Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final., Foreign affairs
Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America
Passed by a large majority
Parliament adopted its position on the law.
- For
- 440
- Against
- 151
- Abstained
- 50
roll-call vote at 13:34 · 69% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by Bernd Lange · Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council. · Report A-10-2026-0069
AI:What this decision does
Parliament adopted its position on a proposed regulation adjusting customs duties and opening tariff quotas for certain goods imported from the United States.§1: source passage in the text The regulation implements commitments from a Joint Statement on a US-EU trade framework, applying a 0% duty on certain US goods and allowing suspension of concessions if the US fails to comply.§1: source passage in the text§4: source passage in the text Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends the proposal.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR; Against: The Left; Abstained: ESN; Divided: Greens, Patriots
- The Left Against 0 for, 39 against, 0 abstainedof 45
- Greens Divided 22 for, 20 against, 3 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 109 for, 14 against, 0 abstainedof 136
- Renew For 56 for, 11 against, 1 abstainedof 77
- EPP For 166 for, 1 against, 1 abstainedof 185
- ECR For 68 for, 3 against, 1 abstainedof 81
- Patriots Divided 13 for, 43 against, 22 abstainedof 86
- ESN Abstained 0 for, 2 against, 20 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 6 for, 18 against, 2 abstainedof 30
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
34 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
S&D voted for (109 of 123). Against: 14
Aurore Lalucq (France), Chloé Ridel (France), Christophe Clergeau (France), Claire Fita (France), Elio Di Rupo (Belgium)
9 more from S&D
Emma Rafowicz (France), Eric Sargiacomo (France), Estelle Ceulemans (Belgium), François Kalfon (France), Jean-Marc Germain (France), Murielle Laurent (France), Nora Mebarek (France), Pierre Jouvet (France), Raphaël Glucksmann (France)
Renew voted for (56 of 68). Against: 11, Abstained: 1
Bernard Guetta (France, against), Christophe Grudler (France, against), Fabienne Keller (France, against), Gilles Boyer (France, against), Grégory Allione (France, against)
7 more from Renew
Jérémy Decerle (France, against), Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez (Spain, abstained), Pascal Canfin (France, against), Sandro Gozi (France, against), Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (France, against), Valérie Devaux (France, against), Yvan Verougstraete (Belgium, against)
EPP voted for (166 of 168). Against: 1, Abstained: 1
Eszter Lakos (Hungary, abstained), Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz (Poland, against)
ECR voted for (68 of 72). Against: 3, Abstained: 1
Emmanouil Fragkos (Greece, abstained), Guillaume Peltier (France, against), Marion Maréchal (France, against), Patryk Jaki (Poland, against)
ESN abstained (20 of 22). Against: 2
Marcin Sypniewski (Poland), Stanisław Tyszka (Poland)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 parts of the text voted on separately (6 lapsed).