Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

, Climate & environment

Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicals

Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For
481
Against
170
Abstained
22

roll-call vote at 13:09 · 71% of votes cast in favour

Committee report by Dimitris Tsiodras · · Report A-10-2025-0018

AI:What this decision does

The proposal establishes a common data platform on chemicals and a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicals, making data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable.§1: source passage in the text Parliament adopted its position on the law, endorsing the proposal with amendments. Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends or replaces its proposal.§1: source passage in the text

Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem

How the groups voted

For: The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP; Against: ECR, Patriots, ESN

  • The Left For 43 for, 0 against, 1 abstainedof 47
  • Greens For 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 54
  • S&D For 127 for, 1 against, 0 abstainedof 137
  • Renew For 70 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 76
  • EPP For 174 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 193
  • ECR Against 2 for, 67 against, 10 abstainedof 80
  • Patriots Against 0 for, 71 against, 8 abstainedof 91
  • ESN Against 0 for, 24 against, 0 abstainedof 27
  • No group not a group 15 for, 7 against, 3 abstainedof 28

Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs

A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.

Did not vote with their group

22 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).

Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.

Find an MEP

Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.

How each of the 673 MEPs voted →

How it got here

Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

All 2 votes on this decision →

Go deeper