Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

opinion parliamentary committee draft, 20 November 2024

On discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023, Section I – European Parliament

Document AFCO-PA-766589 · (2024/2020(DEC))

Committee on Constitutional Affairs · Rapporteur: Sven Simon

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

AI:In short

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control to incorporate its opinion into the resolution on Parliament's 2023 budget discharge. It welcomes anti-disinformation actions, notes concerns about the Authority's resources, and stresses conditions for the ethics body.

Position. The Committee on Constitutional Affairs proposes that the Committee on Budgetary Control incorporate these points into its motion for a resolution on discharge.

Key points

  1. Welcomes actions against disinformation and information manipulation by Parliament structures, including EPLOs, and commends high use of committed appropriations.
  2. Acknowledges initiatives by the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations for the 2024 elections, like the European Campaign Action Plan.
  3. Notes with concern the Authority's constrained human resources, expected to worsen before the 2024 elections and due to new tasks from the recast of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014.
  4. Takes note of Parliament's transparency and integrity reform and EP 2024 reform; calls for evaluation of effectiveness and proportionality; recognises need for budget reinforcement for the Transparency Register IT overhaul.
  5. Expresses concerns about the interinstitutional ethics body agreement, including Council's exclusion, secretariat placement, and definition risks; considers no work or funding should occur until provisions are in Parliament's Rules of Procedure.

Who is affected

  • European Parliament Liaison Offices and Parliament's communication structures.
  • Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations.
  • Interinstitutional body for ethical standards.

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Opinion 6 paragraphs

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following into its motion for a resolution:

1.Welcomes the actions taken on the fight against disinformation and information manipulation by the structures of the Parliament responsible for communication with citizens and countering disinformation such as the European Parliament Liaison Offices; points out that one of the most powerful tools against disinformation is positive, factual communication about Parliament’s work; commends the high use of the appropriations committed by EPLOs in 2023;

2.Acknowledges the initiatives launched by the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations in various areas of importance in the electoral context as part of the general common effort to help the European Union to get ready for the European elections 2024, like the European Campaign Action Plan;

3.Notes with concern that the Authority reported that it is facing constrained human resources; highlights that this issue was expected to become even more pressing in the run-up to the 2024 European Parliament elections and due to the necessary administrative implementation of any new tasks that would arise for the Authority from the ongoing negotiations on a recast of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014;

4.Takes note of the Parliament’s comprehensive actions related to the initiation, creation and implementation of the transparency and integrity reform as well as the EP 2024 reform process; calls to evaluate these measures regarding their effectiveness and proportionality; recognises that a budget reinforcement was required in the course of 2023 to cover Parliament's contribution to the IT overhaul of the (interinstitutional) Transparency Register web platform;

5.Expresses concerns regarding several aspects of the Agreement establishing an interinstitutional body for ethical standards for members of institutions and advisory bodies referred to in Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union, including that the Council is outside the scope of the substance of the Agreement, the placement of the secretariat of the body at the Commission and definition risks associated with using the term ethics; considers that no work of the body should commence and no funding should be provided by Parliament until all provisions of the Agreement have been incorporated into Parliament’s Rules of Procedure.