restrict humanitarian access and expose humanitarian workers and affected communities to reputational, legal and physical harm; calls on the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to strengthen systematic monitoring and cross-sectoral coordination between humanitarian, media and policy actors, train humanitarian staff to recognise and respond to such harmful content, and support engagement with affected communities and trusted local media, including through accessible information in local languages; |
Or. en
Amendment 225
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 18. Notes that AI systems have a direct impact on electoral and democratic processes; | 18. Notes that AI systems present both risks and opportunities for electoral and democratic processes, and that they can be used to support, influence or automate these processes at various stages, including electronic voting, voter assistance, election integrity and security, monitoring and oversight, voter data analysis and prediction, as well as generative AI in political campaigning; |
Or. en
Amendment 226
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 18. Notes that AI systems have a direct impact on electoral and democratic processes; | 18. Notes that AI systems have a direct and increasing impact on electoral and democratic processes, with the potential to support and enhance certain aspects of these processes, including electronic voting and voter data analysis, warns however that AI also creates significant risks of interference, manipulation, and undue influence, including through the mass generation and dissemination of misinformation and disinformation, the use of deepfakes, voter profiling and the manipulation of public opinion, thereby threatening electoral integrity, informed democratic participation and trust in democratic institutions; |
Or. en
Amendment 227
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 18. Notes that AI systems have a direct impact on electoral and democratic processes; | 18. Notes that AI systems have a direct impact on electoral and democratic processes; notes that these impacts are increasingly driven by external actors seeking to influence democratic processes in the Union, in candidate countries and in the Union's neighbourhood; |
Or. en
Amendment 228
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. Emphasises that the deployment of AI systems in electoral processes must comply with the highest standards of transparency, explainability, accountability and independent evaluation; | 19. Emphasises that the deployment of AI systems in electoral processes, particularly by the public authorities, should be openly communicated to voters, and must comply with and be subject to the highest standards of transparency, explainability, accountability and independent evaluation, as well as an open, robust and comprehensive audit system, that allow tracing all decisions and actions carried out; |
Or. en
Amendment 229
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. Emphasises that the deployment of AI systems in electoral processes must comply with the highest standards of transparency, explainability, accountability and independent evaluation; | 19. Emphasises that the deployment of AI systems in electoral processes must comply with the highest standards of transparency, explainability, accountability and independent evaluation, the definition and implementation of which should remain within the competence of national electoral authorities, showing regard for Member States’ sovereignty over their own democratic processes; |
Or. pt
Amendment 230
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19a. Is deeply concerned about the enhanced capability for repression that AI offers to illiberal and authoritarian regimes, enabling them to suppress civil and political freedoms, stifle dissent, and maintain control over their populations on a larger scale, with severe consequences for the rule of law, human rights, freedom of expression, and democratic values; |
Or. en
Amendment 231
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; | 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacity for information manipulation and interference including foreign information manipulation and interference, as well as domestic campaigns aimed at manipulating public opinion and electoral processes; stresses that such practices have the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and electoral processes, erode the quality and plurality of information, and weaken citizens' trust in democracy; |
Or. en
Amendment 232
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; | 20. Notes with concern that the malicious use of AI enhances the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of electoral and democratic institutions and processes, as well as harmful information and degradation of information quality; highlights that AI-powered FIMI activities have a further adverse impact on the plurality of ideas in the public sphere, and undermine the foundations of democratic discourse, freedom of expression, and informed decision-making, which are essential for healthy democratic systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 233
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; | 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways significantly increases the capacities, scale and speed of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of democratic institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; notes that candidate countries and countries in the Union's immediate neighbourhood, including the Republic of Moldova, have been subject to sustained AI-assisted interference operations in the course of recent elections; |
Or. en
Amendment 234
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; | 20. Notes with concern the findings of the Special committee on the European Democracy Shield about how the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; |
Or. en
Amendment 235
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; | 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; notes that some hostile state actors are already deploying AI-enabled capabilities at scale to conduct information manipulation campaigns targeting the Union, candidate countries and countries in the Union's neighbourhood; |
Or. en
Amendment 236
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; | 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality, without it serving as a pretext to restrict freedom of expression or impose disproportionate content moderation obligations on platforms, social media and the media; |
Or. pt
Amendment 237
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; | 20. Notes with concern that the use of AI in malicious ways increases the capacities of foreign information manipulation and interference activities, including the potential to undermine the integrity, independence and effectiveness of institutions and processes, as well as the potential to affect information quality; warns that dependence on AI technologies and providers subject to the control or coercive influence of authoritarian regimes will further exacerbate these risks; |
Or. en
Amendment 238
Loucas Fourlas
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20a. Stresses also that AI can be used by state and non-state bodies to produce and spread disinformation, manipulated content and deepfakes, for the purpose of undermining democratic processes, social cohesion and the safety of Member States; calls on the Union to strengthen its cooperation with international partners, to detect, attribute responsibility for and address such threats. |
Or. el
Amendment 239
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20a. Expresses particular concern about the use of AI in disinformation operations run by third countries that question the sovereignty, sovereign rights or territorial integrity of a Member State; |
Or. el
Amendment 240
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20b. Expresses particular concern about the use of AI in hybrid operations run by third countries whose aim it is to destabilise or exert pressure on Member States, including along the Union's external borders; |
Or. el
Amendment 241
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 20c. Condemns the use of AI systems by third countries or bodies acting on their behalf in strategies that aim to disinform about, undermine or target religious institutions with historic and cultural ties to Member States; |
Or. el
Amendment 242
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy; expresses concern about the risks to the diversity, pluralism, inclusiveness, reliability and accountability of the media posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers; | 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy, and, while acknowledging the potential of AI to advance access to information and support journalistic work, expresses concern about the risks posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers to the diversity, pluralism, inclusiveness, reliability and accountability of the media; |
Or. en
Amendment 243
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy; expresses concern about the risks to the diversity, pluralism, inclusiveness, reliability and accountability of the media posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers; | 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy; expresses concern about the risks to the diversity, pluralism, inclusiveness, reliability and accountability of the media posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers; expresses equal concern at the use of AI systems by state and state-affiliated actors to censor, filter and suppress independent journalism and access to information, and at the growing dependence of European media on AI infrastructure developed outside the Union; calls for support for European media in accessing trustworthy AI tools; |
Or. en
Amendment 244
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy; expresses concern about the risks to the diversity, pluralism, inclusiveness, reliability and accountability of the media posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers; | 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy; expresses concern about the risks to the diversity, pluralism, inclusiveness, reliability and accountability of the media posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers; is concerned that the generative AI systems use large-scale of copyrighted content without authorisation or remuneration, which undermines the business models of news publishers and adds to the economic pressure already facing the free press; |
Or. en
Amendment 245
Matthieu Valet
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy; expresses concern about the risks to the diversity, pluralism, inclusiveness, reliability and accountability of the media posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers; | 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy; expresses concern about the risks to the diversity, pluralism, inclusiveness, reliability and accountability of the media posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers; underscores the importance of the publishing and book-selling sectors and roundly condemns the purchase of millions of printed books only to shred and destroy them for the purposes of training certain AI systems; |
Or. fr
Amendment 246
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy; expresses concern about the risks to the diversity, pluralism, inclusiveness, reliability and accountability of the media posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers; | 21. Emphasises that freedom of the press is a fundamental element of democracy; expresses concern about the risks to the diversity, pluralism, independence, reliability and accountability of the media posed by the concentration of power in the hands of AI providers; and urges the Commission to refrain from applying funding or certification criteria that favour certain politically and ideologically driven editorial narratives over others; |
Or. pt
Amendment 247
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21a. Expresses concern over the concentration of economic and technological power in the hands of a small number of multinational technology corporations and the growing practices of digital colonialism and data extractivism; |
Or. en
Amendment 248
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21a. Emphasises that freedom of speech is a crucial prerequisite for a democratic society; emphasises that the use of AI cannot lead to any curtailment of freedom of speech; |
Or. fi
Amendment 249
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Notes that accountability for AI-related human rights violations arises at the point in the chain where the system is exploited or used to commit the violation, unless the system was maliciously designed from the outset; emphasises that this approach does not absolve developers of their responsibility; | 22. Notes that accountability for AI-related human rights violations can arise at different parts of the value chain; emphasizes that both providers and deployers need to be held to account; stresses provides´ responsibility, including but not limited to if they design software with harmful intentions or fail to address risks or vulnerabilities that are being exploited for malicious purposes; |
Or. en
Amendment 250
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Notes that accountability for AI-related human rights violations arises at the point in the chain where the system is exploited or used to commit the violation, unless the system was maliciously designed from the outset; emphasises that this approach does not absolve developers of their responsibility; | 22. Notes that accountability for AI-related human rights violations may arise not only at the point in the chain where the system is exploited or used to commit the violation, but also at the point where the system itself was designed, developed or placed on the market without adequate risk management, in accordance with Article 9 of the AI Act, regardless of whether the system was maliciously designed from the outset; stresses that legal certainty as to the allocation of responsibility along the AI value chain is essential both for the protection of victims and for the ability of European providers to operate, and that such responsibility should fall solely on whoever caused the harm; recalls that providers of AI systems are subject to obligations under Union law, including as regards risk management, transparency and documentation, and that these obligations cannot be considered fulfilled merely because a violation resulted from misuse of the system by a third party; |
Or. en
Amendment 251
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Notes that accountability for AI-related human rights violations arises at the point in the chain where the system is exploited or used to commit the violation, unless the system was maliciously designed from the outset; emphasises that this approach does not absolve developers of their responsibility; | 22. Notes that accountability for AI-related human rights violations arises at the point in the chain where the system is exploited or used to commit the violation, unless the system was maliciously designed from the outset; emphasises that this approach does not absolve developers of their responsibility, and that this principle should be applied consistently with the general civil liability regime already in force in the Member States, preventing the establishment of a parallel and specific regime for AI that creates legal uncertainty; |
Or. pt
Amendment 252
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. Notes that accountability for AI-related human rights violations arises at the point in the chain where the system is exploited or used to commit the violation, unless the system was maliciously designed from the outset; emphasises that this approach does not absolve developers of their responsibility; | 22. Notes that accountability for AI-related human rights violations arises at the point in the chain where the system is exploited or used to commit the violation, unless the system was maliciously designed from the outset; emphasises that this approach does not absolve developers of their responsibility as set out in the AI Act; |
Or. en
Amendment 253
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22a. Stresses the importance of ensuring that AI systems used in judicial proceedings in third countries, including when assessing evidence or determining sentences, are not applied in proceedings that could lead to the death penalty or other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment; reiterates the European Union’s unequivocal support for the universal abolition of the death penalty; |
Or. pt
Amendment 254
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Calls for AI systems to be compliant with the right of victims of human rights violations to an effective remedy; | 23. Calls for AI systems to be compliant with the right of victims to exercise an effective, accesible and timely remedy for human rights violations; calls for addressing possible accountability and liability gaps between providers and deployers; calls in this regard for AI systems to allow for increased transparency and explainability; considers that truly open-source systems can provide significant benefits in this regard; |
Or. en
Amendment 255
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Calls for AI systems to be compliant with the right of victims of human rights violations to an effective remedy; | 23. Calls for a feminist, intersectional and rights-based approach to AI governance, ensuring meaningful participation, robust safeguards against discrimination and violence, and effective remedies for individuals affected by AI-related harms; stresses that AI systems must fully respect the right of victims of human rights violations to an effective remedy including access to justice, accountability and appropriate redress; |
Or. en
Amendment 256
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. Calls for AI systems to be compliant with the right of victims of human rights violations to an effective remedy; | 23. Calls for AI systems to be compliant with the right of victims of human rights violations to an effective, accessible and timely remedy; |
Or. en
Amendment 257
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23a. Stresses the need for greater transparency regarding algorithms, recommender systems and data collection practices to enable democratic oversight and protect the integrity of public debate; calls for stronger accountability of digital platforms for AI-amplified disinformation, hate speech and harmful content, while safeguarding freedom of expression; |
Or. en
Amendment 258
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23a. Emphasises that international cooperation represents one of the three pillars of the EU approach to AI; acknowledges that the EU approach already encompasses both the internal EU policy and the external dimension of AI and that the European AI Office is actively working on AI diplomacy; |
Or. en
Amendment 259
Dan Barna, Lucia Yar, Petras Auštrevičius
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23a. Points out that binding transnational accountability frameworks are needed to adequately address the accountability and oversight problems that are structurally cross-border; |
Or. en
Amendment 260
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting a human rights-based approach to AI development and deployment; calls for the immediate development of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI to achieve this goal; | 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting a human rights -based approach to AI development and deployment; notes that the European Council will adress AI in one of its upcoming meetings in 2026; calls for the European Council to request the immediate development of of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI; highlights that the Commission, the Council, the Parliament, the EEAS and the EU Member States should participate in the devleopment of this strategy; |
Or. en
Amendment 261
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting a human rights-based approach to AI development and deployment; calls for the immediate development of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI to achieve this goal; | 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting ethical and trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting a human-centric and human rights-based approach to AI development and deployment; calls for the immediate development of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI to achieve this goal; |
Or. en
Amendment 262
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting a human rights-based approach to AI development and deployment; calls for the immediate development of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI to achieve this goal; | 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting an approach to AI development and deployment that is based on international law, the legitimate interests of Member States and human rights; calls for the immediate development of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI to achieve this goal; |
Or. el
Amendment 263
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting a human rights-based approach to AI development and deployment; calls for the immediate development of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI to achieve this goal; | 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting a human rights-based approach to AI development and deployment; calls for the immediate development of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI to achieve this goal that includes a human rights impact assessment to identify, address, and mitigate human rights risks and including a specific focus on protecting and empowering human rights defenders and safeguarding civic space from AI-enabled threats; |
Or. en
Amendment 264
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting a human rights-based approach to AI development and deployment; calls for the immediate development of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI to achieve this goal; | 24. Emphasises the need for the EU to be a leading player in promoting trustworthy AI globally, shaping the global AI landscape and promoting a human rights-based approach to AI development and deployment; calls for the immediate development of a holistic EU strategy for external action in the field of AI to achieve this goal; stresses that such a strategy must be coherent with the Union's competitiveness, economic security and technological sovereignty objectives and be developed together with the Commission's internal AI agenda; |
Or. en
Amendment 265
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24a. Calls on the EU Commission to incorporate structured consultation mechanisms with European innovators, emphasising that fostering AI innovation is paramount not only for strengthening the Union’s competitiveness but also for safeguarding its values, security, technological sovereignty and strategic autonomy; |
Or. en
Amendment 266
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 24a. Emphasises that the AI Act does not apply to areas outside the scope of Union law, acknowledging the competences of the Member States; notes that the AI Act does not include military, defence and national-security AI, thus only regulating AI used for civilian law enforcement and surveillance; |
Or. en
Amendment 267
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Calls on the Commission to work towards establishing global minimum standards of protection against serious risks associated with AI; | 25. Takes note of the comprehensive AI governance framework at EU-level; encourages the Member States to cooperate with other countries, international companies and other partners to work towards establishing global minimum standards of protection against serious risks associated with AI; |
Or. en
Amendment 268
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Calls on the Commission to work towards establishing global minimum standards of protection against serious risks associated with AI; | 25. Calls on the Commission to work towards establishing global minimum standards of protection against serious risks associated with AI, building on the risk assessment framework established by the AI Act as a foundation for interoperable and trustworthy AI governance; further calls the Commission to explore the need for restrictions on the use of advanced AI in areas with significant human rights implications, in particular democracy, security, military, law enforcement and the judiciary; |
Or. en
Amendment 269
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Calls on the Commission to work towards establishing global minimum standards of protection against serious risks associated with AI; | 25. Calls on the Commission to work towards establishing global minimum standards of protection against serious risks associated with AI, while showing full regard for the principle of subsidiarity and preventing duplication or overlapping with existing international forums, such as the OECD and the Council of Europe; |
Or. pt
Amendment 270
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. Calls on the Commission to work towards establishing global minimum standards of protection against serious risks associated with AI; | 25. Calls on the Commission to work towards establishing global minimum standards of protection against serious risks associated with AI, building on existing international frameworks and avoiding the creation of parallel or duplicative standards; |
Or. en
Amendment 271
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Considers that AI offers a genuine opportunity to address, together with non-EU countries, particular challenges to human rights, such as children’s rights, women’s rights and gender equality, workers’ rights and environmental rights; | 26. Considers that AI poses particular challenges to human rights, such as children’s rights, freedom of speech and information, data privacy, and environmental harm; calls on the Member States to cooperate with non-EU countries to address these challenges; |
Or. en
Amendment 272
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Considers that AI offers a genuine opportunity to address, together with non-EU countries, particular challenges to human rights, such as children’s rights, women’s rights and gender equality, workers’ rights and environmental rights; | 26. Considers that AI offers a genuine opportunity to address, together with non-EU countries, particular challenges to human rights, such as children’s rights, women’s rights, workers’ rights and rights connected with nature conservation, showing full regard for the cultural, legal and religious traditions of those non-EU countries, preventing any form of unilateral imposition of standards that could be perceived as a form of digital subjugation; |
Or. pt
Amendment 273
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Considers that AI offers a genuine opportunity to address, together with non-EU countries, particular challenges to human rights, such as children’s rights, women’s rights and gender equality, workers’ rights and environmental rights; | 26. Considers that AI offers a genuine opportunity to address, together with non-EU countries, particular challenges to human rights, such as children’s rights, women’s rights, equality between men and women, freedom of speech, workers’ rights and environmental rights; |
Or. fi
Amendment 274
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. Considers that AI offers a genuine opportunity to address, together with non-EU countries, particular challenges to human rights, such as children’s rights, women’s rights and gender equality, workers’ rights and environmental rights; | 26. Considers that AI offers a genuine opportunity to address, together with non-EU countries, particular challenges to human rights, such as children’s rights, women’s rights and gender equality, workers’ rights and environmental rights; further insists that this opportunity would allow for countering the attacks on the universality of human rights by authoritarian and illiberal regimes, which are developing tailor-made narratives, often based in cultural relativism, to suit their repressive agenda; calls to the EU and Member States to seize this opportunity and build upon this common ground to promote a positive narrative about human rights and democracy promotion; |
Or. en
Amendment 275
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support the establishment of participatory governance mechanisms to shape policy responses and AI governance frameworks at international level; | 27. Stresses that this ethical, human rights-approach to AI requires screening of possible affectations to human rights at the different stages of the AI lifecycle, from design and development to deployment and potential transfer to other uses or fields; calls for the EU and Member States to support the establishment of participatory governance mechanisms to shape policy responses and AI governance and evaluation frameworks at the international level; calls for the inclusion of human rights defenders, civil society, journalists, and vulnerable groups and communities in such mechanisms; |
Or. en
Amendment 276
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support the establishment of participatory governance mechanisms to shape policy responses and AI governance frameworks at international level; | 27. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support the establishment of participatory governance mechanisms to shape policy responses and AI governance frameworks at international level; stresses that such mechanisms should ensure the meaningful, inclusive and safe participation of civil society, human rights defenders, journalists, affected communities and other relevant stakeholders, including from the Global South, and should ensure that their expertise and experiences inform the development, implementation and evaluation of AI governance frameworks; |
Or. en
Amendment 277
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support the establishment of participatory governance mechanisms to shape policy responses and AI governance frameworks at international level; | 27. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support the establishment of participatory governance mechanisms to shape policy responses and AI governance frameworks at international level; Stresses that such mechanisms should ensure meaningful, inclusive and safe participation of civil society, human rights defenders, journalists and affected communities, including from the Global South, in shaping AI governance frameworks; |
Or. en
Amendment 278
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 27. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support the establishment of participatory governance mechanisms to shape policy responses and AI governance frameworks at international level; | 27. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support the establishment of participatory governance mechanisms to shape policy responses and AI governance frameworks at international level, ensuring that those mechanisms do not lead to the transfer of sovereign decision-making powers from Member States to international organisations or non-elected entities; |
Or. pt
Amendment 279
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources; | 28. Stresses the need to provide adequate financial and human resources for the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS); |
Or. fi
Amendment 280
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources; | 28. Stresses the need of cooperation between the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) in order to make the use of their resources more effective; |
Or. en
Amendment 281
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources; | 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources to effectively carry out a cohesive and holistic EU AI diplomacy; calls for improved coordination and information exchange between the AI Office and the EEAS, to leverage synergies between technical expertise and diplomatic outreach, and to enhance the role of the EEAS in the external dimension of EU AI diplomacy; further calls that the EU AI strategy should enhance the cooperation between EU Delegations and the diplomatic representations of EU Member States in third countries; |
Or. en
Amendment 282
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources; | 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources, and specialised expertise on human rights, civic space and AI-related risks; stresses the importance of equipping the EEAS, including EU Delegations, with the capacity to identify, monitor and respond to AI-enabled threats against human rights defenders and civil society actors, including through human rights dialogues, political engagement, diplomatic protection and targeted support; |
Or. en
Amendment 283
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources; | 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources and specialised expertise on human rights, civic space and AI-related risks; stresses the importance of equipping the EEAS, including EU Delegations, with the capacity to identify, monitor and respond to AI-enabled threats against human rights defenders and civil society actors, including through human rights dialogues, political engagement, diplomatic protection and targeted support; |
Or. en
Amendment 284
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources; | 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources, while providing for a rigorous cost-benefit assessment and streamlining of already existing structures before creating new solutions; |
Or. pt
Amendment 285
Christophe Gomart
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources; | 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources, while fully upholding the Member States’ prerogatives in matters of foreign and security policy; |
Or. fr
Amendment 286
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources; | 28. Stresses the need to strengthen the EU AI Office and the European External Action Service (EEAS) through the provision of adequate financial and human resources, primarily through the redeployment and prioritisation of existing resources; |
Or. en
Amendment 287
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Calls for the full use of all the instruments at the EU’s disposal to tackle the impact of AI on human rights, including by strengthening the role of the EU Special Representative on Human Rights; | 29. Calls for the full use of all the instruments at the EU’s disposal to tackle the impact of AI on human rights, including the EU Special Representative on Human Rights; |
Or. en
Amendment 288
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Calls for the full use of all the instruments at the EU’s disposal to tackle the impact of AI on human rights, including by strengthening the role of the EU Special Representative on Human Rights; | 29. Calls for the full use of all the instruments at the EU’s disposal to tackle the impact of AI on human rights, including by strengthening the role of the EU Special Representative on Human Rights and providing the EUSR with adequate resources, as well as the systematic inclusion of AI in human rights dialogues, updating where necessary the EU Guidelines on Human Rights and Human Right Defenders, and fully integrating AI in the upcoming EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy; |
Or. en
Amendment 289
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29. Calls for the full use of all the instruments at the EU’s disposal to tackle the impact of AI on human rights, including by strengthening the role of the EU Special Representative on Human Rights; | 29. Calls for the full use of all the instruments at the EU’s disposal to tackle the impact of AI on human rights, including by strengthening the role of the EU Special Representative on Human Rights, without establishing new mandates or structures, but using all the resources that are available and integrated into the existing mandate; |
Or. pt
Amendment 290
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29a. Calls on the Commission, the EEAS and EU Delegations to systematically integrate AI-related threats to human rights defenders and civic space into the EU's human rights dialogues, political dialogues, development cooperation and partnerships with third countries; calls for human rights defenders and civil society organisations to be meaningfully consulted in the development, implementation and evaluation of EU cooperation on artificial intelligence; |
Or. en
Amendment 291
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29a. Calls on the Commission, the EEAS and EU Delegations to systematically integrate AI-related threats to human rights defenders and civic space into the EU's human rights dialogues, political dialogues, development cooperation and partnerships with third countries; calls for human rights defenders and civil society organisations to be meaningfully consulted in the development, implementation and evaluation of EU cooperation on artificial intelligence; |
Or. en
Amendment 292
Davor Ivo Stier
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29a. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to ensure that the impact of AI on freedom of religion or belief is addressed in the work of the EU Special Envoy for the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside the EU, with particular attention to persecuted religious communities, including Christians, and to raise such concerns, where relevant, in human rights dialogues with third countries; |
Or. en
Amendment 293
Davor Ivo Stier
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 b (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29b. Calls on the EEAS and EU delegations to systematically address the use of AI to restrict human rights and fundamental freedoms in third countries, particularly against human rights defenders and vulnerable communities, including by raising such concerns in political and human rights dialogues with partner countries; |
Or. en
Amendment 294
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 29a. Calls on the EU Special Representative for Human Rights to submit to Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights (DROI) a specific annual report on the impact of AI on human rights in the Union’s external action, including an assessment of cases of transnational repression and misuse of surveillance technologies reported to the EEAS; |
Or. pt
Amendment 295
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Emphasises the need for further discussion on the best ways to introduce the topic of AI in existing EU regulations to ensure that the internal AI policies and rules of the EU strengthen respect for human rights outside the EU; | 30. Emphasises the need for coherence between the Union's internal AI framework and its external action; stresses that this coherence should be achieved through, where possible, the consistent implementation and enforcement of the existing acquis, and through the Union's international engagement, rather than through the reopening or extension of adopted legislation; recalls in this regard the Commission's ongoing work on regulatory simplification under the AI Continent Action Plan, AI omnibus, and Digital Omnibus; |
Or. en
Amendment 296
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Emphasises the need for further discussion on the best ways to introduce the topic of AI in existing EU regulations to ensure that the internal AI policies and rules of the EU strengthen respect for human rights outside the EU; | 30. Emphasises the need for a thorough discussion on the best ways to tackle the growing censorship embedded in AI tools in order to strengthen the freedom of information of citizens across EU Member States; |
Or. en
Amendment 297
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Emphasises the need for further discussion on the best ways to introduce the topic of AI in existing EU regulations to ensure that the internal AI policies and rules of the EU strengthen respect for human rights outside the EU; | 30. Emphasises the need for further discussion on the best ways to introduce the topic of AI in existing EU regulations to ensure that the internal AI policies and rules of the EU strengthen respect for human rights outside the EU, with the full involvement of national parliaments, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity enshrined in Protocol No 2 annexed to the Treaties; |
Or. pt
Amendment 298
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. Emphasises the need for further discussion on the best ways to introduce the topic of AI in existing EU regulations to ensure that the internal AI policies and rules of the EU strengthen respect for human rights outside the EU; | 30. Emphasises the need for further discussion on the best ways to introduce the topic of AI in existing EU regulations to ensure that the internal AI policies and rules of the EU strengthen respect for human rights outside the EU, including the prevention of environmental degradation, and the promotion of fair labour practices; |
Or. en
Amendment 299
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30a. Calls on the Union to place human rights, democratic governance, social justice and the reduction of global inequalities at the centre of its external AI policy; urges the integration of binding human rights, labour rights, gender equality and environmental safeguards into all international partnerships, trade agreements and digital cooperation initiatives related to AI; |
Or. en
Amendment 300
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31. Calls for the Commission and the EEAS to integrate an AI dimension into EU democracy promotion and electoral observation; | 31. Recognises the potential of AI systems to enhance electoral processes and improve electoral observation; calls for Commission and EEAS to integrate an AI dimension to EU democracy promotion and electoral observation, which may include working with partners in developing and implementing trustworthy, truly open-source AI models that contribute to the fairness and transparency of electoral processes, as well as exchanges of best practices and technical assistance; further calls for the development and implementation of AI models and systems that enhance the work of EU electoral observation missions; calls in this regard for appropriate resources to be allocated to the EEAS and the EU AI Office; |
Or. en
Amendment 301
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31. Calls for the Commission and the EEAS to integrate an AI dimension into EU democracy promotion and electoral observation; | 31. Welcomes the efforts of the Commission and the EEAS to integrate an AI dimension into EU democracy promotion and electoral observation, including an assessment of AI-enabled threats against human rights defenders, journalists, civil society organisations and other actors involved in monitoring elections and democratic processes; calls for the development and implementation of AI systems that enhance the work of EU electoral observation missions; calls in this regard for appropriate resources to be allocated to the EEAS and the EU AI Office; |
Or. en
Amendment 302
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31. Calls for the Commission and the EEAS to integrate an AI dimension into EU democracy promotion and electoral observation; | 31. Calls for the Commission and the EEAS to integrate an AI dimension into EU democracy promotion and electoral observation, including an assessment of AI-enabled threats against human rights defenders, journalists, civil society organisations and other actors involved in monitoring elections and democratic processes; |
Or. en
Amendment 303
Engin Eroglu
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; | 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem to mitigate strategic vulnerabilities across all layers of the value chain, including CRMs, microelectronics, computing power, and cloud infrastructure; underlines the need to reinforce EU technological capabilities and diversify supply networks via reliable international alliances with like-minded democratic partners; stresses that autonomous and secure access to these critical assets is vital to preserving Europe's economic security; |
Or. en
Amendment 304
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; | 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies across the AI value chain, including critical raw materials, semiconductors, computing infrastructure and cloud services; stresses the need to strengthen European technological capabilities and diversify supply chains through reliable partnerships with democratic countries; underlines that secure access to these technologies is essential to Europe’s competitiveness, economic security and democratic resilience; |
Or. en
Amendment 305
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; | 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU's strategic autonomy; stresses that this requires tangible investment in European computing capacity, AI factories, access to high-quality data and the availability of skills, in line with the AI Continent Action Plan; underlines that the Union cannot credibly promote a rights-based model of AI abroad while depending almost entirely on systems designed and governed elsewhere; |
Or. en
Amendment 306
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; | 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies across the entire technology stack, including semiconductors, computing capacity, cloud infrastructure, foundation models and applications, and strengthens the EU's strategic autonomy; stresses that dependence on non-European providers for critical public functions constitutes a security vulnerability as much as an economic one; |
Or. en
Amendment 307
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; | 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy whilst combating forms of digital extractivism and the environmental costs of AI that disproportionately affect communities in the Global South; |
Or. en
Amendment 308
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; | 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies, particularly on China, through investment in European computing capacity, semiconductors and talent, and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; |
Or. pt
Amendment 309
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; | 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy, particularly in the face of pressure from other states; |
Or. en
Amendment 310
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; | 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; emphasises the importance of national efforts to develop AI in this context; |
Or. fi
Amendment 311
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy; | 32. Stresses the urgent need to develop a strong and resilient EU AI ecosystem that reduces strategic dependencies and strengthens the EU’s strategic autonomy and independence from big tech companies; |
Or. en
Amendment 312
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32a. Warns that concentrating ever more economic, technological and processing power in the hands of a few AI providers headquartered mainly outside of the Union, is likely to create new strategic dependencies and put citizens and businesses at a comparative disadvantage; |
Or. el
Amendment 313
Dan Barna, Lucia Yar, Petras Auštrevičius
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 32a. Urges the EU to identify and develop its strategic indispensability across the global AI value chain, such as AI chips, data or AI manufacturing, and then use it as a leverage in setting global standards on AI regulatory commitments; |
Or. en
Amendment 314
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33. Recalls the EU’s commitment to a rules-based multilateral order; calls for the EU and its Member States to coordinate their positions in multilateral forums and build partnerships with like-minded partners to promote and advance a shared vision for trustworthy AI; | 33. Recalls the EU’s commitment to a rules-based multilateral order; calls on the EU and Member States to coordinate its positions in multilateral fora and enhance the partnerships with like-minded partners to promote and advance a shared vision for trustworthy AI that can align innovation with high standards on transparency, respect for human rights and dispute-resolution mechanisms; calls on the EU to prioritise partners that uphold democratic values and the rules-based international order; |
Or. en
Amendment 315
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33. Recalls the EU’s commitment to a rules-based multilateral order; calls for the EU and its Member States to coordinate their positions in multilateral forums and build partnerships with like-minded partners to promote and advance a shared vision for trustworthy AI; | 33. Recalls the EU’s commitment to a rules-based multilateral order; calls for the EU and its Member States to coordinate their positions in multilateral forums and build partnerships with like-minded partners to promote and advance a shared vision for trustworthy AI; Stresses that artificial intelligence and digital technologies must be governed in the public interest, social inclusion and equality, rather than reinforcing corporate concentration, digital dependency or geopolitical domination; |
Or. en
Amendment 316
Dan Barna, Lucia Yar, Petras Auštrevičius
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33. Recalls the EU’s commitment to a rules-based multilateral order; calls for the EU and its Member States to coordinate their positions in multilateral forums and build partnerships with like-minded partners to promote and advance a shared vision for trustworthy AI; | 33. Recalls the EU’s commitment to a rules-based multilateral order; calls for the EU and its Member States to coordinate their positions in multilateral forums and build partnerships with like-minded partners to promote and advance a shared vision for trustworthy, human-centric AI; |
Or. en
Amendment 317
Engin Eroglu
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33a. Urges the Commission and the HR/VP to establish strategic cooperation with democratic allies as a fundamental pillar in executing the EU’s International Digital Strategy; highlights the important role and experience of Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan, and advocates for intensified joint initiatives aimed at strengthening AI development, securing semiconductor value chains, and fostering supply chain resilience; |
Or. en
Amendment 318
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33a. Calls for stronger democratic governance of digital infrastructures and data, fair taxation of large technology companies, investment in public digital infrastructure and open-source technologies, and greater international cooperation to ensure that the benefits of AI are shared equitably and contribute to reducing inequalities; |
Or. en
Amendment 319
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 b (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33b. Stresses that AI systems deployed to perform public functions, including in migration, border management, law enforcement and other public services, must be publicly owned or subject to public, democratic and social control, ensuring full transparency, accountability and compliance with fundamental rights; opposes the privatisation of AI infrastructures and governance where they exercise public authority or are financed with public funds; further insists that all data generated through such systems must remain a public asset and must not be retained, commercialised or repurposed by private providers; |
Or. en
Amendment 320
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33a. Calls on the Commission and the High Representative to make cooperation with democratic partners a central pillar of the implementation of the International Digital Strategy for EU; encourages deeper cooperation, including with Japan, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, on AI innovation, semiconductors and resilient supply chains; |
Or. en
Amendment 321
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33a. Stresses that the EU's increased cooperation with candidate countries in the field of AI requires the latter's desistance from using AI technologies for foreign information manipulation, hybrid operations or actions directed against the sovereignty, sovereign rights or territorial integrity of a Member State; |
Or. el
Amendment 322
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 34. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support and strengthen the UN System in its efforts to promote trustworthy AI; | 34. Calls on UN agencies to continue to promote trustworthy and reliable AI in order to make it more effective in the field of global health and crisis response; |
Or. en
Amendment 323
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 34. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support and strengthen the UN System in its efforts to promote trustworthy AI; | 34. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support and strengthen the UN System in its efforts to promote ethical, humancentric and trustworthy AI; |
Or. en
Amendment 324
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 34. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support and strengthen the UN System in its efforts to promote trustworthy AI; | 34. Calls for the EU and its Member States to support and strengthen the UN System in its efforts to promote trustworthy AI; including UN Global Compact, Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, UN Secretary-General's High-level Advisory Body on AI and the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence; |
Or. en
Amendment 325
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 35. Calls for the EU and its Member States to continue collaborating with the Council of Europe in developing international standards for trustworthy AI; | 35. Welcomes the ratification of the EU of the Council of Europe's Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law; calls on the EU and Member States to continue collaborating with the Council of Europe in developing international standards for a trustworthy AI; |
Or. en
Amendment 326
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 35. Calls for the EU and its Member States to continue collaborating with the Council of Europe in developing international standards for trustworthy AI; | 35. Calls for the EU and its Member States to continue collaborating with the Council of Europe in developing international standards for ethical and trustworthy AI; |
Or. en
Amendment 327
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 36. Stresses the need for the EU to support increasing the availability of open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South; | 36. Stresses the need for the EU to support increasing the availability of open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with like-minded countries, candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South; stresses, however, that the promotion of open-source AI must be accompanied by appropriate safeguards against misuse, proliferation and repurposing for surveillance or repression; |
Or. en
Amendment 328
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 36. Stresses the need for the EU to support increasing the availability of open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South; | 36. Stresses the possibility for the EU to support increasing the availability of open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, if this serves the strategic interests of the EU and its Member States; underlines the need to deploy open-source systems in the EU’s own administration too; |
Or. fi
Amendment 329
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 36. Stresses the need for the EU to support increasing the availability of open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South; | 36. Stresses the need for the EU to support an increasing availability of truly open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood, and countries in the Global South, in order to promote affordable and rights-respecting computing solutions and standards that can help bridge the growing digital divide; insists that open-source systems can offer significant advantages, including reduced costs, local development, ownership and agency, and reduced dependencies from external providers; recalls that they can further contribute to the transparency and verifiability of AI systems, and the contestability of their outcomes; considers that they are essential for public administrations, particularly for the deployment of AI systems in sensitive areas such as electoral processes; |
Or. en
Amendment 330
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 36. Stresses the need for the EU to support increasing the availability of open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South; | 36. Stresses the need for the EU to support increasing the availability of open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South; stresses, however, that openly available model weights are not politically neutral, and that models trained under the content restrictions of authoritarian jurisdictions transmit those restrictions to every application built upon them; warns that the zero cost of such models makes them especially attractive to states with limited resources, and that their adoption in public administration, education and media risks entrenching long-term normative dependence on providers subject to authoritarian jurisdiction; |
Or. en
Amendment 331
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 36. Stresses the need for the EU to support increasing the availability of open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South; | 36. Stresses the need for the EU to support increasing the availability of open-source AI systems and interoperable technical standards, particularly with candidate countries, countries in the EU neighbourhood and countries in the Global South, without prejudice to the protection of intellectual property and investments of European companies that have developed those technologies; |
Or. pt
Amendment 332
Alice Teodorescu Måwe
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional on the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; | 37. Emphasises the importance of the EU promoting – through its external instruments and strategic partnerships, including Global Gateway – the development and use of trustworthy artificial intelligence, while taking into account the EU’s interests in terms of security, competitiveness and strategy; |
Or. sv
Amendment 333
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional on the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; | 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional; takes the view that the condition for such aid should be the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI and collaboration with the EU in other areas, such as returns; stresses that any funding from the EU should only target AI models that uphold human rights standards and are not connected to parties or states that act against the EU’s interests; |
Or. fi
Amendment 334
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional on the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; | 37. Calls for the EU to take due account, in its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, of the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI, without this involving the imposition of ideological conditionalities that undermine strategic partnerships with non-EU countries, including in Africa and Latin America; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; |
Or. pt
Amendment 335
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional on the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; | 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional on the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; calls in this regard on the Commission to ensure a human-rights-based approach to digital transformation worldwide, notably through the promotion of regulatory frameworks, as well as through solidly assessed EU-funded projects that ensure safe, trustworthy and human-centric AI systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 336
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional on the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; | 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional on the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; stresses that this conditionality should be applied in a way that keeps European AI systems attractive and accessible to partner countries, so that they do not turn to non-European alternatives; |
Or. en
Amendment 337
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional on the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; | 37. Calls for the EU to make its financial assistance for AI development and deployment in non-EU countries, including under the upcoming Global Europe instrument and under Global Gateway, conditional on the development and use of trustworthy and rights-respecting AI; stresses that the EU should only finance AI models that uphold human rights standards; stresses that Union financial support must not benefit third countries that use AI systems for hybrid operations or interventions against the Union or a Member State; |
Or. el
Amendment 338
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 37a. Calls on the Commission to integrate meaningful human rights due diligence and risk assessments, including impacts on human rights defenders, civil society and civic space, into all project appraisal, approval, monitoring and evaluation processes implemented through EU and multilateral development finance institutions; |
Or. en
Amendment 339
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies to comply with key EU laws, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3 and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4 , as well as laws against forced labour, in order to ensure that AI supply chains are responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; | 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies with process automation, informed decision-making, personalisation and customer experience and efficiency and cost reduction; insists, on the other hand, that companies comply with obligations in the field of security and privacy; |
| 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). | |
| 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 340
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies to comply with key EU laws, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4, as well as laws against forced labour, in order to ensure that AI supply chains are responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; | 38. Stresses that AI systems may help companies to comply, more efficiently and at a lower administrative cost, with existing obligations under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3 and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4, as well as legislation in force against forced labour, to provide AI supply chains that are responsible and respectful of human rights and the environment; welcomes the efforts to simplify those directives as part of the Omnibus initiative and argues that this simplification process should continue, reducing the reporting burdens imposed on businesses, particularly SMEs; stresses, however, that AI must under no circumstances be used, either directly or indirectly, to introduce new reporting, monitoring or due diligence obligations that are not expressly provided for in the legislative acts currently in force, nor to circumvent, through technological means, the ongoing objective of regulatory simplification; |
| 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). | 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859, (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). |
| 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). | 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). |
Or. pt
Amendment 341
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies to comply with key EU laws, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3 and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4 , as well as laws against forced labour, in order to ensure that AI supply chains are responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; | 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies to comply with key EU laws, such as applicable Union law on responsible business conduct, as well as laws against forced labour, in order to ensure that AI supply chains are responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; |
| 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). | |
| 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 342
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies to comply with key EU laws, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3 and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4 , as well as laws against forced labour, in order to ensure that AI supply chains are responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; | 38. Stresses the importance of AI for private companies, as it can support them to comply with key EU laws, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3 and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4 , as well as laws against forced labour, in order to ensure that AI supply chains are ethical, responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; |
| 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). | 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). |
| 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). | 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 343
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies to comply with key EU laws, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3 and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4 , as well as laws against forced labour, in order to ensure that AI supply chains are responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; | 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies to comply with key EU laws, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3 and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4 , as well as laws against forced labour, across the full lifecycle of development and deployment, including systematic identification, prevention, and mitigation of risks, involving concerned communities. with a legal obligation to publicly disclose identified human rights, data protection, supply chain, and environmental risks, as well as the specific mitigation measures adopted, in a standardised and accessible transparency report , in order to ensure that AI supply chains are responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; |
| 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). | 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). |
| 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). | 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 344
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies to comply with key EU laws, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3 and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4 , as well as laws against forced labour, in order to ensure that AI supply chains are responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; | 38. Stresses the importance of AI systems used within companies, as they can support companies to comply with key EU laws, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive3 and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive4 , as well as laws against forced labour, in order to ensure that AI supply chains are responsible, sustainable and respectful of human rights and the environment; Urges the companies to use the digital transition in order to contribute to decent work, stronger labour rights and shorter working time rather than precarious employment; |
| 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). | 3 Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj). |
| 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). | 4 Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 345
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 39. Stresses that a trustworthy AI ecosystem is a key driver of competitiveness; emphasises that investing in AI systems that respect fundamental human rights is essential for building trust with consumers and international partners, fostering long-term innovation, and creating a sustainable competitive advantage in the global market; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 346
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 39. Stresses that a trustworthy AI ecosystem is a key driver of competitiveness; emphasises that investing in AI systems that respect fundamental human rights is essential for building trust with consumers and international partners, fostering long-term innovation, and creating a sustainable competitive advantage in the global market; | 39. Stresses that a trustworthy AI ecosystem is a key driver of competitiveness; emphasizes that investing in AI systems that respect fundamental human rights is essential for building trust with consumers and international partners, fostering long-term innovation, and creating a sustainable competitive advantage in the global market; calls for this to be one of the main messages of the EU to its international partners and to be mainstreamed into the EU's digital and AI-related communication; |
Or. en
Amendment 347
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 39. Stresses that a trustworthy AI ecosystem is a key driver of competitiveness; emphasises that investing in AI systems that respect fundamental human rights is essential for building trust with consumers and international partners, fostering long-term innovation, and creating a sustainable competitive advantage in the global market; | 39. Stresses that a trustworthy AI ecosystem is a key driver of competitiveness; emphasises that investing in AI systems that respect fundamental human rights is essential for building trust with consumers and international partners, fostering long-term innovation, and creating a sustainable competitive advantage in the global market by closing the innovation and investment gap with third-country competitors; |
Or. en
Amendment 348
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 39a. stresses the importance of ensuring that citizens and businesses have the possibility to receive the necessary guidance, and access so that they can make use of AI tools, free from unjustified or disproportionate restrictions; |
Or. el
Amendment 349
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance; | 40. Emphasises that supporting accesible AI literacy is of the utmost importance in order to empower citizens, particularly vulnerable groups, to understand and navigate the benefits and risks of AI, and to ensure that they are able to make informed decisions and exercise their rights; calls for the Commission and EEAS to include this dimension into EU external action; |
Or. en
Amendment 350
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance; | 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance; stresses that AI literacy must be accompanied by investment in advanced skills, training and the retention of talent, including through the AI Skills Academy, and that skills shortages remain a binding constraint on the Union's capacity to develop and deploy AI; underlines that this investment on skills and training can also be used for the union’s external action in the context of programmes dedicated for human rights protection; |
Or. en
Amendment 351
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance; | 40. calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support accessible AI literacy, digital security and capacity-building programmes for human rights defenders and civil society organisations, including guidance on the safe use of AI technologies and on protecting sensitive data, communications and sources; Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance; |
Or. en
Amendment 352
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance; | 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance and must be promoted as a priority through Member States’ national education systems, families and vocational education institutions, with complementary, rather than substitutive, support from EU instruments; |
Or. pt
Amendment 353
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance; | 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance; highlights the joint responsibility of parents, schools and the authorities of the Member States in promoting AI skills; |
Or. fi
Amendment 354
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy is of the utmost importance; | 40. Emphasises that supporting AI literacy, with the special attention to vulnerable and marginalised groups, is of the utmost importance; |
Or. en
Amendment 355
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 40a. Emphasises that the use of AI in the asylum and migration context raises specific concerns with regard to migrants’ fundamental rights and the principle of non-refoulement, and warns against the increasing exploitation of AI technology for migration and border management purpose without appropriate safeguards; stresses therefore that any use of AI in this context must not impede individual assessments and must respect all fundamental rights guaranteed by international and EU law, in particular the right to non-discrimination; |
Or. en
Amendment 356
Alice Teodorescu Måwe
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives; | 41. Supports international initiatives, including within the United Nations, to establish clear international rules for autonomous and AI-enabled weapon systems, with a view to ensuring compliance with international humanitarian law, while recognising Member States' legitimate need to develop and maintain advanced defence capabilities; |
Or. sv
Amendment 357
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives; | 41. Supports the UN´s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate lethal autonomous weapon systems, including a ban on those which can operate outside a responsible chain of human command and control or are not compatible with international humanitarian law principles; |
Or. en
Amendment 358
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives; | 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems and to impose a moratorium on the sale and use of high-risk military AI systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives and to prioritise investments in peace, conflict prevention, social justice and human security; |
Or. en
Amendment 359
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives; | 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives, provided that an agreement of that kind provides for effective verification mechanisms and does not put EU Member States and their allies at a strategic disadvantage relative to powers that do not sign up to it or do not comply with it; |
Or. pt
Amendment 360
Christophe Gomart
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives; | 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives; such an agreement must ensure that meaningful human oversight is maintained in accordance with existing national doctrines and must not jeopardise ongoing defence programmes; |
Or. fr
Amendment 361
Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives; | 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives through relevant regulation or directive explicitly prohibiting the use, production and trade of such systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 362
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support such objectives; | 41. Supports the UN’s efforts for a legally binding agreement to globally regulate and ban lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to support the adoption of these objectives at international level; |
Or. el
Amendment 363
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 41a. Stresses that external AI policy must strictly respect national sovereignty and legitimate defense capabilities of member states and partner democracies; cautions that binding international bans on military AI applications could disadvantage democratic nations while non-compliant authoritarian regimes continue uninhibited development; advocates instead for robust, risk-based operational guardrails within NATO frameworks; |
Or. en
Amendment 364
Loucas Fourlas
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 41a. Stresses that meaningful human control, human accountability and full compliance with international humanitarian law must remain fundamental principles in the development of lethal autonomous weapons systems; |
Or. el
Amendment 365
Alice Teodorescu Måwe
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; | 42. Condemns violations of international humanitarian law and human rights resulting from the illegal use of AI-enabled and autonomous systems in armed conflicts; stresses the importance of ensuring accountability for such violations in accordance with applicable international law and within the framework of relevant international institutions' respective mandates; |
Or. sv
Amendment 366
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; | 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for independent international investigations into such crimes; calls for the EU to increase its support to the ICJ and the ICC in investigating and prosecuting grave human right violations committed with the use of AI; |
Or. en
Amendment 367
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; | 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls on the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court to improve their internal frameworks and introduce specialised training for judges and legal officers in order to deal appropriately with these specific human rights violations; |
Or. en
Amendment 368
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; | 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of lethal autonomous weapon systems; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and addresing grave human rights violations arising from the use of such systhems; |
Or. en
Amendment 369
Miriam Lexmann
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; | 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems, particularly the latest growing evidence of using fully-autonomous drones against Ukraine; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; |
Or. en
Amendment 370
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; | 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; reaffirms, however, the inalienable right of Member States and their allies to self-defence and the modernisation of their defence capabilities, including by responsibly integrating AI-assisted systems; |
Or. pt
Amendment 371
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for the EU to increase its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; | 42. Condemns the potential human rights violations committed in armed conflicts by means of autonomous AI systems; calls for the EU to strengthen its support for the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court in investigating and prosecuting grave human rights violations committed with the use of AI; |
Or. fi
Amendment 372
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 42a. Urges the EU to maintain the legally binding prohibition of funding of lethal autonomous weapons in all future EU defence industrial programmes such as AGILE and the European Competitiveness Fund; |
Or. en
Amendment 373
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 43. Calls for an export ban of AI-assisted mass surveillance systems from the EU to countries where there is a serious risk of these systems being used to violate human rights; | 43. Calls for strengthened human rights safeguards in the export, transfer and provision of AI-assisted surveillance and biometric identification systems from the EU to third countries; calls for the prohibition of such exports where there is a serious risk that these systems could be used to violate human rights; calls for robust human rights risk assessments, and post-export monitoring to prevent diversion or misuse of such technologies; urges the increased use of human rights sanctions against regimes responsible for excessive and illegal surveillance, in order to hold them accountable for their actions and prevent further abuses; |
Or. en
Amendment 374
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 43. Calls for an export ban of AI-assisted mass surveillance systems from the EU to countries where there is a serious risk of these systems being used to violate human rights; | 43. Calls for rigorous export controls, based on the framework of Regulation (EU) 2021/821 on dual-use items, on AI-based mass surveillance systems exported by the Union to countries where there is a serious risk of them being used to violate human rights; calls on the European Commission and the Member States to apply and promote these controls in coordination with like-minded partners in order to ensure their effectiveness and avoid European providers being placed at a disadvantage; |
Or. en
Amendment 375
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 43. Calls for an export ban of AI-assisted mass surveillance systems from the EU to countries where there is a serious risk of these systems being used to violate human rights; | 43. Calls for an export ban of AI-assisted mass surveillance systems from the EU to countries where there is a serious risk of these systems being used to violate human rights, including unlawful surveillance, persecution, repression or targeting of human rights defenders, journalists, civil society organisations or other critical voices; calls for robust human rights risk assessments, end-use controls and post-export monitoring to prevent diversion or misuse of such technologies; |
Or. en
Amendment 376
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 43. Calls for an export ban of AI-assisted mass surveillance systems from the EU to countries where there is a serious risk of these systems being used to violate human rights; | 43. Calls for an export ban of AI-assisted mass surveillance systems from the EU to countries where there is a serious risk of these systems being used to violate human rights, on the basis of objective and publicly auditable criteria, preventing arbitrary decisions or decisions motivated by short-term political convenience that undermine the competitiveness of European industry vis-à-vis competing suppliers from non-EU countries; |
Or. pt
Amendment 377
Isabel Serra Sánchez, Rima Hassan
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 43a. Calls for a ban on mass biometric surveillance, predictive policing, emotion recognition, automated profiling and other AI systems that are incompatible with fundamental rights by design, as well as on the export of such technologies where they may facilitate political repression or human rights abuses; |
Or. en
Amendment 378
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 44. Calls for the integration of the principles of the AI Act into the Dual-Use Regulation5 , which should lead to the prohibition of exports of AI systems banned by the AI Act and obligate Member States to ensure that all high-risk dual-use AI systems intended for export adhere to the obligations under the AI Act as a condition for export approval; | 44. Reiterates that export controls on dual-use AI technologies should remain targeted, risk-proportionate, and focused strictly on hostile foreign actors; warns that excessive export restrictions or pre-market bureaucratic hurdles hurt European AI developers and undermine Western technological leadership on the global stage; |
| 5 Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (OJ L 206, 11.6.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/821/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 379
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 44. Calls for the integration of the principles of the AI Act into the Dual-Use Regulation5 , which should lead to the prohibition of exports of AI systems banned by the AI Act and obligate Member States to ensure that all high-risk dual-use AI systems intended for export adhere to the obligations under the AI Act as a condition for export approval; | 44. Calls for greater coherence between the AI Act and the Dual-Use Regulation5 as regards AI systems with civilian dual-use applications, with the aim of ensuring that all high-risk dual-use AI systems intended for export comply with the obligations established under international humanitarian law; recalls that, pursuant to Article 2(3) of the AI Act, systems developed or used exclusively for military, defence or national security purposes fall outside the scope of the AI Act, and that such systems must continue to be governed by Member States' national defence export control regimes and by Regulation (EU) 2021/821 (Dual-Use Regulation); |
| 5 Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (OJ L 206, 11.6.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/821/oj). | 5 Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (OJ L 206, 11.6.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/821/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 380
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 44. Calls for the integration of the principles of the AI Act into the Dual-Use Regulation5, which should lead to the prohibition of exports of AI systems banned by the AI Act and obligate Member States to ensure that all high-risk dual-use AI systems intended for export adhere to the obligations under the AI Act as a condition for export approval; | 44. Calls for the integration of the principles of the AI Act into the Dual-Use Regulation5, which should lead to the prohibition of exports of AI systems banned by the AI Act and to Member States ensuring that high-risk dual-use AI systems intended for export adhere to the obligations under the AI Act, safeguarding the competitiveness of the European technology and defence industry against competitors outside the EU who are not subject to equivalent restrictions; |
| 5 Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (OJ L 206, 11.6.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/821/oj). | 5 Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (OJ L 206, 11.6.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/821/oj). |
Or. pt
Amendment 381
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 44a. Calls for the revision of the Commission guidelines implementing the Dual-Use Regulation, specifically the sections related to human rights obligations in dual-use licensing and due diligence, to ensure alignment with the due diligence standards defined in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD); |
Or. en
Amendment 382
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 45. Calls for the expansion of the scope of the AI Act to cover exports of AI systems outside the EU for the two main risk categories listed in the AI Act; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 383
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 45. Calls for the expansion of the scope of the AI Act to cover exports of AI systems outside the EU for the two main risk categories listed in the AI Act; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 384
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 45. Calls for the expansion of the scope of the AI Act to cover exports of AI systems outside the EU for the two main risk categories listed in the AI Act; | 45. Calls for the alignment of the export of AI systems outside the EU with the risk-prevention principles of the AI Act; |
Or. en
Amendment 385
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 45. Calls for the expansion of the scope of the AI Act to cover exports of AI systems outside the EU for the two main risk categories listed in the AI Act; | 45. Calls for the strict framing of the scope of the AI Act to cover exports of AI systems outside the EU for the two main risk categories listed in the AI Act, quantifying compliance costs for European exporting companies prior to any legislative decision; |
Or. pt
Amendment 386
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 46. Calls for the AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI; calls on the Commission to include the promotion of trustworthy AI systems under Global Gateway initiatives; | 46. Calls for for systematic ex-ante impact assessments of AI provisions in EU trade agreements; calls for any AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote truly open-source, trustworthy AI through international cooperation programmes and capacity-building initiatives, including exchanges of best practices, technical cooperation, training programmes, and access to digital infrastructure; |
Or. en
Amendment 387
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 46. Calls for the AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI; calls on the Commission to include the promotion of trustworthy AI systems under Global Gateway initiatives; | 46. Calls for AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI through international cooperation programmes and capacity-building initiatives, including exchanges of best practices, technical cooperation, training programmes, and access to digital infrastructure; calls for systematic ex-ante impact assessments of AI provisions in trade agreements; calls on the Commission to apply a careful approach on AI provisions in trade agreements, calls for such provisions to preserve the ability to regulate and enforce its legislation; calls on the Commission to ensure a human-rights-based approach to digital transformation worldwide; |
Or. en
Amendment 388
Cristian Terheş
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 46. Calls for the AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI; calls on the Commission to include the promotion of trustworthy AI systems under Global Gateway initiatives; | 46. Calls on the Commission to include the promotion of trustworthy AI systems under Global Gateway initiatives; calls, in this context, for Global Gateway to actively offer European AI infrastructure, models and standards to partner countries, recognising that those countries will otherwise build on whichever technology is made available to them first, and that early adoption decisions determine dependencies for a decade or more; |
Or. en
Amendment 389
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 46. Calls for the AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI; calls on the Commission to include the promotion of trustworthy AI systems under Global Gateway initiatives; | 46. Calls for the AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI and to boost the export competitiveness of European AI providers, subject to appropriate safeguards against misuse, proliferation and repurposing for surveillance or repression; calls on the Commission to include the promotion of trustworthy AI systems under Global Gateway initiatives; |
Or. en
Amendment 390
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 46. Calls for the AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI; calls on the Commission to include the promotion of trustworthy AI systems under Global Gateway initiatives; | 46. Calls for the AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI; calls on the Commission to include the objective of promoting trustworthy AI systems in international partnerships; |
Or. fi
Amendment 391
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 46. Calls for the AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI; calls on the Commission to include the promotion of trustworthy AI systems under Global Gateway initiatives; | 46. Calls for AI provisions in EU trade agreements to promote open-source, trustworthy AI and ensure reciprocity of market access for European AI companies in partner countries, as a condition for the conclusion of such agreements; calls on the Commission to include the promotion of trustworthy AI systems under Global Gateway initiatives; |
Or. pt
Amendment 392
Geadis Geadi
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 47. Underscores the potential of AI systems to advance and strengthen human rights and address major challenges at a global level; welcomes efforts by the UN and the Council of Europe to advance this use of AI by means of international governance; | 47. Underscores the potential of AI systems to advance and strengthen human rights and address major challenges at a global level; welcomes efforts by the UN and the Council of Europe to advance this use of AI by means of international governance which must, in all circumstances, respect the national sovereignty of states; |
Or. en
Amendment 393
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 47a. Welcomes the work of the EEAS in promoting an EU human rights-based digital diplomacy, and of the EU AI Office on “AI for Public Good”, which seeks to strengthen EU capacities and sovereignty while supporting global solutions through scientific cooperation and open innovation with international partners; |
Or. en
Amendment 394
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 47a. Recalls the specific role of the Subcommittee on Human Rights (DROI) in monitoring the human rights dimension of the Union’s external action in the field of AI and calls for it to be consulted systematically and in a timely manner whenever the Commission or the EEAS adopt relevant initiatives in this regard; |
Or. pt
Amendment 395
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Leire Pajín, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, climate change and energy, and generally in the advancement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; | 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems for monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, climate change, energy, humanitarian aid, including through disaster-risk mapping, anticipatory action, needs assessment and humanitarian logistics to help reach crisis-affected people more rapidly and effectively, and to advance the SDGs; calls on Commission and EUMS to identify and reinforce concrete actions with regards to AI in key fields of EU external action such as promotion of democracy and human rights, humanitarian aid and crisis and disaster risk management, development cooperation, women´s rights and gender equality, children´s rights, rights of migrants and refugees, and food security; calls on the Commission and the EEAS, in cooperation with humanitarian organisations and local actors, to support the responsible and context-sensitive use of trustworthy AI for humanitarian action, disaster preparedness and response, needs assessment, anticipatory action and humanitarian logistics, with a view to improving the needs-based delivery of humanitarian assistance; insists that such applications respect humanitarian principles and the ‘do no harm’ approach and the "human-in-control" principle; |
Or. en
Amendment 396
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, climate change and energy, and generally in the advancement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; | 48. Recognising the sovereignty of Member States over their health and education systems, calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, nature conservation and energy; |
Or. pt
Amendment 397
Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell, Stanislav Stoyanov
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, climate change and energy, and generally in the advancement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; | 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, crisis response, and energy, and generally in the promotion of economic and social development; |
Or. en
Amendment 398
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, climate change and energy, and generally in the advancement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; | 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems , while ensuring that exports are prohibited where there is risk of human rights violations. Human rights risk assessments, end-use controls and post-export monitoring are necessary to prevent the diversion, misuse of such system including for the monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, climate change and energy, and generally in the advancement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; |
Or. en
Amendment 399
Adrián Vázquez Lázara
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, climate change and energy, and generally in the advancement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; | 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, climate change and energy, and generally in the advancement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, making full use of existing Union instruments such as Horizon Europe and the Digital Europe Programme; |
Or. en
Amendment 400
Sebastian Tynkkynen
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, healthcare, climate change and energy, and generally in the advancement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; | 48. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support the application of trustworthy AI systems in monitoring human rights violations and supporting access to justice, as well as in the fields of education, security, healthcare, climate change and energy, and generally in the advancement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; |
Or. fi
Amendment 401
Loucas Fourlas
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 48a. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to use reliable and trustworthy AI tools to substantiate, verify and monitor human rights and international humanitarian law violations, including in cases of protracted occupation, frozen conflicts and in areas where access is limited for independent human rights monitoring mechanisms; |
Or. el
Amendment 402
Catarina Vieira
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 48a. Calls on the Commission to promote a comprehensive strategy integrating the environmental protection and biodiversity conservation as an integral part of the EU's external action on AI; emphasises the importance of supporting partner countries in developing sustainable AI capacities while ensuring that AI deployment does not accelerate ecosystem degradation or unsustainable resource exploitation; |
Or. en
Amendment 403
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Francisco Assis, Sandra Gómez López, Marta Temido, Chloé Ridel, Hana Jalloul Muro
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 48a. Urges Commission and EU Member States to contribute to expanding scientific international cooperation, including research security, with like-minded partners in order to develop trustworthy AI systems that are grounded in scientific excellence; |
Or. en
Amendment 404
Tiago Moreira de Sá
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 49. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Member States. | 49. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Member States' national parliaments. |
Or. pt