amendment list, 3 March 2026

Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024

Report A-10-2026-0015-AM-021-021 · (2025/2138(INI))

Where the law stands · dossier 2025/2138 →

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

Full text

Text 11 paragraphs

4.3.2026 A10-0015/21

Amendment 21

Cristina Guarda

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Report A10-0015/2026

Bogdan Rzońca

(2025/2138(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
Motion for a resolution20. Takes note of the Ombudsman’s decision to open an inquiry into the Commission’s data collection on the impact of the wolf population in the EU; notes, however, that in accordance with the Ombudsman’s statute, the inquiry had to be closed due to a pending case before the CJEU (T-634/24), where the same issues are raised; underlines the importance of basing any decision regarding the legal protection status of wolves on scientific evidence and the protection of rural communities;	Amendment20. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s decision to open an inquiry into the Commission’s data collection on the impact of the wolf population in the EU; notes, however, that in accordance with the Ombudsman’s statute, the inquiry had to be closed due to a pending case before the CJEU (T-634/24), where the same issues are raised; expresses deep concern that the decision to downgrade the protected status of wolves, which lacks sound scientific evidence and is aggravated by a lack of public access to documents and insufficient efforts to implement adequate preventive measures, at odds with the provisions of the Bern Convention, created a troubling precedent, endangering the overall approach to conservation goals and the management of wildlife and natural habitats;

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

20. Takes note of the Ombudsman’s decision to open an inquiry into the Commission’s data collection on the impact of the wolf population in the EU; notes, however, that in accordance with the Ombudsman’s statute, the inquiry had to be closed due to a pending case before the CJEU (T-634/24), where the same issues are raised; underlines the importance of basing any decision regarding the legal protection status of wolves on scientific evidence and the protection of rural communities;

20. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s decision to open an inquiry into the Commission’s data collection on the impact of the wolf population in the EU; notes, however, that in accordance with the Ombudsman’s statute, the inquiry had to be closed due to a pending case before the CJEU (T-634/24), where the same issues are raised; expresses deep concern that the decision to downgrade the protected status of wolves, which lacks sound scientific evidence and is aggravated by a lack of public access to documents and insufficient efforts to implement adequate preventive measures, at odds with the provisions of the Bern Convention, created a troubling precedent, endangering the overall approach to conservation goals and the management of wildlife and natural habitats;

Or. en