Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final., Agriculture, food & fisheries
Amending regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products
Passed by an overwhelming majority
Parliament adopted its position on the law.
- For
- 625
- Against
- 15
- Abstained
- 11
roll-call vote at 12:59 · 96% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by Esther Herranz García · Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council. · Report A-10-2025-0220
AI:What this decision does
Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU law updating market rules and support measures for wine and aromatised wine products.§1: source passage in the text The law aims to tackle the wine sector's structural crisis, including oversupply and falling consumption, with tools such as voluntary grubbing-up and distillation.§2: source passage in the text Parliament's amendments add crisis measures to national strategic plans, allow fund carry-over, and harmonise electronic labelling.§2: source passage in the text The position now goes to the Council for agreement before the law is finalised.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots, ESN
- The Left For 35 for, 3 against, 1 abstainedof 46
- Greens For 43 for, 1 against, 4 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 115 for, 1 against, 5 abstainedof 136
- Renew For 65 for, 4 against, 0 abstainedof 75
- EPP For 176 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 192
- ECR For 68 for, 4 against, 0 abstainedof 79
- Patriots For 71 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 86
- ESN For 25 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 27 for, 2 against, 1 abstainedof 32
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
23 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
The Left voted for (35 of 39). Against: 3, Abstained: 1
Anja Hazekamp (Netherlands, against), Hanna Gedin (Sweden, against), Jonas Sjöstedt (Sweden, against), Per Clausen (Denmark, abstained)
Greens voted for (43 of 48). Against: 1, Abstained: 4
Alice Kuhnke (Sweden, abstained), Isabella Lövin (Sweden, abstained), Kira Marie Peter-Hansen (Denmark, against), Pär Holmgren (Sweden, abstained), Sergey Lagodinsky (Germany, abstained)
S&D voted for (115 of 121). Against: 1, Abstained: 5
Adnan Dibrani (Sweden, abstained), Andi Cristea (Romania, against), Evin Incir (Sweden, abstained), Heléne Fritzon (Sweden, abstained), Johan Danielsson (Sweden, abstained)
1 more from S&D
Sofie Eriksson (Sweden, abstained)
Renew voted for (65 of 69). Against: 4
Abir Al-Sahlani (Sweden), Emma Wiesner (Sweden), Ilhan Kyuchyuk (Bulgaria), Karin Karlsbro (Sweden)
ECR voted for (68 of 72). Against: 4
Beatrice Timgren (Sweden), Charlie Weimers (Sweden), Dick Erixon (Sweden), Sebastian Tynkkynen (Finland)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 lapsed).