Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Plenary report, 20 May 2025

On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as regards a shorter settlement cycle in the Union

Report A-10-2025-0095 · (COM(2025)0038 – C100011/2025 – 2025/0022(COD))

Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs · Rapporteur: Johan Van Overtveldt

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

AI:In short

Parliament's amended version of the proposed regulation shortens the mandatory settlement cycle for securities transactions on trading venues from T+2 to T+1, with exemptions for certain privately negotiated or bilaterally executed transactions and for securities financing transactions documented as single transactions composed of two linked operations. It also amends reporting obligations for settlement fails and requires ESMA to monitor settlement efficiency, including for exempted securities financing transactions, and to report on the market impact of the exemption. The regulation applies from 11 October 2027.

Position. The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs proposes to adopt the Commission proposal with amendments, including exemptions for certain transactions and a deferred application date.

Key points

  1. The intended settlement date for transactions in transferable securities executed on trading venues must be no later than the first business day after trading (T+1).
  2. The T+1 requirement does not apply to privately negotiated but venue-executed transactions, bilaterally executed but venue-reported transactions, or the first transaction in securities subject to initial book-entry recording.
  3. Securities lending, buy-sell back, sell-buy back, and repurchase transactions are exempt from T+1 if documented as single transactions composed of two linked operations.
  4. ESMA's reports on settlement efficiency must include categories of transactions, intended settlement dates, and whether transactions are traded on trading venues.
  5. ESMA must report on the market impact of and justification for the exemption for certain securities financing transactions.
  6. ESMA should monitor settlement efficiency during the move to T+1 and report more frequently immediately before and after, with particular attention to securities financing transactions.
  7. The Commission may adjust delegated rules on cash penalties if the move to T+1 risks a material increase in settlement fails, with temporary and proportionate adjustments.
  8. The regulation applies from 11 October 2027.

Who is affected

  • Central securities depositories and market participants executing transactions on trading venues must comply with the T+1 settlement cycle.
  • Parties to securities financing transactions (lending, buy-sell back, repurchase) are exempt from T+1 if documented as two linked operations.
  • ESMA has new reporting and monitoring obligations regarding settlement efficiency and the exemption's impact.

Figures and deadlines

  • 11 October 2027: date from which the regulation applies.

Legal basis. Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Draft european parliament legislative resolution 64 paragraphs

(COM(2025)0038 – C10-0011/2025 – 2025/0022(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

–having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2025)0038),

–having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C100011/2025),

–having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank of 31 March 2025,

–having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 30 April 2025

–having regard to Rule 60 of its Rules of Procedure,

–having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A10-0095/2025),

1.Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;

Read the rest (52 paragraphs)

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

Amendment 1

2025/0022 (COD)

Proposal for a

REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

amending Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as regards a shorter settlement cycle in the Union

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,

Whereas:

(1) Article 5(2) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 regulates the settlement period for most transactions in transferable securities executed on trading venues. With certain exceptions, the intended settlement date for such transactions is to be no later than on the second business day after the trading takes place. Such period is referred to as the ‘settlement cycle’. The requirement for the settlement to take place at the latest on the second business day after the trading takes place is referred to as ‘settlement cycle in T+2’, or, simply, ‘T+2’.

(2) Longer settlement periods for transactions in transferable securities increase risks for transaction parties and reduce opportunities for buyers and sellers to enter into other transactions. For those reasons, many third-country jurisdictions have moved, are in the process of moving, or plan to move, to a settlement period of one business day after the trade (‘T+1’). The global shift to shorter settlement periods is, however, creating misalignments between Union and global financial markets. Those misalignments will only further increase when more countries move to T+1 settlement and increase the cost caused by such misalignments for Union market participants. Furthermore, some global capital markets have already shortened the settlement cycle to T+0 for certain types of transactions. In the Union, central securities depositories can already settle a non-negligible number of transactions on a T+0 basis.

(3) In its report on the appropriateness of shortening the settlement cycle in the European Union, published on 18 November 2024, the European Securities and Markets Authority concluded that shortening the settlement cycle in the Union to T+1 would significantly reduce risks in the market, in particular with respect to counterparty and volatility risks, and free up capital no longer required to cover margin calls. T+1 would also enable Union capital markets to keep up with the evolution of other global markets, eliminating the costs associated with the current misalignment of settlement periods. It would also contribute to further harmonisation of corporate event standards and market practices in the Union and more generally to the competitiveness of Union capital markets. The Commission shares those conclusions.

(4) It is therefore appropriate to introduce a targeted amendment to Regulation (EU) 909/2014 in order to shorten the current mandatory settlement cycle to one business day after the trading takes place. The shortening of the settlement cycle would not prevent central securities depositories from voluntarily settling transactions on the same date as the trade date, where technologically feasible .

Securities financing transactions allow market participants to manage their liquidity and funding needs in a flexible manner. Market trends indicate a growing use of such transactions on trading venues. Certain securities financing transactions that are executed on trading venues would fall within the scope of the T+1 settlement cycle requirement. However, given the non-standardised nature of such transactions and in particular the non-standardised settlement periods that might need to be agreed to by the parties to such transactions to achieve their objectives, and to avoid discouraging their execution on trading venues, those transactions should be exempt from the T+1 settlement cycle requirement. At the same time, to avoid any risk of circumvention of the T+1 settlement cycle requirement, the exemption should apply only if the securities financing transactions in question are documented as single transactions composed of two linked operations.

An explicit exemption is not needed for margin lending transactions as they are not transactions in transferable securities and hence they fall outside the scope of the T+1 settlement cycle requirement.

(4b) Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 provides for various measures to address settlement fails, including cash penalties imposed on failing participants. The calculation of those cash penalties is determined by parameters specified in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/389. The Commission is expected to monitor market developments, the volumes of settlement fails and the readiness of the industry to comply with the T+1 settlement cycle requirement and consider accordingly whether there is a significant risk that the move from a T+2 to a T+1 settlement cycle could lead to a material increase in settlement fails. Where such a risk is identified, the Commission can, where necessary, consider adjusting Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/389 accordingly, or taking any other appropriate measure within the scope of the empowerments laid down in Regulation (EU) No 909/2014. Any adjustments should be temporary and proportionate to the objective.

(5) Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(6) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely to introduce a shorter settlement cycle in the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of their scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.

(7) To ensure that all relevant stakeholders involved are sufficiently prepared and able to move to T+1 settlement in a coordinated and timely manner, the date of application of this Regulation should be deferred.

(7a) Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, ESMA is mandated to periodically prepare a report on the potential shortening of the settlement cycle in the Union. That report will explore the feasibility of shortening the settlement cycle in the future to T+0, to ensure that regulation and market infrastructures in the Union align with the increasing scope and pace of global financial markets and best practices of other international regulatory regimes. A settlement cycle of T+0 is already technically feasible and might be further facilitated by innovations such as distributed ledger technology while ensuring safety of data and transparency. A further shortening of the settlement cycle would reduce risks of illegal and collusive trading schemes such as dividend stripping (‘cum ex trading’).

(7b) ESMA should monitor settlement efficiency during the move to a T+1 settlement cycle and should report with increased frequency thereon during the months immediately preceding and immediately following the move to T+1. In light of the exemption from the T+1 settlement cycle requirement provided for certain types of securities financing transactions pursuant to this amending Regulation, ESMA should pay particular attention to the settlement efficiency of securities financing transactions traded on or outside trading venues.

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014

In Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2. As regards transactions in transferable securities referred to in paragraph 1 which are executed on trading venues, the intended settlement date shall be no later than on the first business day after the trading takes place. That requirement shall not apply to transactions which are negotiated privately but executed on a trading venue, to transactions which are executed bilaterally but reported to a trading venue or to the first transaction where the transferable securities concerned are subject to initial recording in book-entry form pursuant to Article 3(2).’.

That requirement shall also not apply to any of the following transactions where they are documented as single transactions composed of two linked operations:

(a) securities lending or securities borrowing, as defined in Article 3, point (7), of Regulation (EU) 2015/2365 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

(b) buy-sell back transactions or sell-buy back transactions, as defined in Article 3, point (8), of Regulation (EU) 2015/2365;

(c) repurchase transactions, as defined in Article 3, point (9), of Regulation (EU) 2015/2365.’;

(2) Article 74 is amended as follows:

(a) in paragraph 1, point (a), the following point is inserted:

‘(ia) the categories of transactions, the intended settlement date of the transactions and whether the transactions are traded on trading venues;’;

(b) in paragraph 2, point (d) is replaced by the following:

‘(d) upon request from the Commission, for the reports referred to in paragraph 1, point (a)(ia), points (e), (h), (j) and (k).’;

(3) Article 75 is amended as follows:

(a) in paragraph 1, point (a), the following point is inserted:

‘(ia) the market impact of, and justification for, the exemption from the T+1 settlement cycle requirement for certain types of securities financing transactions;’.

Article 2

Entry into force and application

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 11 October 2027.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the European Parliament For the Council

The President The President

Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur has received input 4 paragraphs

Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he received input from the following entities or persons in the preparation of the draft report, prior to the adoption thereof in committee:

Entity and/or person
European Commission (DG FISMA)
ESMA
BVI (German Investment Funds Federation)
European Banking Federation
Fleishman Hillard
Afore Consulting

The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.

Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament’s Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.

Procedure pages

How the committees handled the text, and how their members voted on it.

Procedure – committee responsible 1 paragraph
TitleAmendment of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as regards a shorter settlement cycle in the Union
ReferencesCOM(2025)0038 – C10-0011/2025 – 2025/0022(COD)
Date submitted to Parliament12.2.2025
Committee(s) responsibleECON
Rapporteurs Date appointedJohan Van Overtveldt 19.2.2025
Discussed in committee13.5.2025
Date adopted20.5.2025
Result of final vote+: –: 0:48 0 4
Members present for the final voteGeorgios Aftias, Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Stefan Berger, Gilles Boyer, Giovanni Crosetto, Fabio De Masi, Siegbert Frank Droese, Marco Falcone, Markus Ferber, Jonás Fernández, Dirk Gotink, Enikő Győri, Michalis Hadjipantela, Eero Heinäluoma, Aurore Lalucq, Rada Laykova, Marlena Maląg, Jorge Martín Frías, Costas Mavrides, Siegfried Mureşan, Denis Nesci, Luděk Niedermayer, Ľudovít Ódor, Gaetano Pedulla’, Lídia Pereira, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Pierre Pimpie, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová, Evelyn Regner, René Repasi, Jussi Saramo, Pasquale Tridico, Johan Van Overtveldt, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin, Auke Zijlstra, Roberts Zīle
Substitutes present for the final voteChristophe Gomart, Bruno Gonçalves, Vladimir Prebilič
Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final votePablo Arias Echeverría, Sakis Arnaoutoglou, Nikola Bartůšek, Stine Bosse, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Katrin Langensiepen, Giuseppe Lupo, Jana Nagyová, Anna Strolenberg, Lara Wolters
Date tabled20.5.2025
Final vote by roll call by the committee responsible 3 paragraphs

48 · For

ECR
Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Giovanni Crosetto, Marlena Maląg, Denis Nesci, Johan Van Overtveldt, Roberts Zīle
ESN
Siegbert Frank Droese, Rada Laykova
EPP
Georgios Aftias, Pablo Arias Echeverría, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Stefan Berger, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Marco Falcone, Markus Ferber, Christophe Gomart, Dirk Gotink, Michalis Hadjipantela, Siegfried Mureşan, Luděk Niedermayer, Lídia Pereira, Sirpa Pietikäinen
Patriots
Nikola Bartůšek, Enikő Győri, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Pierre Pimpie, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová, Auke Zijlstra
Renew
Stine Bosse, Gilles Boyer, Ľudovít Ódor, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin
S&D
Sakis Arnaoutoglou, Jonás Fernández, Bruno Gonçalves, Eero Heinäluoma, Aurore Lalucq, Giuseppe Lupo, Costas Mavrides, Evelyn Regner, René Repasi, Lara Wolters
Greens
Katrin Langensiepen, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, Vladimir Prebilič, Anna Strolenberg

0 · Against

4 · Abstained

No group
Fabio De Masi
The Left
Gaetano Pedulla', Jussi Saramo, Pasquale Tridico