amendment list, 9 September 2026

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Report A-10-2026-0199-AM-084-085 · (2025/2069(INI))

Where the law stands · dossier 2025/2069 →

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

Full text

Text 23 paragraphs

9.9.2026 A10-0199/84

Amendment 84

Mariusz Kamiński, Beata Szydło

on behalf of the ECR Group

Report A10-0199/2026

Tomas Tobé

(2025/2069(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 99 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
Motion for a resolution	Amendment99a. Strongly opposes the continuation of the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and Cuba1a; considers that, in view of the Cuban regime’s complete failure to comply with its provisions, the scale of repression against the Cuban people and Havana’s strategic alliances with Moscow, Minsk, Beijing and Tehran, including actions directly undermining European security, the Agreement should be suspended immediately; stresses that the EU must unequivocally stand with the Cuban people and their aspirations for freedom and democracy, rather than with the communist regime that oppresses them; considers that the EU’s continued failure to do so further undermines its credibility on the international stage; ___________________ 1a OJ L 337 I, 13.12.2016, p. 3, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2016/2232/oj.

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

99a. Strongly opposes the continuation of the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and Cuba1a; considers that, in view of the Cuban regime’s complete failure to comply with its provisions, the scale of repression against the Cuban people and Havana’s strategic alliances with Moscow, Minsk, Beijing and Tehran, including actions directly undermining European security, the Agreement should be suspended immediately; stresses that the EU must unequivocally stand with the Cuban people and their aspirations for freedom and democracy, rather than with the communist regime that oppresses them; considers that the EU’s continued failure to do so further undermines its credibility on the international stage; ___________________ 1a OJ L 337 I, 13.12.2016, p. 3, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2016/2232/oj.

Or. en

9.9.2026 A10-0199/85

Read the rest (11 paragraphs)

Amendment 85

Mariusz Kamiński, Beata Szydło

on behalf of the ECR Group

Report A10-0199/2026

Tomas Tobé

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

(2025/2069(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 118

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
Motion for a resolution118. Underlines that the effectiveness and credibility of EU sanctions depend on strict and consistent enforcement; calls, therefore, on the Member States to establish a mechanism for the effective monitoring of enforcement activities, including through collaboration with civil society and academia, to improve coordination and to work together on closing loopholes and harmonising procedures; welcomes the fact that the announced revision of the mandate of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) offers an opportunity to strengthen its role to include the investigation and prosecution of sanctions violations; stresses that the reform should be matched by adequate funding to enable the EPPO to effectively carry out its enhanced responsibilities;	Amendment118. Underlines that the effectiveness and credibility of EU sanctions depend on strict and consistent enforcement; calls, therefore, on the Member States to establish a mechanism for the effective monitoring of enforcement activities, including through collaboration with civil society and academia, to improve coordination and to work together on closing loopholes and harmonising procedures; welcomes the fact that the announced revision of the mandate of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) offers an opportunity to strengthen its role to include the investigation and prosecution of sanctions violations; stresses that the reform should be matched by adequate funding to enable the EPPO to effectively carry out its enhanced responsibilities; notes, however, that the effectiveness of sanctions depends on their consistent implementation by all state institutions and on the commitment of society as a whole, in particular companies and economic operators; strongly deplores the fact that, 12 years after Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and more than four years after the launch of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, thousands of European companies continue to operate on the Russian market, including more than 1 500 German companies, thereby generating revenues, taxes and economic capacity that contribute to Russia’s ability to sustain its war of aggression;

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

118. Underlines that the effectiveness and credibility of EU sanctions depend on strict and consistent enforcement; calls, therefore, on the Member States to establish a mechanism for the effective monitoring of enforcement activities, including through collaboration with civil society and academia, to improve coordination and to work together on closing loopholes and harmonising procedures; welcomes the fact that the announced revision of the mandate of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) offers an opportunity to strengthen its role to include the investigation and prosecution of sanctions violations; stresses that the reform should be matched by adequate funding to enable the EPPO to effectively carry out its enhanced responsibilities; notes, however, that the effectiveness of sanctions depends on their consistent implementation by all state institutions and on the commitment of society as a whole, in particular companies and economic operators; strongly deplores the fact that, 12 years after Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and more than four years after the launch of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, thousands of European companies continue to operate on the Russian market, including more than 1 500 German companies, thereby generating revenues, taxes and economic capacity that contribute to Russia’s ability to sustain its war of aggression;

Or. en