Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Discharge 2023: Agencies

106 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 13 amendments (2 adopted, 11 rejected) and 59 parts of the text voted on separately (30 adopted, 29 rejected).

Other votes · 31

31 votes
  1. Vote 1:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  2. Vote 2:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  3. Vote 3:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  4. Vote 4:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  5. Vote 5:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  6. Vote 6:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  7. Vote 7:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  8. Vote 8:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  9. Vote 9:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  10. Vote 10:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  11. Vote 11:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  12. Vote 12:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  13. Vote 13:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  14. Vote 14:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  15. Vote 15:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  16. Vote 16:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  17. Vote 17:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  18. Vote 18:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  19. Vote 19:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  20. Vote 20:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  21. Vote 21:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  22. Vote 22:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  23. Vote 23:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  24. Vote 24:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  25. Vote 26:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  26. Vote 27:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  27. Vote 28:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  28. Vote 29:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  29. Vote 30:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  30. Vote 31:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

  31. Vote 32:Proposals for decisions

    Adopted show of hands

· 3

  1. Vote 25:Final vote

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – Proposal for a decision on discharge (EUAA)

    Adopted 520 for, 126 against, 6 abstained

    13:59
  2. Vote 33:Final vote · the decisive vote

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – Proposal for a decision on discharge (Frontex)

    Discharge decision adopted On the proposal for a discharge decision:473 for, 120 against, 64 abstained

    14:00
  3. Vote 106:Final vote — text as a whole

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained

    14:08

· 59

59 votes on parts of the text: 30 adopted, 29 rejected
  1. Vote 34:Separate vote on paragraph 3

    Rejected show of hands

  2. Vote 35:Separate vote on paragraph 4

    Rejected show of hands

    Separate vote by EPP

  3. Vote 36:Separate vote on paragraph 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by EPP

  4. Vote 37:Separate vote on paragraph 7

    Adopted 350 for, 292 against, 14 abstained

  5. Vote 38:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7

    Rejected show of hands

  6. Vote 40:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9

    Rejected show of hands

  7. Vote 45:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 18

    Rejected show of hands

  8. Vote 47:Separate vote on paragraph 21

    Rejected show of hands

  9. Vote 49:Separate vote on paragraph 22

    Adopted 341 for, 285 against, 19 abstained

  10. Vote 50:Separate vote on paragraph 30

    Rejected show of hands

  11. Vote 51:Separate vote on paragraph 32

    Rejected show of hands

  12. Vote 52:Separate vote on paragraph 40

    Rejected show of hands

  13. Vote 53:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 41

    Rejected show of hands

  14. Vote 54:Separate vote on paragraph 52

    Rejected show of hands

  15. Vote 55:Separate vote on paragraph 54

    Rejected show of hands

  16. Vote 56:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 57

    Rejected 289 for, 364 against, 4 abstained

  17. Vote 57:Separate vote on paragraph 58

    Rejected show of hands

  18. Vote 59:Paragraph 82 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Notes with satisfaction that FRA provided fundamental rights analysis and expertise to support the activities and work of other EU justice and home affairs (JHA) agencies, including the EUAA, Frontex, Europol, the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL); welcomes FRA’s contributions in 2023 to advancing the respect for fundamental rights, including through guidance on Union funds and addressing challenges posed by new technologies;’

  19. Vote 60:Paragraph 82 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘calls on FRA to determine the extent to which the rule of law and fundamental rights are intrinsically linked, and how its work could be incorporated or developed in synergy with that of the European Commission in the framework of the annual Rule of Law Report;’

  20. Vote 61:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 82

    Rejected show of hands

  21. Vote 62:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 82

    Rejected show of hands

  22. Vote 64:Separate vote on paragraph 85

    Rejected show of hands

    Separate vote by Patriots

  23. Vote 65:Paragraph 92 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Welcomes the agencies’ efforts (EUROFOUND, CEDEFOP. ETF, EU EUOSHA, ELA) to implement policies on diversity and inclusiveness, particularly when it comes to persons with disabilities; encourages the agencies to enhance comparable data collection on the employment of persons with disabilities;’

  24. Vote 66:Paragraph 92 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘recognises the progress made within the Agencies towards gender balance within their staff: calls for further efforts to ensure gender balance also at the senior management level and to mainstream gender in all their activities;’

  25. Vote 67:Paragraph 94 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘Notes the increase in the EUAA’s budget in 2023 from EUR 168 million to EUR 170 million (+0,77 %) and its staff from 519 to 529 (+2 %);’

  26. Vote 68:Paragraph 94 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘reiterates the important role of the European Union Asylum Agency in supporting Member States with the implementation of the Common European Asylum System and monitoring its correct implementation;’

  27. Vote 69:Paragraph 94 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘recalls that in its 2022 European Union Agency for Asylum discharge report, the discharge authority highlighted concerns about the internal management and procedures of the Agency, noting that OLAF had initiated an investigation, which has now been concluded, allegedly involving nepotism and other issues affecting its financial management; regrets that the Agency's executive director avoided to provide answers during the discharge preparatory hearing in CONT Committee; is alarmed that the Board of the Agency refuses to disclose the contents and recommendation of the said OLAF report to the discharge authority; calls on the Agency to make findings of the report available immediately;’

  28. Vote 71:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 96

    Rejected 307 for, 314 against, 34 abstained

  29. Vote 72:Separate vote on paragraph 97

    Rejected show of hands

  30. Vote 74:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 102

    Rejected show of hands

  31. Vote 75:Separate vote on paragraph 105

    Rejected show of hands

  32. Vote 77:Separate vote on paragraph 108

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Patriots

  33. Vote 78:Separate vote on paragraph 110

    Rejected show of hands

  34. Vote 79:Paragraph 112 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Recalls that the agencies located in countries with relatively low correction coefficient are facing continuous challenges in attracting skilled and geographically diverse staff; calls on the Commission to analyse together with the respective Member State this matter’

  35. Vote 80:Paragraph 112 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘and consider the use of economic incentives to help mitigate the problem;’

  36. Vote 81:Paragraph 112 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘recalls, moreover, that the correction coefficient puts the general principle of equal treatment into practice;’

  37. Vote 82:Paragraph 113 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Highlights that some Agencies make extensive use of external consultants, mainly in the ICT area but also in the areas of their core business, which make up significant parts of their operational budget (e.g. ACER, ETF, ELA, etc.);’

  38. Vote 83:Paragraph 113 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘calls on all the agencies to prioritise permanent staff over external consultants and contractual staff in order to guarantee high quality working conditions and to prevent the loss of knowledge and experience; calls, moreover, on the agencies to prevent job uncertainty due to short term contracts and prioritise long-term employment; appeals, in this regard, for flexibility for agencies to convert seconded national expert (SNE) posts into temporary agent posts, ensuring expertise retention, operational functionality and business continuity;’

  39. Vote 84:Paragraph 113 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘further insists on avoiding the externalisation of tasks to consultancies when know-how is available in-house;’

  40. Vote 85:Paragraph 114 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘Recognises the progress made within the agencies towards gender balance among their staff;’

  41. Vote 86:Paragraph 114 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘calls for intensified efforts to ensure gender balance at the senior management level and to integrate gender equality systematically into all agency policies, procedures and activities;’

  42. Vote 87:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 114

    Adopted 308 for, 270 against, 78 abstained

  43. Vote 88:Paragraph 115 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Notes that gender distribution has improved in 2023 compared to 2022 at the level of senior and middle management and amongst the management board members; notes that the gender balance reported for staff overall did not change;’

  44. Vote 89:Paragraph 115 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘encourages ACER, BEREC Office, Cedefop, ECDC, ECHA, EFSA, EIOPA, EMCDDA, EMSA, ENISA, ERA, eu-LISA, ELA, Europol, EUAA, EUSPA and Frontex to support women in applying for management positions; reiterates its calls on the Commission and Member States to observe gender balance when nominating and appointing members of the management or administrative boards; recalls the ambition of the agencies to align with the Commission to reach a gender balance of 50 % at all levels of its management by the end of 2025; calls on the agencies to keep taking these aspects into consideration with regard to all future recruitment of staff and to work towards the further improvement of gender balance at senior management level;’

  45. Vote 90:Paragraph 116 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Urges decentralised agencies to strengthen gender equality policies at all levels, ensuring equal opportunities in recruitment, career progression and working conditions for all staff; encourages all agencies to adopt and implement robust diversity and inclusion strategies that promote fairness and balance, ensuring equal opportunities’

  46. Vote 91:Paragraph 116 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘and representation of women and minorities in leadership positions; calls on agencies to develop comprehensive strategies to assess progress and identify areas for improvement; recalls that the Parliament will assess compliance with these principles in the annual discharge process;’

  47. Vote 92:Paragraph 117 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Notes that all agencies have put in place measures to improve staff’s well-being at work and work-life balance; notes that the number and impact of such measures varies significantly from one agency to another and that no common framework of reference across agencies appears to exist; calls on the EUAN to coordinate efforts for the development of a common framework of reference in this this regard; notes with satisfaction that a large majority of agencies have put measures for integration of persons with disabilities in place; encourages the agencies to maintain good practices of staff well-being, inclusion and integration of persons with disabilities and to continue to address work-life balance, as well as lifelong learning and career development;’

  48. Vote 93:Paragraph 117 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘stresses the importance of intensifying efforts to achieve gender and geographical balance among institutional staff and in senior management positions;’

  49. Vote 94:Paragraph 117 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘underlines the useful role that exchanges of best practice can play in the field of staff management; invites the agencies to provide relevant and regular training to their staff;’

  50. Vote 95:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 119

    Adopted show of hands

  51. Vote 97:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 143

    Rejected show of hands

  52. Vote 98:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 157

    Rejected show of hands

  53. Vote 99:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 157

    Rejected show of hands

  54. Vote 100:Paragraph 163 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘Notes that ACER had been using interim workers performing long-term tasks to make up for a lack of directly employed staff members since 2019;’

  55. Vote 101:Paragraph 163 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘calls on the Commission to provide additional statutorily staff posts;’

  56. Vote 102:Vote on text inserted after citation 35

    Rejected 294 for, 360 against, 4 abstained

  57. Vote 103:Separate vote on recital A

    Rejected show of hands

  58. Vote 104:Separate vote on recital B

    Rejected show of hands

  59. Vote 105:Separate vote on recital C

    Rejected show of hands

· 13

  1. Vote 39:Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 8

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – After § 8 – Am 12

    Rejected 192 for, 454 against, 11 abstained

    14:01

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  2. Vote 41:Amendment 30 to paragraph 17

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 17 – Am 30

    Rejected 195 for, 459 against, 4 abstained

    14:01

    Roll call requested by ECR

  3. Vote 42:Amendment 14 to paragraph 18

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 18 – Am 14

    Rejected 192 for, 439 against, 5 abstained

    14:01

    Roll call requested by Greens, Patriots

  4. Vote 43:Amendment 31 to paragraph 18

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 18 – Am 31

    Rejected 194 for, 452 against, 3 abstained

    14:02

    Roll call requested by ECR

  5. Vote 44:Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 18

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – After § 18 – Am 15

    Rejected 213 for, 421 against, 7 abstained

    14:02

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  6. Vote 46:Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – After § 18 – Am 17

    Rejected 200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained

    14:02

    Roll call requested by Greens, Patriots

  7. Vote 48:Amendment 18 to paragraph 21

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 21 – Am 18

    Rejected 188 for, 448 against, 18 abstained

    14:02

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  8. Vote 58:Amendment 32 to paragraph 81

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 81 – Am 32

    Rejected 201 for, 452 against, 5 abstained

    14:03

    Roll call requested by ECR

  9. Vote 63:Amendment 33 to paragraph 85

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 85 – Am 33

    Rejected 200 for, 426 against, 16 abstained

    14:04

    Roll call requested by Greens

  10. Vote 70:Amendment 36 to paragraph 96

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 96 – Am 36

    Adopted 643 for, 11 against, 4 abstained

    14:05

    Roll call requested by Greens

  11. Vote 73:Amendment 27 to paragraph 102

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 102 – Am 27

    Adopted 345 for, 286 against, 23 abstained

    14:05

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  12. Vote 76:Amendment 34 to paragraph 108

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 108 – Am 34

    Rejected 200 for, 448 against, 8 abstained

    14:05

    Roll call requested by ECR

  13. Vote 96:Amendment 35 to paragraph 142

    A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – § 142 – Am 35

    Rejected 169 for, 446 against, 41 abstained

    14:07

    Roll call requested by Greens, ECR

← Back to the decision