Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law., EU budget & funds
Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme
Adopted by a large majority
Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
- For
- 472
- Against
- 75
- Abstained
- 92
roll-call vote at 13:03 · 74% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by Christian Ehler · Report A-10-2025-0021
AI:What this decision does
Parliament adopted a resolution assessing the implementation of Horizon Europe and setting out recommendations for the next EU research framework programme.§1: source passage in the text The text calls for a simpler, science-driven programme with a budget of at least EUR 220 billion, and for putting researchers and innovators in the driving seat.§2: source passage in the text The resolution is Parliament's official position, which it will feed into the interim evaluation and the design of the 10th Framework Programme.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR; Abstained: Patriots; Divided: The Left, ESN
- The Left Divided 4 for, 28 against, 11 abstainedof 47
- Greens For 46 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 122 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 137
- Renew For 67 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 76
- EPP For 163 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 193
- ECR For 58 for, 8 against, 4 abstainedof 80
- Patriots Abstained 7 for, 13 against, 61 abstainedof 91
- ESN Divided 0 for, 14 against, 8 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 5 for, 12 against, 8 abstainedof 29
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
32 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
ECR voted for (58 of 70). Against: 8, Abstained: 4
Anna Zalewska (Poland, abstained), Beatrice Timgren (Sweden, against), Charlie Weimers (Sweden, against), Dick Erixon (Sweden, against), Dominik Tarczyński (Poland, abstained)
7 more from ECR
Geadis Geadi (Cyprus, abstained), Jaak Madison (Estonia, against), Jadwiga Wiśniewska (Poland, abstained), Kristoffer Storm (Denmark, against), Maciej Wąsik (Poland, against), Sebastian Tynkkynen (Finland, against), Waldemar Buda (Poland, against)
Patriots abstained (61 of 81). For: 7, Against: 13
Anders Vistisen (Denmark, against), Elisabeth Dieringer (Austria, against), Gerald Hauser (Austria, against), Harald Vilimsky (Austria, against), Hermann Tertsch (Spain, against)
15 more from Patriots
Jana Nagyová (Czechia, for), Jaroslav Bžoch (Czechia, for), Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová (Czechia, for), Jorge Buxadé Villalba (Spain, against), Jorge Martín Frías (Spain, against), Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal (Spain, against), Klara Dostalova (Czechia, for), Margarita De La Pisa Carrión (Spain, against), Mireia Borrás Pabón (Spain, against), Ondřej Knotek (Czechia, for), Ondřej Kovařík (Czechia, for), Petra Steger (Austria, against), Roman Haider (Austria, against), Tomáš Kubín (Czechia, for), Vilis Krištopans (Latvia, against)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected).