Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law., Foreign affairs
Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung
Adopted by an overwhelming majority
Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
- For
- 459
- Against
- 12
- Abstained
- 86
roll-call vote at 13:11 · 82% of votes cast in favour
Motion for a resolution · Motion B-10-2026-0407
AI:What this decision does
This resolution concerns the situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong, following the arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung.§1: source passage in the text Parliament adopted the text as its official position, condemning the eradication of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong and the use of the 2020 National Security Law against journalism, publishing and peaceful political advocacy.§1: source passage in the text Parliament calls for the repeal of the National Security Law and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, and demands the release of those detained for exercising their fundamental rights.§1: source passage in the text It also calls on the Council and the Commission to adopt targeted sanctions against those responsible for violations of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong, and instructs its President to forward the resolution to the Commission, the Council, China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR; Abstained: The Left, ESN; Divided: Patriots
- The Left Abstained 8 for, 1 against, 19 abstainedof 44
- Greens For 45 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 53
- S&D For 106 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 135
- Renew For 62 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 78
- EPP For 146 for, 1 against, 1 abstainedof 184
- ECR For 64 for, 0 against, 4 abstainedof 84
- Patriots Divided 22 for, 0 against, 36 abstainedof 85
- ESN Abstained 2 for, 2 against, 19 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 4 for, 8 against, 7 abstainedof 28
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
19 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
The Left abstained (19 of 28). For: 8, Against: 1
Anja Hazekamp (Netherlands, for), Catarina Martins (Portugal, for), Hanna Gedin (Sweden, for), João Oliveira (Portugal, against), Jonas Sjöstedt (Sweden, for)
4 more from The Left
Jussi Saramo (Finland, for), Li Andersson (Finland, for), Merja Kyllönen (Finland, for), Per Clausen (Denmark, for)
EPP voted for (146 of 148). Against: 1, Abstained: 1
Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz (Poland, against), Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz (Poland, abstained)
ECR voted for (64 of 68). Abstained: 4
Aurelijus Veryga (Lithuania), Emmanouil Fragkos (Greece), Galato Alexandraki (Greece), Georgiana Teodorescu (Romania)
ESN abstained (19 of 23). For: 2, Against: 2
Markus Buchheit (Germany, for), Petar Volgin (Bulgaria, against), Sarah Knafo (France, for), Siegbert Frank Droese (Germany, against)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 adopted). 5 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.