Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)

30 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 adopted) and 22 parts of the text voted on separately (9 adopted, 5 rejected, 8 lapsed).

Other votes · 5

  1. Vote 1:Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively

    Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively

    Adopted show of hands

  2. Vote 2:Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote

    Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote

    Adopted show of hands

  3. Vote 3:Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote

    Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote

    Adopted show of hands

  4. Vote 4:Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote

    Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote

    Adopted show of hands

  5. Vote 6:Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote

    Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote

    Adopted show of hands

· 2

  1. Vote 5:Amendment 48

    A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 48

    Adopted 466 for, 129 against, 15 abstained

    13:37

    Roll call requested by Greens

  2. Vote 7:Amendment 145

    A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 145

    Adopted 454 for, 110 against, 44 abstained

    13:37

    Roll call requested by Greens

· 22

22 votes on parts of the text: 9 adopted, 5 rejected, 8 lapsed or other

  1. Vote 8:Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2, point k

    Adopted 318 for, 280 against, 4 abstained

  2. Vote 9:Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2, point k

    Lapsed show of hands

  3. Vote 10:Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point h

    Adopted show of hands

  4. Vote 11:Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point h

    Lapsed show of hands

  5. Vote 12:Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, after point h

    Adopted show of hands

  6. Vote 13:Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, after point h

    Lapsed show of hands

  7. Vote 14:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3

    Adopted show of hands

  8. Vote 15:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3

    Lapsed show of hands

  9. Vote 16:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3

    Adopted show of hands

  10. Vote 17:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3

    Lapsed show of hands

  11. Vote 18:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3

    Lapsed show of hands

  12. Vote 19:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3

    Adopted show of hands

  13. Vote 20:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3

    Lapsed show of hands

  14. Vote 21:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3

    Rejected show of hands

  15. Vote 22:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3

    Adopted show of hands

  16. Vote 23:Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 4

    Adopted show of hands

  17. Vote 24:Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 2

    Rejected show of hands

  18. Vote 25:Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1

    Rejected show of hands

  19. Vote 26:Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2

    Rejected show of hands

  20. Vote 27:Separate vote on recital 32

    Adopted show of hands

  21. Vote 28:Separate vote on recital 32

    Lapsed no count

  22. Vote 29:Vote on text inserted after recital 68

    Rejected 209 for, 315 against, 80 abstained

· 1

  1. Vote 30:Final vote · the decisive vote

    A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Commission proposal

    Passed 467 for, 65 against, 74 abstained

    13:40

← Back to the decision