Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Discharge 2023: Joint Undertakings

31 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 18 parts of the text voted on separately (13 adopted, 5 rejected).

Other votes · 11

  1. Vote 1:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  2. Vote 2:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  3. Vote 3:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  4. Vote 4:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  5. Vote 5:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  6. Vote 6:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  7. Vote 7:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  8. Vote 8:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  9. Vote 9:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  10. Vote 10:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  11. Vote 11:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

· 1

  1. Vote 12:Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 12

    A10-0056/2025 – Michal Wiezik – After § 12 – Am 1

    Rejected 203 for, 440 against, 4 abstained

    14:10

    Roll call requested by Patriots

· 18

18 votes on parts of the text: 13 adopted, 5 rejected

  1. Vote 13:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13

    Rejected show of hands

  2. Vote 14:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 14

    Rejected show of hands

  3. Vote 15:Separate vote on paragraph 24, point a

    Rejected show of hands

  4. Vote 16:Paragraph 26 — part 1 of 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Takes note of the fact that the levels of detail and the level of accessibility vary when it comes to the quantitative data provided by the joint undertakings on the gender balance of experts selected to work with the joint undertakings;’

  5. Vote 17:Paragraph 26 — part 2 of 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘calls on all joint undertakings to increase transparency and to include clear quantitative data on gender balance among the experts selected in their future Annual Activity Reports;’

  6. Vote 18:Paragraph 26 — part 3 of 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘calls on all joint undertakings to intensify their efforts to promote gender equality at all levels’

  7. Vote 19:Paragraph 26 — part 4 of 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘and to ensure that gender balance remains a horizontal priority in all activities related to procurement, grants and tenders and to provide explanations when gender balance cannot be achieved;’

  8. Vote 20:Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Takes note of the fact that the levels of detail and the level of accessibility vary when it comes to the quantitative data provided by the joint undertakings on the geographical distribution of experts selected to work with the joint undertakings; calls on all joint undertakings to include clear quantitative data on the geographical distribution of the experts selected in their future Annual Activity Reports;’

  9. Vote 21:Paragraph 27 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘calls on all joint undertakings to ensure that geographical distribution remains a horizontal priority in all activities related to procurement, grants and tenders and to provide explanations when sufficient geographical distribution cannot be achieved;’

  10. Vote 22:Paragraph 31 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Calls on all joint undertakings to implement concrete measures to improve gender balance in leadership positions and decision-making bodies, including setting gender balance targets and regularly monitoring progress;’

  11. Vote 23:Paragraph 31 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘stresses the need to address gender pay gaps and ensure equal opportunities for career advancement;’

  12. Vote 24:Paragraph 34 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Takes note of the fact that the levels of detail and the level of accessibility vary when it comes to the quantitative data provided by the joint undertakings on the gender balance among their staff and within their governing bodies and structures in their Annual Activity Reports;’

  13. Vote 25:Paragraph 34 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘calls on all joint undertakings to include a clear section dedicated to quantitative data on gender balance among their staff and within their governing bodies and structures in their future Annual Activity Reports, including the disaggregation of data between different levels of responsibility and different types of contract; calls on all joint undertakings to ensure that gender balance remains an objective at all levels of responsibility and to persist in their efforts to enhance it, in order to ensure a fair representation of society within their staff and to promote a healthy and productive working environment and to provide explanations when gender balance cannot be achieved;’

  14. Vote 26:Paragraph 35 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Takes note of the fact that the levels of detail and the level of accessibility vary when it comes to the quantitative data provided by the joint undertakings on the geographical distribution within their staff and within their governing bodies and structures in their Annual Activity Reports; calls on all joint undertakings to include a clear section dedicated to quantitative data on geographical distribution among their staff and within their governing bodies and structures in their future Annual Activity Reports, including the disaggregation of data between different levels of responsibility and different types of contract;’

  15. Vote 27:Paragraph 35 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘calls on all joint undertakings to ensure that a satisfactory geographical distribution remains an objective at all levels of responsibility and to provide explanations when a sufficient geographical distribution cannot be achieved;’

  16. Vote 28:Paragraph 61 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘Calls on joint undertakings to report effectively on their contribution to horizontal priorities of the budget of the European Union,’

  17. Vote 29:Paragraph 61 — part 2 of 2

    Rejected 281 for, 356 against, 11 abstained

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘including as regards climate mainstreaming and to provide explanations where relevant on how their activities can contribute to the objectives of the European Green Deal;’

  18. Vote 30:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 65

    Rejected show of hands

· 1

  1. Vote 31:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A10-0056/2025 – Michal Wiezik – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Discharge decision adopted On the proposal for a discharge decision:513 for, 101 against, 39 abstained

    14:12

← Back to the decision