Search

3 decisions

Refine

Kind of decision

Result of the deciding vote

The raw outcome: whether what was put to the vote was adopted or rejected. It is not always the verdict — an adopted objection blocks a measure, a rejected motion to reject lets the text go ahead.

Year

Topic

Only decisions with a roll-call vote

Only a records how each MEP voted.

Agriculture, food & fisheries, Objection to a Commission measure, 18 Dec 2025

Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3), and (4)(c) · implementing measure

Maximum residue levels for acetamiprid

Motion for a resolution

Objection failed On the objection: 328 for · 177 against · 39 abstained for lack of an absolute majority (361 votes needed)

Electronic vote: totals recorded, but not how each MEP voted.

AI summary:The draft Commission regulation would raise maximum residue levels for the pesticide acetamiprid in honey to 1 mg/kg, following a previous increase in July 2025.

Climate & environment, Objection to a Commission measure, 17 Dec 2025

Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act

Simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives

Motion for a resolution

Objection failed On the objection: 230 for · 402 against · 28 abstained by a clear majority

AI summary:The regulation narrows the scope of substances of very high concern covered and introduces a materiality threshold for reporting.

Climate & environment, Objection to a Commission measure, 9 Jul 2025

Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Deforestation Regulation - list of countries presenting a low or high risk

Motion for a resolution

Objection passed On the objection: 373 for · 289 against · 26 abstained by a small majority

AI summary:Parliament objected to the Commission's list of countries with low or high deforestation risk for products sold in the EU, arguing the data is outdated and the method flawed.