Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final., Economy & single market
Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects
Passed by an overwhelming majority
Parliament adopted its position on the law.
- For
- 535
- Against
- 36
- Abstained
- 47
roll-call vote at 13:17 · 87% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by Alex Agius Saliba · Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council. · Report A-10-2025-0140
AI:What this decision does
Parliament adopted its position on a proposal to update EU rules on package travel and linked travel arrangements, aiming to strengthen traveller protection and simplify the law.§1: source passage in the text The adopted text revises definitions, insolvency protection, cancellation rights, and introduces rules on vouchers and complaint handling.§1: source passage in the text Parliament asks the Commission to re-refer the matter if it substantially amends its proposal, and will forward its position to the Council and national parliaments.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR; Against: ESN; Divided: Patriots
- The Left For 30 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 47
- Greens For 43 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 115 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 137
- Renew For 59 for, 3 against, 0 abstainedof 76
- EPP For 169 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 193
- ECR For 66 for, 3 against, 1 abstainedof 79
- Patriots Divided 28 for, 5 against, 43 abstainedof 89
- ESN Against 2 for, 20 against, 3 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 23 for, 5 against, 0 abstainedof 30
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
12 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
Renew voted for (59 of 62). Against: 3
Christine Singer (Germany), Engin Eroglu (Germany), Joachim Streit (Germany)
ECR voted for (66 of 70). Against: 3, Abstained: 1
Beatrice Timgren (Sweden, against), Charlie Weimers (Sweden, against), Dick Erixon (Sweden, against), Emmanouil Fragkos (Greece, abstained)
ESN voted against (20 of 25). For: 2, Abstained: 3
Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik (Poland, abstained), Ivan David (Czechia, abstained), Marcin Sypniewski (Poland, for), Petras Gražulis (Lithuania, abstained), Sarah Knafo (France, for)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 8 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted, 6 rejected). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.