Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law., EU institutions & Parliament
European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded
Adopted by a large majority
Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
- For
- 426
- Against
- 140
- Abstained
- 107
roll-call vote at 13:43 · 63% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens · Report A-10-2026-0145
AI:What this decision does
Parliament adopted its annual report on the application of the regulation on European political parties and foundations, assessing the first months of the new rules.§1: source passage in the text The text highlights the strategic role of European political foundations and calls for a review of their funding provisions, which are deemed insufficient for their growing tasks.§1: source passage in the text§2: source passage in the text MEPs ask the Commission to consider a legislative proposal to revise the funding rules, ensuring adequate resources while maintaining transparency and accountability.§1: source passage in the text§2: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP; Against: Patriots, ESN; Abstained: The Left, ECR
- The Left Abstained 7 for, 1 against, 36 abstainedof 45
- Greens For 48 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 131 for, 1 against, 0 abstainedof 136
- Renew For 68 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 77
- EPP For 166 for, 2 against, 2 abstainedof 185
- ECR Abstained 2 for, 16 against, 60 abstainedof 81
- Patriots Against 0 for, 79 against, 0 abstainedof 86
- ESN Against 0 for, 25 against, 0 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 4 for, 16 against, 9 abstainedof 30
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
31 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
The Left abstained (36 of 44). For: 7, Against: 1
Catarina Martins (Portugal, for), Ilaria Salis (Italy, for), João Oliveira (Portugal, against), Jussi Saramo (Finland, for), Li Andersson (Finland, for)
3 more from The Left
Merja Kyllönen (Finland, for), Mimmo Lucano (Italy, for), Younous Omarjee (France, for)
S&D voted for (131 of 132). Against: 1
Christophe Clergeau (France)
EPP voted for (166 of 170). Against: 2, Abstained: 2
Alice Teodorescu Måwe (Sweden, abstained), Christian Doleschal (Germany, against), Henrik Dahl (Denmark, abstained), Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral (Portugal, against)
ECR abstained (60 of 78). For: 2, Against: 16
Beatrice Timgren (Sweden, against), Bert-Jan Ruissen (Netherlands, against), Charlie Weimers (Sweden, against), Cristian Terheş (Romania, against), Dick Erixon (Sweden, against)
13 more from ECR
Diego Solier (Spain, for), Emmanouil Fragkos (Greece, against), Guillaume Peltier (France, against), Jaak Madison (Estonia, against), Jessika van Leeuwen (Netherlands, against), Kristoffer Storm (Denmark, against), Laurence Trochu (France, against), Marion Maréchal (France, against), Nicolas Bay (France, against), Nora Junco García (Spain, for), Sander Smit (Netherlands, against), Sebastian Tynkkynen (Finland, against), Stephen Nikola Bartulica (Croatia, against)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (9 rejected) and 8 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted, 5 rejected).