Every vote on this decision
Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States
21 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 16 parts of the text voted on separately (15 adopted, 1 rejected).
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 16
16 votes on parts of the text: 15 adopted, 1 rejected
-
Vote 1:Paragraph 2 — part 1
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 2/1
Adopted 645 for, 12 against, 0 abstained
13:13Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
‘Reiterates that European elections continue to be conducted largely under national legal and institutional frameworks,’
-
Vote 2:Paragraph 2 — part 2
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 2/2
Adopted 419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained
13:13Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘which were conceived in a markedly different phase of European integration; stresses that these rules no longer correspond to the enhanced role and legislative powers of the European Parliament, particularly since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon;’
-
Vote 4:Paragraph 3 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ESN, Patriots
The part voted on
‘Recalls that Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2018/994 contains a number of provisions that Member States are either obliged or invited to implement; points out that optional measures have not been implemented by some Member States and that some mandatory measures have been implemented differently by some Member States, such as those concerning the prevention of double voting; notes that most provisions laid down in Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2018/994 remain optional;’ without the words ‘that optional measures have not been implemented by some Member States and’
-
Vote 5:Paragraph 3 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ESN, Patriots
‘that optional measures have not been implemented by some Member States and’
-
Vote 6:Paragraph 3 — part 3
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 3/3
Adopted 379 for, 216 against, 53 abstained
13:13Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ESN, Patriots
The part voted on
‘considers that the limited transposition of these non-binding provisions reveals a lack of political will to overcome national resistance and commit to a democratic process that better reflects the European dimension;’
-
Vote 7:Separate vote on paragraph 4
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 5
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ESN
-
Vote 10:Separate vote on paragraph 12
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ESN
-
Vote 12:Separate vote on paragraph 14
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ESN
-
Vote 13:Separate vote on recital B
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 14:Recital B — part 2
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital B/2
Adopted 427 for, 212 against, 24 abstained
13:15Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
‘but also foster the emergence of a European political and public sphere, thereby strengthening the legitimacy of the EU and its institutions;’
-
Vote 15:Separate vote on recital C
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital C
Adopted 645 for, 14 against, 0 abstained
13:15Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 16:Separate vote on recital F
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ESN, Patriots
-
Vote 17:Recital F — part 2
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital F/2
Adopted 428 for, 204 against, 19 abstained
13:15Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots · split vote by ESN, Patriots
those words
-
Vote 18:Separate vote on recital G
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital G
Adopted 420 for, 198 against, 43 abstained
13:15Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 20:Separate vote on recital M
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital M
Adopted 645 for, 8 against, 9 abstained
13:16Roll call requested by Patriots
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 4
-
Vote 3:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 3 – Am 2
Rejected 202 for, 445 against, 5 abstained
13:13Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 9:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 5 – Am 4
Rejected 195 for, 439 against, 8 abstained
13:14Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 11:Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 12 – Am 5
Rejected 198 for, 441 against, 11 abstained
13:14Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 19:Amendment 1 to recital H
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital H – Am 1
Rejected 189 for, 461 against, 12 abstained
13:16Roll call requested by ESN
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 21:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 417 for, 234 against, 9 abstained
13:16