Parliament can object to technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Against a delegated act an adopted objection is a veto; against most implementing measures (such as GMO authorisations) it is a call on the Commission to withdraw the measure, which is not legally binding., Agriculture, food & fisheries
Genetically modified maize NK603
Objection passed by a large majority
The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.
On the objection:
- For
- 479
- Against
- 173
- Abstained
- 8
roll-call vote at 13:14 · 73% of votes cast were for the objection
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure Motion for a resolution · Motion B-10-2025-0562
AI:What this decision does
Parliament objected to a Commission plan to renew the authorisation of genetically modified maize NK603, which is tolerant to glyphosate, for use in food, feed and other products, excluding cultivation.§1: source passage in the text The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the renewal cannot go ahead. Parliament called on the Commission to withdraw its decision and not to renew the authorisation, citing concerns about long-term impacts on biodiversity, food safety, farmers' livelihoods and animal health.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: The Left, Greens, S&D, ECR, Patriots, ESN; Divided: Renew, EPP
- The Left For 42 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 46
- Greens For 49 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 123 for, 0 against, 3 abstainedof 137
- Renew Divided 31 for, 33 against, 1 abstainedof 75
- EPP Divided 58 for, 114 against, 4 abstainedof 193
- ECR For 63 for, 11 against, 0 abstainedof 79
- Patriots For 64 for, 13 against, 0 abstainedof 87
- ESN For 22 for, 1 against, 0 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 27 for, 1 against, 0 abstainedof 30
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
28 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
S&D voted for (123 of 126). Abstained: 3
Christel Schaldemose (Denmark), Marianne Vind (Denmark), Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis (Lithuania)
ECR voted for (63 of 74). Against: 11
Alexandr Vondra (Czechia), Assita Kanko (Belgium), Beatrice Timgren (Sweden), Charlie Weimers (Sweden), Dick Erixon (Sweden)
6 more from ECR
Kris van Dijck (Belgium), Kristoffer Storm (Denmark), Ondřej Krutílek (Czechia), Pietro Fiocchi (Italy), Sebastian Tynkkynen (Finland), Veronika Vrecionová (Czechia)
Patriots voted for (64 of 77). Against: 13
Antonín Staněk (Czechia), Jana Nagyová (Czechia), Jaroslav Bžoch (Czechia), Jaroslav Knot (Czechia), Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová (Czechia)
8 more from Patriots
Jorge Buxadé Villalba (Spain), Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal (Spain), Klara Dostalova (Czechia), Margarita De La Pisa Carrión (Spain), Mireia Borrás Pabón (Spain), Nikola Bartůšek (Czechia), Ondřej Knotek (Czechia), Tomáš Kubín (Czechia)
ESN voted for (22 of 23). Against: 1
Alexander Jungbluth (Germany)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.