Every vote on this decision
Ensuring faster registration and uptake of biological control agents
3 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted).
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 2
-
Vote 1:Paragraph 12 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
The part voted on
‘Calls on the Commission to consider extending the maximum period for the first approval and renewal of active substances exerting biological control to up to 25 years; calls on the Commission to establish and maintain a list of biological control products that, based on their profile, nature and mode of action, may be eligible for authorisation with an extended time frame of up to 25 years for the first authorisation; emphasises that such a list must not be closed and must reflect the most recent scientific standards and remain dynamic, meaning that inclusion on the list must not be considered permanent; calls on the Commission to periodically review and update the list in the light of new data or scientific developments;’
-
Vote 2:Paragraph 12 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members
The part voted on
‘calls on the Commission to assess potential conditions upon which, biological control active substances and products that have been shown to have no or negligible risk profile could be granted indefinite approval and authorisation;’
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 3:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10-0234/2025 – Alexander Bernhuber, Anna Strolenberg – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 590 for, 28 against, 32 abstained
12:42