Thursday 24 March 2022

Parliament's data did not attach these votes to a report or motion.

• Amendment 3 to Article 2, point 1

  More flexible use of funds under the AMIF Regulations in light of the war in Ukraine – C9-0056/2022 – Article 2, point 1 – Am 3

  · 125–442–7125 for, 442 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 4 to Article 2, point 2

  C9-0056/2022 – Article 2, point 2 – Am 4

  · 115–424–5115 for, 424 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 5 to Article 3, point 1

  C9-0056/2022 – Article 3, point 1 – Am 5

  · 118–460–2118 for, 460 against, 2 abstained

• Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 2

  Need for an urgent EU action plan to ensure food security inside and outside the EU in light of the Russian invasion of Ukraine – RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 2 – Am 1

  · 99–459–2599 for, 459 against, 25 abstained

• Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 2 – Am 13

  · 150–424–12150 for, 424 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 2 – Am 29

  · 147–391–51147 for, 391 against, 51 abstained

• Amendment 41 to paragraph 4

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 4 – Am 41

  · 396–163–28396 for, 163 against, 28 abstained

• Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 6

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 6 – Am 42

  · 273–304–11273 for, 304 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 8

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 8 – Am 2

  · 263–307–18263 for, 307 against, 18 abstained

• Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 8

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 8 – Am 3

  · 110–462–11110 for, 462 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 12

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 12 – Am 14

  · 174–361–54174 for, 361 against, 54 abstained

• Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 12 – Am 15

  · 155–426–5155 for, 426 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 12

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 12 – Am 16

  · 155–418–11155 for, 418 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 15

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 15 – Am 4

  · 67–476–4167 for, 476 against, 41 abstained

• Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 16

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 16 – Am 17

  · 145–434–11145 for, 434 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 21

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 21 – Am 5

  · 220–321–48220 for, 321 against, 48 abstained

• Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 21

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 21 – Am 43

  · 525–15–48525 for, 15 against, 48 abstained

• Amendment 27 to paragraph 22

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 22 – Am 27

  · 493–84–13493 for, 84 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 22

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 22 – Am 44

  · 265–249–71265 for, 249 against, 71 abstained

• Paragraph 25 — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 25/2

  · 496–70–17496 for, 70 against, 17 abstained

• Paragraph 26 — part 1

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 26/1

  · 522–24–38522 for, 24 against, 38 abstained

• Paragraph 26 — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 26/2

  · 383–162–45383 for, 162 against, 45 abstained

• Paragraph 26 — part 3

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 26/3

  · 428–139–18428 for, 139 against, 18 abstained

• Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 26

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 26 – Am 12

  · 293–285–12293 for, 285 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 26

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 26 – Am 18

  · 163–410–14163 for, 410 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 29

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 20

  · 166–411–10166 for, 411 against, 10 abstained

• Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 21

  · 142–436–9142 for, 436 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 29 — part 1

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 19/1

  · 482–90–16482 for, 90 against, 16 abstained

• Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 29 — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 19/2

  · 138–426–21138 for, 426 against, 21 abstained

• Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 29 — part 3

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 29 – Am 19/3

  · 512–72–2512 for, 72 against, 2 abstained

• Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 36

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 36 – Am 22

  · 348–204–37348 for, 204 against, 37 abstained

• Amendment 28 to paragraph 39

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 39 – Am 28

  · 138–432–19138 for, 432 against, 19 abstained

• Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 39

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 39 – Am 23

  · 140–435–10140 for, 435 against, 10 abstained

• Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 39

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 39 – Am 24

  · 146–375–66146 for, 375 against, 66 abstained

• Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 39

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 39 – Am 30

  · 139–426–15139 for, 426 against, 15 abstained

• Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 39

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 39 – Am 31

  · 165–406–13165 for, 406 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 42

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 42 – Am 7

  · 273–295–15273 for, 295 against, 15 abstained

• Paragraph 47 — part 1

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 47/1

  · 562–21–6562 for, 21 against, 6 abstained

• Paragraph 47 — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 47/2

  · 464–114–7464 for, 114 against, 7 abstained

• Paragraph 47 — part 3

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 47/3

  · 551–12–15551 for, 12 against, 15 abstained

• Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 47

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 47 – Am 8

  · 274–289–20274 for, 289 against, 20 abstained

• Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 47

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 47 – Am 9

  · 254–306–21254 for, 306 against, 21 abstained

• Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 47 – Am 10

  · 298–276–7298 for, 276 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 45 to paragraph 48 — part 1

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 48 – Am 45/1

  · 270–241–75270 for, 241 against, 75 abstained

• Amendment 45 to paragraph 48 — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 48 – Am 45/2

  · 259–314–10259 for, 314 against, 10 abstained

• Paragraph 49 — part 1

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 49/1

  · 447–75–54447 for, 75 against, 54 abstained

• Paragraph 49 — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 49/2

  · 444–68–71444 for, 68 against, 71 abstained

• Paragraph 49 — part 3

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 49/3

  · 429–120–34429 for, 120 against, 34 abstained

• Paragraph 49 — part 4

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 49/4

  · 493–56–35493 for, 56 against, 35 abstained

• Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 49

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 49 – Am 11

  · 284–278–25284 for, 278 against, 25 abstained

• Amendment 32 to paragraph 53

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 53 – Am 32/rev

  · 465–100–21465 for, 100 against, 21 abstained

• Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 53

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 53 – Am 33/rev

  · 429–127–26429 for, 127 against, 26 abstained

• Paragraph 54 — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – § 54/2

  · 469–88–28469 for, 88 against, 28 abstained

• Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 55

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 55 – Am 25

  · 209–349–29209 for, 349 against, 29 abstained

• Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 57

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – After § 57 – Am 26

  · 193–326–69193 for, 326 against, 69 abstained

• Recital M — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital M/2

  · 552–27–6552 for, 27 against, 6 abstained

• Recital AE — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital AE/2

  · 479–105–2479 for, 105 against, 2 abstained

• Recital AK — part 2

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital AK/2

  · 544–13–27544 for, 13 against, 27 abstained

• Recital M — part 3

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital M/3

  · 353–200–26353 for, 200 against, 26 abstained

• Recital AK — part 3

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – Recital AK/3

  · 479–58–46479 for, 58 against, 46 abstained

• Amendment 1 to recital 18

  C9-0056/2022 – Recital 18 – Am 1

  · 118–455–6118 for, 455 against, 6 abstained

• Amendment 2, adding text after recital 19

  C9-0056/2022 – After recital 19 – Am 2

  · 119–431–8119 for, 431 against, 8 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  MFF 2021-2027: fight against oligarch structures, protection of EU funds from fraud and conflict of interest – A9-0039/2022 – Petri Sarvamaa – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 409–61–42409 for, 61 against, 42 abstained

• Final vote on the provisional agreement

  Roaming Regulation (recast) – A9-0286/2021 – Angelika Winzig – Provisional agreement – Am 74

  · 581–2–5581 for, 2 against, 5 abstained

• Final vote on the provisional agreement

  Pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology – A9-0240/2021 – Johan Van Overtveldt – Provisional agreement – Am 2

  · 527–28–31527 for, 28 against, 31 abstained

• Final vote on the provisional agreement

  Computerised system for the cross-border electronic exchange of data in the area of judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters (e-CODEX system) – A9-0288/2021 – Emil Radev, Nuno Melo – Provisional agreement – Am 71

  · 571–7–10571 for, 7 against, 10 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2021/007 FR/Selecta – France – A9-0048/2022 – Eider Gardiazabal Rubial – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 556–21–10556 for, 21 against, 10 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  RC-B9-0160/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 413–120–49413 for, 120 against, 49 abstained

• Final vote

  Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Italy – A9-0046/2022 – Juan Fernando López Aguilar – Draft Council implementing decision

  · 547–38–4547 for, 38 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote

  Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Italy – A9-0047/2022 – Juan Fernando López Aguilar – Draft Council implementing decision

  · 546–36–6546 for, 36 against, 6 abstained

• Final vote

  Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Greece – A9-0049/2022 – Juan Fernando López Aguilar – Draft Council implementing decision

  · 546–33–9546 for, 33 against, 9 abstained

• Final vote

  Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Italy – A9-0050/2022 – Juan Fernando López Aguilar – Draft Council implementing decision

  · 546–37–3546 for, 37 against, 3 abstained

• Final vote

  Macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova – A9-0043/2022 – Markéta Gregorová – Commission proposal

  · 558–20–10558 for, 20 against, 10 abstained

• Final vote on the draft Council decision

  EU-Brazil Agreement on short-stay visa waiver for holders of ordinary passports – A9-0029/2022 – Paulo Rangel – Draft Council decision

  · 585–3–0585 for, 3 against, 0 abstained

• Final vote on the draft Council decision

  EU-Brazil Agreement on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports – A9-0030/2022 – Paulo Rangel – Draft Council decision

  · 587–3–0587 for, 3 against, 0 abstained

• Final vote

  Refugees in Europe: CARE – C9-0057/2022 – Commission proposal

  · 562–2–3562 for, 2 against, 3 abstained

• Final vote

  C9-0056/2022 – Commission proposal

  · 575–4–3575 for, 4 against, 3 abstained

• Final vote

  Status Agreement between the EU and Moldova on Frontex operational activities – C9-0120/2022 – Proposal for a Council decision

  · 543–34–10543 for, 34 against, 10 abstained