Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

43 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 15 amendments (15 rejected) and 27 parts of the text voted on separately (26 adopted, 1 rejected).

· 15

  1. Vote 1:Amendment 1

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1

    Rejected 184 for, 441 against, 15 abstained

    12:31

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  2. Vote 2:Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – After § 1 – Am 8

    Rejected 186 for, 447 against, 11 abstained

    12:31

    Roll call requested by ESN

  3. Vote 3:Amendment 9 to paragraph 2

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 2 – Am 9

    Rejected 184 for, 450 against, 10 abstained

    12:31

    Roll call requested by ESN

  4. Vote 5:Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – After § 2 – Am 10

    Rejected 182 for, 446 against, 15 abstained

    12:32

    Roll call requested by ESN

  5. Vote 6:Amendment 11 to paragraph 4

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 4 – Am 11

    Rejected 191 for, 443 against, 9 abstained

    12:32

    Roll call requested by ESN

  6. Vote 8:Amendment 12 to paragraph 7

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 7 – Am 12

    Rejected 151 for, 443 against, 49 abstained

    12:33

    Roll call requested by ESN

  7. Vote 9:Amendment 2 to paragraph 9

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 9 – Am 2

    Rejected 225 for, 415 against, 10 abstained

    12:33

    Roll call requested by ESN, Greens

  8. Vote 10:Amendment 13 to paragraph 10

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 10 – Am 13

    Rejected 171 for, 445 against, 27 abstained

    12:33

    Roll call requested by ESN

  9. Vote 11:Amendment 14 to paragraph 12

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 12 – Am 14

    Rejected 194 for, 439 against, 8 abstained

    12:33

    Roll call requested by ESN

  10. Vote 12:Amendment 15 to paragraph 13

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 13 – Am 15

    Rejected 187 for, 444 against, 12 abstained

    12:34

    Roll call requested by ESN

  11. Vote 17:Amendment 16 to paragraph 24

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 24 – Am 16

    Rejected 177 for, 451 against, 15 abstained

    12:35

    Roll call requested by ESN

  12. Vote 21:Amendment 17 to paragraph 28

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 28 – Am 17

    Rejected 163 for, 450 against, 31 abstained

    12:36

    Roll call requested by ESN

  13. Vote 24:Amendment 4 to recital E

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital E – Am 4

    Rejected 183 for, 441 against, 17 abstained

    12:36

    Roll call requested by ESN

  14. Vote 25:Amendment 6, adding text after recital H

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – After recital H – Am 6

    Rejected 182 for, 447 against, 13 abstained

    12:37

    Roll call requested by ESN

  15. Vote 26:Amendment 7, adding text after recital J

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – After recital J – Am 7

    Rejected 144 for, 481 against, 17 abstained

    12:37

    Roll call requested by ESN

· 27

27 votes on parts of the text: 26 adopted, 1 rejected

  1. Vote 4:Separate vote on paragraph 2

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 2

    Adopted 408 for, 213 against, 23 abstained

    12:32

    Roll call requested by ESN

  2. Vote 7:Separate vote on paragraph 4

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 4

    Adopted 422 for, 199 against, 24 abstained

    12:32

    Roll call requested by ESN

  3. Vote 13:Separate vote on paragraph 13

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 13

    Adopted 425 for, 171 against, 46 abstained

    12:34

    Roll call requested by ESN

  4. Vote 14:Separate vote on paragraph 19

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 19

    Adopted 445 for, 188 against, 11 abstained

    12:34

    Roll call requested by ESN

  5. Vote 15:Separate vote on paragraph 22

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 22

    Adopted 453 for, 168 against, 22 abstained

    12:34

    Roll call requested by ESN

  6. Vote 16:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 22

    Adopted show of hands

  7. Vote 18:Separate vote on paragraph 24

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 24

    Adopted 421 for, 203 against, 20 abstained

    12:35

    Roll call requested by ESN

  8. Vote 19:Paragraph 27 — part 1

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 27/1

    Adopted 418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained

    12:35

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘the removal of gender identity from the list of protected characteristics’

  9. Vote 20:Paragraph 27 — part 2

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 27/2

    Adopted 411 for, 209 against, 10 abstained

    12:35

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    those words

  10. Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 28

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 28

    Adopted 432 for, 190 against, 22 abstained

    12:36

    Roll call requested by ESN

  11. Vote 23:Vote on text inserted after recital A

    Rejected show of hands

  12. Vote 27:Separate vote on recital AK

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital AK

    Adopted 440 for, 175 against, 22 abstained

    12:37

    Roll call requested by ESN

  13. Vote 28:Separate vote on recital AP

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital AP

    Adopted 472 for, 130 against, 34 abstained

    12:37

    Roll call requested by ESN

  14. Vote 29:Recital BD — part 1

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BD/1

    Adopted 419 for, 180 against, 30 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘removal of gender identity as grounds for discrimination and a’

  15. Vote 30:Recital BD — part 2

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BD/2

    Adopted 416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    those words

  16. Vote 31:Recital BE — part 1

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BE/1

    Adopted 421 for, 178 against, 33 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘and gender identity’ (first occurrence) and ‘such as a ban on legal gender recognition on a constitutional footing and removing gender identity from the explicit list of protected characteristics under the Equal Treatment Act’

  17. Vote 32:Recital BE — part 2

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BE/2

    Adopted 408 for, 209 against, 11 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    ‘and gender identity’ (first occurrence)

  18. Vote 33:Recital BE — part 3

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BE/3

    Adopted 411 for, 207 against, 14 abstained

    12:38

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘such as a ban on legal gender recognition on a constitutional footing and removing gender identity from the explicit list of protected characteristics under the Equal Treatment Act’

  19. Vote 34:Separate vote on recital BF

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BF

    Adopted 422 for, 180 against, 32 abstained

    12:39

    Roll call requested by S&D

  20. Vote 35:Separate vote on recital BG

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BG

    Adopted 418 for, 158 against, 55 abstained

    12:39

    Roll call requested by S&D

  21. Vote 36:Recital BH — part 1

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BH/1

    Adopted 420 for, 188 against, 24 abstained

    12:39

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘upon the production of evidence of gender reassignment surgery’

  22. Vote 37:Recital BH — part 2

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BH/2

    Adopted 417 for, 199 against, 14 abstained

    12:40

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    those words

  23. Vote 38:Separate vote on recital BI

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BI

    Adopted 418 for, 160 against, 51 abstained

    12:40

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D

  24. Vote 39:Recital BJ — part 1

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BJ/1

    Adopted 413 for, 189 against, 32 abstained

    12:40

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas in its decision of 15-17 September 2025 concerning the pending enhanced supervision of the execution of the ECtHR judgments in <i>Rana group</i> v. <i>Hungary</i>, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe expressed deep concern about the authorities’ persistent failure to take any measures in response to the violations, recalled with deep regret that, while for many years recognition of gender reassignment was permitted on the basis of an informal practice, the May 2020 legislative amendments have made it impossible for transgender persons with Hungarian birth certificates to obtain legal gender recognition in Hungary and that these developments considerably aggravate the uncertainty for the persons concerned and could lead to similar violations, and deplored the fact that the 2025 amendment to the Fundamental Law enshrined this legal ban also at the constitutional level;’

  25. Vote 40:Recital BJ — part 2

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BJ/2

    Adopted 410 for, 190 against, 29 abstained

    12:40

    Roll call requested by ESN, S&D · split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas it strongly underlined the pressing need for legislative changes to lift the current legal ban on changing sex/gender markers in the Hungarian birth register and to eliminate any constitutional obstacles to legal gender recognition, as well as to introduce a clear legal framework regulating the conditions and procedures for legal gender recognition; whereas it urged the authorities to adopt, without further delay, a clear legal framework to enable transgender persons, both lawfully settled non-Hungarian and Hungarian nationals, to access quick, transparent and accessible procedures for changing their name and sex/gender marker in their official identification documents issued by the Hungarian authorities;’

  26. Vote 41:Separate vote on recital BK

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BK

    Adopted 418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained

    12:40

    Roll call requested by S&D

  27. Vote 42:Separate vote on recital BP

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BP

    Adopted 429 for, 188 against, 21 abstained

    12:41

    Roll call requested by ESN

· 1

  1. Vote 43:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 415 for, 193 against, 28 abstained

    12:41

← Back to the decision