Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure

49 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 38 parts of the text voted on separately (32 adopted, 4 rejected, 2 lapsed). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

· 38

38 votes on parts of the text: 32 adopted, 4 rejected, 2 lapsed or other

  1. Vote 1:Separate vote on paragraph 1

    Adopted show of hands

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left

  2. Vote 2:Separate vote on paragraph 1

    Lapsed no count

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left

  3. Vote 3:Separate vote on paragraph 1

    Lapsed no count

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left

  4. Vote 4:Paragraph 2 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by The Left

    The part voted on

    ‘Encourages any initiative that enables the EU and its Member States to take coordinated, united and proportionate action against all violations of their airspace, including shooting down airborne threats;’

  5. Vote 5:Paragraph 2 — part 2

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 2/2

    Adopted 540 for, 34 against, 28 abstained

    13:20

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left

    ‘strongly condemns Russia’s reckless and escalatory actions of violating the airspace of EU Member States’

  6. Vote 6:Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by The Left

    ‘strongly condemns Russia’s reckless and escalatory actions of violating the airspace of EU Member States’

  7. Vote 7:Separate vote on paragraph 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by The Left

  8. Vote 8:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4

    Rejected 253 for, 297 against, 60 abstained

  9. Vote 12:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4

    Rejected show of hands

  10. Vote 13:Paragraph 5 — part 1

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 5/1

    Adopted 543 for, 15 against, 44 abstained

    13:23

    Roll call requested by The Left, Patriots · split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Underlines that the EU and its Member States remain firmly committed to the rules-based international order and to all diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace for Ukraine, in full respect of its sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders;’

  11. Vote 14:Paragraph 5 — part 2

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 5/2

    Adopted 533 for, 9 against, 62 abstained

    13:23

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘calls, in this regard, for the Member States and the EU to closely and effectively coordinate their diplomatic initiatives in multilateral organisations, including the UN, in order to counter Russia’s systematic breaches of international law;’

  12. Vote 15:Separate vote on paragraph 6

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 6

    Adopted 443 for, 112 against, 52 abstained

    13:23

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  13. Vote 16:Paragraph 9 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, Patriots

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘is convinced that the headline goal process should cover not only crisis management but also collective defence, including the full capability spectrum under the national and international capability objectives’ and ‘insists on the urgent need to move towards a genuine European Defence Union, complementing NATO, and building on and going further than current frameworks such as that provided in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030;’

  14. Vote 17:Paragraph 9 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘is convinced that the headline goal process should cover not only crisis management but also collective defence, including the full capability spectrum under the national and international capability objectives’

  15. Vote 18:Paragraph 9 — part 3

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 9/3

    Adopted 356 for, 218 against, 39 abstained

    13:23

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘insists on the urgent need to move towards a genuine European Defence Union, complementing NATO, and building on and going further than current frameworks such as that provided in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030;’

  16. Vote 19:Paragraph 10 — part 1

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 10/1

    Adopted 361 for, 210 against, 41 abstained

    13:24

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Calls for advances towards a European command-and-control structure that not only manages crises in line with the common security and defence policy (CSDP), but also serves as the equivalent of NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE);’

  17. Vote 20:Paragraph 10 — part 2

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 10/2

    Adopted 369 for, 212 against, 35 abstained

    13:24

    Split vote by ECR, Patriots

    ‘notes that, to avoid duplication, such a structure should complement SHAPE and would provide proper resources to the EU Military Staff (EUMS);’

  18. Vote 21:Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Calls for advances towards a European command-and-control structure that not only manages crises in line with the common security and defence policy (CSDP), but also serves as the equivalent of NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE);’

  19. Vote 22:Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, Patriots

    ‘notes that, to avoid duplication, such a structure should complement SHAPE and would provide proper resources to the EU Military Staff (EUMS);’

  20. Vote 23:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 11

    Adopted show of hands

  21. Vote 24:Separate vote on paragraph 15

    Adopted show of hands

  22. Vote 25:Separate vote on paragraph 16

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by S&D

  23. Vote 26:Paragraph 22 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

    ‘Underlines the need for targets for both UAV and counter-UAV development, to ensure comprehensive UAV capabilities;’

  24. Vote 27:Paragraph 22 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

    ‘calls on the Commission to propose exemptions from EU environmental legislation for UAV manufacturing facilities;’

  25. Vote 28:Separate vote on paragraph 24

    Adopted show of hands

  26. Vote 29:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 24

    Adopted show of hands

  27. Vote 30:Separate vote on paragraph 27

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by S&D, Renew, ECR, Patriots

  28. Vote 31:Paragraph 27 — part 2

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 27/2

    Rejected 233 for, 272 against, 104 abstained

    13:25

    Split vote by S&D, Renew, ECR, Patriots

    ‘and calls for military support for the Member States concerned to be funded from the European Peace Facility;’

  29. Vote 32:Paragraph 27 — part 3

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 27/3

    Rejected 204 for, 380 against, 16 abstained

    13:25

    Split vote by S&D, Renew, ECR, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘is convinced that any Member State that opposes recourse to the European Peace Facility in such cases contravenes its duty of loyalty and solidarity under Article 24(3) TEU and its obligation of mutual aid and assistance enshrined in Article 42(7) TEU; considers, therefore, that an opposing vote may not be considered in the Council; recalls that constructive abstention should be possible for those Member States whose constitutional prerogatives require it;’

  30. Vote 33:Paragraph 28 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘through instrumentalised migration,’

  31. Vote 34:Paragraph 28 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

    those words

  32. Vote 35:Separate vote on paragraph 32

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, Patriots

  33. Vote 36:Paragraph 32 — part 2

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 32/2

    Adopted 378 for, 160 against, 64 abstained

    13:27

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘calls for the lifting of restrictions on the use of Western weapons systems delivered to Ukraine against military targets on Russian territory, as these are used for launching attacks on Ukraine’s population and critical civilian infrastructure;’

  34. Vote 37:Separate vote on paragraph 33

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 33

    Adopted 416 for, 140 against, 48 abstained

    13:28

    Roll call requested by ECR, Patriots

  35. Vote 39:Separate vote on recital N

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Patriots

  36. Vote 40:Recital Q — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens, ECR

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘the United States’ stance on’ and ‘and should be strengthened’

  37. Vote 41:Recital Q — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens, ECR

    ‘the United States’ stance on’

  38. Vote 42:Recital Q — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens, ECR

    ‘and should be strengthened’

· 4

  1. Vote 9:Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – After § 4 – Am 5

    Rejected 86 for, 451 against, 70 abstained

    13:21

    Roll call requested by The Left

  2. Vote 10:Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – After § 4 – Am 6

    Rejected 57 for, 443 against, 105 abstained

    13:21

    Roll call requested by The Left

  3. Vote 11:Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – After § 4 – Am 7

    Rejected 65 for, 457 against, 83 abstained

    13:21

    Roll call requested by The Left

  4. Vote 38:Amendment 3, adding text after recital A

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – After recital A – Am 3

    Rejected 54 for, 464 against, 88 abstained

    13:28

    Roll call requested by The Left

· 1

  1. Vote 43:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    RC-B10-0419/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 469 for, 97 against, 38 abstained

    13:28

    Roll call requested by Renew

Alternative motions · 6

  1. Vote 44:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0419/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  2. Vote 45:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0421/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  3. Vote 46:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0422/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  4. Vote 47:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0423/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  5. Vote 48:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0424/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  6. Vote 49:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0437/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

← Back to the decision