Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Protection of minors online

24 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 amendments (6 rejected) and 17 parts of the text voted on separately (15 adopted, 2 rejected).

· 6

  1. Vote 1:Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – After § 1 – Am 1

    Rejected 178 for, 448 against, 19 abstained

    12:35

    Roll call requested by Members

  2. Vote 3:Amendment 4 to paragraph 17

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 17 – Am 4

    Rejected 202 for, 441 against, 10 abstained

    12:35

    Roll call requested by ECR

  3. Vote 8:Amendment 5 to paragraph 20

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 20 – Am 5

    Rejected 216 for, 426 against, 17 abstained

    12:36

    Roll call requested by ECR

  4. Vote 9:Amendment 6 to paragraph 23

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 23 – Am 6

    Rejected 196 for, 445 against, 10 abstained

    12:36

    Roll call requested by ECR

  5. Vote 12:Amendment 7 to paragraph 24

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 24 – Am 7

    Rejected 200 for, 439 against, 15 abstained

    12:37

    Roll call requested by ECR

  6. Vote 18:Amendment 3 to paragraph 28

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 28 – Am 3

    Rejected 172 for, 432 against, 44 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by Members

· 17

17 votes on parts of the text: 15 adopted, 2 rejected

  1. Vote 2:Separate vote on paragraph 16

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 16

    Adopted 632 for, 26 against, 5 abstained

    12:35

    Roll call requested by Members

  2. Vote 4:Paragraph 17 — part 1

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 17/1

    Adopted 416 for, 152 against, 92 abstained

    12:35

    Roll call requested by Members · split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    ‘Welcomes the Commission’s risk-based approach taken in its guidelines for effective, proportionate and privacy-preserving age assurance mechanisms to protect minors online, in accordance with the DSA; highlights that the Commission considers the use of access restrictions supported by age verification methods an appropriate and proportionate measure to ensure a high level of privacy, safety and security for minors;’

  3. Vote 5:Separate vote on paragraph 17

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

  4. Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 18

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 18

    Adopted 628 for, 25 against, 12 abstained

    12:36

    Roll call requested by Members

  5. Vote 7:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 18

    Rejected show of hands

  6. Vote 10:Paragraph 23 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    ‘Encourages collaboration between the Member States that have already developed digital tools for effective age verification’

  7. Vote 11:Paragraph 23 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    ‘and the Commission in order to develop a strong and effective age verification tool at EU level, ensuring full respect for the technical specifications derived from the eIDAS2 Regulation;’

  8. Vote 13:Paragraph 24 — part 1

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 24/1

    Adopted 418 for, 228 against, 16 abstained

    12:37

    Roll call requested by Members · split vote by Members

    ‘Welcomes the Commission’s efforts to provide an EU-wide solution by developing an age-verification app and the EU Digital Identity (eID) Wallet;’

  9. Vote 14:Separate vote on paragraph 24

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

  10. Vote 15:Paragraph 25 — part 1 of 2

    Rejected show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that, to date, the eID Wallet fulfils these objectives;’

  11. Vote 16:Paragraph 25 — part 1

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 25/1

    Adopted 549 for, 97 against, 20 abstained

    12:37

    Roll call requested by Members · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that, to date, the eID Wallet fulfils these objectives;’

  12. Vote 17:Paragraph 25 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    those words

  13. Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 31

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 31

    Adopted 622 for, 17 against, 28 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by Members

  14. Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 33

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 33

    Adopted 576 for, 30 against, 52 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by Members

  15. Vote 21:Separate vote on paragraph 41

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Members

  16. Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 70

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 70

    Adopted 632 for, 18 against, 16 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by Members

  17. Vote 23:Separate vote on paragraph 81

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 81

    Adopted 618 for, 21 against, 23 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by Members

· 1

  1. Vote 24:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 483 for, 92 against, 86 abstained

    12:39

← Back to the decision