Every vote on this decision
Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement
41 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 36 parts of the text voted on separately (35 adopted, 1 rejected).
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 36
36 votes on parts of the text: 35 adopted, 1 rejected
-
Vote 1:Separate vote on paragraph 13
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 13
Adopted 526 for, 58 against, 26 abstained
12:10Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 3:Paragraph 126 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘encourages the EU and the UK to work together to end Russian energy dependence by halting imports of all Russian fossil fuels at the earliest opportunity, including oil, gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), nuclear fuels, and other nuclear materials; notes that both the EU and the UK are continuing to make progress towards their shared goal of ending all energy ties with Russia;’
-
Vote 4:Paragraph 126 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 5:Paragraph 168 — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘the introduction of minimum catch sizes for certain species, the closure of fishing in marine protected areas (for example in the Dogger Bank),’ and ‘and the establishment of wind farms’
-
Vote 6:Paragraph 168 — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
‘the introduction of minimum catch sizes for certain species, the closure of fishing in marine protected areas (for example in the Dogger Bank),’
-
Vote 7:Paragraph 168 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
‘and the establishment of wind farms’
-
Vote 9:Separate vote on paragraph 199
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 199
Adopted 557 for, 35 against, 17 abstained
12:11Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 10:Separate vote on paragraph 204
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 11:Paragraph 204 — part 2
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 204/2
Adopted 549 for, 34 against, 25 abstained
12:11Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘hopes that both parties can avoid the delays that have characterised UK participation in Horizon Europe and the Copernicus programme under the current MFF, in order to ensure continuity in funding for key EU research and innovation projects that involve UK partners;’
-
Vote 12:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 213
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 14:Separate vote on paragraph 250
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 250
Adopted 505 for, 62 against, 38 abstained
12:12Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 15:Paragraph 251 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘Underlines the existential threat posed by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and its threats to expand this aggression to other countries of the European continent;’
-
Vote 16:Paragraph 251 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
‘considers this to be the single most important threat facing our continent in the coming years, notwithstanding the importance of other issues;’
-
Vote 17:Paragraph 251 — part 3
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 251/3
Adopted 472 for, 64 against, 70 abstained
12:13Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘calls for a commensurate policy response that gives priority to addressing the gaps in European defence and deterrence capabilities, especially in cooperation with like-minded European partners;’
-
Vote 18:Paragraph 252 — part 1
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/1
Adopted 511 for, 57 against, 33 abstained
12:13Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘Welcomes the strong EU-UK cooperation in response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as underscored at the EU-UK Summit; highlights the continued alignment of the EU and the UK;’
-
Vote 19:Paragraph 252 — part 2
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/2
Adopted 461 for, 82 against, 43 abstained
12:13Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left, Patriots
‘sanctions, military and financial support and’ without the word ‘military’
-
Vote 20:Paragraph 252 — part 3
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/3
Adopted 456 for, 96 against, 43 abstained
12:13Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left, Patriots
‘military’
-
Vote 21:Paragraph 252 — part 4
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/4
Adopted 528 for, 34 against, 37 abstained
12:13Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘diplomatic coordination, as well as their shared commitment to restoring a comprehensive, just and lasting peace, based on the principles of international law, justice and accountability; calls for the EU and the UK to remain strongly united towards the rest of the international community in condemning Russia’s actions, defending the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of Ukraine, and in countering Russian disinformation about its war of aggression against Ukraine, and to continue their efforts towards achieving the broadest possible international support for these matters; commends the UK’s vital contribution to shaping a strong, unified European response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and in convening the ‘coalition of the willing’; welcomes the UK’s contribution to supporting Ukraine’s future repair and reconstruction; while respecting Member States’ military and security policies, including policies of military neutrality;’ without the words ‘commends the UK’s vital contribution to shaping a strong, unified European response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and in convening the ‘coalition of the willing’;’
-
Vote 22:Paragraph 252 — part 5
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/5
Adopted 455 for, 88 against, 55 abstained
12:13Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘commends the UK’s vital contribution to shaping a strong, unified European response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and in convening the ‘coalition of the willing’;’
-
Vote 23:Paragraph 252 — part 6
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/6
Adopted 424 for, 152 against, 14 abstained
12:14Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘calls on the UK Government and all the Member States to significantly increase military assistance for Ukraine and to lift all restrictions on such assistance; recommends, in that regard, that actions undertaken in the framework of the SAFE Regulation by both the Member States and the UK also include Ukraine and its defence technology and industrial base;’
-
Vote 24:Separate vote on paragraph 254
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 254
Adopted 438 for, 116 against, 52 abstained
12:14Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 25:Separate vote on paragraph 255
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 255
Adopted 465 for, 98 against, 46 abstained
12:14Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 26:Separate vote on paragraph 257
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 257
Adopted 507 for, 72 against, 28 abstained
12:14Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 27:Paragraph 258 — part 1
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/1
Adopted 504 for, 72 against, 28 abstained
12:15Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘Underlines that the UK is a leading European defence actor with distinct expertise and advanced strategic capabilities; recognises the strength of its defence industrial base, particularly in the areas identified by the EU’s Readiness 2030 initiative and the European Defence Industrial Strategy as critical capability gaps, including integrated, multilayered air and missile defence, advanced artillery, long-range missile systems, and unmanned systems; acknowledges the deep links, complementarities and synergies between the European defence technological and industrial base and the UK’s defence technological and industrial base in pursuing shared security objectives by developing new collaborative arrangements in areas such as ballistic and hypersonic missile defence, space-based sensor systems, and early warning networks; calls for the EU, its Member States and the UK to make additional efforts to deepen cooperation between these industrial sectors and to strengthen the geographical coherence of a common European defence industrial base,’
-
Vote 28:Paragraph 258 — part 2
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/2
Adopted 447 for, 126 against, 25 abstained
12:15Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Patriots
‘which also incorporates Ukraine,’
-
Vote 29:Paragraph 258 — part 3
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/3
Adopted 476 for, 71 against, 55 abstained
12:15Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Patriots
‘including in the area of innovation and joint research and development;’
-
Vote 30:Paragraph 258 — part 4
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/4
Adopted 439 for, 93 against, 67 abstained
12:15Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘welcomes efforts by Member States and the UK and their defence industries to invest in and partner with the Ukrainian defence industry, and calls on them to intensify such efforts, in particular through the establishment of joint ventures and by building up production capacity both in Ukraine and in Member States;’
-
Vote 31:Paragraph 258 — part 5
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/5
Adopted 510 for, 67 against, 29 abstained
12:15Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Patriots
‘underlines that the strength of the EU defence industrial base can equally contribute to enhancing the UK’s security;’
-
Vote 32:Separate vote on paragraph 259
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 259
Adopted 471 for, 85 against, 53 abstained
12:15Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 33:Separate vote on paragraph 260
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 260
Adopted 506 for, 71 against, 29 abstained
12:16Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 34:Separate vote on paragraph 262
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 262
Adopted 518 for, 67 against, 25 abstained
12:16Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 35:Paragraph 265 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and gender’
-
Vote 36:Paragraph 265 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 37:Separate vote on citation 21
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Patriots
-
Vote 39:Separate vote on recital M
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left
-
Vote 40:Recital M — part 2
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – recital M/2
Adopted 485 for, 99 against, 13 abstained
12:17Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left
those words
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 4
-
Vote 2:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 125
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – After § 125 – Am 2
Rejected 174 for, 415 against, 18 abstained
12:10Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 8:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 172
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – After § 172 – Am 4
Rejected 137 for, 452 against, 22 abstained
12:11Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 13:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 244
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – After § 244 – Am 3
Rejected 189 for, 407 against, 12 abstained
12:12Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 38:Amendment 1, adding text after recital J
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – After recital J – Am 1
Rejected 178 for, 416 against, 12 abstained
12:16Roll call requested by Patriots
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 41:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 490 for, 41 against, 74 abstained
12:17Roll call requested by The Left