Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Discharge 2022: EU general budget – European Council and Council

6 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 adopted) and 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted).

· 2

  1. Vote 1:Final vote

    A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Proposal for a decision

    Adopted 539 for, 26 against, 29 abstained

    13:12
  2. Vote 6:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Motion for a resolution

    Discharge decision adopted On the proposal for a discharge decision:435 for, 92 against, 77 abstained

    13:13

· 1

  1. Vote 2:Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 16

    A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – After § 16 – Am 1

    Adopted 485 for, 83 against, 29 abstained

    13:12

    Roll call requested by Renew

· 3

  1. Vote 3:Paragraph 24 — part 1

    A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 24/1

    Adopted 446 for, 143 against, 16 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by ID · split vote by ID

    The part voted on

    ‘Notes that the use of the unanimity voting procedure in the Council on certain policy areas can negatively affect the Union’s decision-making process and therefore making it prone to blackmailing by Member States, especially those who fail to respect the rule of law;’

  2. Vote 4:Paragraph 24 — part 2

    A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 24/2

    Adopted 420 for, 155 against, 20 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by ID · split vote by ID

    ‘calls on the Council to apply the qualified majority voting procedures whenever provided by the Treaties;’

  3. Vote 5:Paragraph 24 — part 3

    A9-0071/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 24/3

    Adopted 392 for, 172 against, 28 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by ID · split vote by ID

    ‘notes that a shift to a qualified majority voting procedure in the Council may be one avenue towards more efficient policy-making;’

← Back to the decision