Every vote on this decision
Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service
21 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 5 amendments (5 rejected) and 14 parts of the text voted on separately (10 adopted, 4 rejected).
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 2
-
Vote 1:Final vote · the decisive vote
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – Proposal for a decision
Discharge decision adopted On the proposal for a discharge decision:519 for, 126 against, 16 abstained
13:50 -
Vote 21:Final vote — text as a whole
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 475 for, 136 against, 53 abstained
13:52
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 14
-
Vote 2:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 4:Paragraph 8 — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Renew, The Left
The part voted on
‘Notes that, in 2023, the EEAS has faced growing political and financial challenges, as well as challenges with respect to Human Rights and the Rule of Law; notes that Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and its geopolitical consequences continued to be a key issue in 2023, leading the EEAS to ensure wide-range support for Ukraine, exert pressure on Russia and continue its global outreach to address the wider consequences of the war, including the implementation of the Action Plan on the geopolitical consequences of Russian aggression against Ukraine; acknowledges the EEAS's role in gathering evidence against EU-sanctioned Russian state-backed outlets and individuals involved in spreading disinformation and manipulating information to justify Russia's war of aggression; underlines the need to provide adequate resources to the Strategic Communication and Foresight division of the EEAS to effectively combat disinformation campaigns deployed as strategic tools by authoritarian and illiberal regimes; calls on the EEAS to reinforce the Union Delegations in the Eastern Partnership countries to support those countries heavily affected by Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine; notes that the financial ceiling of the European Peace Facility managed under the authority of the HR/VP was increased from EUR 5,6 million to more than EUR 12 million in 2023; calls on the EEAS to collaborate with DG ENEST to ensure effective oversight and monitoring of the projects funded by the Facility; notes that the reignited Israel-Palestine conflict following the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023 required the EEAS to engage in intense diplomatic efforts, encourage Union institutions to urge regional de-escalation, respond to humanitarian needs and support regional peace efforts; emphasises that Union and EEAS assistance must align with broader human rights and peace objectives in the region, with strong safeguards in place to ensure that the funds do not, either directly or indirectly, support terrorist or violent activities;’
-
Vote 5:Paragraph 8 — part 2 of 3
Adopted 384 for, 233 against, 32 abstained
Split vote by Renew, The Left
‘emphasises that Union funding for the reconstruction of Gaza should only commence once all hostages taken by Hamas have been released;’
-
Vote 6:Paragraph 8 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Renew, The Left
The part voted on
‘emphasises the importance of transparency in the allocation of financial resources in third countries to ensure accountability in the use of the Union budget and the new financial instruments;’
-
Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 10
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 11:Separate vote on paragraph 10
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 12:Separate vote on paragraph 31
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 13:Paragraph 31 — part 2
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 31/2
Adopted 412 for, 152 against, 84 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 14:Paragraph 33 — part 1
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 33/1
Adopted 457 for, 88 against, 98 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
‘Recalls the dire situation of women’s rights and LGBTQI+ rights in many parts of the world; stresses the urgent need to better protect these rights;’
-
Vote 15:Separate vote on paragraph 33
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 16:Separate vote on paragraph 40
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 17:Paragraph 40 — part 2
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 40/2
Adopted 415 for, 133 against, 96 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 18:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 48
Adopted 318 for, 269 against, 70 abstained
-
Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 53
Rejected show of hands
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 5
-
Vote 3:Amendment 5 to paragraph 8
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 8 – Am 5
Rejected 310 for, 339 against, 14 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by S&D
-
Vote 7:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 9
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – After § 9 – Am 3
Rejected 143 for, 455 against, 64 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by ESN, S&D
-
Vote 9:Amendment 1 to paragraph 10
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 10 – Am 1
Rejected 231 for, 384 against, 40 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 10:Amendment 6 to paragraph 10
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 10 – Am 6
Rejected 271 for, 290 against, 90 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by S&D
-
Vote 20:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 82
A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – After § 82 – Am 4
Rejected 187 for, 465 against, 12 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by ESN