Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final., Economy & single market
Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest
Passed by a large majority
Parliament adopted its position on the law.
- For
- 503
- Against
- 57
- Abstained
- 108
roll-call vote at 12:51 · 75% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by Tomislav Sokol · Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council. · Report A-10-2025-0272
AI:What this decision does
The proposal aims to strengthen the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products in the EU.§1: source passage in the text Parliament adopted its position on the proposed law, which includes amendments to boost EU manufacturing and improve coordination among member states.§1: source passage in the text§3: source passage in the text The position also calls for better use of existing data tools and involvement of stakeholders across the supply chain.§8: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP; Against: ESN; Abstained: ECR; Divided: Patriots
- The Left For 37 for, 0 against, 2 abstainedof 46
- Greens For 51 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 127 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 137
- Renew For 68 for, 0 against, 1 abstainedof 75
- EPP For 176 for, 0 against, 5 abstainedof 193
- ECR Abstained 5 for, 11 against, 56 abstainedof 79
- Patriots Divided 21 for, 21 against, 37 abstainedof 87
- ESN Against 1 for, 22 against, 1 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 17 for, 3 against, 6 abstainedof 30
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
26 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
The Left voted for (37 of 39). Abstained: 2
João Oliveira (Portugal), Marc Botenga (Belgium)
Renew voted for (68 of 69). Abstained: 1
Anna-Maja Henriksson (Finland)
EPP voted for (176 of 181). Abstained: 5
Alice Teodorescu Måwe (Sweden), Arba Kokalari (Sweden), Jessica Polfjärd (Sweden), Jörgen Warborn (Sweden), Tomas Tobé (Sweden)
ECR abstained (56 of 72). For: 5, Against: 11
Aurelijus Veryga (Lithuania, for), Beatrice Timgren (Sweden, against), Bert-Jan Ruissen (Netherlands, against), Charlie Weimers (Sweden, against), Claudiu-Richard Târziu (Romania, for)
11 more from ECR
Cristian Terheş (Romania, for), Dick Erixon (Sweden, against), Emmanouil Fragkos (Greece, against), Galato Alexandraki (Greece, against), Guillaume Peltier (France, against), Jacek Ozdoba (Poland, for), Laurence Trochu (France, against), Marion Maréchal (France, against), Nicolas Bay (France, against), Rihards Kols (Latvia, for), Sebastian Tynkkynen (Finland, against)
ESN voted against (22 of 24). For: 1, Abstained: 1
Anja Arndt (Germany, for), Petras Gražulis (Lithuania, abstained)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (10 adopted, 4 rejected) and 24 parts of the text voted on separately (8 adopted, 8 rejected, 8 lapsed). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.