Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Search

Search

5 decisions

Refine

Kind of decision

Result of the deciding vote

The raw outcome: whether what was put to the vote was adopted or rejected. It is not always the verdict — an adopted objection blocks a measure, a rejected motion to reject lets the text go ahead.

Only decisions with a roll-call vote

Only a records how each MEP voted.

Agriculture, food & fisheries, Objection to a Commission measure, 17 Jun 2026

Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act

Catches of porpoise in the Baltic Sea

Motion for a resolution

Objection failed On the objection: 223 for · 327 against · 24 abstained by a clear majority

Electronic vote: totals recorded, but not how each MEP voted.

AI summary:The Commission proposed a delegated regulation adding monitoring and reporting duties for small fishing vessels to cut accidental catches of Baltic Proper harbour porpoises.

Trade & customs, Resolution, 22 Jan 2026

Motion of censure on the Commission

Motion for a resolution

Rejected 165 for · 390 against · 10 abstained by a large majority

AI summary:The motion sought to censure the Commission over its handling of the EU-Mercosur trade agreement and agricultural policy.

Agriculture, food & fisheries, Objection to a Commission measure, 18 Dec 2025

Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3), and (4)(c) · implementing measure

Maximum residue levels for acetamiprid

Motion for a resolution

Objection failed On the objection: 328 for · 177 against · 39 abstained for lack of an absolute majority (361 votes needed)

Electronic vote: totals recorded, but not how each MEP voted.

AI summary:The draft Commission regulation would raise maximum residue levels for the pesticide acetamiprid in honey to 1 mg/kg, following a previous increase in July 2025.

Agriculture, food & fisheries, Objection to a Commission measure, 26 Nov 2025

Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act

Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara

Motion for a resolution

Objection failed On the objection: 359 for · 188 against · 76 abstained for lack of an absolute majority (361 votes needed)

AI summary:The resolution had objected that the labelling could mislead consumers about the true origin, contrary to EU food information rules.