Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector

15 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 10 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted, 3 rejected).

· 10

  1. Vote 1:Separate vote on paragraph 1

    Adopted 322 for, 295 against, 38 abstained

  2. Vote 2:Separate vote on paragraph 2

    Rejected 289 for, 351 against, 14 abstained

    Separate vote by Members

  3. Vote 3:Paragraph 7 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    ‘Observes moreover that existing tax rules have not fully kept pace with the emergence of new financial products and market infrastructures;’

  4. Vote 4:Paragraph 7 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 302 for, 279 against, 72 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    ‘underlines that fragmentation is rapidly becoming more worrying with the success of neobanks, for example, digital-only banks, challenger banks or fintech banks; points out the significant increase in the share of cross-border deposits held by these banks in the last six years; underlines that differences in tax rules between banks and non-bank entities can create distortions;’

  5. Vote 5:Separate vote on paragraph 8

    Adopted 364 for, 286 against, 3 abstained

  6. Vote 7:Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘like more effective VAT grouping and options for reforming the VAT exemption, with a view to bringing forward a proposal to reform the VAT rules for the financial sector;’ and ‘emphasises that any such reform must also safeguard consumers and continue to ensure that the financial sector makes a fair contribution to public revenues;’

  7. Vote 8:Paragraph 27 — part 2 of 3

    Rejected 257 for, 351 against, 41 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    ‘like more effective VAT grouping and options for reforming the VAT exemption, with a view to bringing forward a proposal to reform the VAT rules for the financial sector;’

  8. Vote 9:Paragraph 27 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted 378 for, 245 against, 28 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    ‘emphasises that any such reform must also safeguard consumers and continue to ensure that the financial sector makes a fair contribution to public revenues;’

  9. Vote 10:Paragraph 31 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘that reflects both value creation and negative externalities;’

  10. Vote 11:Paragraph 31 — part 2 of 2

    Rejected 285 for, 342 against, 24 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    those words

· 4

  1. Vote 6:Amendment 3 to paragraph 27

    A10-0169/2026 – Matthias Ecke – § 27 – Am 3

    Rejected 283 for, 341 against, 34 abstained

    13:49

    Roll call requested by S&D

  2. Vote 12:Amendment 4 to paragraph 33

    A10-0169/2026 – Matthias Ecke – § 33 – Am 4

    Rejected 214 for, 389 against, 54 abstained

    13:50

    Roll call requested by S&D

  3. Vote 13:Amendment 5 to paragraph 34

    A10-0169/2026 – Matthias Ecke – § 34 – Am 5

    Rejected 210 for, 393 against, 45 abstained

    13:51

    Roll call requested by S&D

  4. Vote 14:Amendment 6 to paragraph 35

    A10-0169/2026 – Matthias Ecke – § 35 – Am 6

    Rejected 279 for, 333 against, 41 abstained

    13:51

    Roll call requested by S&D

· 1

  1. Vote 15:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A10-0169/2026 – Matthias Ecke – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 418 for, 152 against, 85 abstained

    13:51

← Back to the decision