Every vote on this decision
Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
9 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted, 2 rejected).
Other votes · 1
-
Vote 1:Proposals for decisions
Adopted show of hands
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 6
-
Vote 2:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 62
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 4:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 68
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 5:Separate vote on paragraph 105
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Patriots
-
Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 106
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Patriots
-
Vote 7:Paragraph 107 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to consider, in the application of the Regulation (EU, EURATOM) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council, that non-participation in the EPPO may constitute a potential threat to the Union’s financial interests and’
-
Vote 8:Paragraph 107 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 1
-
Vote 3:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 63
A10-0050/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – After § 63 – Am 2
Rejected 206 for, 272 against, 169 abstained
13:59Roll call requested by ECR
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 9:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10-0050/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Discharge decision adopted On the proposal for a discharge decision:454 for, 161 against, 29 abstained
14:00