Every vote on this decision
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections
152 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 75 amendments (14 adopted, 61 rejected) and 76 parts of the text voted on separately (62 adopted, 10 rejected, 4 lapsed).
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 75
75 amendment votes: 14 adopted, 61 rejected
-
Vote 1:Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 3
Rejected 46 for, 600 against, 8 abstained
13:20Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 2:Amendment 4, adding text before paragraph 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 4
Rejected 109 for, 444 against, 96 abstained
13:20Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 3:Amendment 5, adding text before paragraph 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 5
Rejected 118 for, 512 against, 16 abstained
13:21Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 4:Amendment 6, adding text before paragraph 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 6
Rejected 163 for, 414 against, 69 abstained
13:21Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 5:Amendment 7, adding text before paragraph 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 7
Rejected 78 for, 554 against, 16 abstained
13:21Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 9:Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 4
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 4 – Am 53
Rejected 215 for, 331 against, 108 abstained
13:21Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 12:Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 5
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 5 – Am 54
Rejected 142 for, 462 against, 44 abstained
13:22Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 16:Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 13
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 13 – Am 18
Adopted 379 for, 231 against, 34 abstained
13:22Roll call requested by Members
-
Vote 19:Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 15
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 42
Rejected 167 for, 437 against, 42 abstained
13:23Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 20:Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 15
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 55
Rejected 117 for, 512 against, 24 abstained
13:23Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 21:Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 15
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 56
Rejected 121 for, 501 against, 31 abstained
13:23Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 22:Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 15
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 57
Rejected 105 for, 486 against, 42 abstained
13:23Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 23:Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 15
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 58
Rejected 134 for, 454 against, 49 abstained
13:24Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 24:Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 15
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 59
Rejected 115 for, 506 against, 22 abstained
13:24Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 25:Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 15
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 60
Rejected 106 for, 466 against, 65 abstained
13:24Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 26:Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 15
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 61
Rejected 99 for, 522 against, 26 abstained
13:24Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 28:Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 27 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 27 – Am 21/1
Rejected 192 for, 437 against, 23 abstained
13:24Roll call requested by Patriots, EPP · split vote by EPP
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘Condemns’, ‘which’, ‘inexplicable and devastating’, ‘highlights in that regard, that the use and accountability of Union funds has been transparent for decades at Hungarian universities;’ and ‘calls on the Commission to immediately withdraw its discriminative decision;’
-
Vote 32:Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 34
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 8
Rejected 199 for, 410 against, 29 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 33:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 34
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 9
Rejected 176 for, 389 against, 86 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 34:Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 34
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 10
Rejected 159 for, 376 against, 114 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 35:Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 34
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 11
Rejected 222 for, 310 against, 117 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 36:Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 34
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 12
Rejected 178 for, 383 against, 89 abstained
13:26Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 41:Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 35 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 35 – Am 22/1
Rejected 190 for, 454 against, 7 abstained
13:26Roll call requested by Patriots, EPP · split vote by EPP
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘Highlights that the Hungarian government conducted a series of negotiations with the Commission in order for Hungary to be able to access the cohesion funds it is rightfully entitled to; notes that, as a result of that dialogue, Hungary undertook to fulfil a package of measures; condemns the fact that the Commission is imposing more and more conditions to transfer development funds to Hungary;’, ‘and that the Commission disburse the financial resources immediately’ and ‘and to stop the politically selected ideological blackmailing of Member States.’
-
Vote 42:Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 35 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 35 – Am 22/2
Rejected 178 for, 450 against, 19 abstained
13:26Roll call requested by Patriots, EPP · split vote by EPP
those words
-
Vote 43:Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 40
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 40 – Am 62
Rejected 176 for, 406 against, 69 abstained
13:27Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 50:Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 43 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 43 – Am 23/1
Rejected 200 for, 426 against, 11 abstained
13:27Roll call requested by Patriots, EPP · split vote by EPP
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘Condemns the fact that in December 2022 the Commission decided to exclude Hungarian universities, students, teachers and researchers from mobility programmes;’ and ‘regrets that the realisation of that goal is obviously opposed by Union decisions that exclude the vast majority of students from a Member State from mobility; calls on the Commission to immediately withdraw its discriminative decision;’
-
Vote 51:Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 43 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 43 – Am 23/2
Rejected 180 for, 452 against, 15 abstained
13:28Roll call requested by Patriots, EPP · split vote by EPP
those words
-
Vote 54:Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 44
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 44 – Am 24
Rejected 195 for, 439 against, 13 abstained
13:28Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 57:Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 45
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 45 – Am 25
Rejected 212 for, 414 against, 24 abstained
13:29Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 62:Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 50
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 50 – Am 13
Rejected 271 for, 330 against, 51 abstained
13:29Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 63:Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 50
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 50 – Am 14
Rejected 206 for, 408 against, 37 abstained
13:29Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 66:Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 51
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 51 – Am 43
Rejected 183 for, 449 against, 15 abstained
13:30Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 74:Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 56
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 56 – Am 26
Adopted 293 for, 285 against, 68 abstained
13:31Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 75:Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 57
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 57 – Am 27
Adopted 330 for, 275 against, 36 abstained
13:31Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 78:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 61
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 61 – Am 2
Rejected 197 for, 395 against, 57 abstained
13:31Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 81:Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 62
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 62 – Am 29
Rejected 198 for, 293 against, 149 abstained
13:32Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 82:Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 62
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 62 – Am 44
Rejected 158 for, 448 against, 37 abstained
13:32Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 95:Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 63
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 30
Rejected 212 for, 303 against, 124 abstained
13:33Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 96:Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 63
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 45
Adopted 329 for, 297 against, 15 abstained
13:33Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 97:Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 63 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 31/1
Rejected 196 for, 438 against, 6 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by Patriots, EPP · split vote by EPP
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘regrets that’ and ‘the European Court of Justice imposed a fine on it for not letting migrants enter Hungary before a final decision is made on their application; requests that the Commission use part of the EUR 2 billion due for border protection for Hungary to finance the fine imposed on Hungary by the European Court of Justice.’
-
Vote 98:Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 63 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 31/2
Rejected 169 for, 461 against, 19 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by Patriots, EPP · split vote by EPP
those words
-
Vote 99:Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 63
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 64
Rejected 154 for, 433 against, 65 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 100:Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 64
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 64 – Am 32
Adopted 330 for, 295 against, 22 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 101:Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 64
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 64 – Am 33
Rejected 191 for, 454 against, 5 abstained
13:35Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 102:Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 64
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 64 – Am 34
Rejected 192 for, 455 against, 3 abstained
13:35Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 103:Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 64
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 64 – Am 46
Adopted 326 for, 293 against, 17 abstained
13:35Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 104:Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 66
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 66 – Am 15
Rejected 73 for, 558 against, 17 abstained
13:35Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 106:Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 68
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 68 – Am 65
Rejected 74 for, 482 against, 94 abstained
13:35Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 111:Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 75
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 75 – Am 1
Rejected 280 for, 304 against, 51 abstained
13:36Roll call requested by EPP
-
Vote 112:Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 75
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 75 – Am 37
Rejected 192 for, 420 against, 26 abstained
13:36Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 113:Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 75
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 75 – Am 69
Adopted 333 for, 267 against, 37 abstained
13:36Roll call requested by Members
-
Vote 117:Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 76
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 76 – Am 47
Rejected 121 for, 468 against, 48 abstained
13:37Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 123:Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 79
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 79 – Am 38
Rejected 176 for, 449 against, 19 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 124:Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 79
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 79 – Am 39
Rejected 168 for, 432 against, 32 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 127:Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 87
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 87 – Am 72
Rejected 110 for, 460 against, 76 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 128:Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 87
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 87 – Am 73
Rejected 127 for, 473 against, 29 abstained
13:39Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 130:Amendment 50 to paragraph 89 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 89 – Am 50/1
Adopted 504 for, 94 against, 30 abstained
13:39Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by EPP, S&D, Greens
The part voted on
‘Reiterates Parliament’s priorities for the forthcoming financial year, namely, focusing Parliament’s budget to deliver on its core functions of co-legislator, acting as one arm of the budgetary authority, representing citizens and scrutinising the work of other institutions,’
-
Vote 131:Amendment 50 to paragraph 89 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 89 – Am 50/2
Rejected 231 for, 387 against, 23 abstained
13:39Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by EPP, S&D, Greens
deletion of the words ‘and the implementation of EU legislation’
-
Vote 132:Amendment 50 to paragraph 89 — part 3
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 89 – Am 50/3
Adopted 500 for, 110 against, 40 abstained
13:40Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by EPP, S&D, Greens
The part voted on
‘as well as providing the resources for cyber-security and IT development and priority projects on engaging with citizens, green Parliament promoting the saving of resources and an accessible Parliament, fully respecting gender equality;’ without the word ‘fully’
-
Vote 133:Amendment 50 to paragraph 89 — part 4
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 89 – Am 50/4
Adopted 300 for, 299 against, 45 abstained
13:40Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by EPP, S&D, Greens
‘fully’
-
Vote 134:Amendment 19 to paragraph 90, After point d
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 90, After point d – Am 19
Rejected 291 for, 322 against, 39 abstained
13:40Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 135:Amendment 20 to paragraph 90, point e
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 90, point e – Am 20
Adopted 327 for, 309 against, 13 abstained
13:40Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 139:Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 90
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 90 – Am 74
Rejected 178 for, 442 against, 30 abstained
13:41Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 140:Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 90
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 90 – Am 75
Rejected 79 for, 526 against, 37 abstained
13:41Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 141:Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 90
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 90 – Am 76
Rejected 85 for, 526 against, 35 abstained
13:41Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 142:Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 67/1
Rejected 284 for, 289 against, 79 abstained
13:41Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D
‘Highlights that subcontracting cleaning, catering, crèches and travel agency services puts people, mainly women, in an extremely vulnerable position;’
-
Vote 143:Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 67/2
Rejected 107 for, 536 against, 12 abstained
13:42Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D
‘calls for the internalisation of cleaning, catering, crèches and travel agency staff as soon as possible;’
-
Vote 144:Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 68/1
Adopted 520 for, 66 against, 54 abstained
13:43Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D, Greens
‘Notes with concern the decision of the company managing the Parliament crèche in Brussels to terminate its contract’
-
Vote 145:Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 68/2
Rejected 85 for, 500 against, 58 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D, Greens
The part voted on
‘in advance in order to sign a new one for a higher amount; considers that the budget of the European Parliament should not finance the profits of a private company;’
-
Vote 146:Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 3
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 68/3
Adopted 500 for, 62 against, 81 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D, Greens
The part voted on
‘highlights that the continuous changes of contractors bring uncertainty for the staff, the children and their parents and increase health and safety risks; calls for Parliament to ensure the proper functioning of the crèche protecting the staff, ensuring decent working conditions and fair remuneration, and the quality of the services’
-
Vote 147:Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 4
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 68/4
Rejected 216 for, 389 against, 39 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D, Greens
‘and to take the necessary steps to allow for the crèche staff to be directly employed by Parliament;’
-
Vote 148:Amendment 16 to paragraph 92
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 92 – Am 16
Rejected 255 for, 314 against, 80 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 149:Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 92 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 92 – Am 17/1
Adopted 349 for, 68 against, 230 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D
‘Calls for better working conditions and pay for workers in crèches, catering, security, interpretation and translation’
-
Vote 150:Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 92 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 92 – Am 17/2
Rejected 139 for, 481 against, 29 abstained
13:45Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D
‘by bringing them in-house and making them permanent European Parliament staff as soon as possible;’
-
Vote 151:Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 98
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 98 – Am 77
Rejected 134 for, 484 against, 29 abstained
13:45Roll call requested by The Left
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 76
76 votes on parts of the text: 62 adopted, 10 rejected, 4 lapsed or other
-
Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 1
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 7:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 8:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 10:Separate vote on paragraph 5
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 11:Paragraph 5 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 5/2
Adopted 417 for, 205 against, 27 abstained
13:22Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 13:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 14:Separate vote on paragraph 11
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ESN
-
Vote 15:Separate vote on paragraph 12
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 12
Adopted 482 for, 145 against, 22 abstained
13:22Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 14
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ESN
-
Vote 18:Separate vote on paragraph 15
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 15
Adopted 376 for, 207 against, 64 abstained
13:23Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 27:Separate vote on paragraph 21
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Patriots
-
Vote 29:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 27
Lapsed no count
-
Vote 30:Separate vote on paragraph 31
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 31
Adopted 536 for, 82 against, 24 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 31:Separate vote on paragraph 33
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Patriots
-
Vote 37:Paragraph 35 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and all Member States’ and ‘in parallel to the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility;’
-
Vote 38:Paragraph 35 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 39:Paragraph 36 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and calls on Member States to prevent delays caused by a lack of administrative capacity at all levels of governance;’
-
Vote 40:Paragraph 36 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 44:Separate vote on paragraph 41
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 45:Paragraph 41 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 41/2
Adopted 623 for, 10 against, 18 abstained
13:27Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘stresses that the Union should find the resources to express solidarity by supporting the areas, citizens and companies affected by the recent devastating floods in Central and Eastern Europe in September 2024;’
-
Vote 46:Separate vote on paragraph 42
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
-
Vote 52:Separate vote on paragraph 44
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 53:Paragraph 44 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 44/2
Adopted 620 for, 15 against, 13 abstained
13:28Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 55:Paragraph 45 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 45/1
Adopted 514 for, 83 against, 52 abstained
13:28Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and the LGBTQI+ community,’
-
Vote 56:Paragraph 45 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 45/2
Adopted 495 for, 129 against, 23 abstained
13:28Roll call requested by Patriots, ECR · split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 58:Paragraph 46 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 46/1
Adopted 511 for, 94 against, 41 abstained
13:29Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
‘Demands an increase of the support to the Turkish-Cypriot line by EUR 1 million above DB’
-
Vote 59:Separate vote on paragraph 46
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 60:Paragraph 49 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation’
-
Vote 61:Paragraph 49 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 64:Separate vote on paragraph 51
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 65:Paragraph 51 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 51/2
Adopted 606 for, 20 against, 26 abstained
13:30Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 67:Separate vote on paragraph 52
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 52
Adopted 589 for, 21 against, 39 abstained
13:30Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 68:Separate vote on paragraph 53
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 53
Adopted 610 for, 7 against, 23 abstained
13:30Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 69:Separate vote on paragraph 54
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 70:Paragraph 54 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 54/2
Adopted 576 for, 61 against, 17 abstained
13:30Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 71:Paragraph 55 — part 1
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 55/1
Adopted 622 for, 13 against, 16 abstained
13:30Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘Recalls the economic, social and environmental relevance of fisheries, aquaculture and maritime affairs and the specific economic challenges faced by the small-scale, artisanal and coastal fishing sector; stresses the strategic role of fisheries and the related sectors in this regard’
-
Vote 72:Paragraph 55 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘Recalls the economic, social and environmental relevance of fisheries, aquaculture and maritime affairs and the specific economic challenges faced by the small-scale, artisanal and coastal fishing sector; stresses the strategic role of fisheries and the related sectors in this regard’
-
Vote 73:Paragraph 55 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘and expresses concern over the lack of clarity over the consequences of the Commission proposal to cut the budget of the EMFAF; insists that special attention must be devoted to the fishing fleets in order to improve safety, working conditions, energy efficiency and environmental sustainability,’
-
Vote 76:Paragraph 61 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left · separate vote by ESN, Patriots
The part voted on
‘Stresses that the smooth and efficient implementation of the Union’s migration and asylum policy by Member States is key to ensuring the security of the Union and preserving the free movement of people within the Union;’
-
Vote 77:Paragraph 61 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left · separate vote by ESN, Patriots
The part voted on
‘insists that the Union’s migration and asylum policy should be governed by the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, including its financial implications, between the Member States as enshrined in Article 80 of the TEU, and in respect for fundamental rights, in line with Union values and international commitments;’
-
Vote 79:Separate vote on paragraph 62
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 80:Separate vote on paragraph 62
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 62
Adopted 432 for, 191 against, 24 abstained
13:32Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 83:Paragraph 63 — part 1 of 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘Underlines the importance for Member States to comply with their commitments, including upholding the right to asylum, and ensuring effective, humane and fair management and protection of the EU’s external borders, as well as effective, safe and dignified reception, integration and return and readmission procedures;’ without the words ‘including upholding the right to asylum,’ ‘and protection of the EU’s external borders’ and ‘and return and readmission procedures’
-
Vote 84:Paragraph 63 — part 2 of 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘including upholding the right to asylum,’
-
Vote 85:Paragraph 63 — part 3 of 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘and protection of the EU’s external borders’
-
Vote 86:Paragraph 63 — part 4 of 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘and return and readmission procedures’
-
Vote 87:Paragraph 63 — part 5 of 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘underlines the need to better protect vulnerable people from smuggling and trafficking networks and address the negative effects of the instrumentalisation of migrants as part of hybrid attacks, notably by pro-Russian forces; recalls the crucial role the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (BMVI) play in this regard’ excluding the words ‘and address the negative effects of the instrumentalisation of migrants as part of hybrid attacks, notably by pro-Russian forces;’ and ‘and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (BMVI)’
-
Vote 88:Paragraph 63 — part 6 of 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘and address the negative effects of the instrumentalisation of migrants as part of hybrid attacks, notably by pro-Russian forces;’
-
Vote 89:Paragraph 63 — part 7 of 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (BMVI)’
-
Vote 90:Paragraph 63 — part 8
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 63/8
Adopted 620 for, 13 against, 15 abstained
13:33Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘in particular supporting Member States with’
-
Vote 91:Paragraph 63 — part 9
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 63/9
Adopted 506 for, 111 against, 18 abstained
13:33Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘reinforced border protection capabilities including physical infrastructure, buildings, equipment, systems and services required at border crossing points,’
-
Vote 92:Paragraph 63 — part 8 of 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘in particular supporting Member States with’
-
Vote 93:Paragraph 63 — part 11
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 63/11
Adopted 483 for, 116 against, 49 abstained
13:33Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘as well as meeting the requirements of reception conditions for asylum seekers and migrants;’
-
Vote 94:Paragraph 63 — part 9 of 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘reinforced border protection capabilities including physical infrastructure, buildings, equipment, systems and services required at border crossing points,’
-
Vote 105:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 67
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 107:Paragraph 75 — part 1 of 3
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots, Members
The part voted on
‘Stresses the importance of the Southern Neighbourhood line in supporting political, economic and social reforms in the region taking into consideration the increasing humanitarian needs in the region as well as other purposes of regional cooperation in providing assistance to refugees, in particular Syrian and Palestinian refugees, and in enabling support along the southern migration routes;’
-
Vote 108:Paragraph 75 — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR, Patriots, Members
The part voted on
‘proposes to increase appropriations for the line by EUR 60 million above the DB, including to reinforce funding for UNRWA based on EU regulations and values;’ without the words ‘including to reinforce funding for UNRWA’
-
Vote 109:Paragraph 75 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots, Members
‘including to reinforce funding for UNRWA’
-
Vote 110:Paragraph 75 — part 3
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 75/3
Adopted 367 for, 224 against, 54 abstained
13:36Split vote by ECR, Patriots, Members
‘including to reinforce funding for UNRWA’
-
Vote 114:Paragraph 76 — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘Underlines that the war continues to have significant effects on countries in the Eastern Neighbourhood, such as the Republic of Moldova, that have provided shelter and assistance to refugees fleeing the war and faced the knock-on effects of sky-high inflation and energy prices; stresses the need for targeted financial and technical assistance to help these countries stabilise their economies and strengthen public infrastructure amidst these pressures;’
-
Vote 115:Paragraph 76 — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘underlines the importance of sustained support for candidate countries in implementing the necessary accession-related reforms and in enhancing their resilience and preventing and countering hybrid threats; decides, therefore, to increase appropriations by EUR 50 million above the DB for the Eastern Neighbourhood to address these complex challenges;’
-
Vote 116:Paragraph 76 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘decides, therefore, to increase appropriations by EUR 50 million above the DB for the Eastern Neighbourhood to address these complex challenges; proposes, furthermore, to increase accession-related support under the Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA III) by EUR 3 million in 2025 to accelerate the reform process, enhance resilience, and ensure a smooth transition towards EU standards;’
-
Vote 118:Paragraph 78 — part 1 of 2
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘sexual and reproductive health’, ‘and LGBTIQ+ rights’ and ‘and to further reinforce the work on these aspects by civil society organisations, human rights defenders and journalists,’
-
Vote 119:Paragraph 78 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
‘sexual and reproductive health’
-
Vote 120:Paragraph 78 — part 2
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 78/2
Adopted 462 for, 123 against, 49 abstained
13:37Split vote by ECR, Patriots
‘sexual and reproductive health’
-
Vote 121:Paragraph 78 — part 3
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 78/3
Adopted 452 for, 142 against, 49 abstained
13:38Split vote by ECR, Patriots
‘and LGBTIQ+ rights’
-
Vote 122:Paragraph 78 — part 4
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 78/4
Adopted 502 for, 68 against, 77 abstained
13:38Split vote by ECR, Patriots
‘and to further reinforce the work on these aspects by civil society organisations, human rights defenders and journalists,’
-
Vote 125:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 82
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 126:Separate vote on paragraph 84
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 129:Separate vote on paragraph 88
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 88
Adopted 498 for, 121 against, 24 abstained
13:39Roll call requested by EPP
-
Vote 136:Paragraph 90, point f — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP
Text as a whole without the words: ‘including outreach in the languages of linguistic minorities and communities, where appropriate;’
-
Vote 137:Paragraph 90, point f — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP
those words
-
Vote 138:Separate vote on paragraph 90, point g
Adopted 449 for, 177 against, 18 abstained
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 152:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)
Resolution rejected On the resolution that accompanies the budget position:233 for, 360 against, 59 abstained
13:45