Thursday 10 March 2022

Parliament's data did not attach these votes to a report or motion.

• Paragraph 3 — part 1

  Destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh – RC-B9-0146/2022 – § 3/1

  · 683–1–4683 for, 1 against, 4 abstained

• Paragraph 3 — part 2

  RC-B9-0146/2022 – § 3/2

  · 685–0–3685 for, 0 against, 3 abstained

• Amendment 4 to paragraph 5

  Myanmar, one year after the coup – RC-B9-0141/2022 – § 5 – Am 4

  · 105–513–60105 for, 513 against, 60 abstained

• Amendment 5 to paragraph 6

  RC-B9-0141/2022 – § 6 – Am 5

  · 92–581–592 for, 581 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 1 to paragraph 9

  Fair and simple taxation supporting the recovery strategy – A9-0024/2022 – Luděk Niedermayer – § 9 – Am 1

  · 365–290–37365 for, 290 against, 37 abstained

• Amendment 6 to paragraph 9

  RC-B9-0141/2022 – § 9 – Am 6

  · 240–384–54240 for, 384 against, 54 abstained

• Paragraph 10 — part 1

  EU Citizenship Report 2020 – A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – § 10/1

  · 681–2–8681 for, 2 against, 8 abstained

• Paragraph 10 — part 2

  A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – § 10/2

  · 384–291–17384 for, 291 against, 17 abstained

• Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 10

  RC-B9-0141/2022 – After § 10 – Am 7

  · 92–456–13092 for, 456 against, 130 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 11

  A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – § 11

  · 328–330–34328 for, 330 against, 34 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 12

  A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – § 12

  · 317–348–27317 for, 348 against, 27 abstained

• Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 13

  RC-B9-0141/2022 – After § 13 – Am 2

  · 134–513–31134 for, 513 against, 31 abstained

• Amendment 2 to paragraph 14

  A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – § 14 – Am 2

  · 245–432–15245 for, 432 against, 15 abstained

• Paragraph 15 — part 1

  A9-0024/2022 – Luděk Niedermayer – § 15/1

  · 526–145–21526 for, 145 against, 21 abstained

• Paragraph 15 — part 2

  A9-0024/2022 – Luděk Niedermayer – § 15/2

  · 524–150–18524 for, 150 against, 18 abstained

• Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 16

  RC-B9-0146/2022 – After § 16 – Am 1

  · 166–470–50166 for, 470 against, 50 abstained

• Amendment 8 to paragraph 18

  RC-B9-0141/2022 – § 18 – Am 8

  · 209–357–112209 for, 357 against, 112 abstained

• Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 20

  RC-B9-0141/2022 – After § 20 – Am 10

  · 142–480–56142 for, 480 against, 56 abstained

• Amendment 11 to paragraph 21

  RC-B9-0141/2022 – § 21 – Am 11

  · 269–352–57269 for, 352 against, 57 abstained

• Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 21

  RC-B9-0141/2022 – After § 21 – Am 12

  · 139–507–32139 for, 507 against, 32 abstained

• Amendment 2 to paragraph 22

  A9-0024/2022 – Luděk Niedermayer – § 22 – Am 2

  · 77–369–24577 for, 369 against, 245 abstained

• Amendment 3 to paragraph 29

  A9-0024/2022 – Luděk Niedermayer – § 29 – Am 3

  · 103–543–46103 for, 543 against, 46 abstained

• Amendment 4 to paragraph 30

  A9-0024/2022 – Luděk Niedermayer – § 30 – Am 4

  · 121–544–27121 for, 544 against, 27 abstained

• Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 30

  A9-0024/2022 – Luděk Niedermayer – After § 30 – Am 5

  · 276–407–9276 for, 407 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 6 to paragraph 34

  A9-0024/2022 – Luděk Niedermayer – § 34 – Am 6

  · 144–374–173144 for, 374 against, 173 abstained

• Separate vote on recital A

  RC-B9-0146/2022 – Recital A

  · 681–3–4681 for, 3 against, 4 abstained

• Recital P — part 1

  A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – Recital P/1

  · 617–21–54617 for, 21 against, 54 abstained

• Recital N — part 1

  RC-B9-0146/2022 – Recital N/1

  · 445–212–30445 for, 212 against, 30 abstained

• Recital P — part 2

  A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – Recital P/2

  · 379–280–33379 for, 280 against, 33 abstained

• Recital N — part 2

  RC-B9-0146/2022 – Recital N/2

  · 183–460–44183 for, 460 against, 44 abstained

• Amendment 1 to recital I

  A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – Recital I – Am 1

  · 258–424–10258 for, 424 against, 10 abstained

• Separate vote on recital S

  A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – Recital S

  · 341–316–35341 for, 316 against, 35 abstained

• Amendment 3, adding text after recital W

  RC-B9-0141/2022 – After recital W – Am 3

  · 69–539–7069 for, 539 against, 70 abstained

• European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the annual sustainable growth survey 2022 (text as a whole)

  · 97–279–31497 for, 279 against, 314 abstained

• Referral back to committee

  Batteries and waste batteries – A9-0031/2022 – Simona Bonafè – Referral back (Rule 59(4))

  · 664–16–11664 for, 16 against, 11 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  The situation of journalists and human rights defenders in Mexico – RC-B9-0153/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 607–2–73607 for, 2 against, 73 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Myanmar, one year after the coup – RC-B9-0141/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 646–1–20646 for, 1 against, 20 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh – B9-0146/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 635–2–42635 for, 2 against, 42 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  EU Citizenship Report 2020 – A9-0019/2022 – Yana Toom – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 357–119–207357 for, 119 against, 207 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Fair and simple taxation supporting the recovery strategy – A9-0024/2022 – Luděk Niedermayer – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 476–78–129476 for, 78 against, 129 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  European Withholding Tax framework – A9-0011/2022 – Pedro Marques – Motion for a resolution

  · 625–38–28625 for, 38 against, 28 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  European Semester for economic policy coordination: annual sustainable growth survey 2022 – A9-0034/2022 – Irene Tinagli – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 534–85–73534 for, 85 against, 73 abstained

• Final vote

  Batteries and waste batteries – A9-0031/2022 – Simona Bonafè – Commission proposal

  · 584–67–40584 for, 67 against, 40 abstained