Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law., Foreign affairs
Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises
Adopted by a large majority
Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
- For
- 444
- Against
- 153
- Abstained
- 55
roll-call vote at 13:11 · 68% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by Leire Pajín · Report A-10-2025-0257
AI:What this decision does
Parliament adopted a resolution on humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis, reaffirming principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises.§1: source passage in the text The text proposes three pillars: humanitarian principles and international humanitarian law, more effective responses, and the role of women in humanitarian assistance.§2: source passage in the text It calls for recommitting to the principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence, and for addressing challenges like funding and fragile contexts.§2: source passage in the text The resolution also highlights the critical role of women in delivering aid and advancing peace and security agendas.§2: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP; Against: ECR, ESN; Divided: Patriots
- The Left For 37 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 46
- Greens For 49 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 127 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 137
- Renew For 66 for, 2 against, 0 abstainedof 75
- EPP For 147 for, 7 against, 18 abstainedof 193
- ECR Against 0 for, 68 against, 3 abstainedof 79
- Patriots Divided 0 for, 50 against, 28 abstainedof 87
- ESN Against 0 for, 23 against, 1 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 18 for, 3 against, 5 abstainedof 30
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
31 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
Renew voted for (66 of 68). Against: 2
Christine Singer (Germany), Engin Eroglu (Germany)
EPP voted for (147 of 172). Against: 7, Abstained: 18
Alice Teodorescu Måwe (Sweden, against), Axel Voss (Germany, against), Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz (Poland, abstained), Branko Grims (Slovenia, against), Céline Imart (France, abstained)
20 more from EPP
Christian Ehler (Germany, against), Christophe Gomart (France, abstained), François-Xavier Bellamy (France, abstained), Henrik Dahl (Denmark, against), Ilia Lazarov (Bulgaria, abstained), Isabelle Le Callennec (France, abstained), Jessika van Leeuwen (Netherlands, abstained), Laurent Castillo (France, abstained), Marco Falcone (Italy, abstained), Markus Ferber (Germany, abstained), Massimiliano Salini (Italy, abstained), Matej Tonin (Slovenia, abstained), Milan Zver (Slovenia, abstained), Miriam Lexmann (Slovakia, against), Nadine Morano (France, abstained), Radan Kanev (Bulgaria, abstained), Romana Tomc (Slovenia, abstained), Sander Smit (Netherlands, abstained), Tomáš Zdechovský (Czechia, against), Zala Černilec Tomašič (Slovenia, abstained)
ECR voted against (68 of 71). Abstained: 3
Geadis Geadi (Cyprus), Johan van Overtveldt (Belgium), Kris van Dijck (Belgium)
ESN voted against (23 of 24). Abstained: 1
Ivan David (Czechia)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted).