Plenary report, 9 April 2024
On the request for waiver of the immunity of Gunnar Beck
Report A-9-2024-0170 · (2023/2192(IMM))
Committee on Legal Affairs · Rapporteur: Ibán García Del Blanco
AI:In short
Parliament's decision on a request from the Chief Public Prosecutor in Düsseldorf to waive the immunity of Gunnar Beck, an MEP elected for Germany, in connection with a preliminary investigation into suspected criminal offences. The alleged offences are theft of low-value property in combination with intentional bodily injury and resistance to law enforcement officials, said to have occurred on 29 October 2022 in a department store in Neuss, Germany. Parliament finds the alleged offences do not concern opinions expressed or votes cast in the performance of a Member's duties, and finds no evidence of fumus persecutionis. Parliament decides to waive Gunnar Beck's immunity and instructs its President to forward the decision and the committee report to the competent German authority and to Gunnar Beck.
Position. The Committee on Legal Affairs proposes that Parliament waive the immunity of Gunnar Beck, finding the alleged offences unrelated to his parliamentary duties and no evidence of fumus persecutionis.
Key points
- The Chief Public Prosecutor in Düsseldorf requested the waiver of Gunnar Beck's immunity for a preliminary investigation into suspected criminal offences.
- The suspected offences are theft of low-value property in combination with intentional bodily injury and resistance to law enforcement officials under sections 242(1), 248a, 223(1), 230(1) sentence 1, 113(1) and 53 of the German Criminal Code.
- On 29 October 2022 in a department store in Neuss, Gunnar Beck allegedly took tester products without paying, was restrained by store detectives, and allegedly did not comply with law enforcement officials' requests not to resist.
- The alleged offences do not concern opinions expressed or votes cast in the performance of a Member's duties under Article 8 of Protocol No 7.
- Under Article 9 of Protocol No 7, Members enjoy in their own state the immunities accorded to members of their national parliament; Article 46(2), (3) and (4) of the German Basic Law requires the Bundestag's permission for prosecution or arrest of a Member.
- Article 192b of the Richtlinien für das Strafverfahren und das Bußgeldverfahren provides that a Member of the European Parliament from Germany is entitled to the immunity granted to a Member of the German Bundestag.
- Parliament cannot assume the role of a court, and in a waiver of immunity procedure a Member cannot be regarded as a 'defendant'.
- The purpose of parliamentary immunity is to protect Parliament and its Members from legal proceedings in relation to activities carried out in the performance of parliamentary duties that cannot be separated from those duties.
- Parliament found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, meaning no factual elements indicating that the intention underlying the legal proceeding may be to damage a Member's political activity and thus the European Parliament.
- Parliament decides to waive the immunity of Gunnar Beck.
- Parliament instructs its President to forward the decision and the committee report immediately to the competent German authority and to Gunnar Beck.
Who is affected
- Gunnar Beck, MEP elected for Germany: his immunity is waived, allowing the preliminary investigation to proceed.
- The competent German authority: receives the decision and the committee report.
Figures and deadlines
- 25 July 2023: date of the letter from the German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection forwarding the waiver request.
- 11 September 2023: date the request was communicated in plenary.
- 29 October 2022: date of the alleged offences in a department store in Neuss, Germany.
Legal basis. Articles 8 and 9 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage.
Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 25 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Full text
Proposal for a european parliament decision 24 paragraphs
(2023/2192(IMM))
The European Parliament,
–having regard to the request of the Chief Public Prosecutor in Düsseldorf for the waiver of the immunity of Gunnar Beck, forwarded by letter dated 25 July 2023 by the German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection, in connection with a preliminary investigation into suspected criminal offences, and communicated in plenary on 11 September 2023,
–having heard Gunnar Beck in accordance with Rule 9(6) of its Rules of Procedure,
–having regard to Articles 8 and 9 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union and to Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
–having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 October 2008, 19 March 2010, 6 September 2011, 17 January 2013 and 19 December 2019,
–having regard to Article 46(2), (3) and (4) of the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany and Article 192b of the Richtlinien für das Strafverfahren und das Bußgeldverfahren,
–having regard to Rule 5(2), Rule 6(1) and Rule 9 of its Rules of Procedure,
–having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A9-0170/2024),
A.whereas the Chief Public Prosecutor in Düsseldorf has requested the waiver of the immunity of Gunnar Beck, MEP elected for Germany, with a view to initiating preliminary proceedings for theft of low-value property in combination with intentional bodily injury and resistance to law enforcement officials, pursuant to sections 242(1), 248a, 223(1), 230(1) sentence 1, 113(1) and 53 of the German Criminal Code;
B.whereas, on 29 October 2022 in a department store in Neuss (Germany), Gunnar Beck allegedly took some sample of tester products on display for customers to try out, with, allegedly, a view to taking them away without paying for them; whereas a shoplifting offence was reported; whereas Gunnar Beck allegedly tried to leave the premises and the store detectives restrained him; whereas, afterwards, law enforcement officials intervened on the scene and, allegedly, Gunnar Beck did not comply with their requests to not resist;
C.whereas the alleged offences do not concern opinions expressed or votes cast in the performance of the duties of a Member of the European Parliament within the meaning of Article 8 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union;
Read the rest (12 paragraphs)
D.whereas Article 9 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union provides that Members of the European Parliament enjoy, in the territory of their own state, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;
E.whereas Article 46(2), (3) and (4) of the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany provides:
‘(2) A Member may not be called to account or arrested for a punishable offence without permission of the Bundestag, unless he is apprehended while committing the offence or in the course of the following day.
(3)The permission of the Bundestag shall also be required for any other restriction of a Member’s freedom of the person or for the initiation of proceedings against a Member under Article 18.
(4)Any criminal proceedings or any proceedings under Article 18 against a Member and any detention or other restriction of the freedom of his person shall be suspended at the demand of the Bundestag.’;
F.whereas Article 192b of the Richtlinien für das Strafverfahren und das Bußgeldverfahren [Guidelines for criminal proceedings and fines] governs waivers of the immunity of Members of the European Parliament, and whereas, in particular, paragraph 1 thereof provides as follows:
‘(1) Einem Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland steht die einem Abgeordneten des Deutschen Bundestages zuerkannte Immunität zu. (...)’ [A Member of the European Parliament from the Federal Republic of Germany shall be entitled to the immunity granted to a Member of the German Bundestag];
G.whereas Parliament cannot assume the role of a court, and whereas, in a waiver of immunity procedure, a Member cannot be regarded as a ‘defendant’;
H.whereas the purpose of parliamentary immunity is to protect Parliament and its Members from legal proceedings in relation to activities carried out in the performance of parliamentary duties and which cannot be separated from those duties;
I. whereas in this case, Parliament has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, i.e. factual elements which indicate that the intention underlying the legal proceeding may be to damage a Member’s political activity and thus the European Parliament;
1.Decides to waive the immunity of Gunnar Beck;
2.Instructs its President to forward this decision and the report of its committee responsible immediately to the competent German authority and to Gunnar Beck.
Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur has received input 1 paragraph
The rapporteur declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.
Information on adoption in committee responsible 1 paragraph
| Date adopted | 8.4.2024 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 12 3 0 |
| Members present for the final vote | Gunnar Beck, Ibán García Del Blanco, Virginie Joron, Sergey Lagodinsky, Gilles Lebreton, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Karen Melchior, Sabrina Pignedoli, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Axel Voss, Marion Walsmann, Javier Zarzalejos | |
| Substitutes present for the final vote | Guy Lavocat, Antonius Manders, Nacho Sánchez Amor |