Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Competition policy – annual report 2023

14 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 9 parts of the text voted on separately (8 adopted, 1 rejected).

· 4

  1. Vote 1:Amendment 2 to paragraph 6

    Politique de concurrence – rapport annuel 2023 - Competition policy – annual report 2023 - Wettbewerbspolitik – Jahresbericht 2023 - A9-0427/2023 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin - § 6 - Am 2

    Rejected 207 for, 314 against, 28 abstained

    12:13

    Roll call requested by The Left

  2. Vote 2:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7

    A9-0427/2023 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin - Après le § 7 - Am 3

    Rejected 251 for, 309 against, 58 abstained

    12:14

    Roll call requested by The Left

  3. Vote 3:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 14

    A9-0427/2023 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin - Après le § 14 - Am 4

    Rejected 151 for, 375 against, 84 abstained

    12:14

    Roll call requested by The Left

  4. Vote 8:Amendment 5 to paragraph 25

    A9-0427/2023 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin - § 25 - Am 5

    Rejected 253 for, 277 against, 94 abstained

    12:15

    Roll call requested by The Left

· 9

  1. Vote 4:Paragraph 16 — part 1 of 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘Stresses that EU competition rules should contribute to the EU’s objective as defined in Article 3 TEU;’ ‘not the lowest price possible for the consumer, but’ and ‘while not resulting in negative externalities; underlines that enforcing competition policy to the benefit of consumers should not only include considerations on price levels, but also sustainability considerations and impacts on citizens’ privacy;’

  2. Vote 5:Paragraph 16 — part 2 of 4

    Adopted 337 for, 234 against, 53 abstained

    Split vote by EPP

    ‘Stresses that EU competition rules should contribute to the EU’s objective as defined in Article 3 TEU;’

  3. Vote 6:Paragraph 16 — part 3 of 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    ‘not the lowest price possible for the consumer, but’

  4. Vote 7:Paragraph 16 — part 4 of 4

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘while not resulting in negative externalities; underlines that enforcing competition policy to the benefit of consumers should not only include considerations on price levels, but also sustainability considerations and impacts on citizens’ privacy;’

  5. Vote 9:Separate vote on paragraph 25

    Adopted 426 for, 166 against, 28 abstained

    Separate vote by EPP

  6. Vote 10:Separate vote on paragraph 45

    Adopted 369 for, 214 against, 36 abstained

  7. Vote 11:Paragraph 50 — part 1

    A9-0427/2023 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin - § 50/1

    Adopted 526 for, 72 against, 16 abstained

    12:15

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘Designate’ and ‘recalls its demand to implement concrete policies, timelines and measures to phase out fossil fuel subsidies through tax measures as soon as possible;’

  8. Vote 12:Paragraph 50 — part 2

    A9-0427/2023 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin - § 50/2

    Rejected 48 for, 530 against, 35 abstained

    12:16

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by EPP

    ‘Designate’

  9. Vote 13:Paragraph 50 — part 3

    A9-0427/2023 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin - § 50/3

    Adopted 332 for, 268 against, 17 abstained

    12:16

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by EPP

    ‘recalls its demand to implement concrete policies, timelines and measures to phase out fossil fuel subsidies through tax measures as soon as possible;’

· 1

  1. Vote 14:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A9-0427/2023 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)

    Adopted 481 for, 42 against, 93 abstained

    12:16

← Back to the decision