opinion parliamentary committee, 29 January 2025
On discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023, Section I – European Parliament
Document AFCO-AD-766589 · (2024/2020(DEC))
Committee on Constitutional Affairs · Rapporteur: Sven Simon
AI:In short
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs opinion on Parliament's 2023 budget discharge welcomes actions against disinformation, acknowledges electoral preparations, and raises concerns about resources and ethics body funding.
Position. The Committee on Constitutional Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control to incorporate its suggestions into the motion for a resolution.
Key points
- Welcomes actions against disinformation and information manipulation, including EPLO communication and Europa Experience visitor centres, and supports a comprehensive evaluation of the latter.
- Acknowledges initiatives by the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations for the 2024 European elections, such as the European Campaign Action Plan.
- Notes the Authority's constrained human resources, expected to worsen with new tasks from the recast of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014.
- Welcomes Parliament's transparency and integrity reform and EP 2024 reform, calls for evaluating their effectiveness and proportionality, and recognises the need for budget reinforcement for the Transparency Register IT overhaul.
- Expresses concerns about the interinstitutional ethics body agreement, including the Council's exclusion, secretariat placement, and definition risks, and says no work or funding should occur until provisions are in Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Who is affected
- European Parliament Liaison Offices and Europa Experience visitor centres: their communication and visitor activities are praised and evaluated.
- Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations: faces resource constraints and new tasks from regulation recast.
- Interinstitutional body for ethical standards: its work and funding are conditioned on incorporation into Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Figures and deadlines
Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Full text
Opinion 6 paragraphs
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following into its motion for a resolution:
1.Welcomes the actions taken on the fight against disinformation and information manipulation by the structures of the Parliament responsible for communication with citizens and countering disinformation such as the European Parliament Liaison Offices; points out that one of the most powerful tools against disinformation is positive, factual communication about Parliament’s work; commends the high use of the appropriations committed by EPLOs in 2023; acknowledges that the Europa Experience visitor centres are another important tool to counter disinformation and introduce the role of the Parliament and the values of European democracy to visitors; welcomes the Bureau's decision to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the “Europa Experiences” with the aim of clearly identifying strengths and weaknesses in order to make their financing future-proof and as efficient as possible;
2.Acknowledges the initiatives launched by the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations in various areas of importance in the electoral context as part of the general common effort to help the European Union to get ready for the European elections 2024, like the European Campaign Action Plan;
3.Notes that the Authority reported that it is facing constrained human resources; highlights that this issue was expected to become even more pressing due to the necessary administrative implementation of any new tasks that could arise for the Authority from the ongoing negotiations on a recast of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014;
4.Welcomes Parliament’s comprehensive actions related to the initiation, creation and implementation of the transparency and integrity reform as well as the EP 2024 reform process; calls to evaluate these measures regarding their effectiveness and proportionality; recognises that a budget reinforcement was required in the course of 2023 to cover Parliament's contribution to the IT overhaul of the (interinstitutional) Transparency Register web platform;
5.Expresses concerns regarding several aspects of the Agreement establishing an interinstitutional body for ethical standards for members of institutions and advisory bodies referred to in Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union, including that the Council is outside the scope of the substance of the Agreement, the placement of the secretariat of the body at the Commission and definition risks associated with using the term ethics; considers that no work of the body should commence and no funding should be provided by Parliament until all provisions of the Agreement have been incorporated into Parliament’s Rules of Procedure.
Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur has received input 1 paragraph
The Chair in his capacity as rapporteur for the opinion declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.
Information on adoption by committee asked for opinion 1 paragraph
| Date adopted | 29.1.2025 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 16 13 0 |
| Members present for the final vote | Gerolf Annemans, Brando Benifei, Gabriele Bischoff, Salvatore De Meo, Vasile Dîncu, Klára Dobrev, Nikolas Farantouris, Daniel Freund, Jean-Paul Garraud, Charles Goerens, Sandro Gozi, Patryk Jaki, Ľubica Karvašová, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Nicola Procaccini, Thijs Reuten, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, Sven Simon, Anthony Smith, Reinier Van Lanschot, Alexandre Varaut, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Sabine Verheyen, Loránt Vincze, Charlie Weimers | |
| Substitutes present for the final vote | Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Fabrice Leggeri, Liudas Mažylis |
Procedure pages
How the committees handled the text, and how their members voted on it.
Final vote by roll call in committee asked for opinion 3 paragraphs
16 · For
- ECR
- Patryk Jaki, Nicola Procaccini, Charlie Weimers
- EPP
- Salvatore De Meo, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Liudas Mažylis, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, Sven Simon, Sabine Verheyen, Loránt Vincze, Adrián Vázquez Lázara
- Patriots
- Gerolf Annemans, Jean-Paul Garraud, Fabrice Leggeri, Alexandre Varaut
13 · Against
- Renew
- Charles Goerens, Sandro Gozi, Ľubica Karvašová
- S&D
- Brando Benifei, Gabriele Bischoff, Vasile Dîncu, Klára Dobrev, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Thijs Reuten
- The Left
- Nikolas Farantouris, Anthony Smith
- Greens
- Daniel Freund, Reinier Van Lanschot
0 · Abstained