Wednesday 10 May 2023

Parliament's data did not attach these votes to a report or motion.

• Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 2 – Am 2

  · 80–488–2880 for, 488 against, 28 abstained

• Paragraph 3 — part 1

  2022 Report on Kosovo – A9-0174/2023 – Viola von Cramon-Taubadel – § 3/1

  · 460–76–81460 for, 76 against, 81 abstained

• Paragraph 4 — part 1

  A9-0174/2023 – Viola von Cramon-Taubadel – § 4/1

  · 409–147–64409 for, 147 against, 64 abstained

• Amendment 1 to paragraph 5

  A9-0174/2023 – Viola von Cramon-Taubadel – § 5 – Am 1

  · 101–409–80101 for, 409 against, 80 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 5

  A9-0174/2023 – Viola von Cramon-Taubadel – § 5

  · 393–171–51393 for, 171 against, 51 abstained

• Amendment 7 to paragraph 7

  2022 Report on Serbia – A9-0172/2023 – Vladimír Bilčík – § 7 – Am 7/rev

  · 561–27–37561 for, 27 against, 37 abstained

• Amendment 12 to paragraph 9

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 9 – Am 12

  · 135–479–19135 for, 479 against, 19 abstained

• Paragraph 9 — part 2

  A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – § 9/2

  · 565–48–5565 for, 48 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9

  A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – After § 9 – Am 6

  · 142–462–14142 for, 462 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 9

  A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – After § 9 – Am 7

  · 115–474–38115 for, 474 against, 38 abstained

• Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 9

  A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – After § 9 – Am 8

  · 158–451–14158 for, 451 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 1 to paragraph 13

  Own resources: a new start for EU finances, a new start for Europe – A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – § 13 – Am 1

  · 213–371–38213 for, 371 against, 38 abstained

• Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 14

  A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – After § 14 – Am 6

  · 168–405–38168 for, 405 against, 38 abstained

• Amendment 8 to paragraph 17

  A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – § 17 – Am 8

  · 219–372–12219 for, 372 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 8 to paragraph 18

  A9-0172/2023 – Vladimír Bilčík – § 18 – Am 8/rev

  · 548–24–58548 for, 24 against, 58 abstained

• Amendment 16 to paragraph 19

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – § 19 – Am 16

  · 135–471–6135 for, 471 against, 6 abstained

• Amendment 37 to paragraph 21

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – § 21 – Am 37D

  · 228–390–4228 for, 390 against, 4 abstained

• Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21

  A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – After § 21 – Am 9

  · 135–472–14135 for, 472 against, 14 abstained

• Paragraph 25 — part 2

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 25/2

  · 580–8–44580 for, 8 against, 44 abstained

• Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 27

  A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – After § 27 – Am 10

  · 137–487–7137 for, 487 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 29

  A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – After § 29 – Am 2

  · 196–383–25196 for, 383 against, 25 abstained

• Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 29

  A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – After § 29 – Am 3

  · 245–357–12245 for, 357 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 29

  A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – After § 29 – Am 4

  · 196–372–20196 for, 372 against, 20 abstained

• Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 29

  A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – After § 29 – Am 5

  · 212–383–15212 for, 383 against, 15 abstained

• Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 31

  A9-0085/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – After § 31 – Am 1

  · 189–289–150189 for, 289 against, 150 abstained

• Amendment 9 to paragraph 39

  A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – § 39 – Am 9

  · 248–361–11248 for, 361 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 9 to paragraph 40

  A9-0172/2023 – Vladimír Bilčík – § 40 – Am 9/rev

  · 356–244–27356 for, 244 against, 27 abstained

• Paragraph 42 — part 2

  A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – § 42/2

  · 481–139–8481 for, 139 against, 8 abstained

• Paragraph 43 — part 2

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – § 43/2

  · 594–1–24594 for, 1 against, 24 abstained

• Amendment 10 to paragraph 44

  A9-0172/2023 – Vladimír Bilčík – § 44 – Am 10/rev

  · 335–211–78335 for, 211 against, 78 abstained

• Amendment 11 to paragraph 49

  A9-0172/2023 – Vladimír Bilčík – § 49 – Am 11/rev

  · 323–283–18323 for, 283 against, 18 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 66

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 66

  · 626–11–0626 for, 11 against, 0 abstained

• Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 66

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 66 – Am 14

  · 142–456–16142 for, 456 against, 16 abstained

• Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 66

  A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – After § 66 – Am 11

  · 129–502–2129 for, 502 against, 2 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 73

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 73

  · 491–138–8491 for, 138 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 42 to paragraph 80

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 80 – Am 42

  · 530–63–40530 for, 63 against, 40 abstained

• Amendment 29 to paragraph 92

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 92 – Am 29

  · 249–244–143249 for, 244 against, 143 abstained

• Paragraph 92 — part 1

  A9-0174/2023 – Viola von Cramon-Taubadel – § 92/1

  · 492–53–62492 for, 53 against, 62 abstained

• Amendment 44 to paragraph 98

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 98 – Am 44

  · 338–218–77338 for, 218 against, 77 abstained

• Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 98

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 98 – Am 22

  · 191–433–3191 for, 433 against, 3 abstained

• Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 98

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 98 – Am 23

  · 214–402–11214 for, 402 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 101

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 101 – Am 27

  · 319–288–22319 for, 288 against, 22 abstained

• Paragraph 111 — part 2

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 111/2

  · 630–2–2630 for, 2 against, 2 abstained

• Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 124

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 124 – Am 29

  · 269–323–35269 for, 323 against, 35 abstained

• Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 124

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 124 – Am 30

  · 160–456–14160 for, 456 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 124

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 124 – Am 31

  · 150–455–16150 for, 455 against, 16 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 127

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 127

  · 458–124–56458 for, 124 against, 56 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 128

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 128

  · 460–117–52460 for, 117 against, 52 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 129

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 129

  · 442–123–65442 for, 123 against, 65 abstained

• Paragraph 134 — part 2

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – § 134/2

  · 352–253–21352 for, 253 against, 21 abstained

• Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 135

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 135 – Am 18

  · 85–490–5485 for, 490 against, 54 abstained

• Amendment 3 to paragraph 146

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 146 – Am 3

  · 348–240–36348 for, 240 against, 36 abstained

• Paragraph 151 — part 2

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – § 151/2

  · 629–4–3629 for, 4 against, 3 abstained

• Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 153

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 153 – Am 11/REV

  · 205–295–126205 for, 295 against, 126 abstained

• Paragraph 155 — part 2

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 155/2

  · 438–175–16438 for, 175 against, 16 abstained

• Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 155

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 155 – Am 32

  · 203–272–148203 for, 272 against, 148 abstained

• Amendment 33 to paragraph 163

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 163 – Am 33

  · 267–287–67267 for, 287 against, 67 abstained

• Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 165

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 165 – Am 21

  · 98–476–5598 for, 476 against, 55 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 170

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – § 170

  · 505–40–85505 for, 40 against, 85 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 197, point c

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – § 197, point c

  · 545–12–79545 for, 12 against, 79 abstained

• Separate vote on recital F

  A9-0174/2023 – Viola von Cramon-Taubadel – Recital F

  · 513–51–37513 for, 51 against, 37 abstained

• Separate vote on recital J

  A9-0174/2023 – Viola von Cramon-Taubadel – Recital J

  · 530–43–39530 for, 43 against, 39 abstained

• Discharge 2021: European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking — A9-0089/2023 — Ryszard Czarnecki -Motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking – A9-0089/2023 – Ryszard Czarnecki -Motion for a resolution

  · 553–17–60553 for, 17 against, 60 abstained

• Discharge 2021: EU general budget — European Parliament — A9-0086/2023 — Isabel García Muñoz — Proposals for a decision

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – European Parliament – A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – Proposals for a decision

  · 527–87–7527 for, 87 against, 7 abstained

• Discharge 2021: EU general budget — Commission and executive agencies — A9-0101/2023 — Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier — Proposals for decision

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – Commission and executive agencies – A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – Proposals for decision

  · 421–151–5421 for, 151 against, 5 abstained

• Discharge 2021: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) — A9-0079/2023 — Mikuláš Peksa — Proposals for decision

  Discharge 2021: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) – A9-0079/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Proposals for decision

  · 523–104–11523 for, 104 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 7 to subheading 4

  A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – Subheading 4 – Am 7

  · 218–380–11218 for, 380 against, 11 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0155/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 356–199–65356 for, 199 against, 65 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Impact on the 2024 EU budget of increasing European Union Recovery Instrument borrowing costs – A9-0163/2023 – Johan Van Overtveldt – Motion for a resolution

  · 434–99–89434 for, 99 against, 89 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0086/2023 – Isabel García Muñoz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 500–79–53500 for, 79 against, 53 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0101/2023 – Jeroen Lenaers, Monika Hohlmeier – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 460–129–49460 for, 129 against, 49 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Single European Sky ATM Research 3 Joint Undertaking (before 30 November 2021: SESAR Joint Undertaking) – A9-0118/2023 – Ryszard Czarnecki – Motion for a resolution

  · 564–54–5564 for, 54 against, 5 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking (before 30 November 2021: ECSEL Joint Undertaking) – A9-0082/2023 – Ryszard Czarnecki – Motion for a resolution

  · 563–44–14563 for, 44 against, 14 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking (before 30 November 2021: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking) – A9-0069/2023 – Ryszard Czarnecki – Motion for a resolution

  · 568–53–6568 for, 53 against, 6 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy) – A9-0092/2023 – Ryszard Czarnecki – Motion for a resolution

  · 587–24–16587 for, 24 against, 16 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Europe’s Rail Joint Undertaking (before 30 November 2021: Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking) – A9-0090/2023 – Ryszard Czarnecki – Motion for a resolution

  · 549–41–34549 for, 41 against, 34 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (before 30 November 2021: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking) – A9-0083/2023 – Ryszard Czarnecki – Motion for a resolution

  · 578–30–7578 for, 30 against, 7 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – EDF (8th, 9th, 10th and 11th) – A9-0114/2023 – José Manuel Fernandes – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 542–74–2542 for, 74 against, 2 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking (before 30 November 2021: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking) – A9-0078/2023 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – Motion for a resolution

  · 568–54–4568 for, 54 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking (before 30 November 2021: Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking) – A9-0093/2023 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – Motion for a resolution

  · 569–55–2569 for, 55 against, 2 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0088/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 544–81–9544 for, 81 against, 9 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0074/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 552–79–4552 for, 79 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0085/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 517–57–64517 for, 57 against, 64 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0073/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 560–75–2560 for, 75 against, 2 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0081/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 626–8–4626 for, 8 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0080/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 558–57–21558 for, 57 against, 21 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  A9-0079/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Motion for a resolution

  · 505–111–9505 for, 111 against, 9 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  A9-0067/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Motion for a resolution

  · 606–11–6606 for, 11 against, 6 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  A9-0070/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Motion for a resolution

  · 577–21–37577 for, 21 against, 37 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) – A9-0102/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – Motion for a resolution

  · 578–42–17578 for, 42 against, 17 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction – A9-0107/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – Motion for a resolution

  · 577–39–14577 for, 39 against, 14 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) – A9-0138/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – Motion for a resolution

  · 594–17–21594 for, 17 against, 21 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) – A9-0122/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – Motion for a resolution

  · 610–13–14610 for, 13 against, 14 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights – A9-0141/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – Motion for a resolution

  · 509–122–2509 for, 122 against, 2 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) – A9-0105/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – Motion for a resolution

  · 587–42–6587 for, 42 against, 6 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority – A9-0103/2023 – Gilles Boyer – Motion for a resolution

  · 549–57–15549 for, 57 against, 15 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Securities and Markets Authority – A9-0137/2023 – Gilles Boyer – Motion for a resolution

  · 555–38–36555 for, 38 against, 36 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  Discharge 2021: European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – A9-0111/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 552–76–2552 for, 76 against, 2 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Euratom Supply Agency – A9-0126/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 603–14–9603 for, 14 against, 9 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Medicines Agency – A9-0106/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 548–73–5548 for, 73 against, 5 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) – A9-0115/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 548–47–35548 for, 47 against, 35 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Union Agency for the Space Programme (before 12 May 2021: European GNSS Agency) – A9-0116/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 597–16–11597 for, 16 against, 11 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control – A9-0146/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 556–73–1556 for, 73 against, 1 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Environment Agency – A9-0143/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 544–78–4544 for, 78 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) – A9-0130/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 576–31–22576 for, 31 against, 22 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Agency for Support for BEREC (BEREC Office) – A9-0129/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 547–57–17547 for, 57 against, 17 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Chemicals Agency – A9-0133/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 556–66–7556 for, 66 against, 7 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Food Safety Authority – A9-0131/2023 – Katalin Cseh – Motion for a resolution

  · 578–56–4578 for, 56 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  Discharge 2021: European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (Eurofound) – A9-0109/2023 – Olivier Chastel – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 554–57–24554 for, 57 against, 24 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  Discharge 2021: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) – A9-0125/2023 – Olivier Chastel – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 553–78–6553 for, 78 against, 6 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Union Agency for Railways – A9-0100/2023 – Olivier Chastel – Motion for a resolution

  · 570–36–20570 for, 36 against, 20 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Union Aviation Safety Agency – A9-0098/2023 – Olivier Chastel – Motion for a resolution

  · 585–21–26585 for, 21 against, 26 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Institute for Gender Equality – A9-0121/2023 – Olivier Chastel – Motion for a resolution

  · 511–86–29511 for, 86 against, 29 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union – A9-0104/2023 – Olivier Chastel – Motion for a resolution

  · 585–39–6585 for, 39 against, 6 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Maritime Safety Agency – A9-0113/2023 – Ilana Cicurel – Motion for a resolution

  · 553–55–24553 for, 55 against, 24 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Fisheries Control Agency – A9-0112/2023 – Ilana Cicurel – Motion for a resolution

  · 552–73–1552 for, 73 against, 1 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Training Foundation – A9-0135/2023 – Alin Mituța – Motion for a resolution

  · 565–53–7565 for, 53 against, 7 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) – A9-0132/2023 – Alin Mituța – Motion for a resolution

  · 563–33–27563 for, 33 against, 27 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Banking Authority – A9-0110/2023 – Alin Mituța – Motion for a resolution

  · 556–40–34556 for, 40 against, 34 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Discharge 2021: European Labour Authority – A9-0117/2023 – Alin Mituța – Motion for a resolution

  · 511–74–43511 for, 74 against, 43 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  Discharge 2021: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies – A9-0144/2023 – Olivier Chastel – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 556–72–4556 for, 72 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  Discharge 2021: European Asylum Support Office – A9-0123/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 492–111–22492 for, 111 against, 22 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 498–82–44498 for, 82 against, 44 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0172/2023 – Vladimír Bilčík – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 508–76–37508 for, 76 against, 37 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  A9-0174/2023 – Viola von Cramon-Taubadel – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

  · 452–87–76452 for, 87 against, 76 abstained

• Final vote on the draft Council decision

  Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence – EU accession: institutions and public administration of the Union – A9-0169/2023 – Łukasz Kohut, Arba Kokalari – Draft Council decision

  · 472–62–73472 for, 62 against, 73 abstained

• Final vote on the draft Council decision

  Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence – EU accession: judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement – A9-0170/2023 – Łukasz Kohut, Arba Kokalari – Draft Council decision

  · 464–81–45464 for, 81 against, 45 abstained

• Final vote — text as a whole

  Discharge 2021: European Border and Coast Guard Agency – A9-0142/2023 – Ramona Strugariu – Proposals for decision (as a whole)

  · 388–238–4388 for, 238 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – European Ombudsman – A9-0067/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Proposal for a decision

  · 623–8–5623 for, 8 against, 5 abstained

• Final vote

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – European Data Protection Supervisor – A9-0070/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Proposal for a decision

  · 579–16–33579 for, 16 against, 33 abstained

• Final vote

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – Committee of the Regions – A9-0080/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Proposal for a decision

  · 557–53–21557 for, 53 against, 21 abstained

• Final vote

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – European External Action Service – A9-0088/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Proposal for a decision

  · 553–82–5553 for, 82 against, 5 abstained

• Final vote

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – European Economic and Social Committee – A9-0074/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Proposal for a decision

  · 562–70–4562 for, 70 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – Court of Auditors – A9-0081/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Proposal for a decision

  · 621–7–3621 for, 7 against, 3 abstained

• Final vote

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – European Council and Council – A9-0085/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Proposal for a decision

  · 609–16–9609 for, 16 against, 9 abstained

• Final vote

  Discharge 2021: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union – A9-0073/2023 – Mikuláš Peksa – Proposal for a decision

  · 563–73–1563 for, 73 against, 1 abstained