Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Plenary report, 6 July 2026

On the proposal for a Council regulation establishing the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/101

Report A-10-2026-0197 · (COM(2025)0476 – C100271/2025 – 2025/0268(NLE))

Committee on Industry, Research and Energy · Rapporteur: Virginijus Sinkevičius

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

AI:In short

Parliament's amended version of the Commission proposal for a Council regulation sets up the Ignalina nuclear power plant decommissioning assistance programme for 2028-2034, replacing Regulation (EU) 2021/101. It sets a programme envelope of EUR 678 000 000 in current prices (EUR 602 720 000 in 2025 prices) and a maximum Union co-financing rate as close to 86% as possible. The programme covers dismantling of reactor shafts, building demolition, waste management, radiological hazard reduction, reorganisation of the plant and protection of the site against hybrid threats including drone attacks. It requires knowledge on decommissioning and waste management to be created and shared, coordinated by the Joint Research Centre, with dissemination beyond the Union controlled and subject to confidentiality safeguards. Union funding is limited to legal entities established in a Member State or a country associated with relevant Union programmes, unless justified by security or technical necessity.

Position. The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy approves the Commission proposal as amended, calling on the Commission and Council to alter the proposal accordingly and to consult Parliament again if substantially amending it.

Key points

  1. The regulation establishes the Ignalina decommissioning programme for 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2034 and repeals Regulation (EU) 2021/101 from 1 January 2028.
  2. The programme's general objectives are to assist Lithuania with decommissioning, focusing on radiological safety and efficiency, and to create knowledge on decommissioning and radioactive waste management.
  3. The specific objective is engineering, dismantling and decontamination of Ignalina equipment and reactor shafts under the decommissioning plan, including radioactive waste management and radiation protection.
  4. The programme may finance measures to increase security of the nuclear facility site against hybrid threats, including attacks by unmanned aerial systems.
  5. The programme envelope is EUR 678 000 000 in current prices (EUR 602 720 000 in 2025 prices), and appropriations may be entered in the Union budget beyond 2034 for unfinished actions.
  6. Member States, Union institutions, third countries, international organisations and other third parties may make additional financial or non-financial contributions to the programme.
  7. The overall maximum Union co-financing rate is as close to 86% as possible, with the rest provided by Lithuania and sources other than the Union budget.
  8. Union funding is limited to legal entities established in a Member State or a country associated with relevant Union programmes, unless justified by security or technical necessity.
  9. The Joint Research Centre coordinates structuring and dissemination of knowledge to Member States and, under conditions, third countries, financed under the INSC-D programme at 100% of eligible costs.
  10. The Commission is assisted by a committee under Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, and may amend the Annex on the specific objective through implementing acts.
  11. The Annex lists activities: dismantling reactor shafts, building demolition, safe waste management, downgrading radiological hazards, reorganisation of the plant and site protection against hybrid threats.
  12. The regulation does not affect actions initiated under Regulation (EU) 2021/101, which continues to apply to them until closure.

Who is affected

  • Lithuania: receives Union assistance for decommissioning and must co-finance the programme and submit an updated decommissioning plan when significant events occur.
  • Legal entities established in a Member State or associated country: eligible for Union funding under the programme.
  • Workers involved in decommissioning: benefit from radiation protection standards, upskilling, reskilling and training measures.
  • Third countries: may receive knowledge or training under conditions, possibly subject to a financial contribution.

Figures and deadlines

  • EUR 678 000 000 in current prices (EUR 602 720 000 in 2025 prices) — programme envelope for 2028-2034.
  • 86% — maximum Union co-financing rate, to be as close to this as possible.
  • 100% — Union funding of eligible costs for Joint Research Centre knowledge activities under INSC-D.
  • 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2034 — period of the programme and date of repeal of Regulation (EU) 2021/101.
  • 31 December 2004 and 31 December 2009 — deadlines for closure of Ignalina Unit 1 and Unit 2.
  • 1 500 MW — capacity of each of the two RBMK-type reactor units at Ignalina.
  • about 14% — Lithuania's contribution to direct decommissioning activities since the beginning of the programme.
  • 6.5 billion Euros — estimated cost of final disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste.

Legal basis. Article 3(2) of Protocol No 4 to the 2003 Act of Accession.

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 16 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Draft european parliament legislative resolution 132 paragraphs

(COM(2025)0476 – C100271/2025 – 2025/0268(NLE))

(Consultation)

The European Parliament,

–having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2025)0476),

–having regard to the 2003 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 3(2) of Protocol No 4 attached thereto,

–having regard to the budgetary assessment by the Committee on Budgets,

–having regard to Rule 84 of its Rules of Procedure,

–having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A10-0197/2026),

1.Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, in accordance with Article 293(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

3.Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

4.Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the Commission proposal;

Read the rest (120 paragraphs)

5.Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

2025/0268(NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL REGULATION

establishing the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/101

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the 2003 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 3(2) of Protocol No 4 attached thereto,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Protocol No 4 on the Ignalina nuclear power plant attached to the 2003 Act of Accession, which constitutes the legal basis of the Ignalina Programme, Lithuania committed itself to the closure of Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the Ignalina nuclear power plant by 31 December 2004 and 31 December 2009 respectively, and to the subsequent decommissioning of those units.

(2) In accordance with its obligations under the Act of Accession and with Union assistance, Lithuania shut down the two units within the respective deadlines and made significant progress towards their decommissioning. Further work is necessary in order to continue the decrease of the level of radiological hazard. Based on the available estimates, additional financial resources are required for this purpose beyond 2027.

(3) The decommissioning of the nuclear power plant covered by this Regulation is to be carried out in accordance with Union legislation on nuclear safety, namely Council Directive 2009/71/Euratom, and waste management, namely Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom. Pursuant to this legislation, the ultimate responsibility for nuclear safety and for the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management remains with Lithuania. However, given that the financial burden associated with those activities exceeds the total costs of the decommissioning programme, it is essential to ensure that Lithuania does not bear this responsibility alone, particularly as addressing potential safety threats benefits the Union as a whole, not only Lithuania.

(4) Recognising that the premature shutdown and consequent decommissioning of the Ignalina nuclear power plant with two 1 500 MW RBMK-type reactor units which are similar to, but more powerful than, those used in the Chernobyl Nuclear power plant (‘Chernobyl NPP’) inherited from the Soviet Union was of an unprecedented nature and represented for Lithuania an exceptional financial burden not commensurate with the size and economic strength of the country, Protocol No 4 to the 2003 Act of Accession stated that the Union assistance under the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania (the ‘Programme’) is to be seamlessly continued and extended beyond 2006, for the period of the next Financial Perspectives. The original principles of the Programme, as stipulated by the Protocol no. 4, state that ‘the extended Ignalina programme shall be based on the same elements and principles as described in Article 2 of the Protocol, including measures to enhance the security of energy supply and improving energy efficiency in Lithuania’. However, in order to ensure transparent and efficient use of funds, the ongoing Ignalina Programme, as agreed by Lithuania, is focused only on the decommissioning process, thereby maximising funding efficiency.

(5) This Regulation lays down a reference amount for the Programme for the period 2028-2034.

(6) In implementing the Programme, consistency, coherence and synergies with relevant Union policies and programmes, in particular with the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation and Decommissioning established by Council Regulation [XXX], and with relevant Union and national policies and programmes supporting the social and economic transition of the Visaginas region, should be ensured.

(7) In a rapidly changing economic, social and geopolitical environment, recent experience has shown the need for a more flexible multiannual financial framework and Union spending programmes. To that effect, and in line with the objectives of the Programme, the funding, while ensuring the delivery of the budget allocation for the period 2028-2034 and sufficient predictability for budget implementation, should duly consider the evolving policy needs and Union priorities as identified in relevant documents published by the Commission, in European Parliament resolutions, and Council conclusions. ▌

(8) Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies to the Programme. It lays down the rules on the establishment and the implementation of the general budget of the Union, including the rules on grants, prizes, non-financial donations, procurement, indirect management, financial assistance, financial instruments and budgetary guarantees.

(9) In accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95, Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the financial interests of the Union are to be protected through proportionate measures, including the prevention, detection, correction and investigation of irregularities and fraud, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, the imposition of administrative sanctions. In particular, in accordance with Regulations (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 and (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections, with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) may investigate and prosecute fraud and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union as provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council. In accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, any person or entity receiving Union funds is to fully cooperate in the protection of the Union's financial interests, to grant the necessary rights and access to the Commission, OLAF, EPPO, and the European Court of Auditors and to ensure that any third parties involved in the implementation of Union funds grant equivalent rights.

(9a) The Programme should be implemented with full transparency and accountability in the use of Union resources in order to preserve public trust in the managing of Union funds. All financial needs underpinning each phase of the implementation should be documented and justified in a transparent manner, with a clear breakdown of the budget to be made available to the relevant institutions.

(10) The Programme is to be implemented in accordance with Regulation (EU) [XXX] of the European Parliament and of the Council [Performance Regulation] which establishes the rules for the expenditure tracking and the performance framework for the budget, including rules for ensuring a uniform application of the principles of ‘do no significant harm’ and gender equality referred to in Article 33(2), points (d) and (f), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 respectively, rules for monitoring and reporting on the performance of Union programmes and activities, rules for establishing a Union funding portal, rules for the evaluation of the programmes, as well as other horizontal provisions applicable to all Union programmes such as those on information, communication and visibility.

(11) This Regulation does not prejudge the outcome of any future State aid procedures that may be undertaken in accordance with Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

(12) The financing pursuant to this Regulation should concentrate on activities implementing the safety objectives of the decommissioning and mitigating risks.

(13) The Programme should involve the creation of knowledge and the sharing of experience with the objective of retaining such knowledge and expertise within the Union to strengthen its industrial competitiveness and strategic autonomy. Knowledge and experience gained and lessons learnt under the Programme with regard to the nuclear decommissioning process and waste management should be disseminated across the Union and, where appropriate and under certain conditions, beyond, without disclosing any sensitive information held by undertakings, in coordination and synergy with the Commission’s nuclear installations at the Joint Research Centre (JRC) sites, as such measures bring the greatest Union added value and contribute to the development of nuclear safety skills, the safety of the workers and the general public as well as protection of the environment. The scope, procedure and economic aspects of cooperation should be detailed in multiannual work programmes and could also be subject to agreements between the Member States or between the Member States and the Commission.

(13a) The Programme should ensure the highest standards of radiation protection for workers involved in decommissioning activities and for the general public and the environment, including health and safety measures, skills development, and fair working conditions, in full respect of Union laws, standards and the precautionary principle. Given the potentially severe and long-term risks associated with nuclear installations and the management of radioactive waste, all activities under the Programme should avoid placing undue burdens on future generations.

(14) The JRC should facilitate the dissemination of knowledge on nuclear decommissioning among different Union stakeholders in a coordinated way, for example by carrying out market analysis, reviews and assessments of knowledge needs in the Union and, where relevant, third countries, identifying potential directions for cooperation, interested stakeholders and spheres in which knowledge created in the implementation of the Programme would bring the greatest added value, and developing formats for knowledge sharing. The dissemination of knowledge created should be financed by the JRC. Any Member State should be able to initiate the development of ties and exchanges for knowledge dissemination. Where relevant, such exchanges could involve third countries, where such cooperation aligns with the Union’s strategic interests and priorities, in consistency and complementarity with actions carried out under Regulation [XXX] of the European Parliament and of the Council [Global Europe] and Council Regulation [XXX] [INSC-D]. In order to strengthen the Union’s technological sovereignty and strategic autonomy in the nuclear decommissioning sector, knowledge generated under the Programme should primarily reinforce Union capacities. Any dissemination beyond the Union should be duly controlled and subject to appropriate confidentiality requirements, ensuring the protection of the Union’s security interests, intellectual property and technological leadership.

(15) The decommissioning of the Ignalina nuclear power plant should be carried out with recourse to the best available technical expertise, and with due regard to the nature and technological specifications of the installations to be decommissioned, in order to ensure safety and the highest possible efficiency, taking into account European and international best practices, ensuring the highest level of nuclear safety and environmental protection, and considering the need to minimise risks throughout the entire lifecycle of decommissioning activities.

(15a) In light of the evolving security environment and the threats posed to critical infrastructure, including to nuclear decommissioning sites, by unmanned aerial systems, as demonstrated by the drone attack on the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in February 2025, the Programme should also be able to finance measures to increase the security of the nuclear facility site from such hybrid threats.

(16) The efficiency of the Programme should be enhanced through improved organisation and the optimal use of human resources. In view of the dismantling activities to be performed during 2028-2034 and the planned outsourcing of the full dismantling of reactor shaft central zones, targeted upskilling, reskilling and training measures should be implemented to support the adaptation and redeployment of personnel. Where workforce adjustments due to outsourcing are considered, they should only take place once the outsourcing has been implemented and should be coupled with retraining and reskilling policies. Such adjustments should not endanger the safe and effective conduct of the decommissioning process.

(17) An effective monitoring and control of the evolution of the decommissioning process should be ensured by Lithuania and the Commission in order to ensure the highest Union added value of the funding allocated under this Regulation, although the ultimate responsibility for the decommissioning remains with Lithuania. The monitoring and control include effective measurement of progress, and the enacting of corrective measures where necessary. To that end, as part of work programmes adopted in accordance with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EU) 2021/101, a committee with monitoring and information functions has been established and co-chaired by a representative of the Commission and of Lithuania.

(18) It should be possible to review the level of the appropriations allocated to the Programme on the basis of comprehensive implementation report with a view to ensuring the continuous and uninterrupted delivery of decommissioning activities. Any such review should take into account evolving risks, including those related to the protection of critical infrastructure, while ensuring that nuclear safety is maintained at all times.

(19) Activities co-financed under this Regulation should be identified within the boundaries laid down by the decommissioning plan submitted by Lithuania under Regulation (Euratom) 1369/2013, and its subsequent revisions. The decommissioning plan defines the scope of the Programme, the decommissioning end-state and end-date; it covers the decommissioning activities, their associated schedule, costs and required human resources. Where relevant, in accordance with the provisions of Lithuanian law or within a shorter time frame, in case of any significant event that has an impact on the content of that plan, Lithuania should submit an updated decommissioning plan to the Commission for its consideration in preparing the multiannual work programmes.

(20) Activities under the Programme should be conducted with a joint financial effort by the Union and Lithuania. A maximum Union co-financing threshold has been established in line with the co-financing practice established under the predecessor programmes. Taking into account the practice of comparable Union programmes and the strengthened Lithuanian economy, from the inception of the Programme until the end of the implementation of the activities financed under this Regulation, the Union co-financing rate should be as close to 86% as possible of eligible costs. The remaining co-financing should be provided by Lithuania and sources other than the Union budget, such as international financial institutions and other donors. Since the beginning of the Programme, Lithuania has contributed about 14% to direct decommissioning activities. However, as the Programme does not cover certain related activities, including physical and fire safety, Lithuania's actual contribution is higher. At the same time, Lithuania continues to bear full responsibility for the socio-economic development of Visaginas, a city purpose-built for the nuclear power plant, which remains significantly affected by the highest unemployment rate following the closure of the plant. While those challenges are hereby acknowledged, funding under this Programme should not be used to address them, and should, where necessary, be supported by resources from other funds.

(21) Due account was taken of the Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 22/2016, its recommendations, and the reply from the Commission.

(22) The Programme falls within the scope of the Lithuanian National Programme under Directive 2011/70/Euratom.

(23) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the objectives of the Programme, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

(24) The methods of implementation and the forms of Union funding laid down in this Regulation should be chosen on the basis of their ability to efficiently achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, high level of safety, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non-compliance. That should include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and unit costs, as well as financing not linked to costs as referred to in Article 125(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.

(25) The Programme replaces the programme established by Regulation (EU) 2021/101 for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2027. That Regulation should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Subject matter

This Regulation establishes the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania (‘the Programme’) and lays down the objectives of the Programme, its budget for the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2034, the forms of Union funding and the rules for providing such funding.

Article 2

Definitions

For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:

(1) ‘decommissioning’ means administrative and technical measures which allow the removal of some or all of the regulatory controls from a nuclear facility and which aim at ensuring the long-term protection of the public and the environment, including the reduction of the levels of residual radionuclides in the materials and on the site of the facility;

(2) ‘decommissioning plan’ means a document containing detailed information on the proposed decommissioning and covering the selected decommissioning strategy; the schedule, type and sequence of decommissioning activities; the waste management strategy applied, including clearance; the proposed end state; the storage and disposal of the waste from decommissioning; the timeframe for decommissioning; the cost estimates for the completion of decommissioning; and the objectives, expected results, milestones, target dates, as well as the corresponding key decommissioning indicators, including earned value based indicators. The plan is prepared by the nuclear facility license holder and is reflected in the multiannual work programmes of the Programme.

Article 3

Programme objectives

1. The Programme has the following general objectives:

(a) to adequately assist Lithuania in implementing the decommissioning of the Ignalina nuclear power plant, with specific emphasis on managing the radiological safety challenges and optimising the efficiency of the programme implementation through improved organisation, innovation and the upskilling and reskilling of the workforce, while ensuring that any reduction of the workforce does not create unnecessary operational risks.

(b) to create knowledge on the nuclear decommissioning process and the management of radioactive waste resulting from the decommissioning activities, delivering explicit knowledge products on decommissioning and waste management governance issues, managerial best practices, health and safety protocols for workers and the general public and technological challenges, with a particular focus on preventing environmental contamination and adverse health effects from radioactive materials.

The knowledge referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph shall be disseminated at Union level, and, where appropriate, beyond, in all relevant areas, developing potential Union synergies, under programme Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation and Decommissioning (INSC-D), as set out in Article [X] of Regulation (Euratom) [XXX].

2. The Joint Research Centre shall coordinate the structuring and dissemination of knowledge, referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (b), to Member States and, when relevant, and under certain conditions, to third countries without disclosing any sensitive information held by undertakings. Any dissemination beyond the Union shall be duly controlled and subject to appropriate confidentiality safeguards which ensure the Union’s security interests, intellectual property and technological leadership. Those activities shall be financed under the INSC-D programme and funded by the Union at 100% of eligible costs. Where a third country is granted access to the knowledge or training provided under the Programme, it may be subject to an appropriate financial contribution, which shall be agreed between the Union and the third country.

3. The specific objective of the Programme shall be to carry out the engineering, dismantling and decontamination of the Ignalina equipment and reactor shafts in accordance with the decommissioning plan, including the management of radioactive waste resulting from the decommissioning activities, ensuring the highest standards of radiation protection for workers, the general public and the environment and to continue with the safe management of the decommissioning and legacy waste, while preventing long-term environmental harm and adverse health effects. In light of the evolving geopolitical and security environment, the nuclear decommissioning site shall be adequately protected against hybrid threats, including attacks on critical infrastructure by unmanned aerial systems. To that end, the Programme may be used to finance measures to increase the security of the nuclear facility site from such threats.

4. The detailed description of the specific objective referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article is set out in the Annex. The Commission may amend, by means of implementing acts, the Annex. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 11(2). Implementation of the Programme and its specific objectives shall be guided by clear targets and milestones and a focus on cost-efficient and transparent spending of the budget.

Article 4

Budget

1. The programme envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2034 is set at EUR 678 000 000 in current prices (EUR 602 720 000 in 2025 prices).

2. Budgetary commitments for actions extending over more than one financial year may be broken down over several years into annual instalments.

3. Appropriations may be entered in the Union budget beyond 2034 to cover the expenses necessary and to enable the management of action not completed by the end of the Programme.

4. The financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the amounts of additional resources referred to in Article 5 may also be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Programme, such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, corporate information technology systems and platforms, information communication and visibility activities, including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, and all other technical and administrative assistance or staff-related expenses incurred by the Commission for the management of the Programme.

Article 5

Additional resources

1. Member States, Union institutions, bodies and agencies, third countries, international organisations, international financial institutions, or other third parties, may make additional financial or non-financial contributions to the Programme. Additional financial contributions shall constitute external assigned revenue within the meaning of Article 21(2), points (a), (d), or (e), or Article 21(5) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.

2. Resources allocated to Member States under shared management may, at their request, be made available to the Programme. The Commission shall implement those resources directly or indirectly in accordance with Article 62(1), point (a) or (c), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Such resources shall be additional to the amount referred to in Article 4(1) of this Regulation. Such resources shall be used for the benefit of the Member State concerned. Where the Commission has not entered into a legal commitment under direct or indirect management for additional amounts thus made available to the Programme, the corresponding uncommitted amounts may, at the request of the Member State concerned, be transferred back to one or more respective source programmes or their successors.

Article 6

Alternative, combined and cumulative funding

1. The Programme shall be implemented in synergy with other Union programmes. An action that has received a Union contribution from another programme may also receive a contribution under the Programme. The rules of the relevant Union programme shall apply to the corresponding contribution or a single set of rules may be applied to all contributions and a single legal commitment may be concluded. If the Union contribution is based on eligible costs, the cumulative support from the Union budget shall not exceed the total eligible costs of the action and may be calculated on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the documents setting out the conditions for support.

2. Award procedures under the Programme may be jointly conducted under direct or indirect management by Member States, Union institutions, bodies and agencies, third countries, international organisations, international financial institutions, or other third parties (‘partners to the joint award procedure’), provided the protection of the financial interests of the Union is ensured. Such procedures shall be subject to a single set of rules and lead to the conclusion of single legal commitments. For that purpose, the partners to the joint award procedure may make resources available to the Programme in accordance with Article 5 of this Regulation, or the partners may be entrusted with the implementation of the award procedure, where applicable in accordance with Article 62(1), point (c), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. In joint award procedures, representatives of the partners to the joint award procedure may also be members of the evaluation committee referred to in Article 153(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.

Article 7

Implementation and forms of Union funding

1. The Programme shall be implemented in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, under direct management or under indirect management with entities referred to in Article 62(1), point (c) of that Regulation.

2. Union funding under the Programme may be provided in any form in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, in particular, prizes, procurement and non-financial donations.

Article 8

Eligibility

1. Only activities implementing the objectives set out in Article 3 shall be eligible for Union funding. Compliance with those rules shall be duly monitored, and in the event of any irregularities, appropriate corrective measures shall be taken. Union funding under the Programme shall be limited to legal entities established in a Member State or in a country associated with relevant Union programmes, unless otherwise justified by duly substantiated security or technical necessity.

2. The work programmes referred to in Article 110 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 may further specify the eligibility criteria set out in this Regulation or set additional eligibility criteria for specific actions.

Article 9

Co-financing rates

The overall maximum Union co-financing rate applicable under the Programme shall be as close to 86% as possible. The remaining financing shall be provided by Lithuania and additional sources other than the Union budget.

Article 10

Work programme

1. The Programme shall be implemented by work programmes referred to in Article 110 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.

2. The work programmes shall reflect the applicable decommissioning plan that is to serve as the baseline for the programme monitoring and evaluation.

Article 11

Committee

1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.

2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.

3. Where the opinion of the committee is to be obtained by written procedure, that procedure shall be terminated without result when, within the time limit for delivery of the opinion, the chair of the committee so decides or a simple majority of committee members so requests.

Article 12

Repeal

Regulation (EU) 2021/101 is repealed with effect from 1 January 2028.

Article 13

Transitional provisions

1. This Regulation shall not affect the continuation or modification of actions initiated under Regulation (EU) 2021/101, to which that Regulation shall continue to apply until their closure.

2. The financial envelope for the Programme may also cover technical and administrative assistance expenses necessary to ensure the transition between the Programme and the measures adopted under Regulation (EU) 2021/101.

Article 14

Entry into force and application

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2028.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the Council

The President

ANNEX

The following activities are covered under the specific objective set out in Article 3((3):

(I) Dismantling of reactor shafts, while ensuring the highest standards of radiation protection for workers, the general public and the environment:

(1) completion of dismantling and decontamination of top and bottom zones (called zones R1 and R2, respectively);

(2) completion of Steam Drum Separators dismantling;

(3) reactor cores (called zone R3):

(a) dismantling technology engineered and licensed;

(b) dismantling equipment installed and operational;

(c) dismantling and decontamination of the reactor shafts central zone in accordance with the decommissioning plan; progress has to be measured by the quantity and type of materials removed as well as through earned value);

(d) reactor waste interim storage facility in operation.

▌ (Ia) Implementation of the building demolition programme. Progress made in respect of this objective is to be measured by the quantity of demolished buildings as well as through earned value.

(II) The reorganisation of the Ignalina nuclear power plant (INPP) in order to enhance the efficiency of the decommissioning programme through improved organisation and the optimal use of human resources. In view of the scheduled dismantling activities and the outsourcing of the dismantling of reactor shaft central zones, targeted upskilling, reskilling and training measures shall be implemented to support the adaptation and redeployment of personnel. Where workforce adjustments due to outsourcing are considered, they shall only take place after the outsourcing has been implemented and shall be coupled with retraining and reskilling policies. Such adjustments shall not endanger the safe and effective conduct of the decommissioning process. Progress shall be measured with respect to specific Key Performance Indicators approved in the implementing work programmes.

(III) Safe management of the decommissioning and legacy waste up to interim storage or to disposal (depending on the waste category), including the completion of the waste management infrastructure, and near surface repository. It has to be accomplished in accordance with the decommissioning plan, in its final revision. Progress has to be measured by the quantity and type of waste safely stored or disposed of, as well as through earned value.

(IV) Downgrading of radiological hazards. Progress has to be measured through the safety assessments of the activities and the facility, identifying ways in which potential exposures could occur and estimating the probabilities and magnitude of potential exposures.

▌

(IVa) The protection of nuclear decommissioning site against hybrid threats, including attacks from unmanned systems on critical infrastructure, as well as strengthening of preparedness, risk awareness, and prevention capacities.

Explanatory statement 10 paragraphs

Decommissioning of the Ignalina nuclear power plant (INPP) is a first-of-a-kind, highly technically complex challenge for the European nuclear safety. It is also about the EU delivering on its commitment to solidarity with Lithuania.

Under Protocol No. 4 of Lithuania’s EU Accession Treaty, the country was required to prematurely close the Ignalina nuclear power plant due to serious safety concerns in Europe. The graphite-moderated Chernobyl-type reactors, although significantly more powerful, lacked full containment, and were inherently unsafe due to a fundamentally flawed design. Politically, closing the plant was a very difficult decision for Lithuania, where nuclear power, at its peak in 1993, covered some 88% of domestic electricity demand. However, the decision was taken in the interest of safety of Europe and based on a clear promise enshrined in the Accession Treaty: that the European Union would provide “adequate” financial assistance for the decommissioning of the Soviet-era plant. The Rapporteur welcomes the proposed Regulation which sets the amount and conditions for the next MFF 2028-2034. Discontinuing the Programme would have undermined the credibility of the Union. However, the Rapporteur aims to further strengthen the proposal, especially taking the account current geopolitical challenges, through a series of targeted amendments:

1. Predictable and stable funding

The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s proposal to set the Programme’s funding in the next MFF at EUR 678 000 000 in current prices. However, both in the recitals and in the main text, this amount is referred to as “indicative” (“indicative financial envelope “), potentially implying that this amount is negotiable and can be reduced. This is disconcerting, particularly as this was not the case in the previous periods. The rapporteur considers the term “indicative” as misleading: it could reduce confidence that the Programme will be funded adequately. During the next MFF, the dismantling of the reactor cores will begin, and once started, this work cannot be interrupted to prevent risks and radiological hazards. Any funding uncertainty therefore raises serious nuclear safety concerns.

2. Anti-drone systems

The physical protection of the plant currently falls outside of the Ignalina Programme’s scope and remains the responsibility of the Lithuanian state. However, in recent years, nuclear power plants have become target of military strikes - for instance in February 2025, when a drone has caused nearly irreparable damage to the sarcophagus of the Chernobyl reactor, resulting in significant economic cost. Therefore, the Rapporteur proposes to include the anti-drone protection of the site within the scope of the Programme, to safeguard the population and prevent environmental and economic losses. This would also serve to protect the investments the Union has made over the years into the decommissioning of this object.

3. Strengthening the Union’s technological sovereignty

It is the view of the Rapporteur that Union funding under the Ignalina Programme should be limited to legal entities established in a Member State or in a country associated to relevant Union programmes, unless otherwise justified by duly substantiated security or technical necessity. Limiting eligibility would strengthen the protection of sensitive technologies, critical infrastructure and strategic know-how. It would also support the Union’s objective of reinforcing technological sovereignty and strategic autonomy. Exceptions can be made only by substantial security or technical necessity.In order to strengthen the Union’s technological sovereignty and strategic autonomy in the nuclear decommissioning sector, knowledge generated under the Programme should primarily reinforce Union industrial and technological capacities, while dissemination beyond the Union should be conducted in a manner that safeguards the Union’s security interests, intellectual property, and technological leadership.Sharing the knowledge indiscriminately risks empowering Europe’s competitors, including geopolitical rivals at the expense of the Union’s interest.

4. Geological repository

The Commission’s proposal excludes the disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste in deep geological repository, while the Rapporteur calls for keeping it in the Programme. Due to the premature shutdown, INPP was unable to generate financial resources for the final disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste generated during its operation and fulfil its responsibility as a radioactive waste generator as provided for in the Article 9 of the Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom and national legal acts.Although Lithuania should take due responsibility for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including final disposal, the magnitude of the financial burden placed on Lithuania (to co-finance INPP decommissioning and simultaneously fund the implementation of the deep geological repository) puts Lithuania in an exceptionally problematic situation. The cost of the final disposal is estimated at staggering 6.5 billion Euros. EU solidarity therefore must be also reflected in financial support for Lithuania‘s effort to implement final disposal solutions and avoid undue burden for future generations.

Annex: declaration of input 5 paragraphs

Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he included in his report input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the report, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:

1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register(2)
Mayor of Visaginas, Parko g. 14, 31140 Visaginas, +370 386 31 233, erlandas.galaguz@visaginas.lt
Altra (State Enterprise Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant) ) Elektrinės g. 4 K 47 , Drūkšinių k., LT- 3 1152 Visaginas, +370 694 96193, iae@altra.lt
2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies(3)
None

The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.

Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament’s Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.

3.6.2026

Budgetary assessment of the committee on budgets 17 paragraphs

for the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/101

(COM(2025)0476 – C100271/2025 – 2025/0268(NLE))

Rapporteur for budgetary assessment: Rasmus Nordqvist

The Committee on Budgets has carried out a budgetary assessment of the proposal under Rule 58 of the Rules of Procedure and has reached the following conclusions:

The Committee on Budgets,

A.whereas the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme for the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania (Ignalina programme) is intended to assist Lithuania in addressing the safety challenges associated with the decommissioning of a nuclear power plant, while generating knowledge to be shared with other EU Member States and non-EU countries for their own decommissioning activities; whereas the proposed programme is a continuation of activities that have been conducted since the early 2000s and are expected to run until 2049;

B.whereas nuclear safety is a public good, and past programmes have demonstrated the added value of collecting and disseminating knowledge linked to nuclear safety and the decommissioning of nuclear power plants;

C.whereas high levels of nuclear safety limit the risks associated with the management of nuclear facilities;

D.whereas the EU’s financial and technical contribution to the decommissioning of the Ignalina power plant is enshrined in Lithuania’s Accession Treaty as a demonstration of European solidarity;

1.Agrees that the programme envelope should be set at EUR 678 000 000 in current prices (EUR 602 720 000 in 2025 prices) in order to fulfil the programme’s objectives;

2.Considers that sufficient human and technical resources must be available from the outset and throughout the entire programming period of the 2028-2034 multiannual financial framework to ensure the effective implementation of the Ignalina programme;

3.Stresses that decommissioning activities meet long-term legal and technical obligations; considers, therefore, that stable and predictable financial programming is a condition for sound budgetary management;

4.Takes note of the suggested complementarity between the Ignalina programme and other programmes, such as the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation and Decommissioning and the Cohesion Fund; stresses that enhanced complementarity between instruments must not come at the expense of expenditure traceability or the prerogatives of the budgetary authority; stresses, in this regard, that any such contribution must be duly reflected in the programme performance statement for the Ignalina programme; insists that the budgetary authority retain full control over how resources are combined across instruments and over the effective contribution of each programme to EU priorities, specifically through detailed budgetary nomenclature; stresses that enhanced complementarity between programmes must not lead to disproportionate complexity for beneficiaries; calls for EU funding to be clearer, more accessible and more coherent in order to facilitate uptake and maximise the impact of investments;

5.Stresses that the use of external assigned revenue under the Ignalina programme must be clearly circumscribed, fully transparent and subject to effective parliamentary scrutiny; takes note, in that regard, of the provisions relating to additional financial contributions from any participating non-EU countries and other donors; underlines that, should the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy consider amending the provisions relating to external assigned revenue, this should be done in coordination with the Committee on Budgets and the other committees in order to ensure a consistent approach;

6.Recalls the proposal for a regulation establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities (performance regulation), which establishes a single streamlined list of performance indicators and monitoring and evaluation provisions, some of which are relevant to the Ignalina programme; underlines that any change to the architecture, objectives and eligible actions under the programme will need to be appropriately reflected in Annex I of the performance regulation, as part of the process of amending and negotiating that regulation; points out that while sectoral legislation can supplement the performance regulation, for instance as regards programme evaluations, it should remain consistent with the provisions of that regulation;

7.Recalls that under Article 6(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 (Financial Regulation), a general regime of conditionality in cases of breaches of the the rule of law applies to the establishment and implementation of the budget; underlines, furthermore, that the Member States and the Commission must, in the implementation of the budget, ensure compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and respect the values on which the EU is founded, as enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union.

Amendment 5 paragraphs

As part of its budgetary assessment, the Committee on Budgets also submits the following amendments to the proposal:

Amendment 1

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – Paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The indicative financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2034 is set at EUR 678 000 000 in current prices.The programme envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2034 is set at EUR 678 000 000 in current prices (EUR 602 720 000 in 2025 prices).
Annex: declaration of input 1 paragraph

The rapporteur for budgetary assessment declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not include in his budgetary assessment input from interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies, to be listed in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

Procedure pages

How the committees handled the text, and how their members voted on it.

Procedure – committee asked for budgetary assessment 1 paragraph
TitleNuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/101
ReferencesCOM(2025)0476 – C10-0271/2025 – 2025/0268(NLE)
Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenaryITRE 24.11.2025
Budgetary assessment by Date announced in plenaryBUDG 24.11.2025
Rapporteur for budgetary assessment Date appointedRasmus Nordqvist 10.2.2026
Discussed in committee8.4.2026
Final vote by roll call in committee asked for budgetary assessment 3 paragraphs

23 · For

ECR
Bogdan Rzońca
ESN
Markus Buchheit
No group
Thomas Geisel
EPP
Georgios Aftias, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Esther Herranz García, Monika Hohlmeier, Danuše Nerudová, Jacek Protas, Jüri Ratas, Karlo Ressler
Renew
Stine Bosse, Olivier Chastel, Lucia Yar
S&D
Mohammed Chahim, Matthias Ecke, Nikolas Farantouris, Jean-Marc Germain, Sandra Gómez López, Giuseppe Lupo, Nils Ušakovs
Greens
Rasmus Nordqvist, Nicolae Ștefănuță

1 · Against

Patriots
Tomasz Buczek

4 · Abstained

Patriots
Angéline Furet, Jana Nagyová, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová, Julien Sanchez
Procedure – committee responsible 1 paragraph
TitleNuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/101
ReferencesCOM(2025)0476 – C10-0271/2025 – 2025/0268(NLE)
Date of consultation or request for consent28.10.2025
Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenaryITRE 24.11.2025
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenaryBUDG 24.11.2025
Rapporteurs Date appointedVirginijus Sinkevičius 10.12.2025
Budgetary assessment Date of budgetary assessmentBUDG 3.6.2026
Discussed in committee28.1.202624.3.2026
Date adopted24.6.2026
Result of final vote+: –: 0:78 2 1
Date tabled6.7.2026
Final vote by roll call by the committee responsible 3 paragraphs

78 · For

ECR
Alessandro Ciriani, Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek, Gheorghe Piperea, Diego Solier, Beata Szydło, Francesco Torselli, Kris Van Dijck, Mariateresa Vivaldini, Anna Zalewska
ESN
Milan Mazurek, Volker Schnurrbusch
EPP
Hildegard Bentele, Alexander Bernhuber, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Paulo Cunha, Jan Farský, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Michalis Hadjipantela, Niels Flemming Hansen, Radan Kanev, Seán Kelly, Willemien Koning, Eszter Lakos, Letizia Moratti, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Angelika Niebler, Andrey Novakov, Mirosława Nykiel, Massimiliano Salini, Aura Salla, Paulius Saudargas, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Riho Terras, Angelika Winzig
Patriots
Paolo Borchia, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, András László, Jana Nagyová, Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Raffaele Stancanelli, Pierre-Romain Thionnet
Renew
Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Sigrid Friis, Bart Groothuis, Christophe Grudler, Michał Kobosko, Brigitte van den Berg, Yvan Verougstraete, Sophie Wilmès
S&D
Annalisa Corrado, Matthias Ecke, Sofie Eriksson, Niels Fuglsang, Lina Gálvez, Jens Geier, Sérgio Gonçalves, Nicolás González Casares, Giorgio Gori, Eero Heinäluoma, Thomas Pellerin-Carlin, Tsvetelina Penkova, Elena Sancho Murillo, Bruno Tobback, Nicola Zingaretti
The Left
Marc Botenga, Per Clausen, Marina Mesure, Dario Tamburrano
Greens
Alexandra Geese, Ville Niinistö, Jutta Paulus, Benedetta Scuderi, Virginijus Sinkevičius, Villy Søvndal

2 · Against

Patriots
Georg Mayer, Auke Zijlstra

1 · Abstained

ESN
Siegbert Frank Droese