Every vote on this decision
European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025
39 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 16 amendments (16 rejected) and 22 parts of the text voted on separately (17 adopted, 5 rejected).
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 22
22 votes on parts of the text: 17 adopted, 5 rejected
-
Vote 1:Paragraph 3 — part 1 of 2
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘Notes the Commission’s commitment to ensure that the European Semester drives policy coordination for competitiveness, sustainability and social fairness, as well as the integration of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the European pillar of social rights;’
-
Vote 3:Paragraph 3 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
‘notes that the European Green Deal remains a core deliverable for the Commission;’
-
Vote 4:Paragraph 3 — part 2
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 3/2
Adopted 465 for, 187 against, 16 abstained
12:07Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
‘notes that the European Green Deal remains a core deliverable for the Commission;’
-
Vote 7:Separate vote on paragraph 5
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 9:Paragraph 8 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
Text as a whole without the words: ‘including the European pillar of social rights’
-
Vote 10:Paragraph 8 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 12:Paragraph 10 — part 1
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 10/1
Adopted 525 for, 129 against, 19 abstained
12:08Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘Highlights the need to create fiscal buffers to address fiscal sustainability challenges, ensuring sufficient resources for investment and for dealing with potential future shocks and crises;’
-
Vote 13:Paragraph 10 — part 2
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 10/2
Adopted 535 for, 72 against, 71 abstained
12:09Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
‘stresses the importance of promoting competitive, sustainable and inclusive growth in supporting long-term fiscal stability and resilience;’
-
Vote 14:Separate vote on paragraph 15
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 22
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 29
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 21:Paragraph 29 — part 2
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 29/2
Adopted 487 for, 137 against, 49 abstained
12:10Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 23:Separate vote on paragraph 32
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 24:Paragraph 32 — part 2
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 32/2
Adopted 529 for, 132 against, 17 abstained
12:10Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 25:Separate vote on paragraph 35
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 26:Paragraph 35 — part 2
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 35/2
Adopted 501 for, 164 against, 14 abstained
12:11Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘believes that this framework, where appropriate, should be strengthened by EU-level investment instruments and tools designed to minimise the cost for EU taxpayers and maximise efficiency in the provision of European public goods;’
-
Vote 29:Separate vote on paragraph 38
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 31:Recital E — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
Text as a whole without the words: ‘including the European pillar of social rights’
-
Vote 32:Recital E — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 35:Recital N — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas the new Commission has set the goal of being an ‘investment Commission’; whereas discussions on addressing the significant investment gap and reducing borrowing costs are needed in the EU;’
-
Vote 36:Recital N — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas the framework, where appropriate, should be strengthened by EU-level investment instruments and tools designed to minimise the cost for EU taxpayers and maximise efficiency in the provision of European public goods;’
-
Vote 37:Separate vote on recital P
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ECR
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 16
16 amendment votes: 16 rejected
-
Vote 2:Amendment 15 to paragraph 3 — part 2
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 3 – Am 15/2
Rejected 188 for, 460 against, 19 abstained
12:07Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘regrets that, despite its negative impact on the European economy, industry and competitiveness, the European Green Deal remains a core deliverable for the Commission;’
-
Vote 5:Amendment 3 to paragraph 4
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 4 – Am 3
Rejected 115 for, 508 against, 46 abstained
12:07Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 6:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 4 – Am 4
Rejected 139 for, 392 against, 139 abstained
12:08Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 8:Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 5 – Am 5
Rejected 112 for, 531 against, 29 abstained
12:08Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 11:Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 9 – Am 6
Rejected 122 for, 506 against, 51 abstained
12:08Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 15:Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 21
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 21 – Am 7
Rejected 109 for, 556 against, 13 abstained
12:09Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 16:Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 21 – Am 8
Rejected 138 for, 378 against, 159 abstained
12:09Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 18:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 23
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 23 – Am 9
Rejected 115 for, 543 against, 21 abstained
12:09Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 19:Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 23
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 23 – Am 10
Rejected 74 for, 521 against, 82 abstained
12:10Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 22:Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 31
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 31 – Am 11
Rejected 103 for, 531 against, 44 abstained
12:10Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 27:Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 35
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 35 – Am 12
Rejected 122 for, 504 against, 50 abstained
12:11Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 28:Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 35
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 35 – Am 14
Rejected 172 for, 473 against, 37 abstained
12:11Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 30:Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 41
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After § 41 – Am 20
Rejected 175 for, 463 against, 42 abstained
12:11Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 33:Amendment 1, adding text after recital F
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After recital F – Am 1
Rejected 175 for, 484 against, 22 abstained
12:12Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 34:Amendment 13, adding text after recital K
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After recital K – Am 13
Rejected 139 for, 471 against, 53 abstained
12:12Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 38:Amendment 2, adding text after recital P
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – After recital P – Am 2
Rejected 129 for, 499 against, 55 abstained
12:13Roll call requested by Patriots, The Left
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 39:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 469 for, 162 against, 54 abstained
12:13