Every vote on this decision
An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector
23 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected) and 19 parts of the text voted on separately (19 adopted).
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 19
19 votes on parts of the text: 19 adopted
-
Vote 1:Separate vote on paragraph 1
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 3:Separate vote on paragraph 2
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 4:Paragraph 5 — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
The part voted on
‘Underlines that safe staffing levels, good working conditions and the right combination of professionals in the healthcare workforce are essential for patient safety, quality of care and staff well-being; calls moreover on the Commission to propose a Council recommendation setting out common principles for safe, evidence-based and high-quality staffing for the whole healthcare workforce, anchored in patient safety outcomes, social dialogue and collective bargaining and risk-based assessment while fully respecting the diversity of healthcare system models; calls for such a recommendation to recognise unsafe staffing levels as an occupational hazard;’
-
Vote 5:Paragraph 5 — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
The part voted on
‘calls on the Commission to consider the need for an obligatory framework to this end which comprises workload controls and doctor-to-patient/nurse-to-patient ratios, including in high-acuity settings and measures to relieve the physical, psychological and administrative burden faced by healthcare workers, aiming to reduce errors and strengthening overall healthcare system performance, while recognising the need for flexibility for health organisations to adapt to labour-market realities and workforce planning priorities without compromising quality of care or patient safety;’
-
Vote 6:Paragraph 5 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
The part voted on
‘calls on the Member States to adopt, implement and regularly review national legislative frameworks thereafter, including minimum thresholds and benchmarks on safe staffing, as well as minimum consultation times that are sufficient to ensure an accurate assessment and appropriate care of patients with increasingly complex clinical profiles, also in the light of the expansion of treatment options, where applicable; calls for national approaches to be based on evidence, clinical context, social dialogue and collective agreements, ensuring transparent reporting on quality and safety indicators;’
-
Vote 7:Separate vote on paragraph 6
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 17
A10-0168/2026 – Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero Razza – § 17
Adopted 487 for, 45 against, 66 abstained
13:16Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members
-
Vote 9:Separate vote on paragraph 20
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 10:Separate vote on paragraph 21
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 11:Separate vote on paragraph 23
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 13:Paragraph 33 — part 1 of 5
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
The part voted on
‘Stresses the need for a coordinated approach by the, the WHO and the EU to monitoring the flow of healthcare workers, promoting ethical rules for international mobility and preventing brain drain;’
-
Vote 14:Paragraph 33 — part 2 of 5
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
The part voted on
‘stresses that, where international recruitment is needed, it should not be considered the only tool for the long-term sustainability of healthcare systems, and should be regarded as a complementary measure, and must comply with ethical principles as set out in the WHO Global Code of Practice, so as to prevent creating or exacerbating workforce shortages in countries of origin and to improve relevant monitoring;’
-
Vote 15:Paragraph 33 — part 3 of 5
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
‘recalls that such recruitment should also be carried out in full respect of national health systems and workforce sustainability;’
-
Vote 16:Paragraph 33 — part 4 of 5
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
The part voted on
‘welcomes the inclusion of certain categories of healthcare professions in the list of EU-wide shortage occupations as part of an array of measures addressing labour shortages in the EU,’
-
Vote 17:Paragraph 33 — part 5 of 5
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
‘in the context of the recently adopted EU Talent Pool Regulation;’
-
Vote 18:Separate vote on paragraph 37
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 51
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 53
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 22:Separate vote on recital AH
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Members
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 3
-
Vote 2:Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1
A10-0168/2026 – Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero Razza – After § 1 – Am 1
Rejected 195 for, 373 against, 29 abstained
13:14Roll call requested by Members
-
Vote 12:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0168/2026 – Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero Razza – After § 29 – Am 2
Rejected 189 for, 387 against, 23 abstained
13:17Roll call requested by Members
-
Vote 21:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 55
A10-0168/2026 – Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero Razza – After § 55 – Am 3
Rejected 197 for, 400 against, 9 abstained
13:18Roll call requested by Members
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 23:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10-0168/2026 – Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero Razza – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 514 for, 61 against, 33 abstained
13:18