Every vote on this decision
Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material
37 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 18 amendments (18 rejected) and 15 parts of the text voted on separately (11 adopted, 4 rejected).
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 4
-
Vote 1:Final vote on the motion for a resolution
B10-0496/2025 – Motion for a resolution
Rejected 49 for, 600 against, 16 abstained
12:42Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 35:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted show of hands
Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 36:Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Motion for a resolution
Lapsed show of hands
Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 37:Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Motion for a resolution
Lapsed show of hands
Roll call requested by The Left
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 18
18 amendment votes: 18 rejected
-
Vote 2:Amendment 3 to paragraph 1
B10-0500/2025 – § 1 – Am 3
Rejected 174 for, 458 against, 22 abstained
12:42 -
Vote 3:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1
B10-0500/2025 – After § 1 – Am 4
Rejected 155 for, 413 against, 80 abstained
12:42 -
Vote 4:Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1
B10-0500/2025 – After § 1 – Am 5
Rejected 85 for, 471 against, 93 abstained
12:43 -
Vote 5:Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1
B10-0500/2025 – After § 1 – Am 6
Rejected 95 for, 471 against, 82 abstained
12:43 -
Vote 6:Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6
B10-0500/2025 – After § 6 – Am 7
Rejected 133 for, 492 against, 22 abstained
12:43 -
Vote 7:Amendment 18 to paragraph 11
B10-0500/2025 – § 11 – Am 18
Rejected 233 for, 393 against, 28 abstained
12:43Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 12:Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11
B10-0500/2025 – After § 11 – Am 8
Rejected 173 for, 433 against, 39 abstained
12:44 -
Vote 13:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 11
B10-0500/2025 – After § 11 – Am 9
Rejected 124 for, 503 against, 21 abstained
12:44 -
Vote 14:Amendment 10 to paragraph 13
B10-0500/2025 – § 13 – Am 10
Rejected 159 for, 430 against, 59 abstained
12:44Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 18:Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 19
B10-0500/2025 – After § 19 – Am 17
Rejected 234 for, 402 against, 22 abstained
12:45 -
Vote 23:Amendment 11 to paragraph 31
B10-0500/2025 – § 31 – Am 11
Rejected 171 for, 461 against, 18 abstained
12:45 -
Vote 24:Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 31
B10-0500/2025 – After § 31 – Am 12
Rejected 170 for, 399 against, 71 abstained
12:45 -
Vote 25:Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 31
B10-0500/2025 – After § 31 – Am 13
Rejected 89 for, 549 against, 11 abstained
12:46 -
Vote 26:Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 31
B10-0500/2025 – After § 31 – Am 14
Rejected 70 for, 576 against, 5 abstained
12:46 -
Vote 27:Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 32
B10-0500/2025 – After § 32 – Am 16
Rejected 233 for, 383 against, 36 abstained
12:46Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 30:Amendment 15 to paragraph 33
B10-0500/2025 – § 33 – Am 15
Rejected 94 for, 477 against, 80 abstained
12:46 -
Vote 32:Amendment 1, adding text after recital C
B10-0500/2025 – After recital C – Am 1
Rejected 140 for, 414 against, 99 abstained
12:48 -
Vote 33:Amendment 2, adding text after recital E
B10-0500/2025 – After recital E – Am 2
Rejected 182 for, 436 against, 31 abstained
12:48
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 15
-
Vote 8:Paragraph 9 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and the absence of harmonised and interoperable technological tools across the Member States,’
-
Vote 9:Paragraph 9 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
those words
-
Vote 10:Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘including the introduction of a harmonised EU-level WTO-compliant handling fee to cover the increased supervisory costs of custom authorities, and clearly defined responsibility for platforms and sellers established in third countries for the safety and compliance of products they target at EU consumers, which should accompany the removal of the VAT and customs duty exemption for low-value consignments that has been recently agreed in the Council;’
-
Vote 11:Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
those words
-
Vote 15:Paragraph 14 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
Text as a whole without the word: ‘temporary’
-
Vote 16:Paragraph 14 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
that word
-
Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 17
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 25
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots, ECR (B10-0500/2025)
-
Vote 20:Paragraph 25 — part 2
B10-0500/2025 – § 25/2
Adopted 467 for, 190 against, 10 abstained
12:45Split vote by Patriots, ECR (B10-0500/2025)
The part voted on
‘underlines the need to grant the Commission direct investigatory and sanctioning powers for serious, high-impact infringements of consumer law, in order to secure coherent, simultaneous and deterrent enforcement throughout the EU;’
-
Vote 21:Paragraph 28 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
The part voted on
‘Urges the Member States, furthermore, to considerably accelerate the digitalisation of import procedures in customs administrations, supported by the EU Customs Data Hub, in order to ensure the effective application of current legislation and to speed up customs clearance, in particular given the exponential growth in parcel flows; calls on the Member States to increase the use of automated processes, such as automatic label scanning during parcel processing at customs; stresses that the wide use of the digital product passport would allow ex ante compliance verification for all products imported via e-commerce, containing detailed quality and compliance information and which would be integrated directly into the EU Customs Data Hub;’
-
Vote 22:Paragraph 28 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
‘calls on the Commission to cover, as soon as possible, all physical goods placed on the EU market with the digital product passport;’
-
Vote 28:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 32
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 29:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 32
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 31:Vote on text inserted after recital B
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 34:Vote on text inserted after recital E
Rejected show of hands