Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Gender Equality Strategy 2025

101 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 96 parts of the text voted on separately (64 adopted, 32 rejected).

· 4

  1. Vote 1:Amendment 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1

    Rejected 172 for, 440 against, 10 abstained

    12:05

    Roll call requested by ESN

  2. Vote 2:Amendment 4

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 4

    Rejected 159 for, 424 against, 31 abstained

    12:06

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  3. Vote 3:Amendment 2 to paragraph 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 1 – Am 2

    Rejected 207 for, 391 against, 12 abstained

    12:06

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  4. Vote 6:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – After § 3 – Am 3

    Rejected 208 for, 390 against, 16 abstained

    12:06

    Roll call requested by Patriots

· 96

96 votes on parts of the text: 64 adopted, 32 rejected

  1. Vote 4:Paragraph 3 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 3/1

    Adopted 510 for, 41 against, 63 abstained

    12:06

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘the denial of abortion care,’

  2. Vote 5:Paragraph 3 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 3/2

    Adopted 381 for, 182 against, 44 abstained

    12:06

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    those words

  3. Vote 7:Separate vote on paragraph 5

    Adopted 380 for, 116 against, 96 abstained

    Separate vote by Members

  4. Vote 8:Paragraph 10 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 10/1

    Adopted 437 for, 166 against, 6 abstained

    12:07

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘, including due to law enforcement practices’ and ‘mandatory,’

  5. Vote 9:Paragraph 10 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 10/2

    Rejected 295 for, 302 against, 7 abstained

    12:07

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    ‘, including due to law enforcement practices’

  6. Vote 10:Paragraph 10 — part 3

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 10/3

    Adopted 298 for, 282 against, 34 abstained

    12:07

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    ‘mandatory,’

  7. Vote 11:Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘decriminalisation of people and especially women in prostitution,’ and ‘demand reduction, punishment of clients,’

  8. Vote 12:Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    ‘decriminalisation of people and especially women in prostitution,’

  9. Vote 13:Paragraph 13 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted 253 for, 182 against, 156 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    ‘demand reduction, punishment of clients,’

  10. Vote 14:Separate vote on paragraph 14

    Adopted 352 for, 162 against, 89 abstained

    Separate vote by Members

  11. Vote 15:Paragraph 16 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 16/1

    Adopted 439 for, 138 against, 28 abstained

    12:08

    Roll call requested by S&D

  12. Vote 16:Paragraph 16 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 16/2

    Adopted 299 for, 270 against, 38 abstained

    12:08

    Roll call requested by S&D

  13. Vote 17:Paragraph 21 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 21/1

    Adopted 518 for, 24 against, 74 abstained

    12:09

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘and calls on the Commission to increase investment in gender mainstreaming in health systems’

  14. Vote 18:Paragraph 21 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 21/2

    Adopted 301 for, 298 against, 12 abstained

    12:09

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    those words

  15. Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 27

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 27

    Adopted 341 for, 218 against, 58 abstained

    12:09

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  16. Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 28

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 28

    Adopted 336 for, 218 against, 58 abstained

    12:09

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · separate vote by Members

  17. Vote 21:Separate vote on paragraph 29

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 29

    Adopted 292 for, 262 against, 56 abstained

    12:09

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  18. Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 30

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 30

    Adopted 359 for, 200 against, 51 abstained

    12:10

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · separate vote by Members

  19. Vote 23:Paragraph 36 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘to be monitored within the framework of the European Semester’ and ‘calls for structural reforms, with gender-responsive public investment and economic redistribution to address systemic gender inequalities;’

  20. Vote 24:Paragraph 36 — part 2 of 3

    Rejected 278 for, 328 against, 8 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    ‘to be monitored within the framework of the European Semester’

  21. Vote 25:Paragraph 36 — part 3 of 3

    Rejected show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    ‘calls for structural reforms, with gender-responsive public investment and economic redistribution to address systemic gender inequalities;’

  22. Vote 26:Paragraph 37 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to propose legislation on teleworking rules and the Right to Disconnect without further delay and to ensure it is done in a gender-responsive manner which does not exacerbate existing gender inequalities;’

  23. Vote 27:Paragraph 37 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 303 for, 279 against, 31 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    those words

  24. Vote 28:Paragraph 46 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘ensuring collective bargaining rights,’

  25. Vote 29:Paragraph 46 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 372 for, 157 against, 83 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    those words

  26. Vote 30:Paragraph 47 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted 433 for, 161 against, 13 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘horizontal and vertical segregation of the labour market as one of the main reasons for a’

  27. Vote 31:Paragraph 47 — part 2 of 2

    Rejected 289 for, 310 against, 7 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    those words

  28. Vote 32:Paragraph 48 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘free and’

  29. Vote 33:Paragraph 48 — part 2 of 2

    Rejected 289 for, 321 against, 7 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    those words

  30. Vote 34:Separate vote on paragraph 57

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 57

    Adopted 300 for, 238 against, 78 abstained

    12:12

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  31. Vote 35:Separate vote on paragraph 59

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 59

    Rejected 256 for, 305 against, 50 abstained

    12:12

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  32. Vote 36:Paragraph 60 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘binding’

  33. Vote 37:Paragraph 60 — part 2 of 2

    Rejected 251 for, 332 against, 25 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    that word

  34. Vote 38:Separate vote on paragraph 64

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 64

    Rejected 262 for, 287 against, 50 abstained

    12:13

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  35. Vote 39:Separate vote on paragraph 65

    Rejected 263 for, 299 against, 41 abstained

    Separate vote by Members

  36. Vote 40:Separate vote on paragraph 67

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 67

    Rejected 251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained

    12:13

    Roll call requested by S&D

  37. Vote 41:Separate vote on Title before paragraph 68

    Rejected 261 for, 326 against, 14 abstained

  38. Vote 42:Separate vote on paragraph 68

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 68

    Rejected 262 for, 309 against, 33 abstained

    12:14

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · separate vote by Members

  39. Vote 43:Paragraph 69 — part 1 of 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘all’, ‘and sufficient in-house capacity to systemically integrate a holistic gender perspective and conduct gender analysis’ and ‘all phases of’

  40. Vote 44:Paragraph 69 — part 2 of 4

    Rejected 237 for, 330 against, 41 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    ‘all’

  41. Vote 45:Paragraph 69 — part 3 of 4

    Rejected show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    ‘and sufficient in-house capacity to systemically integrate a holistic gender perspective and conduct gender analysis’

  42. Vote 46:Paragraph 69 — part 4 of 4

    Rejected 249 for, 319 against, 41 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    ‘all phases of’

  43. Vote 47:Paragraph 71 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 71/1

    Adopted 411 for, 161 against, 28 abstained

    12:15

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘feminist,’ and second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’

  44. Vote 48:Paragraph 71 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 71/2

    Adopted 292 for, 260 against, 47 abstained

    12:15

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · split vote by Members

    ‘feminist,’

  45. Vote 49:Paragraph 71 — part 3

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 71/3

    Adopted 368 for, 147 against, 93 abstained

    12:15

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · split vote by Members

    second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’

  46. Vote 50:Paragraph 72 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 72/1

    Adopted 396 for, 183 against, 28 abstained

    12:15

    Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’ and ‘and to ensure that the next MFF contains strengthened gender equality targets in external actions with 85 % of all EU official development assistance (ODA) mainstreaming gender (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) marker G1) and 20 % of ODA dedicated to gender-targeted projects (OECD marker 2);’

  47. Vote 51:Paragraph 72 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 72/2

    Adopted 365 for, 149 against, 73 abstained

    12:15

    Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members

    second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’

  48. Vote 52:Paragraph 72 — part 3

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 72/3

    Rejected 254 for, 324 against, 30 abstained

    12:16

    Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    ‘and to ensure that the next MFF contains strengthened gender equality targets in external actions with 85 % of all EU official development assistance (ODA) mainstreaming gender (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) marker G1) and 20 % of ODA dedicated to gender-targeted projects (OECD marker 2);’

  49. Vote 53:Separate vote on paragraph 73

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 73

    Rejected 279 for, 289 against, 42 abstained

    12:16

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · separate vote by Members

  50. Vote 54:Paragraph 74 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 74/1

    Adopted 397 for, 170 against, 44 abstained

    12:16

    Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to allocate targeted funding to Permanent Representations to enable them to effectively carry out this task’

  51. Vote 55:Paragraph 74 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 74/2

    Rejected 258 for, 325 against, 21 abstained

    12:16

    Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members

    those words

  52. Vote 56:Separate vote on paragraph 77

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 77

    Adopted 346 for, 224 against, 35 abstained

    12:16

    Roll call requested by Renew · separate vote by Members

  53. Vote 57:Paragraph 78 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 78/1

    Adopted 396 for, 182 against, 32 abstained

    12:17

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘feminism and’

  54. Vote 58:Paragraph 78 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 78/2

    Rejected 289 for, 304 against, 11 abstained

    12:17

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    those words

  55. Vote 59:Paragraph 79 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 79/1

    Adopted 406 for, 176 against, 29 abstained

    12:17

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘feminist,’ and ‘and sexual and reproductive rights’

  56. Vote 60:Paragraph 79 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 79/2

    Adopted 299 for, 246 against, 45 abstained

    12:17

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    ‘feminist,’

  57. Vote 61:Paragraph 79 — part 3

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 79/3

    Adopted 359 for, 167 against, 68 abstained

    12:17

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    ‘and sexual and reproductive rights’

  58. Vote 62:Separate vote on paragraph 80

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Members

  59. Vote 63:Separate vote on paragraph 83

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 83

    Rejected 272 for, 320 against, 19 abstained

    12:18

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  60. Vote 64:Separate vote on paragraph 84

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 84

    Rejected 269 for, 313 against, 26 abstained

    12:18

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  61. Vote 65:Separate vote on paragraph 85

    Rejected show of hands

    Separate vote by Members

  62. Vote 66:Separate vote on paragraph 86

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 86

    Rejected 273 for, 324 against, 18 abstained

    12:18

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  63. Vote 67:Paragraph 87 — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 87/1

    Adopted 411 for, 187 against, 15 abstained

    12:18

    Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’

  64. Vote 68:Paragraph 87 — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 87/2

    Adopted 362 for, 163 against, 62 abstained

    12:18

    Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members

    that word

  65. Vote 69:Paragraph 89 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘or migration status’ and ‘gender identity’

  66. Vote 70:Paragraph 89 — part 2 of 3

    Rejected 272 for, 323 against, 7 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    ‘or migration status’

  67. Vote 71:Paragraph 89 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted 325 for, 235 against, 35 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    ‘gender identity’

  68. Vote 72:Separate vote on paragraph 90

    Rejected 275 for, 313 against, 13 abstained

    Separate vote by Members

  69. Vote 73:Separate vote on paragraph 93

    Rejected 281 for, 301 against, 14 abstained

    Separate vote by Members

  70. Vote 74:Paragraph 100 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘femicide,’ and ‘, gender identity’

  71. Vote 75:Paragraph 100 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    ‘femicide,’

  72. Vote 76:Paragraph 100 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted 343 for, 213 against, 39 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    ‘, gender identity’

  73. Vote 77:Separate vote on citation 64

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Members

  74. Vote 78:Separate vote on citation 74

    Adopted 287 for, 258 against, 58 abstained

    Separate vote by Members

  75. Vote 79:Recital D — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital D/1

    Adopted 404 for, 176 against, 22 abstained

    12:21

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘and rights (SRHR)’ and ‘feminism and’

  76. Vote 80:Recital D — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital D/2

    Adopted 347 for, 170 against, 61 abstained

    12:21

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    ‘and rights (SRHR)’

  77. Vote 81:Recital D — part 3

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital D/3

    Adopted 289 for, 289 against, 7 abstained

    12:21

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    ‘feminism and’

  78. Vote 82:Recital G — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital G/1

    Adopted 493 for, 8 against, 101 abstained

    12:22

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘, and a lack of safe and legal migration opportunities’

  79. Vote 83:Recital G — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital G/2

    Rejected 254 for, 335 against, 18 abstained

    12:22

    Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Members

    those words

  80. Vote 84:Separate vote on recital H

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital H

    Adopted 298 for, 239 against, 61 abstained

    12:22

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · separate vote by Members

  81. Vote 85:Separate vote on recital I

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital I

    Adopted 355 for, 191 against, 44 abstained

    12:22

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · separate vote by Members

  82. Vote 86:Recital L — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘as well as gendered disinformation,’

  83. Vote 87:Recital L — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 302 for, 282 against, 17 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    those words

  84. Vote 88:Recital M — part 1

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital M/1

    Adopted 476 for, 41 against, 92 abstained

    12:23

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’ and ‘gender identity, gender expression,’

  85. Vote 89:Recital M — part 2

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital M/2

    Adopted 379 for, 134 against, 80 abstained

    12:23

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · split vote by Members

    second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’

  86. Vote 90:Recital M — part 3

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital M/3

    Adopted 331 for, 220 against, 30 abstained

    12:23

    Roll call requested by Renew, S&D · split vote by Members

    ‘gender identity, gender expression,’

  87. Vote 91:Recital Q — part 1 of 2

    Rejected show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas labour market segregation, as well as horizontal and vertical gender segregation in education, remains a key factor contributing to gender inequality in the work domain, while gender stereotyping is a major driver of occupational segregation that women face continuously while also receiving lower wages;’

  88. Vote 92:Recital Q — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas labour market disparities, differences in employment for women and men across sectors and regions, including in outermost regions, and a lack of fair working conditions and safety for women workers are still persistent across the EU, and the existing gender pay gap is, to a large extent, the consequence of the systematic undervaluation of work carried out in female-dominated sectors in which there is a prevalence of women and only around 20 % of men participate, such as care, education, health and welfare; whereas the issue of “equal pay for equal work or work of equal value” therefore needs to be tackled to close the gender pay gap; whereas education, especially tertiary education, training and social protection, is essential for gender equality, especially for women over the age of 55 and women living in rural, remote or depopulated areas who face specific and compounded obstacles; whereas education is also essential to allow everyone to adapt to labour market changes and have access to quality job opportunities;’

  89. Vote 93:Separate vote on recital S

    Rejected show of hands

    Separate vote by Members

  90. Vote 94:Recital X — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘many of whom face exploitation due to a lack of adequate regularisation pathways,’

  91. Vote 95:Recital X — part 2 of 2

    Rejected 270 for, 299 against, 39 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    those words

  92. Vote 96:Separate vote on recital Y

    Rejected 258 for, 268 against, 84 abstained

    Separate vote by Members

  93. Vote 97:Separate vote on recital Z

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital Z

    Adopted 293 for, 269 against, 42 abstained

    12:24

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  94. Vote 98:Separate vote on recital AC

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital AC

    Rejected 276 for, 317 against, 16 abstained

    12:24

    Roll call requested by S&D · separate vote by Members

  95. Vote 99:Recital AD — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Members

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas women and LGBTIQ+ individuals, whether in transit or residing in reception facilities, are frequently exposed to specific gender-based risks, including violence, insufficient access to healthcare and legal insecurity;’

  96. Vote 100:Recital AD — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 287 for, 285 against, 27 abstained

    Split vote by Members

    those words

· 1

  1. Vote 101:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained

    12:25

← Back to the decision