Parliament can object to technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Against a delegated act an adopted objection is a veto; against most implementing measures (such as GMO authorisations) it is a call on the Commission to withdraw the measure, which is not legally binding., Economy & single market
Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add certain countries to the list of high-risk third countries, and to remove other countries from that list
Objection failed by a clear majority
The objection failed — the Commission measure goes ahead.
On the objection:
- For
- 264
- Against
- 369
- Abstained
- 55
roll-call vote at 13:18 · 38% of votes cast were for the objection
Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act Motion for a resolution · Motion B-10-2025-0311
AI:What this decision does
The Commission proposed updating the EU list of high-risk third countries for money laundering and terrorist financing, adding ten countries and removing eight, including Gibraltar.§1: source passage in the text Parliament rejected the objection to this delegated regulation, so the Commission's measure goes ahead as planned. The resolution had asked the Commission to keep Gibraltar on the list and to submit a new act, but that request has no effect now.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: The Left, Greens; Against: Renew, Patriots; Abstained: ESN; Divided: S&D, EPP, ECR
- The Left For 42 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 47
- Greens For 50 for, 0 against, 1 abstainedof 54
- S&D Divided 63 for, 54 against, 12 abstainedof 137
- Renew Against 6 for, 67 against, 0 abstainedof 76
- EPP Divided 48 for, 116 against, 14 abstainedof 193
- ECR Divided 27 for, 49 against, 2 abstainedof 79
- Patriots Against 24 for, 58 against, 0 abstainedof 90
- ESN Abstained 2 for, 2 against, 23 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 2 for, 23 against, 3 abstainedof 30
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
35 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
Greens voted for (50 of 51). Abstained: 1
Leoluca Orlando (Italy)
Renew voted against (67 of 73). For: 6
Ľubica Karvašová (Slovakia), Lucia Yar (Slovakia), Ľudovít Ódor (Slovakia), Martin Hojsík (Slovakia), Michal Wiezik (Slovakia)
1 more from Renew
Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová (Slovakia)
Patriots voted against (58 of 82). For: 24
Afroditi Latinopoulou (Greece), Anders Vistisen (Denmark), Anna Bryłka (Poland), António Tânger Corrêa (Portugal), Barbara Bonte (Belgium)
19 more from Patriots
Filip Turek (Czechia), Gerolf Annemans (Belgium), Hermann Tertsch (Spain), Jana Nagyová (Czechia), Jaroslav Bžoch (Czechia), Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová (Czechia), Jorge Buxadé Villalba (Spain), Jorge Martín Frías (Spain), Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal (Spain), Klara Dostalova (Czechia), Margarita De La Pisa Carrión (Spain), Mireia Borrás Pabón (Spain), Nikola Bartůšek (Czechia), Ondřej Knotek (Czechia), Tiago Moreira De Sá (Portugal), Tom Vandendriessche (Belgium), Tomáš Kubín (Czechia), Tomasz Buczek (Poland), Vilis Krištopans (Latvia)
ESN abstained (23 of 27). For: 2, Against: 2
Ivan David (Czechia, against), Petr Bystron (Germany, against), Petras Gražulis (Lithuania, for), Rada Laykova (Bulgaria, for)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 16 parts of the text voted on separately (16 rejected).