Parliament can object to technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Against a delegated act an adopted objection is a veto; against most implementing measures (such as GMO authorisations) it is a call on the Commission to withdraw the measure, which is not legally binding., Agriculture, food & fisheries
Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)
Objection passed by a large majority
The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.
On the objection:
- For
- 462
- Against
- 169
- Abstained
- 22
roll-call vote at 12:26 · 71% of votes cast were for the objection
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure Motion for a resolution · Motion B-10-2026-0106
AI:What this decision does
Parliament objected to a Commission decision that would renew the authorisation of genetically modified maize T25, which is tolerant to the herbicide glufosinate, for use in food, feed, and other products, excluding cultivation.§1: source passage in the text The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the renewal cannot go ahead. Parliament also called on the Commission to withdraw its draft decision and to propose a reform of the decision-making procedure for genetically modified organisms.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: The Left, Greens, S&D, ECR, Patriots, ESN; Divided: Renew, EPP
- The Left For 43 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 46
- Greens For 37 for, 0 against, 8 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 118 for, 0 against, 5 abstainedof 136
- Renew Divided 31 for, 35 against, 1 abstainedof 75
- EPP Divided 56 for, 109 against, 6 abstainedof 192
- ECR For 61 for, 11 against, 1 abstainedof 79
- Patriots For 61 for, 13 against, 0 abstainedof 86
- ESN For 26 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 29 for, 1 against, 1 abstainedof 32
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
38 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
Greens voted for (37 of 45). Abstained: 8
Alexandra Geese (Germany), Anna Cavazzini (Germany), Erik Marquardt (Germany), Hannah Neumann (Germany), Jutta Paulus (Germany)
3 more from Greens
Katrin Langensiepen (Germany), Michael Bloss (Germany), Sergey Lagodinsky (Germany)
S&D voted for (118 of 123). Abstained: 5
Christel Schaldemose (Denmark), Marianne Vind (Denmark), Marina Kaljurand (Estonia), Niels Fuglsang (Denmark), Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis (Lithuania)
ECR voted for (61 of 73). Against: 11, Abstained: 1
Alexandr Vondra (Czechia, against), Beatrice Timgren (Sweden, against), Charlie Weimers (Sweden, against), Dick Erixon (Sweden, against), Jaak Madison (Estonia, abstained)
7 more from ECR
Kris van Dijck (Belgium, against), Kristoffer Storm (Denmark, against), Nora Junco García (Spain, against), Ondřej Krutílek (Czechia, against), Pietro Fiocchi (Italy, against), Sebastian Tynkkynen (Finland, against), Veronika Vrecionová (Czechia, against)
Patriots voted for (61 of 74). Against: 13
Antonín Staněk (Czechia), Harald Vilimsky (Austria), Hermann Tertsch (Spain), Jana Nagyová (Czechia), Jaroslav Bžoch (Czechia)
8 more from Patriots
Jaroslav Knot (Czechia), Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová (Czechia), Jorge Buxadé Villalba (Spain), Jorge Martín Frías (Spain), Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal (Spain), Margarita De La Pisa Carrión (Spain), Ondřej Knotek (Czechia), Tomáš Kubín (Czechia)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.