amendment list, 4 March 2026

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

Report A-10-2026-0036-AM-015-017 · (2025/2214(INI))

Where the law stands · dossier 2025/2214 →

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

Full text

Text 35 paragraphs

4.3.2026 A10-0036/15

Amendment 15

Enikő Győri, Paolo Borchia, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Pierre Pimpie, Tomáš Kubín, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová

on behalf of the PfE Group

Report A10-0036/2026

Kira Marie Peter-Hansen

(2025/2214(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 24 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
Motion for a resolution	Amendment24a. Emphasises that CSRs should be better focused, by preserving their macroeconomic character, and should always remain within the remit of EU competences and should never use double standards;

Or. en

4.3.2026 A10-0036/16

Read the rest (23 paragraphs)

Amendment 16

Enikő Győri, Paolo Borchia, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Pierre Pimpie

on behalf of the PfE Group

Report A10-0036/2026

Kira Marie Peter-Hansen

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

(2025/2214(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 28

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
Motion for a resolution28. Stresses the growing importance of CSRs linked to the national and regional partnership plans; draws attention to the fact that there is currently no transparent or traceable methodology for developing and selecting CSRs, nor clarity on why some are proposed and others are not, which raises concerns regarding accountability and equal treatment of Member States; calls on the Commission to clarify the underlying procedures and selection criteria; underlines that any overall increase in the Commission’s discretionary power must be accompanied by corresponding ex post accountability mechanisms and a substantial improvement in the flow of information towards Parliament;	Amendment28. Stresses that the growing importance and potentially more binding character of CSRs, when linked to the NRPPs, constitute a significant increase in the Commission’s discretionary power; draws attention to the fact that there is currently no transparent or traceable methodology for developing and selecting CSRs, nor clarity on why some are proposed and others are not, which raises concerns regarding accountability and equal treatment of Member States; calls on the Commission to clarify the underlying procedures and selection criteria; underlines that any overall increase in the Commission’s discretionary power must be accompanied by corresponding ex post accountability mechanisms and a substantial improvement in the flow of information towards Parliament;

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

28. Stresses the growing importance of CSRs linked to the national and regional partnership plans; draws attention to the fact that there is currently no transparent or traceable methodology for developing and selecting CSRs, nor clarity on why some are proposed and others are not, which raises concerns regarding accountability and equal treatment of Member States; calls on the Commission to clarify the underlying procedures and selection criteria; underlines that any overall increase in the Commission’s discretionary power must be accompanied by corresponding ex post accountability mechanisms and a substantial improvement in the flow of information towards Parliament;

28. Stresses that the growing importance and potentially more binding character of CSRs, when linked to the NRPPs, constitute a significant increase in the Commission’s discretionary power; draws attention to the fact that there is currently no transparent or traceable methodology for developing and selecting CSRs, nor clarity on why some are proposed and others are not, which raises concerns regarding accountability and equal treatment of Member States; calls on the Commission to clarify the underlying procedures and selection criteria; underlines that any overall increase in the Commission’s discretionary power must be accompanied by corresponding ex post accountability mechanisms and a substantial improvement in the flow of information towards Parliament;

Or. en

4.3.2026 A10-0036/17

Amendment 17

Enikő Győri, Paolo Borchia, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Pierre Pimpie

on behalf of the PfE Group

Report A10-0036/2026

Kira Marie Peter-Hansen

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

(2025/2214(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
Motion for a resolution	Amendment28a. Expresses strong concern about the Commission’s proposal to make access to significant funding under the NRPPs and the European Competitiveness Fund conditional on the fulfilment of CSRs; recalls that similar conditionality in the context of the RRF has demonstrated serious shortcomings, including inconsistencies in the assessment of national reforms, politicisation of the process and insufficient accountability; stresses that replicating this approach risks undermining the credibility, ownership and effectiveness of both the European Semester and future EU funding;

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

28a. Expresses strong concern about the Commission’s proposal to make access to significant funding under the NRPPs and the European Competitiveness Fund conditional on the fulfilment of CSRs; recalls that similar conditionality in the context of the RRF has demonstrated serious shortcomings, including inconsistencies in the assessment of national reforms, politicisation of the process and insufficient accountability; stresses that replicating this approach risks undermining the credibility, ownership and effectiveness of both the European Semester and future EU funding;

Or. en