Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility

87 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 24 amendments (24 rejected) and 62 parts of the text voted on separately (51 adopted, 11 rejected).

· 62

62 votes on parts of the text: 51 adopted, 11 rejected

  1. Vote 1:Paragraph 1 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘of solidarity in the light of two unprecedented crises’

  2. Vote 2:Paragraph 1 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    those words

  3. Vote 4:Paragraph 3 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘the Commission finding that the RRF has led to a sustained increase in investments across the EU and’ and ‘given its synergies with other EU funds; is, however, concerned that the RRF expiration in 2026 poses a significant risk of a substantial decline in public investment in common European priorities;’

  4. Vote 5:Paragraph 3 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    those words

  5. Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 5

    Rejected show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

  6. Vote 7:Separate vote on paragraph 5

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

  7. Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 5

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

  8. Vote 10:Separate vote on paragraph 7

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

  9. Vote 11:Paragraph 7 — part 2

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 7/2

    Adopted 467 for, 126 against, 62 abstained

    13:07

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots

    those words

  10. Vote 12:Separate vote on paragraph 9

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  11. Vote 13:Separate vote on paragraph 15

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  12. Vote 15:Paragraph 17 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘Stresses that the RRF is the first major performance-based instrument at EU level which is exclusively based on financing not linked to costs (FNLC);’

  13. Vote 16:Paragraph 17 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘recalls that Article 8 of the RRF Regulation stipulates that the RRF must be implemented by the Commission in direct management in accordance with the relevant rules adopted pursuant to Article 322 TFEU, in particular the Financial Regulation and the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation;’

  14. Vote 17:Paragraph 17 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘regrets that the Council did not agree to insert specific rules in the Financial Regulation to address the risks of this delivery model, such as double funding; considers that the rules of the Financial Regulation should be fully applicable to future instruments based on FNLC, including as regards fines, penalties and sanctions;’

  15. Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 18

    Rejected show of hands

  16. Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 19

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN, Patriots

  17. Vote 21:Paragraph 19 — part 2

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 19/2

    Adopted 430 for, 218 against, 7 abstained

    13:08

    Split vote by ESN, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘including through sufficient proceeds from new own resources introduced after 2021 without any undue reduction in programme expenditure or investment instruments under the MFF; deplores the lack of progress made in this regard, which raises concerns regarding the viability of the repayment of the debt undertaken under NGEU,’

  18. Vote 22:Paragraph 19 — part 3

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 19/3

    Adopted 404 for, 235 against, 10 abstained

    13:08

    Split vote by ESN, Patriots

    ‘and urges the Council to adopt new own resources without delay and as a matter of urgency;’

  19. Vote 23:Paragraph 19 — part 4

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 19/4

    Adopted 402 for, 238 against, 12 abstained

    13:08

    Split vote by ESN, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘urges the Commission, furthermore, to continue efforts to identify additional genuine new own resources beyond the IIA and linked to EU policies, in order to cover the high spending needs associated with the funding of new priorities and the repayment of NGEU debt;’

  20. Vote 28:Separate vote on paragraph 22

    Rejected show of hands

  21. Vote 29:Separate vote on paragraph 23

    Rejected show of hands

  22. Vote 31:Separate vote on paragraph 25

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  23. Vote 32:Separate vote on paragraph 26

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN, Patriots

  24. Vote 33:Separate vote on paragraph 27

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  25. Vote 34:Paragraph 28 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘need for an acceleration of investments in transnational cooperation’

  26. Vote 35:Paragraph 28 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    those words

  27. Vote 36:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 30

    Rejected show of hands

  28. Vote 38:Separate vote on paragraph 33

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN, Patriots

  29. Vote 39:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 33

    Rejected show of hands

  30. Vote 42:Separate vote on paragraph 36

    Rejected show of hands

  31. Vote 43:Separate vote on paragraph 37

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  32. Vote 44:Paragraph 38 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    ‘Notes that some milestones and targets may be no longer achievable because of objective circumstances;’

  33. Vote 45:Paragraph 38 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘stresses that any NRRP revisions should be made in accordance with the RRF Regulation, including the applicable deadlines, and should not entail backtracking on reforms, commitments or lower quality projects but should maintain the overall ambition and the efficiency of public spending;’

  34. Vote 48:Separate vote on paragraph 42

    Rejected show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  35. Vote 49:Separate vote on paragraph 42

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  36. Vote 50:Paragraph 43 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots · separate vote by ESN

    ‘Calls for an evaluation of how this framework could enable targeted investments in EU defence supply chains, strategic stockpiles and defence innovation,’

  37. Vote 51:Paragraph 43 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots · separate vote by ESN

    ‘ensuring alignment with broader European security objectives;’

  38. Vote 54:Separate vote on paragraph 46

    Rejected show of hands

  39. Vote 55:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 47

    Adopted show of hands

  40. Vote 57:Separate vote on paragraph 52

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 52

    Adopted 575 for, 9 against, 72 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by ESN

  41. Vote 60:Paragraph 60 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘civil society organisations, social partners’

  42. Vote 61:Paragraph 60 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    those words

  43. Vote 62:Paragraph 64 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots · separate vote by ESN

    ‘Believes that the combination of reforms and investments has proved successful but that a clearer link is needed between the two;’

  44. Vote 63:Paragraph 64 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots · separate vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘highlights the importance of aligning any funding with the objectives of the instrument and disbursing it in line with the progress made towards them; insists that the level of ambition of NRRPs should not be lowered but should be commensurate with the RRF timeline to ensure their successful implementation;’

  45. Vote 64:Separate vote on paragraph 65

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  46. Vote 66:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 67

    Adopted show of hands

  47. Vote 67:Paragraph 70 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘social partners, civil society organisations’

  48. Vote 68:Paragraph 70 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    those words

  49. Vote 69:Separate vote on paragraph 81

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 81

    Adopted 642 for, 6 against, 6 abstained

    13:15

    Roll call requested by ESN

  50. Vote 71:Separate vote on citation 6

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Patriots

  51. Vote 74:Separate vote on recital E

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

  52. Vote 75:Recital E — part 2

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital E/2

    Adopted 420 for, 224 against, 13 abstained

    13:15

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    those words

  53. Vote 76:Separate vote on recital F

    Rejected show of hands

  54. Vote 77:Separate vote on recital G

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN, Patriots

  55. Vote 78:Recital G — part 2

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital G/2

    Adopted 418 for, 200 against, 35 abstained

    13:16

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas the Council has yet to adopt the adjusted basket of new own resources proposed by the Commission, which raises concerns about the viability of the repayment of the debt undertaken under NGEU;’

  56. Vote 79:Separate vote on recital H

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  57. Vote 80:Separate vote on recital I

    Rejected show of hands

  58. Vote 81:Recital K — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas by 31 December 2024, Member States had submitted 95 payment requests and the level of RRF disbursements including pre-financing stood at EUR 197.46 billion in grants (55 % of the total grants envelope) and EUR 108.68 billion in loans (37 % of the total loans envelope); whereas three Member States have already received their fifth payment, while one Member State has not received any RRF funding; whereas all Member States have revised their national recovery and resilience plans (NRRP) at least once; whereas 28 % of milestones and targets have been satisfactorily fulfilled and the Commission has made use of the possibility to partially suspend payments where some milestones and targets linked to a payment request were not found to be satisfactorily fulfilled;’

  59. Vote 82:Recital K — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas delays in the execution of planned reforms and investments, particularly in social infrastructure and public services, could lead to the underutilisation of available resources, thereby reducing the expected impact on economic growth, employment and social cohesion;’

  60. Vote 83:Recital M — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘whereas robust audit and control systems are crucial to protect the financial interests of the EU throughout the life cycle of the RRF;’

  61. Vote 84:Recital M — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘whereas the milestones commonly known as “super milestones”, in particular related to the rule of law, had to be fulfilled prior to any RRF disbursements;’

  62. Vote 85:Vote on text inserted after recital L

    Adopted show of hands

· 24

24 amendment votes: 24 rejected

  1. Vote 3:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 1 – Am 2

    Rejected 124 for, 452 against, 68 abstained

    13:06

    Roll call requested by ESN

  2. Vote 9:Amendment 15 to paragraph 7

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 7 – Am 15

    Rejected 114 for, 458 against, 81 abstained

    13:07

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  3. Vote 14:Amendment 16 to paragraph 17

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 17 – Am 16

    Rejected 188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained

    13:07

    Roll call requested by ESN

  4. Vote 18:Amendment 3 to paragraph 18

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 18 – Am 3

    Rejected 145 for, 447 against, 62 abstained

    13:08

    Roll call requested by ESN

  5. Vote 24:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 19

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 19 – Am 4

    Rejected 188 for, 437 against, 30 abstained

    13:09

    Roll call requested by ESN

  6. Vote 25:Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 19

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 19 – Am 18

    Rejected 206 for, 432 against, 17 abstained

    13:09

    Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots

  7. Vote 26:Amendment 19 to paragraph 20

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 20 – Am 19

    Rejected 152 for, 444 against, 54 abstained

    13:09

    Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots

  8. Vote 27:Amendment 5 to paragraph 21

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 21 – Am 5

    Rejected 189 for, 442 against, 22 abstained

    13:09

    Roll call requested by ESN

  9. Vote 30:Amendment 22 to paragraph 24

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 24 – Am 22

    Rejected 175 for, 433 against, 37 abstained

    13:10

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  10. Vote 37:Amendment 24 to paragraph 33

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 33 – Am 24

    Rejected 184 for, 454 against, 16 abstained

    13:10

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  11. Vote 40:Amendment 26 to paragraph 34

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 34 – Am 26

    Rejected 159 for, 445 against, 49 abstained

    13:11

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  12. Vote 41:Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 35

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 35 – Am 27

    Rejected 199 for, 446 against, 6 abstained

    13:11

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  13. Vote 46:Amendment 29 to paragraph 39

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 39 – Am 29

    Rejected 150 for, 452 against, 52 abstained

    13:12

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  14. Vote 47:Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 41

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 41 – Am 1

    Rejected 76 for, 488 against, 89 abstained

    13:12

    Roll call requested by The Left

  15. Vote 52:Amendment 31 to paragraph 44

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 44 – Am 31

    Rejected 152 for, 450 against, 54 abstained

    13:12

    Roll call requested by ESN

  16. Vote 53:Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 45

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 45 – Am 32

    Rejected 159 for, 447 against, 47 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots

  17. Vote 56:Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 47

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 47 – Am 34

    Rejected 152 for, 454 against, 53 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots

  18. Vote 58:Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 55

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 55 – Am 35

    Rejected 159 for, 438 against, 52 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by ESN

  19. Vote 59:Amendment 36 to paragraph 59

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 59 – Am 36

    Rejected 187 for, 450 against, 16 abstained

    13:14

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  20. Vote 65:Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 66

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 66 – Am 37

    Rejected 173 for, 446 against, 35 abstained

    13:14

    Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots

  21. Vote 70:Amendment 38 to paragraph 82

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 82 – Am 38

    Rejected 154 for, 450 against, 51 abstained

    13:15

    Roll call requested by ESN

  22. Vote 72:Amendment 9, adding text after recital A

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After recital A – Am 9

    Rejected 150 for, 445 against, 56 abstained

    13:15

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  23. Vote 73:Amendment 10 to recital E

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital E – Am 10

    Rejected 199 for, 441 against, 11 abstained

    13:15

    Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots

  24. Vote 86:Amendment 13 to recital P

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital P – Am 13

    Rejected 198 for, 444 against, 11 abstained

    13:17

    Roll call requested by Patriots

· 1

  1. Vote 87:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

    Adopted 421 for, 180 against, 55 abstained

    13:17

← Back to the decision